Evaluation of Sorghum and Ryegrass Silage as Alternatives to Corn Silage
Yıl 2023,
Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 467 - 473, 30.09.2023
Alparslan Mutluhan Türedi
,
İbrahim Sadi Çetingül
Öz
Silage; They are feed pickles obtained by storing green plants under anaerobic conditions. It provides an important source of roughage during the winter months and is of interest to producers for many reasons. The most cultivated silage product is corn. Maize is an important source of feed for large ruminant and small ruminant in their rations. However, maize is a hot season crop and the yield is adversely affected by the lack of precipitation in arid and semi-arid regions. At the same time, intensive use of fertilizers is needed for satisfactory maize production. Sorghum; It has been reported that it can tolerate soils with less fertile water use efficiency compared to maize in arid, semi-arid and high salinity areas. Sorghum production has low water needs and agriculture requirements. Ryegrass; Lolium spp. is a key fodder crop in temperate regions. Ryegrass silage; It stood out for yield, digestibility, water-soluble carbohydrate content, quality and durability. In addition, ryegrass cultivation stands out as an advantageous aspect as it allows more than one mowing. Profitable livestock farming; it depends on the cost of forage and the consumption of concentrated feed. If the silage making techniques are applied correctly, the producer can obtain the roughage from ryegrass, sorghum and corn silages. Profitable, high yield parameters and sustainable livestock activities can be done.
Kaynakça
-
Basmacıoğlu, H. & Ergül, M. (2002). Silaj
Mikrobiyolojisi. Hayvansal Üretim, 43(1), 12-24.
http://dergipark.gov.tr/hayuretim/issue/7629/999
36
-
Baldinger, L., Zollitsch, W. & Knaus, W. (2014). Maize
silage and Italian ryegrass silage as high-energy
forages in organic dairy cow diets: Differences in
feed intake, milk yield and quality, and nitrogen
efficiency. Renewable Agriculture and Food
Systems, 29(4), 378-387. DOI:
10.1017/S1742170513000252
-
Behling Neto, A., Reis, R.H.P.D., Cabral, L.D.S.,
Abreu, J.G.D., Sousa, D.D.P., & Sousa, F.G.D.
(2017). Nutritional value of sorghum silage of
different purposes. Ciência e Agrotecnologia,
41(3), 288-299. DOI: 10.1590/1413-
70542017413038516
-
Bernard, J.K., West, J.W., & Trammell, D.S. (2002).
Effect of replacing corn silage with annual
ryegrass silage on nutrient digestibility, ıntake and
milk yield for lactating dairy cows. Journal of
Dairy Science, 85(9), 2277-2282. DOI:
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74307-5
-
Borreani, G., Tabacco, E., Schmidt, R.J., Holmes, B.J.
& Muck, R.E. (2018). Silage review: factors
affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages.
Journal of Dairy Science, 101(5), 3952-3979.
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13837
-
Chaves, B., De Vliegher, A., Van Waes, J., Carlier, L.,
& Marynissen, B. (2009). Change in agronomie
performance of Lolium perenne and Lolium
multiflorum varieties in the past 40 years based on
data from Belgian VCU trials. Plant Breeding,
128(6), 680-690. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-
0523.2009.01621.x
-
Chen, L., Dong, Z., Li, J. & Shao, T. (2019). Ensiling
characteristics, in vitro rumen fermentation,
microbial communities and aerobic stability of
low-dry matter silages produced with sweet
sorghum and alfalfa mixtures. Journal of the
Science of Food and Agriculture, 99(5), 2140-
2151. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9406
-
Chiambiro, G., Madzimure, J. & Mpofu, I.D.T. (2022).
Constraints and opportunities of sweet sorghum
(Sorghum bicolor L.) silage production and
utilisation by smallholder milk production sector
in Zimbabwe. Tropical Animal Health and
Production, 54(2), 105. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-
022-03084-z
-
Colombini, S., Galassi, G., Crovetto, G.M. & Rapetti,
L. (2012). Milk production, nitrogen balance, and
fiber digestibility prediction of corn, whole plant
grain sorghum, and forage sorghum silages in the
dairy cow. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(8), 4457-
4467. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4444
-
Elferink, S.J.W.H.O., Driehuis, F., Gottschal, J.C., &
Spoelstra, S.F. (2000). Silage fermentation
processes and their manipulation. FAO Plant
Production and Protection Papers, 17-30.
-
Ergün A., Tuncer Ş.D., Çolpan İ., Yalçın S., Yıldız G.
vd. (2016). Yemler Yem Hijyeni ve Teknolojisi.
Genişletilmiş 6. Baskı, Kardelen Ofset,
Ankara.0020
-
FAO. (2021). Faostat Analytıcal Brıef 60 Agricultural
Production Statistics 2000-2021 Faostat
Analytical Brief 60 Faostat Crops And Lıvestock
Productıon Introductıon. Agricultural Production
Statistics 2000-2021, 60, 1-17.
-
Getachew, G., Putnam, D.H., De Ben, C.M. & De
Peters, E.J. (2016). Potential of sorghum as an
alternative to corn forage. American Journal of
Plant Sciences, 07(07), 1106-1121. DOI:
10.4236/ajps.2016.77106
-
Hadebe, S. T., Modi, A. T. & Mabhaudhi, T. (2017).
Drought tolerance and water use of cereal crops:
A focus on sorghum as a food security crop in sub‐
Saharan Africa. Journal of Agronomy and Crop
Science, 203(3), 177-191.
-
Kaiser, A.G., Piltz, J.W., Burns, H.M. & Neil, W.G.
(2004). Successful silage. Dairy Australia and
New South Wales Department of Primary
Industries, 405-467. DOI:
10.2134/agronmonogr42.c9
-
Kaymak, G. , Gülümser, E. , Can, M. , Acar, Z. & Ayan,
İ. (2021). Yapraklı ve Yarı Yapraklı Yem
Bezelyesi Çeşitleri ile Tek Yıllık Çim
Karışımlarının Silaj Kalitesinin Belirlenmesi.
Journal of the Institute of Science and
Technology, 11(2), 1595-1602. DOI:
10.21597/jist.867823
-
Khosravi, M., Rouzbehan, Y., Rezaei, M., & Rezaei, J.
(2018). Total replacement of corn silage with
sorghum silage improves milk fatty acid profile
and antioxidant capacity of Holstein dairy cows.
Journal of Dairy Science, 101(12), 10953-10961.
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-14350
-
Kızılşimşek, M., Erol, A., Dönmez, R. & Katrancı, B.
(2016). Silaj mikro florasının birbirleri ile
ilişkileri, silaj fermentasyonu ve kalitesi üzerine
etkileri. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam
Üniversitesi Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(2), 136.
DOI: 10.18016/ksujns.35488
-
Li, Y. & Nishino, N. (2013). Effects of ensiling
fermentation and aerobic deterioration on the
bacterial community in italian ryegrass, guinea
grass, and whole-crop maize silages stored at high
moisture content. Asian-Australasian Journal of
Animal Sciences, 26(9), 1304-1312. DOI:
10.5713/ajas.2013.13175
-
McDonald, P., Henderson, A.R. & Heron, S.J.E. (1991).
The Biochemistry of Silage. 2nd Edition.
Chalcombe Publications. Mallow, Bucks (UK),
DOI: 10.1017/ S0014479700023115
-
Miron, J., Zuckerman, E., Sadeh, D., Adin, G.,
Nikbachat, M., Yosef, E., Ben-Ghedalia, D.,
Carmi, A., Kipnis, T. & Solomon, R. (2005).
Yield, composition and in vitro digestibility of
new forage sorghum varieties and their ensilage
characteristics. Animal Feed Science and
Technology, 120(1-2), 17-32. DOI:
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.01.008
-
Mohd-Setapar, S.H., Abd-Talib, N. & Aziz, R. (2012).
Review on crucial parameters of silage quality.
APCBEE Procedia, 3, 99-103. DOI:
10.1016/j.apcbee.2012.06.053
-
Mut, H., Gülümser, E., Çopur Doğrusöz, M. &
Başaran, U. (2020). Koca Fiğ ile İtalyan Çimi
Karışımlarının Silaj Kalitesinin Belirlenmesi.
ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 391-396.
DOI: 10.33202/comuagri.753574
-
Okumuş, A. (2021). İkinci ürün mısır silajına fındık zurufu
ilavesinin silaj fermantasyonu, aerobik stabilite
ve in vitro gaz üretimi üzerine etkileri. Yüksek
Lisans Tezi, Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Fen
Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 5-7pp, 72s.
-
Ozkurt, M., Tufan, Y. & Karadag, Y. (2022). Feed
Quality Parameters of Silage Corn Cultivars in
Mus Ecological Conditions. Levantine Journal of
Applied Sciences, 2(1), 12-18).
-
Öztürk, O. (2022). Effects of different irrigation methods
on yield, plant water consumption and some
forage quality values of Italian grass (Lolium
multiflorum). Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi
Dergisi, 59(2), 313-322. DOI:
10.20289/zfdergi.991023
-
Partigöç, N.S. & Soğancı, S. (2019). Küresel İklim
Değişikliğinin Kaçınılmaz Sonucu: Kuraklık..
Resilience, 3 (2), 287-299. DOI:
10.32569/resilience.619219
-
Pino, F. & Heinrichs, A.J. (2017). Sorghum forage in
precision-fed dairy heifer diets. Journal of Dairy
Science, 100(1), 224-235. DOI:
10.3168/jds.2016-11551
-
Pond, W.G., Church, D.B., Pond, K.R. & Schoknecht,
P.A. (2004). Basic animal nutrition and feeding.
John Wiley & Sons. New York.
-
Ran, T., Tang, S.X., Yu, X., Hou, Z.P., Hou, F.J.,
Beauchemin, K.A., Yang, W.Z., & Wu, D.Q.
(2021). Diets varying in ratio of sweet sorghum
silage to corn silage for lactating dairy cows: Feed intake, milk production, blood biochemistry,
ruminal fermentation, and ruminal microbial
community. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(12),
12600-12615. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-20408
-
Ranum, P., Peña-Rosas, J.P. & Garcia-Casal, M.N.
(2014). Global maize production, utilization, and
consumption. Annals of the New York Academy of
Sciences, 1312(1), 105-112. DOI:
10.1111/nyas.12396
-
Rotz, C.A., Ford, S.A. & Buckmaster, D.R. (2015).
Silages in farming systems. In Silage Science and
Technology, 505-546. DOI:
10.2134/agronmonogr42.c11
-
Sakai, T., Devkota, N.R., Oishi, K., Hirooka, H., &
Kumagai, H. (2015). Evaluation of total mixed
ration silage with brewers grains for dairy buffalo
in Tarai, Nepal. Animal Science Journal, 86(10),
884-890. DOI: 10.1111/asj.12374
-
Samarappuli, D. & Berti, M. T. (2018). Intercropping
forage sorghum with maize is a promising
alternative to maize silage for biogas production.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 515-524.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.083
-
Sánchez-Duarte, J.I., Kalscheur, K.F., García, A.D., &
Contreras-Govea, F.E. (2019). Short
communication: Meta-analysis of dairy cows fed
conventional sorghum or corn silages compared
with brown midrib sorghum silage. Journal of
Dairy Science, 102(1), 419-425. DOI:
10.3168/jds.2018-14552
-
Şahin, A. (2019). İtalyan çimi ( Lolium Multiflorum Cv .
Caramba) silajına farklı oranlarda melas
katılmasının silaj kalitesi üzerine etkisi. Yüksek
Lisans Tezi, Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi
Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Hatay, Türkiye, 37s.
-
Şahin, İ.F. & Zaman, M. (2010). Hayvancılıkta önemli
bir yem kaynağı: Silaj. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi,
15(23)1-18.
-
Taş, T. & Uçak, A.B. (2020). Yarı kurak iklim
koşullarında yetiştirilen silaj mısır çeşitlerinin
bazı agronomi ve kalite özelliklerinin
incelenmesi. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science,
8(3), 171-180. DOI: 10.3195/ejejfs.770351
-
Valente, M.E., Borreani, G., Peiretti, P.G. & Tabacco,
E. (2000). Codified morphological stage for
predicting digestibility of Italian ryegrass during
the spring cycle. Agron. J., 967-973. DOI:
10.2134/agronj2000.925967x
-
Wang, T., Jiao, J., Wang, H., Allan Degen, A., Gou, N.,
Li, S., Bai, Y. & Shang, Z. (2020). The effects of
supplementing sweet sorghum with grapeseeds on
dry matter intake, average daily gain, feed
digestibility and rumen parameters and
microbiota in lambs. Animal Feed Science and
Technology, November, 114750. DOI:
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114750
-
Wang, Z.Y., Nagel, J., Potrykus, I. & Spangenberg, G.
(1993). Plants from cell suspension-derived
protoplasts in Lolium species. Plant Science,
94(1-2), 179-193. DOI: 10.1016/0168-
9452(93)90019-V
-
Wilkinson, J.M. & Rinne, M. (2018). Highlights of
progress in silage conservation and future
perspectives. Grass and Forage Science, 73(1),
40-52.
-
Wu, P., Fu, X., Wang, H., Hou, M. & Shang, Z. (2021).
Effect of silage diet (Sweet Sorghum vs. wholecrop corn) and breed on growth performance,
carcass traits, and meat quality of lambs. Animals,
11(11), 3120. DOI: 10.3390/ani11113120
-
Yan, R., Chen, S., Zhang, X., Han, J., Zhang, Y. &
Undersander, D. (2011). Short communication:
Effects of replacing part of corn silage and alfalfa
hay with Leymus chinensis hay on milk
production and composition. Journal of Dairy
Science, 94(7), 3605-3608. DOI:
10.3168/jds.2010-3536
-
Yan, Y., Li, X., Guan, H., Huang, L., Ma, X., Peng, Y.,
Li, Z., Nie, G., Zhou, J., Yang, W., Cai, Y. &
Zhang, X. (2019). Microbial community and
fermentation characteristic of Italian ryegrass
silage prepared with corn stover and lactic acid
bacteria. Bioresource Technology, 279, 166-173.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.107
-
Zhang, S.J., Chaudhry, A.S., Ramdani, D., Osman, A.,
GUO, X.F., Edwards, G.R. & Cheng, L. (2016).
Chemical composition and in vitro fermentation
characteristics of high sugar forage sorghum as an
alternative to forage maize for silage making in
Tarim Basin, China. Journal of Integrative
Agriculture, 15(1), 175-182. DOI:
10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60939-4
-
Zhao, J., Yin, X., Wang, S., Li, J., Dong, Z.H. & Shao,
T. (2022). Changes in the fermentation products,
taxonomic and functional profiles of microbiota
during high-moisture sweet sorghum silage
fermentation. Frontiers in Microbiology,
13(August), 1-12. DOI:
10.3389/fmicb.2022.967624
Mısır Silajına Alternatif Olarak Sorgum ve Ryegrass Silajlarının Değerlendirilmesi
Yıl 2023,
Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 467 - 473, 30.09.2023
Alparslan Mutluhan Türedi
,
İbrahim Sadi Çetingül
Öz
Silaj; yeşil bitkilerin anaerobik koşullarda depolanmasıyla elde edilen yem turşularıdır. Kış aylarında önemli kaba yem kaynağı sağlamaktadır ve birçok nedenden dolayı üreticiler için ilgi çekicidir. En çok tarımı yapılan silaj ürünü mısırdır. Mısır büyük ruminant ve küçük ruminatlar için rasyonlarının önemli bir yem kaynağıdır. Ancak mısır, sıcak mevsim mahsulü olup, kurak ve yarı kurak bölgelerde yağış eksikliğinden verim olumsuz etkilenir. Aynı zamanda tatmin edici mısır üretimi için yoğun gübre kullanımına ihtiyaç vardır. Sorgum; kurak, yarı kurak ve yüksek tuzlu alanlarda su kullanım verimliliği mısırla karşılaştırıldığında daha az verimli olan toprakları tolere edebileceği bildirilmiştir. Sorgum daha az su ihtiyacına ve tarım gereksinimlerine sahiptir. Ryegrass; Lolium spp.’leri ılıman bölgelerde bir anahtar rol oynayan yem bitkisidir. Ryegrass silajı; verim, sindirilebilirlik, suda çözünebilir karbonhidrat içeriği, kalite ve dayanıklılık için öne çıkmıştır. Ayrıca ryegrass yetiştirciliği birden fazla biçime imkan vermesi avantajlı bir yön olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Karlı hayvancılık yapmak; kaba yemin maliyetine ve konsantre yemin tüketime bağlıdır. Silaj yapım teknikleri doğru uygulanırsa üretici kaba yemi büyük ölçüde ryegrass, sorgum ve mısır silajlarından sağlayabilir. Bu sayede karlı, verim parametreleri yüksek ve sürdürülebilir bir hayvancılık faaliyeti yapılabilir.
Kaynakça
-
Basmacıoğlu, H. & Ergül, M. (2002). Silaj
Mikrobiyolojisi. Hayvansal Üretim, 43(1), 12-24.
http://dergipark.gov.tr/hayuretim/issue/7629/999
36
-
Baldinger, L., Zollitsch, W. & Knaus, W. (2014). Maize
silage and Italian ryegrass silage as high-energy
forages in organic dairy cow diets: Differences in
feed intake, milk yield and quality, and nitrogen
efficiency. Renewable Agriculture and Food
Systems, 29(4), 378-387. DOI:
10.1017/S1742170513000252
-
Behling Neto, A., Reis, R.H.P.D., Cabral, L.D.S.,
Abreu, J.G.D., Sousa, D.D.P., & Sousa, F.G.D.
(2017). Nutritional value of sorghum silage of
different purposes. Ciência e Agrotecnologia,
41(3), 288-299. DOI: 10.1590/1413-
70542017413038516
-
Bernard, J.K., West, J.W., & Trammell, D.S. (2002).
Effect of replacing corn silage with annual
ryegrass silage on nutrient digestibility, ıntake and
milk yield for lactating dairy cows. Journal of
Dairy Science, 85(9), 2277-2282. DOI:
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74307-5
-
Borreani, G., Tabacco, E., Schmidt, R.J., Holmes, B.J.
& Muck, R.E. (2018). Silage review: factors
affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages.
Journal of Dairy Science, 101(5), 3952-3979.
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13837
-
Chaves, B., De Vliegher, A., Van Waes, J., Carlier, L.,
& Marynissen, B. (2009). Change in agronomie
performance of Lolium perenne and Lolium
multiflorum varieties in the past 40 years based on
data from Belgian VCU trials. Plant Breeding,
128(6), 680-690. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-
0523.2009.01621.x
-
Chen, L., Dong, Z., Li, J. & Shao, T. (2019). Ensiling
characteristics, in vitro rumen fermentation,
microbial communities and aerobic stability of
low-dry matter silages produced with sweet
sorghum and alfalfa mixtures. Journal of the
Science of Food and Agriculture, 99(5), 2140-
2151. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9406
-
Chiambiro, G., Madzimure, J. & Mpofu, I.D.T. (2022).
Constraints and opportunities of sweet sorghum
(Sorghum bicolor L.) silage production and
utilisation by smallholder milk production sector
in Zimbabwe. Tropical Animal Health and
Production, 54(2), 105. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-
022-03084-z
-
Colombini, S., Galassi, G., Crovetto, G.M. & Rapetti,
L. (2012). Milk production, nitrogen balance, and
fiber digestibility prediction of corn, whole plant
grain sorghum, and forage sorghum silages in the
dairy cow. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(8), 4457-
4467. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4444
-
Elferink, S.J.W.H.O., Driehuis, F., Gottschal, J.C., &
Spoelstra, S.F. (2000). Silage fermentation
processes and their manipulation. FAO Plant
Production and Protection Papers, 17-30.
-
Ergün A., Tuncer Ş.D., Çolpan İ., Yalçın S., Yıldız G.
vd. (2016). Yemler Yem Hijyeni ve Teknolojisi.
Genişletilmiş 6. Baskı, Kardelen Ofset,
Ankara.0020
-
FAO. (2021). Faostat Analytıcal Brıef 60 Agricultural
Production Statistics 2000-2021 Faostat
Analytical Brief 60 Faostat Crops And Lıvestock
Productıon Introductıon. Agricultural Production
Statistics 2000-2021, 60, 1-17.
-
Getachew, G., Putnam, D.H., De Ben, C.M. & De
Peters, E.J. (2016). Potential of sorghum as an
alternative to corn forage. American Journal of
Plant Sciences, 07(07), 1106-1121. DOI:
10.4236/ajps.2016.77106
-
Hadebe, S. T., Modi, A. T. & Mabhaudhi, T. (2017).
Drought tolerance and water use of cereal crops:
A focus on sorghum as a food security crop in sub‐
Saharan Africa. Journal of Agronomy and Crop
Science, 203(3), 177-191.
-
Kaiser, A.G., Piltz, J.W., Burns, H.M. & Neil, W.G.
(2004). Successful silage. Dairy Australia and
New South Wales Department of Primary
Industries, 405-467. DOI:
10.2134/agronmonogr42.c9
-
Kaymak, G. , Gülümser, E. , Can, M. , Acar, Z. & Ayan,
İ. (2021). Yapraklı ve Yarı Yapraklı Yem
Bezelyesi Çeşitleri ile Tek Yıllık Çim
Karışımlarının Silaj Kalitesinin Belirlenmesi.
Journal of the Institute of Science and
Technology, 11(2), 1595-1602. DOI:
10.21597/jist.867823
-
Khosravi, M., Rouzbehan, Y., Rezaei, M., & Rezaei, J.
(2018). Total replacement of corn silage with
sorghum silage improves milk fatty acid profile
and antioxidant capacity of Holstein dairy cows.
Journal of Dairy Science, 101(12), 10953-10961.
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-14350
-
Kızılşimşek, M., Erol, A., Dönmez, R. & Katrancı, B.
(2016). Silaj mikro florasının birbirleri ile
ilişkileri, silaj fermentasyonu ve kalitesi üzerine
etkileri. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam
Üniversitesi Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(2), 136.
DOI: 10.18016/ksujns.35488
-
Li, Y. & Nishino, N. (2013). Effects of ensiling
fermentation and aerobic deterioration on the
bacterial community in italian ryegrass, guinea
grass, and whole-crop maize silages stored at high
moisture content. Asian-Australasian Journal of
Animal Sciences, 26(9), 1304-1312. DOI:
10.5713/ajas.2013.13175
-
McDonald, P., Henderson, A.R. & Heron, S.J.E. (1991).
The Biochemistry of Silage. 2nd Edition.
Chalcombe Publications. Mallow, Bucks (UK),
DOI: 10.1017/ S0014479700023115
-
Miron, J., Zuckerman, E., Sadeh, D., Adin, G.,
Nikbachat, M., Yosef, E., Ben-Ghedalia, D.,
Carmi, A., Kipnis, T. & Solomon, R. (2005).
Yield, composition and in vitro digestibility of
new forage sorghum varieties and their ensilage
characteristics. Animal Feed Science and
Technology, 120(1-2), 17-32. DOI:
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.01.008
-
Mohd-Setapar, S.H., Abd-Talib, N. & Aziz, R. (2012).
Review on crucial parameters of silage quality.
APCBEE Procedia, 3, 99-103. DOI:
10.1016/j.apcbee.2012.06.053
-
Mut, H., Gülümser, E., Çopur Doğrusöz, M. &
Başaran, U. (2020). Koca Fiğ ile İtalyan Çimi
Karışımlarının Silaj Kalitesinin Belirlenmesi.
ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 391-396.
DOI: 10.33202/comuagri.753574
-
Okumuş, A. (2021). İkinci ürün mısır silajına fındık zurufu
ilavesinin silaj fermantasyonu, aerobik stabilite
ve in vitro gaz üretimi üzerine etkileri. Yüksek
Lisans Tezi, Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Fen
Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 5-7pp, 72s.
-
Ozkurt, M., Tufan, Y. & Karadag, Y. (2022). Feed
Quality Parameters of Silage Corn Cultivars in
Mus Ecological Conditions. Levantine Journal of
Applied Sciences, 2(1), 12-18).
-
Öztürk, O. (2022). Effects of different irrigation methods
on yield, plant water consumption and some
forage quality values of Italian grass (Lolium
multiflorum). Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi
Dergisi, 59(2), 313-322. DOI:
10.20289/zfdergi.991023
-
Partigöç, N.S. & Soğancı, S. (2019). Küresel İklim
Değişikliğinin Kaçınılmaz Sonucu: Kuraklık..
Resilience, 3 (2), 287-299. DOI:
10.32569/resilience.619219
-
Pino, F. & Heinrichs, A.J. (2017). Sorghum forage in
precision-fed dairy heifer diets. Journal of Dairy
Science, 100(1), 224-235. DOI:
10.3168/jds.2016-11551
-
Pond, W.G., Church, D.B., Pond, K.R. & Schoknecht,
P.A. (2004). Basic animal nutrition and feeding.
John Wiley & Sons. New York.
-
Ran, T., Tang, S.X., Yu, X., Hou, Z.P., Hou, F.J.,
Beauchemin, K.A., Yang, W.Z., & Wu, D.Q.
(2021). Diets varying in ratio of sweet sorghum
silage to corn silage for lactating dairy cows: Feed intake, milk production, blood biochemistry,
ruminal fermentation, and ruminal microbial
community. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(12),
12600-12615. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-20408
-
Ranum, P., Peña-Rosas, J.P. & Garcia-Casal, M.N.
(2014). Global maize production, utilization, and
consumption. Annals of the New York Academy of
Sciences, 1312(1), 105-112. DOI:
10.1111/nyas.12396
-
Rotz, C.A., Ford, S.A. & Buckmaster, D.R. (2015).
Silages in farming systems. In Silage Science and
Technology, 505-546. DOI:
10.2134/agronmonogr42.c11
-
Sakai, T., Devkota, N.R., Oishi, K., Hirooka, H., &
Kumagai, H. (2015). Evaluation of total mixed
ration silage with brewers grains for dairy buffalo
in Tarai, Nepal. Animal Science Journal, 86(10),
884-890. DOI: 10.1111/asj.12374
-
Samarappuli, D. & Berti, M. T. (2018). Intercropping
forage sorghum with maize is a promising
alternative to maize silage for biogas production.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 515-524.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.083
-
Sánchez-Duarte, J.I., Kalscheur, K.F., García, A.D., &
Contreras-Govea, F.E. (2019). Short
communication: Meta-analysis of dairy cows fed
conventional sorghum or corn silages compared
with brown midrib sorghum silage. Journal of
Dairy Science, 102(1), 419-425. DOI:
10.3168/jds.2018-14552
-
Şahin, A. (2019). İtalyan çimi ( Lolium Multiflorum Cv .
Caramba) silajına farklı oranlarda melas
katılmasının silaj kalitesi üzerine etkisi. Yüksek
Lisans Tezi, Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi
Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Hatay, Türkiye, 37s.
-
Şahin, İ.F. & Zaman, M. (2010). Hayvancılıkta önemli
bir yem kaynağı: Silaj. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi,
15(23)1-18.
-
Taş, T. & Uçak, A.B. (2020). Yarı kurak iklim
koşullarında yetiştirilen silaj mısır çeşitlerinin
bazı agronomi ve kalite özelliklerinin
incelenmesi. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science,
8(3), 171-180. DOI: 10.3195/ejejfs.770351
-
Valente, M.E., Borreani, G., Peiretti, P.G. & Tabacco,
E. (2000). Codified morphological stage for
predicting digestibility of Italian ryegrass during
the spring cycle. Agron. J., 967-973. DOI:
10.2134/agronj2000.925967x
-
Wang, T., Jiao, J., Wang, H., Allan Degen, A., Gou, N.,
Li, S., Bai, Y. & Shang, Z. (2020). The effects of
supplementing sweet sorghum with grapeseeds on
dry matter intake, average daily gain, feed
digestibility and rumen parameters and
microbiota in lambs. Animal Feed Science and
Technology, November, 114750. DOI:
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114750
-
Wang, Z.Y., Nagel, J., Potrykus, I. & Spangenberg, G.
(1993). Plants from cell suspension-derived
protoplasts in Lolium species. Plant Science,
94(1-2), 179-193. DOI: 10.1016/0168-
9452(93)90019-V
-
Wilkinson, J.M. & Rinne, M. (2018). Highlights of
progress in silage conservation and future
perspectives. Grass and Forage Science, 73(1),
40-52.
-
Wu, P., Fu, X., Wang, H., Hou, M. & Shang, Z. (2021).
Effect of silage diet (Sweet Sorghum vs. wholecrop corn) and breed on growth performance,
carcass traits, and meat quality of lambs. Animals,
11(11), 3120. DOI: 10.3390/ani11113120
-
Yan, R., Chen, S., Zhang, X., Han, J., Zhang, Y. &
Undersander, D. (2011). Short communication:
Effects of replacing part of corn silage and alfalfa
hay with Leymus chinensis hay on milk
production and composition. Journal of Dairy
Science, 94(7), 3605-3608. DOI:
10.3168/jds.2010-3536
-
Yan, Y., Li, X., Guan, H., Huang, L., Ma, X., Peng, Y.,
Li, Z., Nie, G., Zhou, J., Yang, W., Cai, Y. &
Zhang, X. (2019). Microbial community and
fermentation characteristic of Italian ryegrass
silage prepared with corn stover and lactic acid
bacteria. Bioresource Technology, 279, 166-173.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.107
-
Zhang, S.J., Chaudhry, A.S., Ramdani, D., Osman, A.,
GUO, X.F., Edwards, G.R. & Cheng, L. (2016).
Chemical composition and in vitro fermentation
characteristics of high sugar forage sorghum as an
alternative to forage maize for silage making in
Tarim Basin, China. Journal of Integrative
Agriculture, 15(1), 175-182. DOI:
10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60939-4
-
Zhao, J., Yin, X., Wang, S., Li, J., Dong, Z.H. & Shao,
T. (2022). Changes in the fermentation products,
taxonomic and functional profiles of microbiota
during high-moisture sweet sorghum silage
fermentation. Frontiers in Microbiology,
13(August), 1-12. DOI:
10.3389/fmicb.2022.967624