Determination of Parcel Based Session of Agricultural and Animal Production Facility Areas Inside or Outside the Contiguous Area Boundaries

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 74 - 85, 30.12.2022

Selim Taşkaya

https://doi.org/10.46876/ja.1126092

Abstract

The adjacent area is neighbor as a word. In the language of cartography, it means the region within the borders adjacent to the zoning boundaries. The parcels located at the borders of the adjacent area are cadastral, that is, the areas that have not been developed in the form of fields. Since this type of parcel is outside the zoning boundaries, certain definite criteria for construction are not as diverse as in a zoning island. The most significant part is that the parcel must have at least one side of the parcel should face the road. In the adjacent area, facilities such as chicken, fattening, cattle breeding farm or cheese, dairy production facilities, trustee parking lot, silo and feed facility are built. The purpose of the study is how the parcels can move within the boundaries in the construction of these related structures. As a method, it is to make it geometrically closed while determining the residential areas for the building at the borders of the parcels with the end-to-end splicing technique. Therefore, with various examples, it is to examine how a construction permit will be granted on the ground within the framework of the regulation on unplanned areas while the facility is placed on the ground in an adjacent area.

Keywords

Adjacent Space, Joining Technique, State of Structure

References

• Anonim1 Publications, (2022). General Physics Course Vector and Scalar Size Lecture Notes. https://acikders.ankara.edu.tr/course/view.php?id=31. (Date of access:05.06.2022).
• Anonim2 Publications, (2022). Surveying Engineering and Surveying Associate Degree Lecture Notes. https://www.kentharita.com/olcme-bilgisi-ders-notlari-pdf/. ((Date of access:10.07.2022).
• Berisha, E., Cotella, G., Rivolin, U.J., & Solly, A. (2020). Spatial governance and planning systems and the public control of spatial development:a European typology. European Planning Studies. 29 (1), p.181-200.
• Booth, P. (2003). Planning by Consent. The Origins and Nature of British Development Control London, Routledge.
• Çubukçu, S. (2022). Examining the Changes Made in the Zoning Legislation and the Differences in the Construction Process of the Parceling Plans, Istanbul Technical University Graduate Education Institute, Geomatics Engineering Department, Master Thesis, Istanbul.
• Erğan, E.Z. (2022). Re-evaluating Lost Spaces as Undefined Urban Areas and Bringing them to the City: The Case of Anadoluhisarı-Göksu, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Institute of Science, City and Regional Planning Department, Urban Design Program, Master Thesis, Istanbul.
• Ersoy, M., & Keskinok, H. C. (2000). Space Planning and Judicial Control, Judicial Publications, Ankara.
• Faludi, A. (1987). A Decision- Centered View of Environmental Planning. Oxford: Pergaon Press.
• Gursoy, N. (2015). Integrating the Strategic Planning Approach into the Regulatory Plan System: Planning Studies in Fikirtepe Urban Transformation Area. (Master Thesis), Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul.
• Kilinc, A. (2022). Investigation of Urban Life Quality of Housing and Its Environment: Bursa Yıldırım Millet Mahallesi Siteler Region, Bursa Uludağ University Institute of Science, Architecture Department, Master Thesis, Bursa.
• Kilinc, N. (2021). Examining the Development Plan Changes from the Perspective of Legal, Spatial and Urban Rent: The Case of Istanbul, Istanbul Technical University Graduate Education Institute, Department of City and Regional Planning, PhD Thesis, Istanbul.
• Muñoz Gielen, D. (2010). Capturing Value Increase in Urban Redevelopment. Leiden: Sidestone Press.
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2008). European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. The Planning Review, 44 (172), 35–47.
• Rivolin, U. J. (2017). Global crisis and the systems of spatial governance and planning: a European comparison. European Planning Studies, 25 (6), 994-1012.
• Spatial Plans Construction Regulation, (2014). T. C. Official Gazette, 29030, 14 June 2014.
• Şardağ, H. (2019). On Vectorial Moments of Alternative Roof, Ordu University, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Mathematics, Master Thesis, Ordu.
• Tang, B., Choy, L. H., & Wat, J. K. F. (2000). Certainty and Discretion in Planning Control:A Case Study of Office Development in Hong Kong. Urban Studies, Vol. 37, (13). 2465-2483.
• Taşan- Kok, T., & Gielen, D. M. (2010). Flexibility in Planning and the Consequences for Public-value Capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 18 (7), 1097-1131.
• Turk, S. S. (2016). Urban Law Practices Lecture Notes. Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul. Unplanned Areas Zoning Regulation, (2021). Date of Official Gazette Published in the Regulation: 2/11/1985, Number: 18916 Repeated, Official Gazettes, Date: 11/7/2021, Number: 31538.
• Zoning Law, (1985). T. C. Official Gazette, 18749, 9 May 1985, no: 3194.