Research Article

Effect of PGPB on leaf nutrient status and growth of Begonia semperflorens

Volume: 9 Number: 2 June 26, 2025
EN

Effect of PGPB on leaf nutrient status and growth of Begonia semperflorens

Abstract

Bacteria are increasingly used in agriculture as eco-friendly alternatives to promote plant growth through mechanisms such as nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, hormone production, and improved nutrient uptake. This study aims to examine the effects of plant growth-promoting bacteria on the growth, quality, and nutrient content of Begonia semperflorens, a commercially valuable ornamental plant known for its long flowering period and vibrant blooms. In this study, one-month-old Begonia semperflorens seedlings were dipped into bacterial suspensions (10⁸ CFU ml⁻¹) of Pseudomonas chlororaphis MF-1, Bacillus megaterium M-3, and Agrobacterium radiobacter A-16 for 20 minutes prior to planting. After planting, the seedlings were irrigated with bacterial suspensions as watering solution at twice at 15-day intervals. At the end of one month, plant growth and quality parameters (plant height, number of leaves, leaf area, plant fresh weight, plant dry weight, stem diameter, flower stem, plant crown width, number of blooming flowers). were evaluated, along with macro- and microelement contents (total N, P, K, Ca, Mn, Mg, and Fe) in both plant leaves and the growing medium. All bacterial treatments significantly improved plant growth and quality compared to the control group, with M-3 exhibiting the most pronounced effects, increasing plant height by 40%, leaf number by 133%, leaf area by 348%, and flower number by 61%. A-16 enhanced crown width (45%) and flower stem length (26%), while MF-1 improved plant height (43%) and flower production (51%). Additionally, M-3 increased total nitrogen in leaves by 43%, while bacterial treatments enhanced various elements in plant leaves. The results show that these bacterial isolates improve begonia plant characteristics, providing high-quality plants and offering a sustainable alternative as microbial fertilizers in ornamental plant cultivation.

Keywords

Pseudomonas chlororaphis, Bacillus megaterium, Agrobacterium radiobacter, Begonia semperflorens, Microbial fertilizer

References

  1. Aksoy, H.M., Yilmaz, N.D.K. (2008). Antagonistic effects of natural Pseudomonas putida biotypes on Polymyxa betae Keskin, the vector of Beet necrotic yellow vein virüs in sugar beet. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 115 (6), 241-246.
  2. Aktaş, S. (2014). Domates Öz Nekrozuna Neden Olan Etmenlere Karşı PGPR ve Biyoajan Bakterileri Kullanılarak Kontrollü Koşullarda Biyolojik Mücadele Imkânlarının Araştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
  3. Altın, N. (2004). Serada Hıyar Fusarıum Solgunluğu (Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cucumerinum)’na Karşı Biyolojik Savaş Odaklı Önlemler Üzerinde Araştırmalar. Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  4. Altın, N., Bora, T. (2015). Serada hıyar Fusarium solgunluğu (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum)’na karşı floresan Pseudomonasların etkinliğinin belirlenmesi. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 3 (1), 63-71.
  5. Anonymous (2005). In: Halkman A (ed) Merck Gıda Mikrobiyolojisi Uygulamaları. Başak Matbaacılık Ltd. Şti, Ankara
  6. Arab, A., Zamani, G. R., Sayyariand, M. H., Asili, J. (2015). Effects of chemical and biological fertilizers on morpho-physiological traits of marigold (Calendula officinalis L.). European Journal of Medicinal Plants, 8(1), 60-68.
  7. Bashan, Y. and de-Bashan, L.E. (2002). Protection of tomato seedlings aganist infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato by using the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 6, 2637-2643.
  8. Bremner, J.M. and Mulvaney, C.S. (1996). Nitrogen–Total. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, Second Edition, Ed. A.L. Page, SSSA Book series, No: 9, Madison, 595-622
  9. Cardoso, J. C., & Vendrame, W. A. (2022). Innovation in propagation and cultivation of ornamental plants. Horticulturae, 8(3), 229.
  10. Çakmakçı, R., Dönmez, M.F. and Erdoğan, Ü. (2007). The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on barley seedling growth, nutrient uptake, some soil properties, and bacterial counts. Turkish J. Agric. For., 31, 189-199.
APA
Şenol Kotan, M. (2025). Effect of PGPB on leaf nutrient status and growth of Begonia semperflorens. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 9(2), 551-558. https://doi.org/10.31015/2025.2.28
AMA
1.Şenol Kotan M. Effect of PGPB on leaf nutrient status and growth of Begonia semperflorens. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2025;9(2):551-558. doi:10.31015/2025.2.28
Chicago
Şenol Kotan, Merve. 2025. “Effect of PGPB on Leaf Nutrient Status and Growth of Begonia Semperflorens”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 9 (2): 551-58. https://doi.org/10.31015/2025.2.28.
EndNote
Şenol Kotan M (June 1, 2025) Effect of PGPB on leaf nutrient status and growth of Begonia semperflorens. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 9 2 551–558.
IEEE
[1]M. Şenol Kotan, “Effect of PGPB on leaf nutrient status and growth of Begonia semperflorens”, int. j. agric. environ. food sci., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 551–558, June 2025, doi: 10.31015/2025.2.28.
ISNAD
Şenol Kotan, Merve. “Effect of PGPB on Leaf Nutrient Status and Growth of Begonia Semperflorens”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 9/2 (June 1, 2025): 551-558. https://doi.org/10.31015/2025.2.28.
JAMA
1.Şenol Kotan M. Effect of PGPB on leaf nutrient status and growth of Begonia semperflorens. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2025;9:551–558.
MLA
Şenol Kotan, Merve. “Effect of PGPB on Leaf Nutrient Status and Growth of Begonia Semperflorens”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, June 2025, pp. 551-8, doi:10.31015/2025.2.28.
Vancouver
1.Merve Şenol Kotan. Effect of PGPB on leaf nutrient status and growth of Begonia semperflorens. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2025 Jun. 1;9(2):551-8. doi:10.31015/2025.2.28