The Challenge to the Concept of Transnational Motherhood in Migration Studies from Radical Feminist Perspectives

Öz

In the last thirty years, and owing to the extent of global women’s migration, academic research has concentrated on migrant mothers and their motherhood experiences in the transnational context. It is claimed that an academic consideration of the specific mothering experience of migrant women is missing in the feminist discipline. In order to address this, a new transnational feminist perspective is suggested on migration studies, reconceptualising motherhood. This paper analyses the historical background to the concept of motherhood and progress made therein from feminist perspectives. A response to the question of whether the radical feminist perspectives, which have shown much interest in the motherhood concept, are able to challenge today’s transnational motherhood, is considered by examining the critiques of both these radical and transnational feminist perspectives towards each other. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Globalisation,Motherhood,Transnationalism,Feminism

Göç Çalışmalarındaki Ulusötesi Annelik Kavramını Radikal Feminist Perspektiften Okuma

Öz

Artan küresel kadın göçü sebebiyle göçmen anneler ve onların annelik deneyimleri konusunda ulusötesicilik bağlamında akademik araştırmalar son otuz yılda yoğunlaşmaya başlamıştır. Bu özel annelik deneyiminin bilimsel kavranışının feminist yazındaki eksikliğine dikkat çekilmiştir. Bunun bir adım ötesinde, annelik yeniden kavramsallaştırılarak, yeni bir ulusötesi feminist bakış açısı göçmen çalışmalarıyla tanıştırılmıştır. Bu makale annelik kavramının tarihsel arka planını ve kavramın feminist ele alınışı ile kaydedilen gelişmeleri analiz etmektedir. Bahsedilen radikal ve ulusötesi feminist perspektiflerin karşılıklı eleştirileri göz önünde bulundurularak, günümüze kadar annelik kavramına en çok ilgi göstermiş disiplin olan radikal feminizmin bugünün ulusötesi anneliğini nasıl okuduğu tartışılmaktadır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Küreselleşme,Annelik,Ulusötesicilik,Feminizm

Kaynakça

1. Aksit, E. E. (2010). Fertility. In A. O’Reilly (Ed.), Encyclopedia of motherhood (pp. 408–410). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
2. Anthias, F. (1980). Women and the reserve army of labour: A critique of Veronica Beechey. Capital and Class, 50‒63.
3. Beechey, V. (1977). Some notes on female wage labour in capitalist production. Capital and Class, 45‒66.
4. Berktay, F. (2015). Feminist teoride açılımlar. In L. Kılıç (Ed.), Toplumsal cinsiyet çalışmaları (pp. 2–23). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
5. Bryceson, D., & Vuorela, U. (2002). The transnational family: New European frontiers and global networks. Oxford: Berg.
6. Collins, P. H. (1994). Shifting the center: Race, class, and feminist theorizing about motherhood. In E. N. Glenn, G. Chang, & L. R. Forcey (Eds.), Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency (pp. 45–66). Great Britain: Routledge.
7. Coulter, M. (2010). Maternal feminism. In A. O’Reilly (Ed.), Encyclopedia of motherhood (p. 708). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
8. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 46(3), 1241‒1299.

9. De Beauvoir, S. (2011). The second sex. New York: First Vintage Books Edition. Ehrenreich, B., & Hochschild, A. R. (2003) Global woman: Nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. New York: Holt Paperbacks.
10. Firestone, S. (1972). The dialectic of sex: the case for feminist revolution by Shulamith Firestone (8th ed.). New York: Bantam Books.
11. Fraser, N., & Nicholson, L. J. (1990). Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism (pp. XX). Great Britain: Routledge.
12. Glenn, E. N., Chang, G., & Forcey, L. R. (1994) Mothering: Ideology, experience, and agency. Great Britain: Routledge.
13. Hampshire, J. (2013). The politics of immigration: contradictions of the liberal state. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14. Hartmann, H. (1979). The unhappy marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a more progressive union. Capital and Class, XX 1‒33.
15. Herzog, S. (2010). History of motherhood: Renaissance. In A. O’Reilly (Ed.), Encyclopedia of motherhood (pp. 524‒526). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
16. Hochschild, A. R. (2001). The nanny chain. The American Prospect. Retrieved May 12, 2017 from http://prospect.org/article/nanny-chain
17. Hochschild, A. R. (2003a). Love and gold. In B. Ehrenreich & A. R. Hochschild (Eds.), Global woman: Nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy (pp. XX). New York: Holt Paperbacks.
18. Hochschild, A. R. (2003b). The commercialization of intimate life: Notes from home and work. London: University of California Press.
19. Hochschild, A. R. (2003c). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. London: University of California Press.
20. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2000). Feminism and migration. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Feminist Views of the Social Sciences, 571, 107‒120.
21. Kandiyoti, D. (2000). Guest editor’s introduction, the awkward relationship: Gender and nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 6(4), 491‒494.
22. L’Estrange, E. (2012). Holy Motherhood: Gender, dynasty and visual culture in the later middle ages. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
23. Lennon, K. (2014). Feminist Perspectives on the body. In N. Z. Edward (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved June 7, 2018 from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/ entries/feminist-body/
24. Levitt, P., & Jaworsky, B. N. (2007). Transnational migration studies: Past developments and future trends. Annual Reviews, 33, 129‒156. https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131816
25. Lima, A. (2010). Transnationalism: A new mode of immigrant integration. The Mauricio Gaston Institute for Latino Community Development and Public Policy. Retrieved June 7, 2018 from http://www.bostonplans.org/getattachment/b5ea6e3a-e94e-451b-af08-ca9fcc3a1b5b/
26. Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2011). Mobile phone parenting: Reconfiguring relationships between Filipina migrant mothers and their left-behind children. New Media and Society, 13(3), 457‒470. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444810393903
27. Mahler, S. J., & Pessar, P. R. (2001) Gendered geographies of power: Analyzing gender across transnational spaces. Identities, 7(4), 441‒459. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2001.9962675
28. Neyer, G., & Bernardi, L. (2011). Feminist perspectives on motherhood and reproduction. Historical Social Research/ Fertility in the History of the 20th Century: Trends, Theories, Policies, Discourses, 36(2), 162‒176.
29. Oakley, A. (2005). The Ann Oakley reader: Gender, women and social science. Bristol: Policy Press.
30. Özkazanç, A. (2010). Bilim ve toplumsal cinsiyet. In II. Kadın Hekimlik ve Kadın Sağlığı Kongresi: Kadını Görmeyen Bilim ve Sağlık Politikaları (pp. 1‒13).
31. Parrenas, R. S. (2000). Migrant Filipina domestic workers and the international division of reproductive labor. Gender and Society, 14(4), 560‒580.
32. Parrenas, R. S. (2001a). Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families. Feminist Studies, 27(2), 361‒390.
33. Parrenas, R. S. (2001b). Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. California: Stanford University Press.
34. Parrenas, R. S. (2005). Long distance intimacy: Class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks, 5(4), 317‒336.
35. Parrenas, R. S. (2009). Inserting Feminism in transnational Migration Studies: Feminist research methods. Paper presented at the Centre for Gender Studies, Stockholm University, Sweden.
36. Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Oxford: Polity Press. Porter, M. (2010). History of motherhood: 1900 to present. In A. O’Reilly (Ed.), Encyclopedia of motherhood (pp. 505‒507). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
37. Rich, A. (1984). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. Great Britain: The Anchor Press.
38. Segal, M. T., & Chow, E. N. (2015). Analyzing gender, intersectionality, and inequality in global. In E. N.-L. Chow, M. T. Segal, & L. Tan (Eds.), Analyzing gender, intersectionality, and multiple inequalities: Global, transnational and local contexts (Advance in Gender Research, 15) (pp. 1‒14). https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1529-2126(2011)0000015005
39. Standing, G. (1999). Global feminization through flexible labor: A theme revisited. World Development, 27(3), 583‒602.
40. Trevino, M. B. (2010). History of motherhood: Middle ages. In A. O’Reilly (Ed.), Encyclopedia of motherhood (pp. 521 O’Reilly, 523). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
41. Walby, S. (1992). Woman and nation. International Journal of Comparative Sociology XXXIII, 1(2), 81‒100.
42. Wollstonecraft, M. (2014). A vindication of the rights of woman: With strictures on political and moral subjects. Web edition: University of Adelaide.
43. Yuval-Davis, N. (1993). Gender and nation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 16(4), 621‒632. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/01419870.1993.9993800