Araştırma Makalesi

Green Campus Initiatives: Assessing the Impact and Necessity of Sustainable Practises in Higher Education Institutions

Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1 31 Ocak 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Green Campus Initiatives: Assessing the Impact and Necessity of Sustainable Practises in Higher Education Institutions

Abstract

This study examines the implementation and impact of sustainable practises at three universities: University of Copenhagen, University of Nottingham, and Middle East Technical University. Using a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative data analysis and qualitative document review, the research evaluates six key criteria: Energy efficiency, green spaces, waste management, environmental education, carbon footprint reduction, and sustainable transportation. The findings demonstrate significant progress across all institutions in reducing environmental impact, with notable achievements in energy efficiency and carbon emissions reduction. While approaches vary based on local contexts, all universities show a commitment to integrating sustainability into curricula and campus operations. The study reveals that sustainable campus practises contribute positively to environmental conservation, potentially enhance student well-being, and foster environmental consciousness. However, challenges remain, including the need for long-term planning and resource allocation. The research underscores the importance of tailoring sustainability strategies to specific institutional and cultural contexts. It concludes that universities play a crucial role in driving sustainability efforts, not only within their campuses but also in broader societal transitions towards sustainable development. The study recommends further longitudinal research to assess long-term impacts on student behaviour and societal outcomes.

Keywords

sustainable campus , green spaces , energy efficiency , environmental education , waste management , carbon footprint

Kaynakça

  1. Abo-Khalil, A.G. (2024). Integrating sustainability into higher education challenges and opportunities for universities worldwide. Heliyon, 10(9), e29946.
  2. Amaral, A.R., Rodrigues, E., Gaspar, A.R. & Gomes, Á. (2020). A review of empirical data of sustainability initiatives in university campus operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119558.
  3. Balsas, C.J.L. (2003). Sustainable transportation planning on college campuses. Transport Policy, 10(1), 35-49.
  4. Bowen, G.A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
  5. Browning, M. & Rigolon, A. (2019). School green space and its impact on academic performance: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(3), 1- 22.
  6. Brundiers, K., Barth, M., Cebrián, G., Cohen, M., Diaz, L., Doucette‑Remington, S., . . . Zint, M. (2021). Key competencies in sustainability in higher education- toward an agreed‑upon reference framework. Sustainability Science, 16, 13-29.
  7. Denmark Climate & Clean Air Coalition. (n.d.). (2024). Retrieved from https://www.ccacoalition.org/partners/denmark#:~:text =Denmark%20has%20ensured%20ambitious%20clim ate,by%202050%20at%20the%20latest.
  8. Dlouhá, J., Henderson, L., Kapitulčinová, D. & Mader, C. (2018). Sustainability-oriented higher education networks: Characteristics and achievements in the context of the UN DESD. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4263-4276.
  9. Ebrahimi, K. & North, L. (2017). Effective strategies for enhancing waste management at university campuses. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(7), 1123-1141.
  10. Esser, F. & Vliegenthart, R. (2017). Comparative research methods, In: Matthes C. S. D. & Potter R. F. (Eds.), The international encyclopaedia of communication research methods, 1-22p, Wiley-Blackwell, USA.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Sütünç, H. S. (2025). Green Campus Initiatives: Assessing the Impact and Necessity of Sustainable Practises in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 10(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1539272