The Effect of Depth of Rice Hulls Litter on Fattening Performance, Foot Pad Dermatitis, Meat Quality Characteristics of Broiler Chicken

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 338 - 344, 30.09.2023

Bülent Teke Gökhan İnat

https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1298242

Öz

This study was carried out to determine the effect of rice hulls used as litter in two different thicknesses (5 and 10 cm) on fattening performance, mortality rate, foot pad lesions, meat quality and meat color characteristics of Ross 308 chickens. Rice hulls of 5 cm (T5) and 10 cm (T10) thickness were laid on the coops that were similar in size and design. Fattening performance, FCR (feed conversion ratio), mortality rate, foot pad lesions, meat quality, and meat color characteristics were determined in three consecutive fattening periods. It was determined that the feed conversion ratios were 1.748 and 1.577 in the T5 and T10 groups, respectively, and the difference was significant (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two litter thickness groups in mortality rates, foot pad lesions of the chickens, meat quality characteristics and, meat color characteristics (P>0.05). On the other hand, it was determined that the difference between foot pad lesion scores within the litter thickness groups was significant (P<0.001). As a result, although it is considered an advantage that rice hulls are cheaper than other litter varieties, it is a disadvantage that the lesion rates at Score 3 and 4 levels are high. Since there is no significant difference between the T5 and T10 groups without FCR. Therefore, it may be economically beneficial to use 5 cm thick as a substrate instead of 10 cm.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Broiler, fattening performance,, foot pad dermatitis,, litter thickness,, rice hulls

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

Teşekkür

-

Etçi Piliçlerde Pirinç Kabuğu Altlık Derinliğinin Besi Performansı, Ayak Taban Yangısı ve Et Kalite Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Bu araştırma altlık olarak iki farklı kalınlıkta (5 ve 10 cm) kullanılan pirinç kabuğunun Ross 308 piliçlerinde besi performansı, mortalite oranı, ayak taban yangısı, et kalite ve et renk özellikleri üzerine etkisini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Boyut ve dizayn olarak birbirinin benzeri iki kümesten birisine 5 cm (T5), diğerine 10 cm (T10) kalınlığında pirinç kabuğu serilmiştir. Ardışık üç besi döneminde besi performansı, FCR (yem dönüşüm oranı), mortalite oranı, ayak taban yangısı lezyonları, et kalite ve et rengi özellikleri belirlenmiştir. Yem dönüşüm oranlarının T5 ve T10 gruplarında sırasıyla 1,748 ve 1,577 olduğu, aradaki farkın önemli olduğu belirlenmiştir (P<0,05). İki altlık kalınlığı grubu arasında ölüm oranları, piliçlerin ayak taban yangıları, et kalite özellikleri ve et rengi özellikleri arasında istatistiksel olarak önemli bir farklılık bulunmamıştır (P>0,05). Buna karşın altlık kalınlığı grupları içinde ayak taban yangı skorları arasındaki farkın önemli olduğu belirlenmiştir (P<0,001). Sonuç olarak pirinç kabuğunun diğer altlık çeşitlerinden daha ucuz olması avantaj olarak değerlendirilse bile Skor 3 ve 4 düzeyde lezyon oranlarının fazla olması dezavantajdır. T5 ve T10 grupları arasında FCR dışında diğer özelliklerde önemli bir farklılık olmaması nedeniyle altlık olarak 10 cm yerine 5 cm kalınlığında kullanılması ekonomik bakımdan kazanç sağlayabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Altlık kalınlığı, ayak taban yangısı, besi performansı, etçi piliç,, pirinç kabuğu

Proje Numarası

-

Kaynakça

• Anisuzzaman, M. & Chowdhury, S.D. (1996). Use of four types of litter for rearing broiler. British Poultry Science, 37, 541-545.
• Angelo, J.S., Gonzales E., Kondo, N., Anzai, N.H. & Cabral, M.M. (1997). Material de Cama: Quantidade e Efeito Sobre o Desempenho de Frangos de Corte. Revista Brasileria de Zootecnia, 26, 121-130.
• Atasoy, F. (2000). Tavuk Yetiştiriciliğinde Altlığın Kullanılması ve Önemi. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 40(1), 90-97.
• Benabdeljelil, K. & Ayachi, A. (1996). Evaluation of alternative litter materials for poultry. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 5, 203-209.
• Brown, R.H., Howell, E.S. & McLendon, B.D. (1977). A new concept of litter management for broiler production. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineer, 20, 345-348.
• Çolak, B. & Teke, B. (2022). The effect of season and feed withdrawal duration on meat quality characteristics of broiler chicken in commercial slaughter condition. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 3, 367-373.
• FAWC. (1991). Report on the European Commission Proposals on the Transport of Animals. London: MAFF Publications.
• Garces, A., Afonso, S.S., Chilundo, A. & Jairoce, T.S. (2017). Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 2. Productive performance and carcass characteristics. Tropical Animal Health Production, 49, 369-374.
• Gençoğlan, S. & Gençoğlan, C. (2017). The effect of the litter materials on broiler chickens welfare and performance. Turkish Journal of AgricultureFood Science and Technology, 5(12), 1660-1667.
• Haque, M.I. & Chowdhury, S.D. (1994). Use of rice husk litter at different depths for broiler chicks during summer. British Poultry Science, 35, 809-812.
• Honikel, K.O. (1998). Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Science, 49, 447-457.
• Huang, Y., Yoo, J.S., Kim, H.J., Wang, Y., Chen, Y.J., Cho, J.H. & Kim, I.H. (2009). Effect of bedding types and different nutrient densities on growth performance, visceral organ weight, and blood characteristics in broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 18, 1-7.
• Kabir, F. & Uddin, M. (2010). Effect of different types of litter on production performance of broiler. Journal of Science Technology (Dinajpur), 8, 115-119.
• Kaukonen, E., Norring, M. & Valros, A. (2017). Evaluating the effects of bedding materials and elevated platforms on contact dermatitis and plumage cleanliness of commercial broilers and on litter condition in broiler houses. British Poultry Science, 58(5), 480-489.
• Moesta, A., Knierim, U., Briese, A. & Hartung, J. (2008). The effect of litter condition and depth on the suitability of wood shavings for dustbathing behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 115(3-4), 160-170.
• Munir, M.T., Belloncle, C., Irle, M. & Federighi, M. (2019). Wood-based litter in poultry production: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal, 75(1), 5-16.
• Onu, P.N., Madubuike, F.N., Nwakpu, P.E. & Anyaehie, A.I. (2011). Performance and carcass characteristics of broilers raised on three different litter materials. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 2, 1347-1350.
• Petek, M., Üstüner, H. & Yeşilbağ, D. (2014). Effects of stocking density and litter type on litter quality and growth performance of broiler chicken. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(5), 743-748.
• Ramadan Sameh, G.A. & Khloya, S.E. (2017). Do alternative litter materials affect performance, welfare and immun response of broiler chicks? Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 52, 133-141.
• Sarıca, M. & Erensoy, K. (2020). Effects of Using Hazelnut Husk, Wood Shaving and of the Mixture at Different Thicknesses on Broiler Performances, Some Organ Weights, Foot-Pad Dermatitis and Litter Traits. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 8(6), 1399-1404.
• Shao, D., He, J., Lu, J., Wang, Q., Chang, L., Shi, S. R. & Bing, T.H. (2015). Effects of sawdust thickness on the growth performance, environmental condition, and welfare quality of yellow broilers. Poultry Science, 94(1), 1-6.
• Shepherd, E.M., Fairchild, B.D. & Ritz, C.W. (2017). Alternative bedding materials and litter depth impact litter moisture and footpad dermatitis. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 26(4), 518- 528.
• Şekeroğlu, A., Eleroğlu, H., Sarıca, M. & Camcı, Ö. (2013). Yerde üretimde kullanılan altlık materyalleri ve altlık yönetimi. Tavukçuluk Araştırma Dergisi, 10, 25-34.
• Sogunle, O.M., Ogunjimi, B.A. & Fanimo, A.O. (2006). Effect of litter depth on the performance of three strains of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 5(12), 1155-1157.
• Teke B., Uğurlu, M. & Akdağ, F. (2019). Etlik piliçlerde iki farklı barındırma sıklığının piliçlerin besi performansı, ölüm oranı ve ayak taban yangısı üzerine etkisi. Lalahan Hayvancılık Araştırma Dergisi, 59(Ek Sayı), 102-106.
• Toledo, T.D., Pich, S.D., Roll, C.S., Dai Prá, A.A.P., Leivas Leite, M.A., Gonçalves F., Xavier, E. & Roll, V.F.B. (2019). The effect of litter materials on broiler performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Poultry Science, 60(6), 605-616.
• Welfare Quality. (2009). Welfare Quality assessment for poultry. Welfare Quality Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands.