Effects of different rootstocks on the growth and yield characteristics of Papazkarası (Vitis vinifera L.)

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 591 - 601, 29.09.2024

Elman Bahar , Ilknur Korkutal , Semih Erişken

https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2024.3.12

Öz

Rootstocks, which are becoming increasingly important in viticulture, influence the growth, yield, and grape quality of the grafted variety. Therefore, understanding the resistance characteristics of rootstocks to phylloxera, nematodes, environmental conditions, and abiotic and biotic stresses is crucial. Selecting a rootstock that is appropriate for the region where the vineyard will be established optimizes grape quality. The aim of this research is to determine the performance of the cv. Papazkarası on different rootstocks. For this purpose, an experiment was established at Irem Çamlica Viticulture and Winery Co. vineyard in Kırklareli province. Ten-year-old Papazkarası vines grafted onto 1103P, 110R, and 420A rootstocks were used as plant material. To determine the growth of the vines, parameters such as shoot elongation rate (cm/week), shoot length changings (cm), pruning wood weight (PW) (kg/vine), vigor (g), puissance, number of buds per square meter (number), balanced pruning buds number (number/vine), vegetative growth (VG), Ravaz Index (RI), Partridge Index (PI), and yield (kg/vine) were examined. Additionally, to determine cluster characteristics, cluster width and length (cm), weight (g), and the volume of gappy and spaceless clusters (cm³) were measured. The results of the research indicated that the 1103P rootstock had the lowest yield, puissance, RI, PI, and VG values; moderate values for PW, vigor, number of shoots, number of berries per cluster, and cluster length; and the highest values for cluster weight, the volume of gappy and spaceless clusters. The 110R rootstock was found to be more balanced compared to other rootstocks, with the highest values for vigor, RI, and PI; average values for yield, puissance, and VG; and the lowest values for PW, number of shoots, number of berries per cluster, cluster length, weight, and the volume of gappy and spaceless clusters. The 420A rootstock had the highest values for yield, PW, VG, number of shoots, number of berries per cluster, and cluster width and length; average values for RI, PI, cluster weight, and the volume of gappy and spaceless clusters; and the lowest value for one-year-old cane weight. In conclusion, based on the characteristics outlined, a selection can be made from these rootstocks according to cultivation purposes, but other rootstocks should also be investigated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Autochthonous, Thrace, Cluster, Partridge Index, Ravaz Index

Teşekkür

This research was a part of third authors MSc. Thesis (YOK Thesis No: 760210 / Date: 21.07.2022). The authors would like to express their gratitude to Mr. Mustafa Çamlıca, the owner of Irem Çamlıca Viticulture and Winery Co., for providing permission to conduct this research in his vineyard.

Kaynakça

• Abdel-Mohsen, M. A. & Rashedy, A. A. (2023). Callusing soil of grafted grape cuttings as a positive feature for climate change. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 46, e-019. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452024019
• Anonim (1990). Standart grape variety catalogue. (Ed: Gökçe, M. H.) Tarım Orman ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Yayın Dairesi Başkanlığı. Mesleki Yayınlar Seri 15. Ankara.
• Atak, A. (2022). New perspectives in grapevine (Vitis spp.) breeding (Chapter 13). In: Case Studies of Breeding Strategies in Major Plant Species (Ed: Wang, H). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105194
• Atak, A., Ergönül, O., Dilli, Y., Kesgin, M. & Altındişli, A. (2023). Grapevine breeding studies in Turkey. Acta Horticulturae. 1370, 145-152. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2023.1370.18
• Atak, A. (2024). Climate change and adaptive strategies on viticulture (Vitis spp.). Open Agriculture, 9 (1), 20220258. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0258
• Bahar, E., Korkutal, İ. & Kök, D. (2008). Taking ratio and carbohydrate-nitrogen accumulation of woody tissues of grafted vines grown in hydroponic culture and nursery conditions. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 21 (1), 15-26 (in Turkish).
• Bahar, E. & Öner, H. (2016). Effects of different cultural treatments on yield traits in cv. Cabernet-Sauvignon. Bahçe, Special Issue 45, 591-598 (in Turkish).
• Bahar, E., Korkutal, İ. & Tok Abay, C. (2023). Effects of abiotic and biotic stresses applied to grapevines in late-stage on cluster characteristics. (Ed: Kunter, B., Keskin, N., Cantürk, S.) Viticulture Studies: Traditional and modern approaches. İksad Publications. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10444909
• Bahar, E., Korkutal, İ. & Tok Abay, C. (2024). Grape berry morphology in semi-arid climate of Tekirdağ: evaluating the effects of environmental factors and stress applications. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 7 (2), 144-156. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1409746
• Bona, C. M., Gould, J. H., Creighton, J., Miller, Jr., Mceachern, G. R., Setamou, M. & Louzada, E. S. (2007). In vitro micropropagation of nine grape cultivars. Subtropical Plant Science, 59, 56-63.
• Bozan, B., Tosun, G. & Özcan, D. (2008). Study of polyphenol content in the seeds of red grape (Vitis vinifera L.) varieties cultivated in Turkey and their antiradical activity. Food Chemistry, 109, 426-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.12.056
• Candar, S., Demirkapı, E. K., Ekiz, M., Alço, T., Korkutal, İ. & Bahar, E. (2022). Effects of restricted irrigation on root morphological properties of wine grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 27 (3), 601-614. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1104298
• Carbonneau, A., Champagnol, F., Deloire, A. & Sevilla, F. (1998). Récolte et qualité du raisin, in C. Flanzy Fondements Scientifiques et Technologiques Lavoisier Tec & Doc ed.
• Carbonneau, A., Deloire, A. & Jaillard, B. (2007). La vigne. Physiologie, terroir, culture. Dunod.
• Cookson, S. J., Moreno, M. J. C., Hevin, C., Mendome, L. Z. N., Delrot, S., Trossat-Magnin, C. & Ollat, N. (2014). Heterografting with nonself rootstocks induces genes involved in stress responses at the graft interface when compared with autografted controls. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65 (9), 2473-2481. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru145
• Corso, M. & Bonghi, C. (2014). Grapevine rootstock effects on abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Science Today, 1 (3), 108-13. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2014.1.3.64
• Csikász-Krizsics, A. & Diófási, L. (2008). Effects of rootstock-scion combinations on macro elements availability of the vines. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 9 (3), 495-504.
• Çelik, H. (2006). Grape variety catalogue. Sun Fidan A.Ş. Mesleki Kitaplar Serisi: 3.
• Di Filippo, M. & Vila, H. (2011). Influence of different rootstocks on the vegetative and reproductive performance of Vitis vinifera L. Malbec under irrigated conditions. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin, 45 (2), 75-84.
• El-Gendy, R. S. S. (2013). Evaluation of Flame Seedless grapevines grafted on some rootstocks. Journal of Horticultural Science and Ornamental Plants, 5 (1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.jhsop.2013.5.1.267
• Faikoğlu, F. (2014). Investigation of quality and sensory properties of hardaliye produced with Adakarası, Papaz Karası and Kalecik Karası grape varieties. Uludağ University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Food Engineering, MSc. Thesis, Bursa, Türkiye, 73p.
• Fayek, M. A., Ali, A. E. M. & Rashedy, A. A. (2022). Water soaking and benzyladenine as strategy for improving grapevine grafting success. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 44 (3), e-946. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452022946
• Ferrandino, A., Pagliarani, C. & Pérez-Álvarez, E. P. (2023). Secondary metabolites in grapevine: crosstalk of transcriptional, metabolic and hormonal signals controlling stress defence responses in berries and vegetative organs. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1124298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1124298
• Gülcü, M., Taşeri, L., Boz, Y. & Dağlıoğlu, F. (2018). Determination of suitability grades to grape juice of some native grape varieties. Bahçe, 47 (Special Issue 1), 381-388 (in Turkish).
• Harbertson, J. F. & Keller, M. (2012). Rootstock effects on deficit-irrigated winegrapes in a dry climate: Grape and wine composition. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 63 (1), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2011.11079
• Keller, M., Lynn, J. M. & Harbertson, J. F. (2012). Rootstock effects on deficit-irrigated winegrapes in a dry climate: Vigor, yield formation, and fruit ripening. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 63 (1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2011.11078
• Ibacache, A. G. & Sierra, C. B. (2009). Influence of rootstocks on nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content in petioles of four table grape varieties. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 69 (4), 503-508.
• Karaca Sanyürek, N., Tahmaz, H., Çakır, A. & Söylemezoğlu, G. (2018). Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of some grape varieties grown in Tunceli province. Turkish J Agric. and Natural Sci., 5 (4), 551-555 (in Turkish). https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.471340
• KMM (2022). Records of Kırklareli Meteorology Directorate . Demirtaş Mah., Fuat Umay Caddesi, No: 27, Kırklareli, Türkiye.
• Korkutal, İ., Bahar, E. & Güvemli Dündar, D. (2019). Examination of the vineyard structure of Edirne province Uzunköprü country. COMU Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 7 (1), 127-136 (in Turkish). https://doi.org/10.33202/comuagri.457451
• Koundouras, S., Hatzidimitriou, E., Karamolegkou, M., Dimopoulou, E., Kallithraka, S., Tsialtas, J. T., Zioziou, E., Nikolaou, N. & Kotseridis, Y. (2009). Irrigation and phenolic concentration and aroma potential rootstock effects, Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet-Sauvignon grapes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57, 7805-7813. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf901063a
• Lacombe, T., Boursiquot, J. M., Laucou, V., Staraz, M. D. V., Péros, J. P. & This, P. (2012). Large-scale parentage analysis in an extended set of grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 126 (2), 401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-012-1988-2.
• Lorenz, D. H., Eichhorn, K. W., Bleiholder, H., Klose, R., Meier, U. & Weber, E. (1995). Phenological growth stages of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. vinifera) codes and descriptions according to the extended BBCH scale. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 1, 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.1995.tb00085.x
• Mariani, L. & Ferrante, A. (2017). Agronomic management for enhancing plant tolerance to abiotic stresses-drought, salinity, hypoxia, and lodging. Horticulturae, 3, 52. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae3040052.
• Mattii G. B., Orlandini S. & Calabrese C. E. (2005). Analysis of grapevine vegeto-productive responses to plant density and rootstock. International GiESCO Viticulture Congress 14. August, 23-27, Geisenheim, 2, 629-634.
• OIV (2009). 2nd Edition of the OIV descriptor list for grape varieties and Vitis species. 178p.
• Opazo, I., Toro, G., Salvatierra, A., Pastenes, C. & Pimentel, P. (2020). Rootstocks modulate the physiologyand growth responses to water deficit and long-term recovery in grafted stone fruit trees. Agricultural Water Management, 228, 105897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105897
• Ozen, T., Gurnil, K., Ozisik, S. & Usta, K. 1993. Influence of various rootstocks on the some quality properties of the must and yield of cv. Papazkarası. Tekirdag Viticultural Research Institute, 20p. Retrieved in June, 19, 2024 from https://agris.fao.org/search/en/providers/122624/records/6472350553aa8c8963022fa1
• Partridge, N. L. (1925). Growth and yield of Concord grape vines. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 22, 84-87.
• Plantgrape (2024). Catalogue of grapevines cultivated in France. Retrieved in June, 19, 2024 from https://plantgrape.plantnet-project.org/en/porte-greffe/110%20Richter
• Ravaz, L. (1903). Sur la brunissure de la vigne. Les Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 136, 1276-1278.
• Rizk-Alla M. S., Sabry, G. H. & Abd-El-Wahab, M. A. (2011). Influence of some rootstocks on the performance of Red Globe grape cultivar. Journal of American Science, 7 (4), 71-81. doi:10.7537/marsjas070411.13
• Rodriguez, J., Galarraga, L., Cavagnaro, R., Ocvirk, M. & Matus, M. (1998). Evaluación de clones y portainjertos en Mendoza. UVA, 72, 12-13.
• Sampaio, T. & Vasconcelos, C. (2005). Optimizing water status, gas-exchange, fruit yield and composition using rootstocks. International GiESCO Viticulture Congress 14. August, 23-27, Geisenheim, 2, 115-118.
• Santarosa, E., Souza, P. V., Mariath, J. E. & Lourosa, G. V. (2015). Physiological interaction between rootstock-scion: effects on xylem vessels in Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot grapevines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 67 (1), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2015.15003
• Satisha, S. J., Somkuwar, R., Sharma, J., Upadhyay, A. & Adsule, P. (2010). Influence of rootstocks on growth yield and fruit composition of Thompson Seedless grapes grown in the Pune region of India. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 31 (1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.21548/31-1-1392
• Shaulis, N. (1950). Cultural practices for New York vineyards. Cornell Extension Bulletin 805.
• Skinkis, P. A. & Vance, A. J. (2013). Understanding vine balance: An important concept in vineyard management. EM 9068. Oregon State University, Extension Service. June 2013, 10p.
• Smart, R. E., Dick, J. K., Gravett, I. M. & Fisher, B. M. (1990). Canopy management to improve grape yield and wine quality-principles and practices. South African Society for Enology and Viticulture, 11 (1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.21548/11-1-2232
• Stevens, R. M., Pech, J. M., Gibberd, M. R., Walker, R. R., Jones, J. A., Taylor, J. & Nicholas P. R. (2008). The effect of reduced irrigation on growth, yield, ripening rates and water relations of Chardonnay vines grafted on five rootstocks. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 14, 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2008.00018.x
• Striegler, K. R., Morris, R. J., Main, L. G. & Lake, B. C. (2002). Effect of rootstock on fruit composition, yield, growth, and vine nutritional status of Cabernet Franc. Proceedings of the Grapevine Rootstocks: Current Use, Research, and Application. 2005 Rootstock Symposium. Osage Beach, Missouri February 5, 2005.pp. 84-105.
• Tandonnet, J. P., Decroocq, S., Gaudillère, J. P., Fouquet, R. & Ollat, N. (2005). Conferred vigour by rootstocks in grapevine: evaluation of some hypothesis. International GiESCO Viticulture Congress 14. August, 23-27, Geisenheim, 2, 120-125.
• Tedesco, S., Pina, A., Fevereiro, P. & Kragler, F. (2020). A phenotypic search on graft compatibility ingrapevine. Agronomy, 10 (5), 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050706
• Todorov, H. (1970). Research on the shaking of flower buds and other changes during the bud transformation phase. (Bulgarian). Gradinarska i Lazarska Nauka, 1. Bŭlgarska Akademii.
• Ulaş, S., Güler, A. & Candemir, A. (2014). Effect of rootstocks on different physiological parameters in some grape cultivars, Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 1 (Special Issue 1), 1097-1100.
• Whiting, J. (2003). Selection of grapevine rootstocks and clones for Greater Victoria. Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 500, East Melbourne, Vic. 3002.
• Whiting, J. (2012). Rootstock breeding and associated R&D in the viticulture and wine industry. Wine and Viticulture Journal, 27 (6), 52-54.
• Yazar, K., Kara, Z., Doğan, O. & Akinci, S. P. S. (2023). The effects of rootstock-scion relationships on yield and quality in grapevine cv. Ekşi Kara (Vitis vinifera L.). Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 37 (2), 248-257.
• Zombardo, A., Crosatti, C., Bagnaresi, P., Bassolino, L., Reshef, N., Puccioni, S., Faccioli, P., Tafuri, A., Delledonne, M., Fait, A., Storchi, P., Cattivelli, L. & Mica, E. (2020). Transcriptomic and biochemical investigations support the role of rootstock-scion interaction in grapevine berry quality. BMC Genomics, 21, 468. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06795-5