REZİDANS TASARIMINDA YALNIZLIK VE SOSYAL İZOLASYONUN MEKÂNSAL BOYUTU

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 75 - 99, 26.03.2026

Bihter Erdem Okumus

https://izlik.org/JA22AK44LG

Öz

Son yıllarda büyük kentlerde yaygınlaşan rezidans projeleri, güvenlik, konfor ve prestij odaklı yaşam biçimleri sunmalarıyla öne çıkmaktadır. Ancak bu konut tipolojisinin sosyal etkileşim, aidiyet ve topluluk ilişkileri üzerindeki etkileri giderek daha fazla tartışılmaktadır. Bu çalışma, çağdaş rezidans tipolojisinin yalnızlık ve sosyal izolasyonla ilişkisini, mekânsal organizasyon ve tasarım stratejileri üzerinden incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmanın temel problemi, bireysel yaşamı koruma iddiası taşıyan rezidans mekânsal kurgularının, toplumsal karşılaşmaları hangi mekânsal mekanizmalar aracılığıyla sınırlandırdığıdır. Çalışma, nitel ve yorumlayıcı bir yöntem benimseyerek İstanbul’da yer alan Zorlu Center Residences, Varyap Meridian, Metropol İstanbul ve Spine Tower projelerini örnek olay olarak ele almaktadır. Plan şemaları, dolaşım sistemleri, kamusal–yarı kamusal–özel alan hiyerarşileri ile erişim ve güvenlik kurguları analiz edilmiş; bulgular Lefebvre, Augé ve Sennett’in kuramsal yaklaşımları çerçevesinde değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları, yüksek katlı yapılaşma, kontrollü erişim sistemleri ve programlanmış ortak alanların sosyal etkileşimi desteklemekten ziyade sınırlayan bir mekânsal düzen ürettiğini göstermektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışma, rezidans tipolojisini sosyal sürdürülebilirlik açısından ele alarak, konut tasarımında mekânsal organizasyonun toplumsal ilişkiler üzerindeki belirleyici rolüne dikkat çekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Rezidans , yalnızlık , sosyal izolasyon , mekânsal tasarım , sosyal sürdürülebilirlik.

THE SPATIAL DIMENSION OF LONELINESS AND SOCIAL ISOLATION IN RESIDENCE DESIGN

https://izlik.org/JA22AK44LG

Öz

In recent years, residence projects have become increasingly widespread in large metropolitan areas, offering lifestyles centered on security, comfort, and prestige. However, the social implications of this housing typology—particularly in relation to social interaction, sense of belonging, and community formation—have become an important subject of debate. This study aims to examine the relationship between contemporary residence typology and loneliness and social isolation through spatial organization and architectural design strategies. The main problem of the research lies in identifying the spatial mechanisms through which residence layouts, while claiming to protect individual privacy, tend to limit everyday social encounters. Adopting a qualitative and interpretive approach, the study examines four residence projects located in Istanbul—Zorlu Center Residences, Varyap Meridian, Metropol Istanbul, and Spine Tower—as case studies. Plan layouts, circulation systems, hierarchies of public, semi-public, and private spaces, as well as access and security configurations, are analyzed, and the findings are interpreted within a theoretical framework informed by Lefebvre, Augé, and Sennett. The findings indicate that high-rise development patterns, controlled access systems, and programmatically defined shared spaces tend to restrict rather than foster social interaction. In this respect, the study approaches residence typology from the perspective of social sustainability and highlights the decisive role of spatial organization in shaping social relations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Residence , loneliness , social isolation , spatial design , social sustainability.

Kaynakça

• Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. Verso.
• Atkinson, R. (2006). Padding the bunker: Strategies of middle-class disaffiliation and colonisation in the city. Urban Studies, 43(4), 819-832. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600597806
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Patrick, W. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. W. W. Norton & Company. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Blackwell.
• de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. University of California Press.
• Dovey, K. (2010). Becoming places: Urbanism/architecture/identity/power. Routledge.
• Erkip, F. (2005). The rise of the shopping mall in Turkey: The use and appeal of a mall in Ankara. Cities, 22(2), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.01.001
• Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces. Diacritics, 16(1), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.2307/464648
• Gehl, J. (2011). Cities for people. Island Press.
• Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods (2nd ed.). Wiley.
• Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press.
• Klinenberg, E. (2002). Heat wave: A social autopsy of disaster in Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
• Klinenberg, E. (2018). Palaces for the people: How social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. Crown Publishing.
• Korkmaz, K. (2011). Gated communities and the changing urban fabric in Turkey: The case of Ankara. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 28(2), 55-72.
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
• Low, S. M. (2003). Behind the gates: Life, security, and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. Routledge.
• Marcuse, P. (1997). The enclave, the citadel, and the ghetto. Urban Affairs Review, 33(2), 228-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808749703300206
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
• Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press.
• Sennett, R. (1977). The fall of public man. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Sennett, R. (2000). Respect in a world of inequality. W. W. Norton & Company.
• Sennett, R. (2012). Together: The rituals, pleasures and politics of cooperation. Yale University Press.
• Weiss, R. S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. MIT Press.
• Arolat, E. (2014). Zorlu Center mixed-use complex. Emre Arolat Architecture. https://emrearolat.com/project/zorlu-center-mixed-use-complex/
• Metropol İstanbul. (2023). Metropol İstanbul projesi. https://www.metropolistanbul.com/
• Spine Tower. (2025). Spine Tower sosyal alanlar. https://www.spine-tower.com/sosyal.html
• Varyap. (2023). Varyap Meridian. https://www.varyap.com/varyap-meridian
• Zorlu Gayrimenkul. (2023). Zorlu Center Residences. https://www.zorlucenter.com/rezidanslar