STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION AND PREFERENCES TOWARDS ONLINE LEARNING IN THE POST-PANDEMIC ERA

Öz

With the advent of technological advancements, online learning has emerged as a transformative force in education over the years, revolutionizing the way people acquire knowledge and skills. It was not until the COVID-19 pandemic that online learning fully took hold in the global educational system. As the world recovers, the traditional face-to-face educational setting is restored. However, the air surrounding the discussion of online learning seems to have changed. The world is now more illuminated with an even higher appreciation for online learning and the potential it musters. Lessons, assessments, and seminars by institutions alike continue to be held online on top of the face-to-face setting. This paper therefore aims to explore the post-pandemic era of online learning, focusing on identifying the preferences and level of satisfaction with online learning among higher education students. A total of 380 students from Sultan Idris Shah Polytechnic were randomly selected to answer a structured questionnaire via Google Forms. The findings revealed that the students’ satisfaction and preferences towards the implementation of online learning were high. Students perceived that online learning helped aid in their learning process. Of the three examined dimensions, the lecturer dimension was found to be the main factor affecting students’ satisfaction with online learning. The learner and technological dimensions were strongly correlated with students’ preferences towards online learning. Considering how online education has changed over time, it is hoped that the findings of this study will help educational policymakers and stakeholders build an inclusive and resilient online education in the present post-pandemic era, fostering a better learning environment and ensuring equitable educational opportunities for all in the future.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Online learning
• student satisfaction
• student preferences
• post-pandemic

ÖĞRENCİLERİN PANDEMİ SONRASI DÖNEMDE ÇEVRİMİÇİ ÖĞRENMEYE YÖNELİK MEMNUNİYETİ VE TERCİHLERİ

Öz

Teknolojik gelişmelerin artmasıyla birlikte, çevrimiçi öğrenme yıllar içinde eğitimde dönüştürücü bir güç olarak ortaya çıkmış ve insanların bilgi ve beceri edinme biçiminde köklü değişikliklere sebep olmuştur. Çevrimiçi öğrenmenin küresel eğitim sisteminde tam olarak yerleşmesi KOVID-19 salgınına kadar gerçekleşmemiştir. Dünya iyileşirken, geleneksel yüz yüze eğitim ortamı restore edilmiştir. Ancak, çevrimiçi öğrenme tartışmalarını çevreleyen hava değişmiş gibi görünmektedir. Dünya artık çevrimiçi öğrenmeye ve onun yarattığı potansiyele yönelik daha da yüksek bir takdirle daha da aydınlanmaktadır. Kurumlar tarafından verilen dersler, değerlendirmeler ve seminerler yüz yüze eğitimin yanı sıra çevrimiçi olarak da yapılmaya devam etmektedir. Bu nedenle bu makale, yükseköğrenim öğrencileri arasında çevrimiçi öğrenmeye yönelik tercihleri ve memnuniyet düzeyini belirlemeye odaklanarak, pandemi sonrası çevrimiçi öğrenme dönemini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında, bir yükseköğretim kurumundan toplam 380 öğrenci rastgele olarak seçilmiş ve Google Formlar aracılığıyla yapılandırılmış bir anketi yanıtlamıştır. Bulgular, öğrencilerin çevrimiçi öğrenmenin uygulanmasına yönelik memnuniyet ve tercihlerinin yüksek olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Öğrenciler, çevrimiçi öğrenmenin öğrenme süreçlerine yardımcı olduğunu algıladıklarını belirtmiştir. İncelenen üç boyuttan, öğretim görevlisi boyutunun öğrencilerin çevrimiçi öğrenmeden duyduğu memnuniyeti etkileyen ana faktör olduğu bulunmuştur. Öğrenen ve teknolojik boyutlar, öğrencilerin çevrimiçi öğrenmeye yönelik tercihleriyle güçlü bir şekilde ilişkili bulunmuştur. Çevrimiçi eğitimin zaman içinde nasıl değiştiğini göz önünde bulundurarak, bu çalışmanın bulgularının eğitim politikası yapıcılarının ve paydaşların mevcut pandemi sonrası dönemde kapsayıcı ve dayanıklı bir çevrimiçi eğitim oluşturmasına, daha iyi bir öğrenme ortamı oluşturmasına ve gelecekte herkes için eşit eğitim fırsatları sağlamasına yardımcı olacağı umulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çevrimiçi öğrenme
• öğrenci memnuniyeti
• öğrenci tercihleri
• pandemi-sonrası eğitim

Kaynakça

1. Arbaugh J. B. (2014). System, scholar, or students? Which most influences online MBA course effectiveness? J. Comput. Assisted Learn., 30, 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12048
2. Aslanian, C. B., & Clinefelter, D. L. (2012). Online college students 2012: Comprehensive data on demands and preferences. The Learning House, Inc.
3. Baharin, A. T., Lateh, H., Nawawi, H. M., & Nathan, S. S. (2015). Evaluation of satisfaction using online learning with interactivity. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 905–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.208
4. Bali, S. & Liu, M. C. (2018). Students’ perceptions towards online learning and face-to-face learning courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108, 012094. https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/1108/1/012094
5. Benson, A. (2002). Using online learning to meet workforce demand: A case study of stakeholder influence. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(4), 443−452.
6. Carmines, E. G. & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Sage Publications.
7. Cen X., Sun D., Rong M., Fekete G., Baker J. S., Song Y., et al. (2020). The online education mode and reopening plans for Chinese schools during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mini review. Frontier in Public Health, 8, 566316. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.566316
8. Chen, W. S. & Yao, A. Y. T. (2016). An empirical evaluation of critical factors ınfluencing learner satisfaction in blended learning: A pilot study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 1667−1671.

9. Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98−101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
10. Cole, M. T., Shelley, D. J., & Swartz, L. B. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6), 111−131.
11. Conrad, D. (2002). Deep in the hearts of learners: Insights into the nature of online community. Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 1−19.
12. Eom, S. B. & Ashill, N. (2016). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An update. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 185–215.
13. Gao, B. W., Jiang, J., & Tang, Y. (2020). The effect of blended learning platform and engagement on students’ satisfaction—— the case from the tourism management teaching. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 27, 100272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100272
14. Han, J. Y., Geng, X. H., & Wang, Q. X. (2021). Sustainable development of university EFL learners’ engagement, satisfaction, and self-efficacy in online learning environments: Chinese experiences. Sustainability, 13(21), 11655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111655
15. Harun, Z., Hamzah, F. M., Abidin, Z. Z., Zamri, W. F. H. W., & Hashim, H. (2021). Challenges in online learning during COVID-19: Malaysian students’ perspectives, UKM Journal, Online.
16. Jafar, A., Dollah, R., Sakke, N., et. al. (2022). Assessing the challenges of e-learning in Malaysia during the pandemic of Covid-19 using the geo-spatial approach. Scientific Reports, 12, 17316. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22360-4
17. Jenkins, M., & Hanson, J. (2003). E-learning series no 1: A Guide for senior managers. Learning and Teaching Support Network (LSTN) Generic Centre Publications.
18. Juanis, A. A. & Ejus, G. A. (2020). Students’ perspectives on online learning in Politeknik Kota
19. Kinabalu. Journal of General Studies Department, Jilid, 1, 54–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14916.35205
20. Kubiszyn, T. & Borich, G. (2000) Educational testing and measurement: Classroom application and practice. (6th ed.) John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
21. Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2013). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet & Higher Education, 20, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
22. Li, N., Marsh, V., & Rientis, B. (2016). Modelling and managing learner satisfaction: Use of learner feedback to enhance blended and online learning experience. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 216–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12096
23. Liaw, S.-S., Chen, G.-D., & Huang, H.-M. (2008). Users’ attitudes toward Web-based collaborative learning systems for knowledge management. Computers & Education, 50(3), 950961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.007
24. Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015
25. Malik, M. W. (2010). Factor effecting learner’s satisfaction towards e-learning: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(3), 77–82.
26. Moidunny, K. (2009). The effectiveness of the national professional qualifications for educational leaders (NPQEL). Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The National University of Malaysia.
27. Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Educating the net generation. EDUCAUSE. https://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf
28. Pimentel, J. L. (2010). A note on the usage of Likert Scaling for research data analysis. USM R&D Journal, 18(2), 109–112.
29. Saleh, S. & Aziz, A. (2012). Teaching practices among secondary school teachers in Malaysia. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 47(14), 63–67.
30. Scagnoli, N. (2009). A review of online learning and its evolution in Latin America. Policy Futures in Education, 7(5), 555–565. https://doi:10.2304/pfie.2009.7.5.555 Sharma, K., Deo, G., Timalsina, S., Joshi, A., Shrestha, N., & Neupane H. C. (2020). Online Learning in the Face of COVID-19 Pandemic: Assessment of Students’ Satisfaction at Chitwan Medical College, Nepal. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 70(2), 40–47.
31. She, L., Ma, L., Jan, A., Sharif, N. H., Rahmatpour, P. (2021). Online learning satisfaction during COVID19 pandemic among Chinese university students: The serial mediation model. Frontier in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743936
32. Singh, V. & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
33. Subramaniam, N. K. (2023). Technology in education: a case study on Malaysia. Global Education Monitoring Report, Southeast Asia Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.54676/QXEG1330
34. Suhaidi, N. (2023, August 29). Highlights of the education and technology advancement in the country. The Malaysian Reserve. https://themalaysianreserve.com/2023/08/29/highlights-of-the education-and technology-advancement-in-the-country/
35. Tan, S., Chuah, F., & Ting, H. (2016). Factors affecting university students’ satisfaction on online learning system. In TARC International Conference on Learning & Teaching (pp. 17–20). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299510166
36. Tengku Kasim, T. S. A. (2014). Teaching paradigms: An analysis of traditional and student-centred approaches. Journal of Usuluddin, 40, 199–218.
37. Yu, Q. F. (2022). Factors influencing online learning satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 852360. https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852360