Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of the Abundance of Selected Invasive Alien Species and Economically Important Native Species between Fishing and No-Fishing Zones within Marine Protected Areas: A Case Study from Türkiye, Eastern Mediterranean

Cilt: 10 Sayı: 6 30 Kasım 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Comparison of the Abundance of Selected Invasive Alien Species and Economically Important Native Species between Fishing and No-Fishing Zones within Marine Protected Areas: A Case Study from Türkiye, Eastern Mediterranean

Abstract

Marine protected areas are management tools that necessitate the systematic and continuous monitoring of the abundances of sensitive species, economically valuable native species, and alien invasive species. This study aimed to investigate whether there are differences in the abundances of selected invasive alien species and indicator species of economic or ecological importance between fishing zones and no-fishing zones within marine protected areas. The research was conducted in two Special Environmental Protection Areas (Gökova and Datça-Bozburun, Türkiye), where data were collected across four seasons using the underwater visual census method. It has been determined that the abundances of most invasive alien species (e.g. Diadema setosum, Siganus rivulatus, Pterois miles, and Parupeneus forsskali) are higher in fishing zones compared to no-fishing zones. In contrast, the abundances of Epinephelus costae, a native and economically valuable species with relatively high population levels in the area, and Serranus scriba, an ecologically important species, are greater in no-fishing zones. The study also revealed that seasonal variations in the abundances of most species examined were statistically significant. Moreover, larger individuals of Epinephelus costae were predominantly observed in no-fishing zones. Although the study was conducted in a relatively limited area, it suggests that in marine protected areas, the decline of native predators may create opportunities for invasive alien species to become more opportunistic.

Keywords

fisheries management , invasive species , eastern Mediterranean , Epinephelus costae , Pterois miles , Siganus rivulatus

Kaynakça

  1. Bacher, S., Galil, B.S., Nuñez, M.A., Ansong, M., Cassey, P., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Fayvush, G., Hiremath, A.J., Ikegami, M., Martinou, A.F., McDermott, S.M., Preda, C., Vilà, M., Weyl, O.L.F., Fernandez, R.D., & Ryan-Colton, E. (2023). Chapter 4: Impacts of invasive alien species on nature, nature’s contributions to people, and good quality of life. Thematic Assessment Report on Invasive Alien Species and their Control of the Intergovernmental Science- Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, In: H. E. Roy, A. Pauchard, P. Stoett, & T. Renard Truong (Ed). IPBES Secretariat, Bonn, Germany. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7430731
  2. Bilecenoğlu, M., & Çınar, M.E. (2021). Alien Species Threat across Marine Protected Areas of Turkey—An updated Inventory. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(10), 1077. DOI: 10.3390/jmse9101077
  3. Burfeind, D.D., Pitt, K.A., Connolly, R.M. & Byers, J.E. (2013). Performance of non-native species within marine reserves. Biological Invasions, 15, 17-28. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-012-0265-2
  4. Cebrian, E., & Rodríguez-Prieto, C. (2012). Marine invasion in the Mediterranean Sea: the role of abiotic factors when there is no biological resistance. Plos One, 7(2), e31135. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031135
  5. Ceccherelli, G., Addis, P., Atzori, F., Cadoni, N., Casu, M., Coppa, S. ..., & Piazzi, L. (2022). Sea urchin harvest inside marine protected areas: An opportunity to investigate the effects of exploitation where trophic upgrading is achieved. PeerJ, 10, e12971. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12971
  6. Claudet, J., Pelletier, D., Jouvenel, J.Y., Bachet, F., & Galzin, R. (2006). Assessing the effects of marine protected area (MPA) on a reef fish assemblage in a northwestern Mediterranean marine reserve: Identifying community-based indicators. Biological Conservation, 130(3), 349-369. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.030
  7. Costello, M.J., & Ballantine, B. (2015). Biodiversity conservation should focus on no-take marine reserves: 94% of marine protected areas allow fishing. Trends in ecology & evolution, 30(9), 507-509. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.011
  8. Dimitriadis, C., Sini, M., Trygonis, V., Gerovasileiou, V., Sourbès, L., & Koutsoubas, D. (2018). Assessment of fish communities in a Mediterranean MPA: Can a seasonal no-take zone provide effective protection? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 207, 223-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2018.04.012
  9. e Costa, B.H., de Benito-Abelló, C., Pike, E., Turnbull, J., MacCarthy, J., Harasta, N. ..., & Claudet, J. (2025). Marine protected areas stage of establishment and level of protection are good predictors of their conservation outcomes. Cell Reports Sustainability, 2(4). DOI: 10.1016/j.crsus.2025.100345
  10. Edgar, G.J., Stuart-Smith, R.D., Willis, T.J., Kininmonth, S., Baker, S.C., Banks, S. ..., & Thomson, R.J. (2014). Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features. Nature, 506(7487), 216-220. DOI: 10.1038/nature13022

Kaynak Göster

APA
Alan, V., & Öndes, F. (2025). Comparison of the Abundance of Selected Invasive Alien Species and Economically Important Native Species between Fishing and No-Fishing Zones within Marine Protected Areas: A Case Study from Türkiye, Eastern Mediterranean. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 10(6), 816-824. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1773613