Dorcadion micans J. Thomson, 1867 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Pronotumunda Geometrik Morfometri Kullanarak Eşeysel Dimorfizm

Yıl 2021, , 88 - 91, 31.03.2021

Atılay Yağmur Okutaner , Aslı Doğan Sarıkaya

https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.824342

Öz

Eşeysel dimorfizm, hayvanlarda fenotipik varyasyonun en önemli kaynaklarından biridir. Birçok türdeki böcekler için eşeysel özelliklerin ifadesi büyük farklılıklar gösterir. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'de endemik tür olan Dorcadion micans J. Thomson, 1867 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) 'da pronotumun eşeysel büyüklük ve şekil dimorfizmini analiz ettik. Sonuçlarımız, pronotumda istatistiksel olarak eşeysel büyüklük ve şekil dimorfizmini göstermiştir. Erkekler dişilerden daha küçük pronotum boyutuyla birlikte daha uzun ve daha keskin bir pronotum şekline sahiptir. Çok değişkenli regresyon sonuçları, büyüklüğün cinsiyetler arasında pronotum şeklindeki farklılaşma üzerinde göz ardı edilebilir bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Coleoptera, Dorcadion micans, eşeysel dimorfizm, geometrik morfometri, pronotum

Sexual Dimorphism of the Pronotum in Dorcadion micans J. Thomson, 1867 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Using Geometric Morphometrics

Öz

Sexual dimorphism is one of the most notable sources of phenotypic variation in animals. The expression of sexual traits varies widely for many species of insects. In this study, we analyzed the sexual size and shape dimorphism of pronotum in Turkish endemic species, Dorcadion micans J. Thomson, 1867 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Our results have showed that there is statistically significant sexual size and shape dimorphism in pronotum. Males have a longer and sharper pronotum shape with smaller pronotum size than females. Multivariate regression results indicated that size has negligible influence on the differentiation in pronotum shape between sexes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Coleoptera, Dorcadion micans, geometric morphometrics, pronotum, sexual dimorphism

Kaynakça

• Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press, USA, 247-297p.
• Benítez, H.A. (2013). Sexual dimorphism using geometric morphometric approach. In: Moriyama H (Ed.) Sexual Dimorphism. IntechOpen, London, 35-50p.
• Benítez, H.A., Sanzana, M.-J., Jerez, V., Parra, L.E., Hernandez, C.E., Canales- Aguirre, C.B., (2013). Sexual shape and size dimorphism in carabid beetles of the genus Ceroglossus: is geometric body size similar between sexes due to sex ratio? Zoological Science, 30, 289-295.
• Bookstein, F.L. (1986). Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions. Statistical Science, 1 (2): 181- 222.
• Brock, T. H., Guinness, F. E., & Albon, S. D. (1982). Red deer: behavior and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago press, USA, 1-40p.
• Dascălu, M. & Fusu, L. (2012). Dorcadion axillare Küster, 1847 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae): distribution, morphometrics, karyotype and description of a new subspecies from Romania. Zootaxa, 3322(3322): 35-48. Doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3322.1.2
• Doğan Sarıkaya, A., Okutaner, A & Sarıkaya, Ö. (2019). Geometric morphometric analysis of pronotum shape in two isolated populations of Dorcadion anatolicum Pic, 1900 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Entomology, 43 (3), 263-270. Doi: 10.16970/entoted.525860.
• Donoso, S. E., Angulo-Bedoya, M., Lemic, D. & Benítez, H. A. (2020). Assessing the influence of allometry on sexual and non-sexual traits: An example in Cicindelidia trifasciata (Coleoptera: Cicindelinae) using geometric morphometrics. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 287, 61-66.
• Eberhard, M. J. (1979). Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 123, 222-234.
• Eldred, T., Meloro, C., Scholtz, C., & Murphy, D. (2019). Does size matter for horny beetles? A geometric morphometric analysis of interspecific and intersexual size and shape variation in Colophon haughtoni 2 Barnard, 1929, and C. kawaii Mizukami, 1997 (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Organism Diversity Evolution, 16, 821-833.
• Emlen, D. J. (1996). Artificial selection on horn length‐body size allometry in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Evolution, 50, 1219-1230.
• Fairbairn, D.J. (2013). Odd Couples: Extraordinary Differences between the Sexes in the Animal Kingdom. Princeton University Press. USA, 1-9p.
• Kelly, C.D. (2020). Sexual selection on size and shape in Japanese beetles (Popillia japonica). Behavioral Ecology, 31(4), 1073–1083. Klingenberg, C.P. (2011). MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11 (2): 353-357.
• Lemic, D., Benítez, H.A. & Bazok, R. (2014). Intercontinental effect on sexual shape dimorphism and allometric relationships in the beetle pest Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Zool. Anz. J. Comp.Zool, 253 (3), 203-206.
• Lemic, D., Benítez, H.A., Püschel, T.A., Gasparic, H.V., Satvar, M. & Bazok, R. (2016). Ecological morphology of the sugar beet weevil Croatian populations: Evaluating the role of environmental conditions on body shape. Zool. Anz. J. Comp.Zool, 260, 25-32.
• Li, S., Ricchiardi, E., Bai, E. M. & Yang, X. (2016). A taxonomy review of Oreoderus Burmeister, 1842 from China with a geometric morphometric evaluation (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Zookeys, 13 (552): 67-89.
• Nair, P., Hunter, A.H., Worsham, M.L., Stehle, M., Gibson, J.R. & Nowlin, W.H. (2019). Sexual dimorphism in three species of Heterelmis Sharp (Coleoptera: Elmidae). Coleopt. Bull, 73, 1075-1083.
• Ober, K. A. & Connolly, T. C. (2015). Geometric morphometric and phylogenetic analyses of Arizona Sky Island populations of Scaphinotus petersi Roeschke (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 175: 107-118.
• Pizzo, A., Mercurio, D., Palestrini, C., Roggero, A. & Rolando, A. (2006). Male differentiation patterns in two polyphenic sister species of the genus Onthophagus Latreille, 1802 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): a geometric morphometric approach. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 44 (1): 54-62.
• Rohlf, F.J. (1999). Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification, 16: 197- 223.
• Rohlf, F.J. (2013). tpsDig, 2.17 (Web page: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph) (Date accessed:11.05.2020).
• Vesovic, N., Ivanovic, A. & Curcic, S. (2019). Sexual size and shape dimorphism in two ground beetle taxa, Carabus (Procrustes) coriaceus cerisyi and C.(Morphocarabus) kollari praecellens (Coleoptera: Carabidae)-A geometric morphometric approach. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 49, 1-9.
• Zelditch, M., Swiderski, D, Sheets, D. & Fink, W. (2004). Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Elsevier, London: 1-70p.