Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde Kan Şekeri Düzeyi ile Kültür Pozitifliği Arasındaki İlişki: Prospektif Gözlemsel Bir Çalışma

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4, 205 - 212, 25.12.2023

Süleyman Yıldırım Hüseyin Oğuz Yılmaz Yusuf Durmaz Cenk Kıraklı

https://doi.org/10.57221/izmirtip.1264041

Öz

Giriş: Sepsis, yoğun bakım ünitesindeki (YBÜ) ölümlerin en önemli nedenlerinden biridir. Tedavi başlangıcında antibiyotikler ampirik olarak seçilir, daha sonra kültür sonuçlarına ve tedavi cevabına göre tedavi değiştirilir. Kritik hastalarda kültür pozitifliği ile ilişkili faktörler önemli bir konudur. Bu nedenle, çalışmamızda kan kültürü pozitifliği ile ilişkili faktörler, özellikle de kan kültürü örneklemesi sırasındaki kan glukoz seviyesi ile kan kültürü arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu prospektif gözlemsel çalışma 1 Ekim 2017 ile 1 Ocak 2018 tarihleri arasında Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Dr. Suat Seren Göğüs Hastalıkları ve Cerrahisi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kan kültürü hastaların iki ayrı bölgesinden steril koşullar altında alınmıştır. Yatak başı kan şekeri ölçüm cihazı ile eş zamanlı kan glukoz düzeyi ölçülmüştür ve iki ölçümün ortalaması alınmıştır. Kan kültürü pozitifliği etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi için multivariate regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya 174 hasta alındı ve 53 (%30) hastada kan kültürü pozitifliği saptanmıştır. Univariate analizde kan glukoz düzeyi, santral venöz kateter varlığı, antibiyotik tedavisi, vazoaktif ilaç kullanımı ve diabetes mellitus (DM) kültür pozitifliği ile ilişki bulunmuştur. Multivariate regresyon analizinde sadece DM, kültür pozitifliği ile ilişkili bulunmuştur (OR 5.63 [95% CI 1.99-15.91] p=0,001).
Sonuç: DM kan kültürü pozitifliği olasılığını arttırabilir. Bu durum kontrolsüz DM’den kaynaklanmış olabilir. Bu riskin kontrolsüz hastalardan kaynaklanıp kaynaklanmadığını değerlendirmek için iyi tasarlanmış daha ileri çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kan Kültürü, Kan Glukoz Düzeyi, Yoğun Bakım Ünitesi, Diabetes Mellitus

Association Between Blood Glucose Level and Blood Culture Positivity in Intensive Care Unit: Prospective Observational Study

Öz

Aim: Sepsis is one of the major causes of death in intensive care unit (ICU). At the beginning antibiotics is chosen empirically after that is changed according to culture results or response to initial treatment. The factors associated culture positivity are of interest in the critically ill patients. Therefore, we aim in our study to explore the factors associated with blood culture positivity especially blood glucose levels at the time blood culture sampling.
Material and Methods: We perform this prospective observational study between October 1, 2017, and January 1, 2018, at University of Health Sciences Turkey, Dr. Suat Seren Chest Disease and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Intensive Care Unit. Two separate samples from opposite sides of each patient were obtained, and blood glucose was measured simultaneously with bed-side blood glucose measurement device by using the blood drawn for blood culture for each vial. The average of the two measurements was considered as the simultaneous blood glucose level of the patient. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the factors that associated with blood culture positivity.
Results: 174 patients were enrolled into the study, blood culture positivity was detected in 53 (30%) patients. In univariate analyzes, blood glucose levels, presence of central venous catheter, antibiotic treatment, vasoactive drug infusion and diabetes mellitus (DM) were found to be associated with culture positivity. In multivariate regression analyze only DM was found to be associated culture positivity (OR 5.63 [95% CI 1.99-15.91] p=0,001).
Conclusion: DM increase possibility of blood culture positivity. It may stem from uncontrolled DM. Further well-designed studies are needed to evaluate if this risk is derived from uncontrolled patients.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Blood culture, Blood Glucose, Intensive Care Unit, Diabetes Mellitus

Kaynakça

• Kaynaklar 1.Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: ınternational guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2017;43:304-77.
• 2.Pollack LA, Van Santen KL, Weiner LM, Dudeck MA, Edwards JR, Srinivasan A. Antibiotic stewardship programs in U.S. acute care hospitals: Findings from the 2014 national healthcare safety network annual hospital survey. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:443-9.
• 3.Gupta S, Sakhuja A, Kumar G, McGrath E, Nanchal RS, Kashani KB. Culture-negative severe sepsis: nationwide trends and outcomes. Chest. 2016;150:1251-9.
• 4.Phua J, Ngerng WJ, See KC, Tay CK, Kiong T, Lim HF, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative versus culture-positive severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2013;17:R202 .
• 5.Brun-Buisson C, Doyon F, Carlet J, Dellamonica P, Gouin F, Lepoutre A, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe in adults ıncidence, risk factors and outcome sepsis and septic shock. Jama. 1995;274:968-74.
• 6.Previsdomini M, Gini M, Cerutti B, Dolina M, Perren A. Predictors of positive blood cultures in critically ill patients: a retrospective evaluation. Croat Med J. 2012;53:30-9.
• 7.Naffaa M, Makhoul BF, Tobia A, Kaplan M, Aronson D, Azzam ZS, et al. Procalcitonin and interleukin 6 for predicting blood culture positivity in sepsis. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32:448-51 .
• 8.Scheer CS, Fuchs C, Gründling M, Vollmer M, Bast J, Bohnert JA, et al. Impact of antibiotic administration on blood culture positivity at the beginning of sepsis: a prospective clinical cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25:326-31.
• 9.Yoshida T, Tsushima K, Tsuchiya A, Nishikawa N, Shirahata K, Kaneko K, et al. Risk factors for hospital-acquired bacteremia. Intern Med. 2005;44:1157–62.
• 10.Falciglia M, Freyberg RW, Almenoff PL, D’Alessio DA, Render ML. Hyperglycemia-related mortality in critically ill patients varies with admission diagnosis. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:3001-9.
• 11.Van Vught LA, Wiewel MA, Klein Klouwenberg PMC, Hoogendijk AJ, Scicluna BP, Ong DSY, et al. Admission hyperglycemia in critically ıll sepsis patients: association with outcome and host response. Crit Care Med. 2016;1;44:1338-46.
• 12.Chang MW, Huang CY, Liu HT, Chen YC, Hsieh CH. Stress-Induced and diabetic hyperglycemia associated with higher mortality among ıntensive care unit trauma patients: cross-sectional analysis of the propensity score-matched population. Int J Environ Res Public Heal. 2018;15:992 .
• 13.Fabbri A, Marchesini G, Benazzi B, Morelli A, Montesi D, Bini C, et al. Stress hyperglycemia and mortality in subjects with diabetes and sepsis. Crit Care Explor. 2020;2:e0152 .
• 14.Marik PE, Raghavan M. Stress-hyperglycemia, insulin and immunomodulation in sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:748–56 .
• 15.Richards JE, Kauffmann RM, Zuckerman SL, Obremskey WT, May AK. Relationship of hyperglycemia and surgical-site ınfection in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Jt Surgery Am. 2012;94:1181.
• 16.Järvelä KM, Khan NK, Loisa EL, Sutinen JA, Laurikka JO, Khan JA. Hyperglycemic episodes are associated with postoperative ınfections after cardiac surgery. Scand J Surg. 2018;107:138-44 .
• 17.Kumar A, Ellis P, Arabi Y, Roberts D, Light B, Parrillo JE, et al. Initiation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy results in a fivefold reduction of survival in human septic shock. Chest. 2009;136:12 37-48.
• 18.Vaswani PPM, Bernardo DCC, Quero AKH, Cruz MCA, Bonifacio LB. The association of hyperglycemia with the development of infectious complications in adult Filipino patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2023;1;45:66-71.
• 19.Finfer S, Chittock DR, Yu-Shuo Su S, Blair D, Foster D, Dhingra V, et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ıll patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1283-97 .
• 20.Leonidou L, Michalaki M, Leonardou A, Polyzogopoulou E, Fouka K, Gerolymos M, et al. Stress-ınduced hyperglycemia in patients with severe sepsis: a compromising factor for survival. Am J Med Sci. 2008;336:467-71.
• 21.Leonidou L, Mouzaki A, Michalaki M, DeLastic AL, Kyriazopoulou V, Bassaris HP, et al. Cytokine production and hospital mortality in patients with sepsis-induced stress hyperglycemia. J Infect. 2007;55:340-6.
• 22.Vedantam D, Poman DS, Motwani L, Asif N, Patel A, Anne KK, et al. Stress-ınduced hyperglycemia: consequences and management. cureus. 2022;14:e26714.
• 23.Stoeckle M, Kaech C, Trampuz a, Zimmerli W. The role of diabetes mellitus in patients with bloodstream infections. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008;138:512-9 .
• 24.Geerlings SE, Hoepelman I. Immune dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1999;26:259-65 .
• 25.Gupta S, Koirala J, Khardori R, Khardori N. Infections in diabetes mellitus and hyperglycemia. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2007 Sep;21:617-38 .
• 26.Kim CH, Kim SJ, Lee MJ, Kwon YE, Kim YL, Park KS, et al. An increase in mean platelet volume from Yıldırım ve ark. baseline is associated with mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. PLoS One. 2015;10:1-13.
• 27.Kitazawa T, Yoshino Y, Tatsuno K, Ota Y, Yotsuyanagi H. Changes in the mean platelet volume levels after bloodstream ınfection have prognostic value. Intern Med. 2013;52:1487-93 .
• 28.Djordjevic D, Rondovic G, Surbatovic M, Stanojevic I, Udovicic I, Andjelic T, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and mean platelet volume-to-platelet count ratio as biomarkers in critically ıll and ınjured patients: which ratio to choose to predict outcome and nature of bacte. Mediat Inflamm. 2018;2018:15.
• 29.Grace CJ, Lieberman J, Pierce K, Littenberg B. Usefulness of blood culture for hospitalized patients who are receiving antibiotic therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:1651-5.