Sürdürülebilir kalkınma, sosyal koruma ve sorumluluk

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 83 - 91, 31.12.2020

Gordana Djukıc , Biljana Ilıc

Öz

Sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedefine, karar alma sürecinin tüm yönlerinde çevresel, sosyal ve ekonomik kaygıların dahil edilmesi ve kabul edilmesi yoluyla ulaşılabilir ve öğrenimden yana olmayı ve ticari kuruluşlarda bir örgüt kültürü geliştirmeyi ima eder. Bilgiye dayalı değil, aynı zamanda bilgi taşıyıcısı olan insan kaynaklarına da dayalı yeni toplumsal değerler oluşturmak gerekir. Eğitime, iyi işin yanı sıra insan faktörüne ve çalışanların bakımına odaklanacak olan sürdürülebilir yönetimin yaratılmasına ihtiyaç vardır. İyi tanımlanmış sürdürülebilir kalkınma stratejileri sayesinde, modern toplumlar iş faaliyetlerine, çevre korumaya, çalışanlarına değil, artık çalışamayanlara da dikkat ederler. Bu tür devletler, sosyal yaşamın her alanında sürdürülebilirliği desteklemektedir. Makalenin amacı, Avustralya gibi gelişmiş bir ülkenin, özellikle sosyal koruma ve sürdürülebilirliği alanında ulusal düzeyde sosyal sorumluluğu yöneten iyi uygulamalarına dikkat çekmek ve Avustralya hükümetinin üst düzey sorumluluk ve sosyal sigorta modelini Sırbistan'da uygulamaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sürdürülebilir kalkınma, Çevre, Sorumluluk, Sosyal koruma, Sırbistan, Avustralya

Sustainable development, social protection and responsibility

Öz

The goal of sustainable development is achievable through the integration and acknowledgement of environmental, social and economic concerns in all aspects of the decision making and implies favouring learning and developing an organizational culture in business entities. It is necessary to establish new social values based on knowledge, but also on human resources that are carriers of knowledge. There is a need for education, the creation of sustainable management that will focus, in addition to good business, the human factor as well as the care of employees. Through well-defined sustainable development strategies, modern societies take care of their business activities, environmental protection, their employees, but also those who are no longer able to work. Such states favour sustainability in all fields and all spheres of social life. The aim of the paper is to point out, for example, the good practice of one of the developed countries, such as Australia, which manages social responsibility at the national level, especially in the field of social protection and its sustainability, and to apply the high level of responsibility of the Australian government in Serbia and will present the model of social insurance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainable development, Environment, Responsibility, Social protection, Serbia, Australia

Kaynakça

• Australia: Report on the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. (2018). Voluntary National Review. HLPF, High-Level Political Forum, 7-10. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/20470VNR_final_approved_version.pdf.
• Corporate Social Responsibility in Serbia (2005). Strategic marketing research, Belgrade. Retrieved from: https://odgovornoposlovanje.rs/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/CSR-uSrbiji-165x237mm-WEB.pdf
• Djordjevic, D. & Urosevic, S. (2009). Environmental protection as an aspect of the concept of social responsibility, [in Serbian: Zaštita životne sredine kao aspekt koncepta društvene odgovornosti], Ecologica, (56), Belgrade.
• ENDEMIT. (2007). Program for Education for Susainable Development in the Carpathian Eco-Region: Living with nature, Ecological Society ENDEMIT, Belgrade, 7-10. Retrived from: http://www.endemit.org.rs
• European Commission. (2019). Commission Working Document, Republic of Serbia Report for 2019, 87.
• Figar N. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility, Business Policy [in Serbian: Društvena odgovornost preduzeća, Poslovna politika], Belgrade.
• Holzman, R., Hinz, R. (2005). Old-Age Income Support in the 21st Century. The World Bank, 42. Retrieved from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPENSIONS/Resources/Old_Age_Inc_Supp_Full_En.pdf
• ILO, International Labour Office Geneva. (2019). Universal Social Protection for Human Dignity, social justice and sustainable development, International Labour Conference, 108th.
• IGS, Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary-General, Global Sustainable Development Report 2019: The Future is Now – Science for Achieving Sustainable Development. (2019). New York, United Nations, 36. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/24797GSDR_report_2019.pdf
• Krstic, B. & Vukadinovic, D. (2008). Knowledge management as a source of sustainable competitive advantage, Economic topics, [in Serbian: Upravljanje znanjem kao izvor održive konkurentske prednosti, Ekonomske teme], Vol. 46 (3), 85-98. Niš.
• Markov, K., Stern Plaza, M. & Behrendt, C. (2019). ILO Social Security Standards: A global reference for social security systems. Social Protection for All Issue Brief, November 2019, 1. Retrieved from: https://www.social-protection.org/gimi/gess/ResourcePDF.action?id55563
• Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: literature review, Cogent Social Sciences, (5) 1653531, Taylor & Francis, Doi: 10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531, 14-16.
• Pinheiro, V. (2017). Global Partnership on Universal Social Protection to Achieve the SDGs USP2030. High-Level Political Forum. New York, World Bank, 13. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/16717USP2030_18_July_2017_Vinicius_ILO.pdf
• Quality policy - Miva company. Retrived from: http://www.miva.rs/Politika
• Rudolph, A. (2016). Pension programs around the world: Determinants of social pension, Discussion Papers, No. 212, Goettingen, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Courant Research Centre - Poverty, Equity and Growth, 17-28. Retrieved from: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/144773/1/865474117.pdfived
• Shi, L., Han, L., Yang, F. & Gao, L. (2019). The Evolution of Sustainable Development Theory: Types, Goals, and Research Prospects. Sustainability, (11) 7158, 10-16.
• Schildberg, C. & Wodsak, V. (2019). Formulating National Policies and Strategies and National Dialogue. In: Global Social Protection Week: Achieving SDG 1.3. and universal social protection in the context of the future of work. Geneva, International Labour Work, 24-25. Retrieved from: https://socialprotectionweek.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Global_Social_Protection_Week-2019-Agenda_Booklet.pdf
• The Republic of Serbia.: Report on the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (2019). Voluntary National Review, HLPF, 2. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org
• Trading Economics (database). 2020. Social Security rate. Retrieved from: https://tradingeconomics.com//social-security-rate
• United Nations Development Programme (2019) Human Development Report (2019), Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: Inequalities in human development in the 21st century, UNDP, New York, 325-316.
• UNDP Serbia (2018). Human Development Paper on Income Inequality in the Republic of Serbia. Reduced inequality as part of the SDG agenda, 61. Retrieved from: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/2934/undp_rs_humandevelopmentpaper_incomeinequalitysrb_aug2018.pdf
• Vujic, D. (2000). Human resource management and quality: people - the key to quality and success, Belgrade, [in Serbian: Menadžment ljudskih resursa i kvalitet: ljudi – ključ kvaliteta i uspeha, Beograd].
• WSPR, World Social Protection Report 2017-19: Universal social protection to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. (2017). International Labour Office, Geneva, 75-78.