Sivas (Türkiye)’da Satılan Ambalajlanmış Doğal Mineralli Suların Bazı Kimyasal Özellikleri için Karşılaştırmalı Bir Çalışma

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3, 261 - 266, 30.05.2025

Seher Dirican

https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1614428

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Sivas’da satılan ambalajlanmış doğal mineralli suların bazı kimyasal özellikleri araştırılmış ve etiket değerleri ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Etiket ve laboratuvar bulguları arasındaki karşılaştırmalar için eşleştirilmiş t-testi kullanılmıştır. Etiket ve laboratuvar bulguları arasında florür (p=0.042*), magnezyum (p=0.009**) ve sülfat (p=0.000**) için istatistiksel olarak önemli farklar bulunmuştur. Maksimum değerler, etiket bulguları için pH (8.30), kalsiyum (85.60 ppm), klorür (6.60 ppm), florür (0.12 ppm), demir (0.03 ppm), magnezyum (21.10 ppm), potasyum (1.50 ppm), sülfat (8.00 ppm); laboratuvar bulguları için pH (8.14), kalsiyum (39.98 ppm), klorür (4.00 ppm), florür (0.01 ppm), demir (0.30 ppm), magnezyum (23.97 ppm), potasyum (0.00 ppm), sülfat (0.00 ppm) olarak belirlenmiştir. Tüm ambalajlanmış doğal mineralli su örneklerinden elde edilen bu sonuçlar, içme suyu için önerilen ulusal ve uluslararası standartların altındadır. Aynı zamanda, Sivas’da ambalajlanmış doğal mineralli suların florür içeriğinin oldukça düşük olduğu belirlenmiştir ve bu da yerel halk sağlığına diş çürümeleri şeklinde olumsuz etkiler yapabilir. Bu vesile ile Sivas halkı, hangi ambalajlı doğal mineralli suları içeceğine karar verirken seçici davranmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sağlık , ambalajlanmış , doğal , mineral , su , kalite

Proje Numarası

-

A Comparative Study for Some Chemical Properties of Packaged Natural Mineral Water Sold in Sivas (Türkiye)

Öz

In the study, some chemical properties of packaged natural mineral water sold in Sivas were researched and compared with sticker values. The paired t-test statistic was used for comparisons between the sticker and laboratory findings. There were statistically significant differences for fluoride (p=0.042*), magnesium (p=0.009**) and sulfate (p=0.000**) between sticker and laboratory findings. The maximum values were observed to be as pH (8.30), calcium (85.60 ppm), chloride (6.60 ppm), fluoride (0.12 ppm), iron (0.03 ppm), magnesium (21.10 ppm), potassium (1.50 ppm), sulphate (8.00 ppm) in sticker findings and pH (8.14), calcium (39.98 ppm), chloride (4.00 ppm), fluoride (0.01 ppm), iron (0.30 ppm), magnesium (23.97 ppm), potassium (0.00 ppm), sulphate (0.00 ppm) in laboratory findings for water samples. These results obtained from all packaged natural mineral water samples were below the proposed standards of national and international for drinking water. At the same time, the fluoride content of packaged natural mineral waters in Sivas was determined to be fairly small which may be detrimental in the health of local inhabitants for dental carries. Hereby, the people of Sivas should be selective when deciding which packaged natural mineral waters to drink.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Health , packaged , natural , mineral , water , quality

Etik Beyan

-

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

Teşekkür

-

Kaynakça

• CDWQ. (2017). Guidelines for Canadian drinking water quality - summary table. Water and Air Quality Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, February 2017, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 32 pp.
• Dissanayake, C.B. (1991). The fluoride problem in the ground water of Sri Lanka - environmental management and health. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 38(2), 137-15.
• Doğan, A. (2007). Sivas province in terms of macro- economic indicators place in the economy of Turkey and central Anatolia region. Selçuk University Karaman İİBF Journal, Special Issue, 40-52.
• ECDWD. (1998). Drinking water directive 98/83/EC. Official Journal of the European Communities No: L330, 05 December 1998, 54 pp.
• EPA. (2014). Drinking water parameters - microbiological, chemical and indicator parameters in the 2014, drinking water regulations 2014. Environmental Protection Agency, Johnstown Castle Estate, Wexford Ireland, 9 pp.
• Güler, C. (2007). Characterization of Turkish bottled waters using pattern recognition methods. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 86, 86-94.
• Höll, K. (1979). Wasser (untersuchung, beurteilung, aufbereitung, chemie, bakteriologie, virologie, biologie). 6. Auflage de Gruyter, Berlin, 586 pp. Karagülle, M.Z. (2004). Safe water, natural mineral water, spring water. ANKEM Journal, 18(2), 21- 25.
• Karakuş, E., Lorcu, F., & Demiralay, T. (2016). Consumer preferences in the bottled water sector: Edirne province example. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies, 17, 103- 128.
• Kasımlıoğlu, C., & Yılmaz, F. (2014). Investigation of some physical and chemical properties of Tersakan stream (Muğla, Turkey). Journal of Balikesir University Institute of Science and Technology, 16(2), 51-67.
• Ögenler, O., & Okuyaz, S. (2017). A brief evaluation regarding status of water in Turkey. Lokman Hekim Journal, 7(3), 178-186.
• Pürlü, K. (2013). Culture and tourism development strategy plan in Sivas. Culture and Tourism Directorate of Sivas Governor, 49 pp.
• Şavik, E., Demer, S., Memiş, Ü., Doguç, D.K., Çalışkan, T.A., Sezer, M.T., Gültekin, F., & Özgür, N. (2012). Evaluation of drinking water consumed in and around Isparta in terms of content and health. Medical Journal of Süleyman Demirel University, 19(3), 92-102.
• Tümer, E.İ., Birinci, A., & Yıldırım, Ç. (2011). Determination of factor affecting bottled water comsumption: the case of Keçiören county of Ankara province. Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Science, 21(2), 11-19.
• TWRHC. (2005). Turkish waters regulation for human consumption. Official Journal of Turkey Republic, No: 25730, 17 February 2005, 32 pp.
• Ulvi, A., Aydın, S., & Aydın, M.E. (2022). Trihalomethane concentrations in bottled water and fresh water taps. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 11(3), 557-566. DOI: 10.28948/ngmuh.1091070
• WHO. (2009). Calcium and magnesium in drinking water: public health significance. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 180 pp.
• WHO. (2017). Guidelines for drinking water quality: fourth edition incorporating the first addendum. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 541 pp.