The Use of Different Sewing Methods in Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Fish

Yıl 2020, , 373 - 377, 30.09.2020

Tunahan Sancak , Şükrü Önalan

https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.736513

Bu makale için 31 Aralık 2022 tarihinde bir düzeltme yayımlandı. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jaes/issue/73880/1209750

Öz

In this study, it is aimed to compare the sewing methods in wounds created for different purposes in the field of aquaculture. For this purpose, Tilapia fish, which took the second place after carp in the inland waters fish breeding of hot countries, were used. In the study, Control group (n = 3), simple suture (n = 3), U suture (n = 3) and X (Sultan) suture (n = 3) applications were performed. The fish were subjected to 7 days of adaptation before starting the study. During the study, feeding was done once a day with Tetra Discus food. For the formation of cut wounds, scales were removed in Tilapia fish under anesthesia, and 2 cm long incision were performed. As a result of the study, it was observed that the cut wounds were closed on the 6th day in the U suture group, at the end of the 7th day in the control group and simple suture groups, and the 9th day in the X suture group. It was observed that the absorbable suture materials were absorbed in all fish in which they were applied, but in the X suture group, 1 fish was absorbed at the end of the 9th day. It is concluded that it is healthier to prefer simple suture and U suture primarily in areas such as marking, remote sensing, monitoring and management of fish methods, and fish health.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fish diseases, Oreochromis niloticus, Sewing methods, Wound

Kaynakça

• Alderton, D. (2008). Encyclopedia of Aquarium & Pond Fish. Dorling Kindersley, China. p.94.
• Aslanbey, E. (2002). Veteriner genel operasyon bilgisi. Medipres, Ankara, 147-172.
• Bailey, M. & Sandford, G. (1998). The new guide to aquarium fish. Anness Publishing, United Kingdom. p.64.
• Capello, M., Soria, M., Potin, G., Cotel, P. & Dagorn, L. (2013). Effect of current and daylight variations on small-pelagic fish aggregations (Selar crumenophthalmus) around a coastal fish aggregating device studied by fine-scale acoustic tracking. Aquatic Living Resource, 26(1), 63–68.
• Cooke, S.J., Graeb, B.D.S., Suski, C.D. & Ostrand, K.G. (2003). Effects of suture material on incision healing, growth and survival of juvenile largemouth bass implanted with miniature radio transmitters: case study of a novice and experienced fish surgeon. Journal of Fish Biology, 62(1): 1366–1380.
• Cui, M., Zhang, H., Li, J., Liu, R., Wu, M., Xu, D. & Zhang, Q. (2019). Differential PCR detection of Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus iniae in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by a single primer pair. Journal of fish diseases, 42(8), 1211.
• Dagorn, L., Holland, K.N. & Itano, D.G. (2007). Behavior of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (T. obesus) tuna in a network of fish aggregating devices (FADs). Marin Biology, 151(1), 595–606.
• El-Sappah, A.H., Shawky, A.S.H., Sayed-Ahmad, M.S. & Youssef, M.A.H. (2017). Estimation of heat shock protein 70 (hsp 70) gene expression in nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) using quantitative Real-Time PCR. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research, 44(3), 1003-1015.
• Gemci, R. & Ulcay, Y. (2004). Ameliyat iplikleri tipleri özellikleri ve krome katgüt ile normal katgüt arasindaki mukavemet farklari. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 95-105.
• Harms, C.G. & Lewbart, G.A. (2000). Surgery in fish. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice. 3(3), 759-774.
• Jepsen, N., Mikkelsen, J.S. & Koed, A. (2008). Effects of tag and suture type on survival and growth of brown trout with surgically implanted telemetry tags in the wild. Journal of Fish Biology, 72(1) 594–602.
• Karasu, A. & Bakır, B. (2006). Veteriner cerrahide kullanılan dikiş materyalleri. YYÜ Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1-2), 37-44.
• Lescenko, P., Matlova, L., Dvorska, L., Bartos, M., Vavra, O., Navratil, S., Novotny, L. & Pavlik, I. (2003). Mycobacterial infection in aquarium fish. Veterinary Medicine–Czech, 48(3), 71–78.
• Meyer, C.G., Holland, K.N., Wetherbee, B.M. & Lowe, C.G. (2000). Movement patterns, habitat utilization, home range size and site fidelity of whitesaddle goatfish, Parupeneus porphyreus, in a marine reserve. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 59(1), 235–242.
• Noga, E.J. (2010). Fish disease diagnosis and treatment. Second Edt. Wiley-Blackwell, USA. p.13-48.
• Önalan, Ş. (2019). Expression differences of stress and immunity genes in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum 1792) with different bacterial fish diseases. The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture-Bamidgeh. 71(1), 1597-1607.
• Samsar, E. & Akın, F. (2003). Genel cerrahi. Medipress, Malatya, 207-267.
• Sarıeyyüpoğlu, M., Özcan, M. & Barata, S. (2017). Gökkuşağı alabalığı (Oncorhynchus mykiss)’nda deri ensizyonuyla operasyon uygulanması ve balığın canlılığının kontrolü üzerine bir araştırma. Fırat Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 29(1): 9-13.
• Trust, T.J. & Money, V.G. (1972). Bacterial population of diets for aquarium fishes. Journal of the fisheries research board of Canada, 29(1), 429-433.
• Verma, N., Kumari, U., Mittal, S. & Mittal, K. (2017). Effect of asiaticoside on the healing of skin wounds in the carp Cirrhinus mrigala: An immunohistochemical investigation. Tissue Cell, 49(6), 734-745.
• Wagner, G.N. & Cooke, S.J. (2005). Methodological approaches and opinions of researchers involved in the surgical implantation of telemetry transmitters in fish. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health, 17(1), 160–169.
• Wagner, G.N. & Cooke, S.J. (2011). Surgical implantation techniques for electronic tags in fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 21(1), 71–81.
• Zhou, T., Wang, N., Xue, Y., Ding, T., Liu, X., Mo, X. & Sun, J. (2015). Development of biomimetic tilapia collagen nanofibers for skin regeneration through inducing keratinocytes differentiation and collagen synthesis of dermal fibroblasts. ACS applied materials & interfaces, 7(5), 3253-3262.