Research Article

Evaluation of the use of prepaid water meter on some irrigation management performance indicators: A case study

Volume: 5 Number: 4 December 15, 2021
Mevlüt Aydın , Mehmet Uğur Yıldırım , Aynur Fayrap *, Hakan Özdal
EN

Evaluation of the use of prepaid water meter on some irrigation management performance indicators: A case study

Abstract

Volume based pricing in irrigation is an important application method in solving excessive and illegal water use problems. It is essential to use a properly selected water meter to accurately measure the amount of water. In this study, the irrigation system performance of Kayack Water User Association (WUA) was comparatively analyzed for the years 2012 to 2017. The prepaid water meter has been used for water measurement in Kayacık irrigation scheme since 2015. While it could be irrigated on 11.754 ha in 2012, the irrigated area reached 19.528 ha in 2017. It was determined that there was a significant water saving and economic recovery after the installation of prepaid water meters in the irrigation scheme. The quantity of water, which was 7,414 m3ha-1 in 2012, decreased to 3,617 m3ha-1 in 2017. The cost recovery ratios were 76% and 107% in 2013 and 2017, respectively. Consequently, prepaid water meter usage provides so many advantages in service delivery, economics and productivity. In addition, the quantity of water discharged into the drainage canal has significantly decreased. It is recommended that prepaid water meter usage should be prevalence in irrigation operation.

Keywords

Measuring irrigation water, Prepaid water meter, Service delivery performance, Financial performance, Production performance

References

  1. Anonymous, (2001). Water Measurement Manuel. Chapter 4. Selection of Water Measuring Devices. Revised Printed, pp 4-13. https://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/mands/wmm/index.htm .Washington.
  2. Anonymous, (2013). Evaluation Report of Irrigation Facilities Operated and Transferred by DSI for 2012. Turkish Republic Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 462-478. Ankara. (In Turkish)
  3. Anonymous, (2018). Evaluation Report of Irrigation Facilities Operated and Transferred by DSI for 2017. Turkish Republic Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 449-465. Ankara. (In Turkish).
  4. Baum, C.B., Dukes, M.D., Haman, DZ. (2012). “Selection and Use of Water Meters for Irrigation Water Measurement”. Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, UF/IFAS Extension, February.
  5. Beyribey, M. (1997). Devlet Sulama Şebekelerinde Sistem Performansının Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi. Ziraat Fakultesi Yayınları, Ankara (In Turkish).
  6. Bos, G.B., Kselik R.A.L., Allen, G., Molden, D.J. (2009). Water Requirements for Irrigation and the Environment.118-119. Publisher: Springer Netherlands ISBN: 978-1-4020-8947-3,978- 1-4020-8948-0.
  7. Burt, C.M. (2007). Volumetric Irrigation Water Pricing Considerations. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 21-2.133-144 DOI: 10.1007/s10795-007-9025- 3.
  8. Chartzoulakis, K. and Bertaki, M. (2015). Sustainable water management in agriculture under climate change. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 4, 88 – 98. www.sciencedirect.com.
  9. Çakmak, E. H., (2010). Agricultural Water Pricing in Turkey. OECD. 1-24.
  10. Çakmak B., Kibaroglu, A., Kendirli, B., Gokalp, Z. (2010). Assessment of the irrigation performance of transferred schemes in Turkey: a case study analysis. Irrigation and Drainage 59-2, 138–149. Doi: 10.1002/ird.452.
APA
Aydın, M., Yıldırım, M. U., Fayrap, A., & Özdal, H. (2021). Evaluation of the use of prepaid water meter on some irrigation management performance indicators: A case study. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 5(4), 701-708. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2021.4.31
AMA
1.Aydın M, Yıldırım MU, Fayrap A, Özdal H. Evaluation of the use of prepaid water meter on some irrigation management performance indicators: A case study. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2021;5(4):701-708. doi:10.31015/jaefs.2021.4.31
Chicago
Aydın, Mevlüt, Mehmet Uğur Yıldırım, Aynur Fayrap, and Hakan Özdal. 2021. “Evaluation of the Use of Prepaid Water Meter on Some Irrigation Management Performance Indicators: A Case Study”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 5 (4): 701-8. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2021.4.31.
EndNote
Aydın M, Yıldırım MU, Fayrap A, Özdal H (December 1, 2021) Evaluation of the use of prepaid water meter on some irrigation management performance indicators: A case study. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 5 4 701–708.
IEEE
[1]M. Aydın, M. U. Yıldırım, A. Fayrap, and H. Özdal, “Evaluation of the use of prepaid water meter on some irrigation management performance indicators: A case study”, int. j. agric. environ. food sci., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 701–708, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.31015/jaefs.2021.4.31.
ISNAD
Aydın, Mevlüt - Yıldırım, Mehmet Uğur - Fayrap, Aynur - Özdal, Hakan. “Evaluation of the Use of Prepaid Water Meter on Some Irrigation Management Performance Indicators: A Case Study”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 5/4 (December 1, 2021): 701-708. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2021.4.31.
JAMA
1.Aydın M, Yıldırım MU, Fayrap A, Özdal H. Evaluation of the use of prepaid water meter on some irrigation management performance indicators: A case study. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2021;5:701–708.
MLA
Aydın, Mevlüt, et al. “Evaluation of the Use of Prepaid Water Meter on Some Irrigation Management Performance Indicators: A Case Study”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, vol. 5, no. 4, Dec. 2021, pp. 701-8, doi:10.31015/jaefs.2021.4.31.
Vancouver
1.Mevlüt Aydın, Mehmet Uğur Yıldırım, Aynur Fayrap, Hakan Özdal. Evaluation of the use of prepaid water meter on some irrigation management performance indicators: A case study. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2021 Dec. 1;5(4):701-8. doi:10.31015/jaefs.2021.4.31