Okul Temelli Zorbalık Önleme Programlarına İlişkin Bilimsel Yayınların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Okul Temelli Zorbalık Önleme Programlarına İlişkin Bilimsel Yayınların Bibliyometrik Analizi [Yiğit DOĞAN]¹* Öz Bu çalışmanın amacı, okul temelli zorbalık önleme programlarına ilişkin uluslararası literatürün bibliyometrik özelliklerini incelemek ve alanın entelektüel yapısını ortaya koymaktır. Araştırmada Web of Science Core Collection veri tabanından elde edilen ve 2001-2026 yılları arasında yayımlanan 442 makale analiz edilmiştir. Veriler, R yazılımındaki bibliometrix paketi ve web arayüzü Biblioshiny kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analizlerde yayın trendi, en üretken yazarlar, dergiler ve ülkeler, Lotka ve Bradford yasaları, anahtar kelime birlikte görülme ağı, tematik harita ve trend konular incelenmiştir. Bulgulara göre makaleler 241 farklı dergide 1.604 yazar tarafından üretilmiş ve yıllık büyüme oranı %11,44 olarak saptanmıştır. Alan özellikle 2018 sonrası hızlı bir büyüme sürecine girmiştir. Christina Salmivalli (h-indeks = 13) en etkili yazar, Frontiers in Psychology (n = 19) en fazla makale yayımlayan dergi, ABD (n = 90) ise en üretken ülke olarak belirlenmiştir. Tematik harita analizi, zorbalık mağduriyeti ve önlemenin alanın önde gelen teması olduğunu, öğretmen eğitimi ve öz-yeterliğin ise gelecek araştırmalar için fırsat alanı sunduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Türkiye alana yalnızca 5 makaleyle sınırlı katkı sunmaktadır. Anahtar Sözcükler Bibliyometrik analiz Zorbalık önleme Okul temelli müdahale Bilim haritalama Bibliometrix

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• Zorbalık Önleme
• Okul Temelli Müdahale

A Bibliometric Analysis of School-Based Bullying Prevention Programs (2001-2026)

Öz

A Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Publications on School-Based Bullying Prevention Programs Abstract This study aims to examine the bibliometric characteristics of the international literature on school-based bullying prevention programs and to reveal the intellectual structure of the field. A total of 442 articles published between 2001 and 2026 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection and analyzed using the bibliometrix package in R and its web interface Biblioshiny. The analyses examined publication trends, the most productive authors, journals, and countries, Lotka's and Bradford's laws, keyword co-occurrence network, thematic map, and trending topics. Findings revealed that the articles were published in 241 different journals by 1,604 authors, with an annual growth rate of 11.44%. The field entered a rapid growth phase particularly after 2018. Christina Salmivalli (h-index = 13) was identified as the most influential author, Frontiers in Psychology (n = 19) as the most productive journal, and the United States (n = 90) as the most productive country. Thematic map analysis revealed that bullying victimization and prevention constitute the motor theme of the field, while teacher training and self-efficacy represent an opportunity area for future research. Turkey contributes limitedly to the field with only 5 articles. Keywords Bibliometric analysis Bullying prevention School-based intervention Science mapping Bibliometrix

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bibliometric Analysis
• Bullying
• School-Based Prevention

Kaynakça

1. Aria, M. ve Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
2. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
3. Cross, D., Monks, H., Hall, M., Shaw, T., Pintabona, Y., Erceg, E., Hamilton, G., Roberts, C., Waters, S. & Lester, L. (2011). Three-year results of the Friendly Schools whole-of-school intervention on children's bullying behaviour. British Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 105-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903420024
4. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
5. Dölek, N. (2002). Öğrencilerde zorbaca davranışların araştırılması ve bir önleyici program modeli [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Marmara Üniversitesi.
6. Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M. & Farrington, D. P. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of school-bullying prevention programs: An updated meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.001
7. Hawker, D. S. & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00629
8. Kapçı, E. G. (2004). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin zorbalığa maruz kalma türünün ve sıklığının depresyon, kaygı ve benlik saygısıyla ilişkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000087

9. Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A. & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: Grades 4-6. Child Development, 82(1), 311-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x
10. Kepenekçi, Y. K. ve Çınkır, Ş. (2006). Bullying among Turkish high school students. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(2), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.10.005
11. Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P. & McCord, A. (2019). A developmental approach to cyberbullying: Prevalence and protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.009
12. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317-323.
13. Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G. & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(5), 602-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007
14. Moore, S. E., Norman, R. E., Suetani, S., Thomas, H. J., Sly, P. D. & Scott, J. G. (2017). Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Psychiatry, 7(1), 60-76. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v7.i1.60
15. Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B. & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA, 285(16), 2094-2100. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.16.2094
16. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell.
17. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
18. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
19. Pişkin, M. (2002). Okul zorbalığı: Tanımı, türleri, ilişkili olduğu faktörler ve alınabilecek önlemler. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 2(2), 531-562.
20. Pişkin, M. (2010). Examining bullying victimization among elementary school students in terms of gender, grade level and socio-economic status. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(156), 175-189.
21. Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A. ve Poskiparta, E. (2011). Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(5), 405-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411407457
22. Smith, P.K. and Brain, P. (2000), Bullying in schools: Lessons from two decades of research. Aggr. Behav., 26: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(2000)26:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-7
23. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S. & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
24. Ttofi, M. M. & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1
25. UNESCO. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. UNESCO Publishing.
26. Yöndem, Z. D., & Totan, T. (2007). Ergenlerde Zorbalığın Anne Baba ve Akran İlişkileri Açısından İncelenmesi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 8(2), 53-68. https://izlik.org/JA94FX94LD
27. Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R. & Del Rey, R. (2015). Systematic review of theoretical studies on bullying and cyberbullying: Facts, knowledge, prevention, and intervention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.10.001
28. Zupic, I. & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods,18(3),429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629