Araştırma Makalesi

İstanbul’da Satışa Sunulan Piliç Etlerinde Termotolerant Campylobacter spp. Prevalansı ve Antibiyotik Dirençliliği

Cilt: 43 Sayı: 2 2 Temmuz 2017
PDF İndir
EN TR

Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. in Chicken Meat Sold in İstanbul

Öz

Campylobacter spp. are some of the most common causes of bacterial diarrhea in humans worldwide. They are mainly considered as foodborne pathogens that are found in raw or undercooked poultry and serve as an important source of sporadic campylobacteriosis. The present study was aimed to determine the prevalence and the antimicrobial resistance patterns of thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. in chicken meat. A total of 176 samples of chicken meat were analyzed using PCM and BAX® system.  The samples analyzed included: 56 samples of whole chicken, 27 samples of chicken breast, 33 samples of chicken thigh, 25 samples of chicken drumstick and 35 samples of chicken wings. Samples of all the fresh chicken meat sold in İstanbul were randomly purchased from different major supermarkets in their original, individual packages. Laboratory analyses to detect thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. were performed in accordance with the ISO 10272-1, 2006 standard (qualitative analysis). API® Campy (bioMerieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France) was used for the confirmation of presumptive colonies. Campylobacter isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility tests by the disc diffusion method as recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Zones of growth inhibition were evaluated according to the NCCLS standards. Using PCM, the prevalence of C. coli, C. jejuni and C. lari was determined as 15.34, 8.52 and 1.7%, respectively. However, using BAX® system, the prevalence was determined as 15.90, 18.75 and 1.7% for C. coli, C. jejuni and C. lari, respectively. C. coli was resistant to nalidixic acid (78.57%), ofloxacin (14.29%) norfloxacin (10.71%) and ampicillin (10.71%). But the highest resistance was observed to nalidixic acid (90.91%) for C. jejuni and (100%) for C. lari. In conclusion, considering the public health, chicken meat is a common source for Campylobacter strains and antibiotics should be used carefully in veterinary medicine.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Abay, S., Kayman, T., Otlu, B., Hızlısoy, H., Aydın, F., Ertaş, N., 2014. Genetic diversity and antibiotic resistance profiles of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from poultry and humans in Turkey. International Journal of Food Microbiology 178, 29-38.
  2. Akan, Ö.A., Hasçelik, G., Akyön, Y., Yurdakök, K., 1994. Campylobacter türlerinin çeşitli antibiyotiklere in vitro duyarlılığı. Mikrobiyoloji Bülteni 28, 122-126.
  3. Alfredson, D.A., Korolik, V., 2007. Antibiotic resistance and resistance mechanisms in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. FEMS Microbiology Letters 277, 123-132.
  4. Altmeyer, M., Krabisch, P., Dorn, P., 1985. Vorkommen und verbreitung von Campylobacter jejuni/coli in der jungmastgeflügel-produktion Vet. Med. Diss., München.
  5. Aral, Y., Aydın, E., Demir, P., Akın, A.C., İşbilir, S., Cevger, Y., 2011. Piliç eti tüketimini etkileyen faktörler ve tüketici tercihleri-Ankara ili örneği. I. Uluslararası Beyaz Et Kongresi, Antalya, 195-201.
  6. Barroeta, A.C., 2007. Nutritive value of poultry meat: relationship between vitamin E and PUFA. World’s Poultry Science Journal 63, 277-284.
  7. Baysal, A., 2007. Beslenme. Hatipoğlu Yayınevi, Yenilenmiş 11.Baskı, Ankara.
  8. Bostan, K., Aydın, A., Anğ, M.K., 2009. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of thermophilic Campylobacter species on beef, mutton, and chicken carcasses in Istanbul, Turkey. Microbial Drug Resistance 15, 143-149.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

2 Temmuz 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

19 Ekim 2016

Kabul Tarihi

11 Aralık 2016

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Cilt: 43 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Büyükünal, S. K. (2017). İstanbul’da Satışa Sunulan Piliç Etlerinde Termotolerant Campylobacter spp. Prevalansı ve Antibiyotik Dirençliliği. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 43(2), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.16988/iuvfd.282027
AMA
1.Büyükünal SK. İstanbul’da Satışa Sunulan Piliç Etlerinde Termotolerant Campylobacter spp. Prevalansı ve Antibiyotik Dirençliliği. iuvfd. 2017;43(2):98-109. doi:10.16988/iuvfd.282027
Chicago
Büyükünal, Serkan Kemal. 2017. “İstanbul’da Satışa Sunulan Piliç Etlerinde Termotolerant Campylobacter spp. Prevalansı ve Antibiyotik Dirençliliği”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 43 (2): 98-109. https://doi.org/10.16988/iuvfd.282027.
EndNote
Büyükünal SK (01 Temmuz 2017) İstanbul’da Satışa Sunulan Piliç Etlerinde Termotolerant Campylobacter spp. Prevalansı ve Antibiyotik Dirençliliği. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 43 2 98–109.
IEEE
[1]S. K. Büyükünal, “İstanbul’da Satışa Sunulan Piliç Etlerinde Termotolerant Campylobacter spp. Prevalansı ve Antibiyotik Dirençliliği”, iuvfd, c. 43, sy 2, ss. 98–109, Tem. 2017, doi: 10.16988/iuvfd.282027.
ISNAD
Büyükünal, Serkan Kemal. “İstanbul’da Satışa Sunulan Piliç Etlerinde Termotolerant Campylobacter spp. Prevalansı ve Antibiyotik Dirençliliği”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 43/2 (01 Temmuz 2017): 98-109. https://doi.org/10.16988/iuvfd.282027.
JAMA
1.Büyükünal SK. İstanbul’da Satışa Sunulan Piliç Etlerinde Termotolerant Campylobacter spp. Prevalansı ve Antibiyotik Dirençliliği. iuvfd. 2017;43:98–109.
MLA
Büyükünal, Serkan Kemal. “İstanbul’da Satışa Sunulan Piliç Etlerinde Termotolerant Campylobacter spp. Prevalansı ve Antibiyotik Dirençliliği”. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 43, sy 2, Temmuz 2017, ss. 98-109, doi:10.16988/iuvfd.282027.
Vancouver
1.Serkan Kemal Büyükünal. İstanbul’da Satışa Sunulan Piliç Etlerinde Termotolerant Campylobacter spp. Prevalansı ve Antibiyotik Dirençliliği. iuvfd. 01 Temmuz 2017;43(2):98-109. doi:10.16988/iuvfd.282027