Reducing Carbon Footprint of Pop-Art Chair Designs By Ecodesign Strategies

Çağrı Uludüz; Serkan Sipahi; Neslihan Kulözü

doi:10.35229/jaes.1514795

EN TR

Reducing Carbon Footprint of Pop-Art Chair Designs By Ecodesign Strategies

Abstract

Reducing the footprint of industrial pieces since the design stage is a modern concern of practitioners and scholars. In the context of industrial design, the ecodesign approach aims at minimizing environmental impact from the early stages of the product lifecycle. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a widely used methodology to evaluate environmental impacts, relying on the cradle-to-grave metaphor. The purpose of this article is to identify how and to what extent LCA can reduce the carbon footprints of products in the early stage, the design. The research method is the multiple case study. The research object is a set of nine pop-art chairs. The CCaLC software supported the study. The study reviewed the original designs aiming at reducing carbon footprints by relying on eco-design strategies. The findings show that expressive reduction can be achieved, even by preserving vintage features, aesthetic values, and usefulness. The study concludes that is possible, owing to eco-design strategies, to significantly reduce the carbon footprints of design products without jeopardizing performance.

Keywords

Ecodesign , life cycle analysis (lca) , carbon footprint , chair design , pop-art.

Ekotasarım Stratejileri ile Pop-Art Sandalye Tasarımlarının Karbon Ayak İzinin Azaltılması

Öz

Endüstriyel ürünlerin karbon ayak izini tasarım aşamasından itibaren azaltmak, uygulayıcılar ve akademisyenler için modern bir endişe konusudur. Endüstriyel tasarım bağlamında eko-tasarım yaklaşımı, ürün yaşam döngüsünün erken aşamalarından itibaren çevresel etkiyi en aza indirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yaşam Döngüsü Değerlendirmesi (YDD), çevresel etkileri değerlendirmek için geniş çapta kullanılan ve beşikten mezara metaforuna dayanan bir metodolojidir. Bu makalenin amacı, YDD'nin ürünlerin tasarım aşamasındaki karbon ayak izlerini nasıl ve ne ölçüde azaltabileceğini belirlemektir. Araştırma, dokuz pop-art sandalye tasarımı üzerinden gerçekleştirilen bir çoklu vaka çalışmasıdır. Çalışmada, karbon ayak izlerini azaltmaya yönelik eko-tasarım stratejileri temelinde özgün tasarımlar irdelenmiş; karbon ayak izlerinin hesaplanmasında CCaLC yazılımından yararlanılmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgular; vintage özellikleri, estetik değerleri ve işlevselliği koruyarak bile anlamlı bir karbon ayak izi azalımı sağlanabileceğini göstermektedir. Çalışma, ekotasarım stratejileri sayesinde tasarım ürünlerinin, performansını tehlikeye atmadan, karbon ayak izlerinin önemli ölçüde azaltılabileceğinin mümkün olduğu sonucuna ulaşmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ekotasarım , yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesi (ydd) , karbon ayak izi , sandalye tasarımı , pop-art

Kaynakça

Alderson, S., Ball, R. & Barber, E. (2006). Pioneers: Products from Phaidon design classics: 1,2,3. Phaidon Press, Londra.
Anonymous. (2018). Chair: 500 designs that matter. Phaidon Publishing, London.
Antmen, A. (2009). 20. yüzyıl batı sanatında akımlar. Sel Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
Barca, S. (2011). Energy, property, and the industrial revolution narrative. Ecological Economics, 70(7), 1309-1315. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.012
Borchardt, M., Sellitto, M.A., Pereira, G.M. & Gomes, L.P. (2012). Eco-design case studies for furniture companies using the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 19(8), 330-340.
Bovea, M.D. & Vidal, R. (2004). Materials selection for sustainable product design: A case study of wood- based furniture eco-design. Materials & Design, 25(2), 111-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2003.09.018
Cinar, H. (2005). Eco-design and furniture: Environmental impacts of wood-based panels, surface and edge finishes. Forest Products Journal, 55(11), 27-33.
Cordella, M. & Hidalgo, C. (2016). Analysis of key environmental areas in the design and labelling of furniture products: Application of a screening approach based on a literature review of LCA studies. Sustainable Production & Consumption, 8: 64-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2016.07.002
Cordero, M. P., & Poler, R. (2012). Eco-Design in the furniture and wood-processing sector in Spain: Benefits and constraints. In Industrial Engineering: Innovative Networks, 147-155p. Springer London, Londra. DOI: 10.1007/978-1- 4471-2321-7_17
European Commission. (2016). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/lifecycle assessment.html. (24 Aralık 2020). Fiell, C. & Fiell, P. (2019). 100 Ideas that changed design. Laurence King Publishing, Londra.

Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M.Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D. & Suh, S. (2009). Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 1-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018
Guinee, J.B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P., Buonamici, R., Ekvall, T. & Rydberg, T. (2011). Life cycle assessment: Past, present, and future. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(1), 90-96. DOI: 10.1021/es101316v
Gonzalez-Garcia, S., Gasol, C.M., Lozano, R.G., Moreira, M.T., Gabarrell, X., Rieradevalli Pons, J. & Feijoo, G. (2011). Assessing the global warming potential of wooden products from the furniture sector to improve their ecodesign. Science of The Total Environment, 410-411, 16-25. DOI: 0.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.059
Gonzalez-Garcia, S., Garcia Lozano, R., Moreira, M.T., Gabarrell, X., Rieradevall i Pons, J., Feijoo, G. & Murphy, R.J. (2012). Eco- innovation of a wooden childhood furniture set: An example of environmental solutions in the wood sector. Science of The Total Environment, 426, 318-326. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.077
Hahnel, G., Whyte, A. & Biswas, W.K. (2021). A comparative life cycle assessment of structural flooring systems in Western Australia. Journal of Building Engineering, 35, 102109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102109
Hartini, S., Wicaksono, P.A., Prastawa, H., Hadyan, A.F. & Sriyanto. (2019). The environmental impact assessment of furniture production process using the life cycle assessment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science & Engineering, 598(1), 012078. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/598/1/012078 Hill, M.K. (2020). Understanding environmental pollution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Iritani, D.R., Silva, D.A.L., Saavedra, Y.M.B., Grael, P.F.F. & Ometto, A.R. (2015). Sustainable strategies analysis through Life Cycle Assessment: A case study in a furniture industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 308-318. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.029
ISO14040. (2006). International standard. Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework; International Organization for Standardization.
ISO14044. (2006). International Standard. Environmental management-life cycle assessment-requirements and guidelines; International Organization for Standardization.
Jeswani, H.K., Smith, R.W. & Azapagic, A. (2013). Energy from waste: Carbon footprint of incineration and landfill biogas in the UK. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(1), 218-229. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-012-0441- 8
Klinpikul, N., & Srichandr, P. (2009). Status of eco- design in Thai furniture industry. Key Engineering Materials, 419-420: 769-772. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.419-420.769 Kulözü-Uzunboy, N. & Sipahi, S. (2020). Mimaride karbon ayak izini azaltmaya yönelik uygulamalı bir ders deneyimi. Journal of International Social Research, 13(73), 517-525.
Kulözü-Uzunboy, N. & Kocabaş, A. (2021). Aydınlanma ekseninde insan-çevre iliskisinde yasanan degisime odaklanılarak modernitenin çevresel sonuçlarının kentlesme ve planlama ile birlikte irdelenmesi. Sürdürülebilir Çevre Dergisi, 1(2), 13-24.
Landeta‐Manzano, B., Arana‐Landín, G., RuizdeArbulo, P. & DíazdeBasurto, P. (2016). Longitudinal analysis of the eco‐design management standardization process in furniture companies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(5), 1356-1369. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12479
Mirabella, N., Castellani, V. & Sala, S. (2014). LCA for assessing environmental benefit of eco-design strategies and forest wood short supply chain: A furniture case study. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(8), 1536-1550. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-014-0757-7
Medeiros, D.L., Tavares, A.O. do C., Raposo, A.L.Q.R. e S. & Kiperstok, A. (2017). Life cycle assessment in the furniture industry: The case study of an office cabinet. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 22(11), 1823- 1836. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-017-1370-3
Olagunju, B.D. & Olanrewaju, O.A. (2020). Comparison of life cycle assessment tools in cement production. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 31(4). DOI: 10.7166/31-4-2317
Olkowicz, M. & Grzegorzewska, E. (2014). Eco-design as a strategic way to competitiveness in global markets for furniture family-owned MSMEs. Journal of Intercultural Management, 6(4-1), 203-214. DOI: 10.2478/joim-2014-0046
Parikka-Alhola, K. (2008). Promoting environmentally sound furniture by green public procurement. Ecological Economics, 68(1-2), 472-485. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.004
Paul, B.D. (2008). A History Of The Concept Of Sustainable Development: Literature Review, The Annals Of The University Of Oradea. Economic Sciences Series, 17, 576-580.
Pereira, D., Cunha, S.K. da. & Pereira, L. (2018). Ecodesign in the furniture industry: opportunities and challenges for organizational insertion. Ambiente & Sociedade, 21, 1-17. DOI: 10.1590/1809-4422asoc0079r1vu18l1ao
Schramm, A., Richter, F. & Götze, U. (2020). Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment for manufacturing – analysis of existing approaches. Procedia Manufacturing, 43, 712-719. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.115
Sellitto, M.A., Luchese, J., Bauer, J.M., Saueressig, G.G. & Viegas, C.V. (2017). Ecodesign practices in a furniture industrial cluster of southern brazil: From incipient practices to improvement. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, 19(01), 1750001.
Sı̇pahı̇, M. & Yilmaz, H. (2022). Planning experience on the factors affecting the physical land use change and temporal change in the Eastern Black Sea coastal settlements; the case of Çayeli. Journal of Anatolian Environmental & Animal Sciences, 7(4), 397-405. DOI: 10.35229/jaes.1153664
Sipahi, S. & Kulözü-Uzunboy, N. (2021). A study on reducing the carbon footprint of architectural buildings based on their materials under the guidance of eco-design strategies. Clean Technologies & Environmental Policy, 23(3), 991-1005. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-020-02009-4
Stearns, P.N. (2020). The industrial revolution in world history. Routledge, New York.
van Hemel, C. (1998). Ecodesign empirically explored: Design for environment in Dutch small and medium sized enterprises. University of Technology, Doktora Tezi. Delft, Hollanda.
van Hemel, C. & Cramer, J. (2002). Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(5), 439-453. DOI: 10.1016/s0959- 6526(02)00013-6
Wenker, J.L., Richter, K. & Rüter, S. (2017). A methodical approach for systematic life cycle assessment of wood‐based furniture. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22(4), 671-685. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12581
Williamson, J.G. (2002). Coping with city growth during the British industrial revolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Xiong, X., Ma, Q., YingyingYuan, Wu, Z. & Zhang, M. (2020). Current situation and key manufacturing considerations of green furniture in China: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 267, 121957. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121957.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Çevresel Değerlendirme ve İzleme

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Çağrı Uludüz
0000-0002-9951-855X
Türkiye

Serkan Sipahi ^*
0000-0002-5684-8671
Türkiye

Neslihan Kulözü
0000-0002-1945-2635
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

17 Aralık 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

11 Temmuz 2024

Kabul Tarihi

4 Ekim 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1514795

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA46NZ84BW

APA

Uludüz, Ç., Sipahi, S., & Kulözü, N. (2024). Reducing Carbon Footprint of Pop-Art Chair Designs By Ecodesign Strategies. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 9(4), 676-686. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1514795

Cited By

Geri Kazanılmış Kağıt Tüketimi Orman Ekolojik Ayak İzi için Öncü Bir Gösterge Olabilir mi? Türkiye Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences

https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1691446

JAES, 2016- 11.yıl

Reducing Carbon Footprint of Pop-Art Chair Designs By Ecodesign Strategies

Abstract

Keywords

Ekotasarım Stratejileri ile Pop-Art Sandalye Tasarımlarının Karbon Ayak İzinin Azaltılması

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

Cited By

Geri Kazanılmış Kağıt Tüketimi Orman Ekolojik Ayak İzi için Öncü Bir Gösterge Olabilir mi? Türkiye Üzerine Bir Araştırma