Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yeşil Liman ve Şehir Entegrasyonu: Lokasyon Seçiminde Sürdürülebilir Yaklaşımlar

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 132 - 138
https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1622890

Öz

Yeşil liman kavramı her geçen gün daha da önemli hale gelmektedir. Ancak mevcut limanların yeşil liman olarak işletilmesi veya yeni inşa edilecek limanların yeşil liman olarak planlanması belirli gereklilikleri beraberinde getirmektedir. Yeşil limanlarda lokasyon seçiminin öneminin limanın verimliliğini ve ismine uygunluğunu önemli ölçüde etkilediği görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada, yeşil liman lokasyonlarının seçimini etkileyen kriterler, çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinden (ÇKKV) Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHS) kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışma sonuçlarına göre yeşil liman lokasyonlarının seçiminde dikkate alınan kriterler arasında en önemli kriter Çevresel ve Sosyal Sürdürülebilirlik (%29,27) olmuştur. Coğrafi ve Doğal Koşullar (%24,78) ikinci en önemli kriter olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Altyapı ve Operasyonel Verimlilik (%18,47) ile Ekonomik ve Ticari Konular (%16,8) da ağırlık bakımından birbirleriyle sıkı rekabet halindedir. Yönetim ve Stratejik Önem (%10,68) son sırada yer almaktadır. Yeşil limanların seçiminde çevreye ve insanlığa saygılı bir iş yapma tarzı benimsemek gerekir. Sanayi devriminden önce liman-şehir ilişkisi yerini günümüzde uzak ilişkilere bırakmıştır. Bu bağlamda temiz bir gelecek için sadece yeşil limanlardan değil yeşil hinterland ve yeşil şehirler ile entegre sistemler oluşturulması gerekmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Aregall, M.G., Bergqvist, R. & Monios, J. (2018). A global review of the hinterland dimension of green port strategies. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59, 23-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.013
  • Bin Ibrahim, I., Jalil, S.A. & Salleh, S. S. (2023). A Conceptual Model for Sustainable Green Port Practices: A Case Study of Northport (Malaysia) Berhad. Information Management and Business Review, 15(3 (SI)), 267-279. DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v15i3(si).3483
  • Çolak, Z., Onat, B., Coşgun, M. S., Ayvaz, B. U., Ayvaz, C., Kuzu, S. L., ... & Şahin, Ü. A. (2024). İstanbul'da Kentsel Arka Planda Atmosferik Siyah Karbon Konsantrasyon Değişiminin Değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 9(4), 648- 659. DOI: 10.35229/jaes.1561066
  • Dos Santos, M.C. & Pereira, F.H. (2021). Development and application of a dynamic model for road port access and its impacts on port-city relationship indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 96, 103189. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103189
  • De Oliveira, G.F. & Cariou, P. (2015). The impact of competition on container port (in) efficiency. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 124-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.034
  • Ducruet, C., & Lee, S. W. (2006). Frontline soldiers of globalization: Port-city evolution and regional competition. GeoJournal, 67(2), 107-122. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-006-9782-6
  • Gill, A.B. (2005). Offshore renewable energy: ecological implications of generating electricity in the coastal zone. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42(4), 605-615. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2664.2005.01060.x
  • Kong, Y. & Liu, J. (2021). Sustainable port cities with coupling coordination and environmental efficiency. Ocean and Coastal Management, 205, 105534. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105534
  • Kotowska, I., Mankowska, M. & Plucinski, M. (2018). Inland shipping to serve the hinterland: The challenge for seaport authorities. Sustainability, 10(10), 3468. DOI: 10.3390/su10103468
  • Köse, S. (2020). Measurement and Modelling of Particulate Matter Emissions from Harbor Activities at a Port area: A Case Study of Trabzon, Turkey. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 8(4). DOI: 10.5505/jems.2020.49389
  • Lakshmi, E., Priya, M. & Achari, V.S. (2021). An overview on the treatment of ballast water in ships. Ocean & Coastal Management, 199, 105296. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105296
  • Lugo, I. & Martínez-Mekler, G. (2022). Theoretical study of the effect of ports in the formation of city systems. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 7(1), Article 16. DOI: 10.1186/s41072-022-00117-6
  • Merk, O. & Hesse, M. (2012). The competitiveness of global port-cities: The case of Hamburg, Germany. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2012/06. DOI: 10.1787/5k97g3hm1gvk- en
  • Monios, J., Bergqvist, R. & Woxenius, J. (2018). Port- centric cities: The role of freight distribution in defining the port-city relationship. Journal of Transport Geography, 66, 53-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.11.012
  • Nielsen, K.S., Nicholas, K.A., Creutzig, F., Dietz, T. & Stern, P.C. (2021). The role of high- socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions. Nature Energy, 6(11), 1011-1016. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-021-00900-y
  • OECD. (2018). The Future of Ports in Global Supply Chains. OECD iLibrary. DOI: 10.1787/future- ports-2018-en
  • OECD Hamburg. (2020). Building a bridge between port and city: Improving the urban competitiveness of port cities. OECD iLibrary. DOI: 10.1787/5k3ttg8zn1zt-en
  • Özdemir, Ü., Altinpinar, İ. & Demirel, F.B. (2018). A MCDM approach with fuzzy AHP method for occupational accidents on board. TransNav, International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 12(1), 93-98. DOI: 10.12716/1001.12.01.10.
  • Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
  • Satır, T. & Doğan-Sağlamtimur, N. (2018). The protection of marine aquatic life: Green Port (EcoPort) model inspired by Green Port concept in selected ports from Turkey, Europe and the USA. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), 6(1), 120-129. DOI: 10.21533/pen.v12.i4
  • Sharifi, A. (2020). Trade-offs and conflicts between urban climate change mitigation and adaptation measures: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 122813. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122813.
  • UNCTAD. (2019). Review of maritime transport 2019. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/webflyer/review-maritime- transport-2019.
  • Witte, P., Wiegmans, B., Van Oort, F. & Spit, T. (2014). Governing inland ports: A multi-dimensional approach to addressing inland port–city challenges in European transport corridors. Journal of Transport Geography, 36, 42-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.02.011.
  • Yu, L., Zhang, J. & Chen, S. (2020). Urban and port development dynamics: A case study. Sustainability, 12(2857), 1-18. DOI: 10.3390/su12072857
  • Zhao, Q., Xu, H., Wall, R.S. & Stavropoulos, S. (2017). Building a bridge between port and city: Improving the urban competitiveness of port cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 59, 120- 133. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.01.014.

Green Port and City Integration: Sustainable Approaches in Location Selection

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 132 - 138
https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1622890

Öz

The concept of green ports is becoming increasingly important every day. However, operating existing ports as green ports or planning newly constructed ports as green ports brings certain requirements. It is seen that the importance of location selection in green ports significantly affects the efficiency of the port and its suitability to its name. In this study, the criteria affecting the selection of green port locations were evaluated using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is a multi-criteria decision-making method (MCDM). The study results show that the most important criterion among the criteria considered in the selection of green port locations is Environmental and Social Sustainability (29.27%). Geographical and Natural Conditions (24.78%) emerges as the second most important criterion. Infrastructure and Operational Efficiency (18.47%) and Economic and Commercial Issues (16.8%) are also emphasized in close competition with each other in terms of weight. Management and Strategic Importance (10.68%) are in the last place. In the selection of green ports, it is necessary to adopt a business style that respects the environment and humanity. Before the industrial revolution, the port-city relationship has given way to distant relations today. In this respect, for a clean future, integrated systems need to be created not only from green ports but also with green hinterlands and green cities.

Kaynakça

  • Aregall, M.G., Bergqvist, R. & Monios, J. (2018). A global review of the hinterland dimension of green port strategies. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59, 23-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.013
  • Bin Ibrahim, I., Jalil, S.A. & Salleh, S. S. (2023). A Conceptual Model for Sustainable Green Port Practices: A Case Study of Northport (Malaysia) Berhad. Information Management and Business Review, 15(3 (SI)), 267-279. DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v15i3(si).3483
  • Çolak, Z., Onat, B., Coşgun, M. S., Ayvaz, B. U., Ayvaz, C., Kuzu, S. L., ... & Şahin, Ü. A. (2024). İstanbul'da Kentsel Arka Planda Atmosferik Siyah Karbon Konsantrasyon Değişiminin Değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 9(4), 648- 659. DOI: 10.35229/jaes.1561066
  • Dos Santos, M.C. & Pereira, F.H. (2021). Development and application of a dynamic model for road port access and its impacts on port-city relationship indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 96, 103189. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103189
  • De Oliveira, G.F. & Cariou, P. (2015). The impact of competition on container port (in) efficiency. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 124-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.034
  • Ducruet, C., & Lee, S. W. (2006). Frontline soldiers of globalization: Port-city evolution and regional competition. GeoJournal, 67(2), 107-122. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-006-9782-6
  • Gill, A.B. (2005). Offshore renewable energy: ecological implications of generating electricity in the coastal zone. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42(4), 605-615. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2664.2005.01060.x
  • Kong, Y. & Liu, J. (2021). Sustainable port cities with coupling coordination and environmental efficiency. Ocean and Coastal Management, 205, 105534. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105534
  • Kotowska, I., Mankowska, M. & Plucinski, M. (2018). Inland shipping to serve the hinterland: The challenge for seaport authorities. Sustainability, 10(10), 3468. DOI: 10.3390/su10103468
  • Köse, S. (2020). Measurement and Modelling of Particulate Matter Emissions from Harbor Activities at a Port area: A Case Study of Trabzon, Turkey. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 8(4). DOI: 10.5505/jems.2020.49389
  • Lakshmi, E., Priya, M. & Achari, V.S. (2021). An overview on the treatment of ballast water in ships. Ocean & Coastal Management, 199, 105296. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105296
  • Lugo, I. & Martínez-Mekler, G. (2022). Theoretical study of the effect of ports in the formation of city systems. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 7(1), Article 16. DOI: 10.1186/s41072-022-00117-6
  • Merk, O. & Hesse, M. (2012). The competitiveness of global port-cities: The case of Hamburg, Germany. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2012/06. DOI: 10.1787/5k97g3hm1gvk- en
  • Monios, J., Bergqvist, R. & Woxenius, J. (2018). Port- centric cities: The role of freight distribution in defining the port-city relationship. Journal of Transport Geography, 66, 53-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.11.012
  • Nielsen, K.S., Nicholas, K.A., Creutzig, F., Dietz, T. & Stern, P.C. (2021). The role of high- socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions. Nature Energy, 6(11), 1011-1016. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-021-00900-y
  • OECD. (2018). The Future of Ports in Global Supply Chains. OECD iLibrary. DOI: 10.1787/future- ports-2018-en
  • OECD Hamburg. (2020). Building a bridge between port and city: Improving the urban competitiveness of port cities. OECD iLibrary. DOI: 10.1787/5k3ttg8zn1zt-en
  • Özdemir, Ü., Altinpinar, İ. & Demirel, F.B. (2018). A MCDM approach with fuzzy AHP method for occupational accidents on board. TransNav, International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 12(1), 93-98. DOI: 10.12716/1001.12.01.10.
  • Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
  • Satır, T. & Doğan-Sağlamtimur, N. (2018). The protection of marine aquatic life: Green Port (EcoPort) model inspired by Green Port concept in selected ports from Turkey, Europe and the USA. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), 6(1), 120-129. DOI: 10.21533/pen.v12.i4
  • Sharifi, A. (2020). Trade-offs and conflicts between urban climate change mitigation and adaptation measures: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 122813. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122813.
  • UNCTAD. (2019). Review of maritime transport 2019. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/webflyer/review-maritime- transport-2019.
  • Witte, P., Wiegmans, B., Van Oort, F. & Spit, T. (2014). Governing inland ports: A multi-dimensional approach to addressing inland port–city challenges in European transport corridors. Journal of Transport Geography, 36, 42-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.02.011.
  • Yu, L., Zhang, J. & Chen, S. (2020). Urban and port development dynamics: A case study. Sustainability, 12(2857), 1-18. DOI: 10.3390/su12072857
  • Zhao, Q., Xu, H., Wall, R.S. & Stavropoulos, S. (2017). Building a bridge between port and city: Improving the urban competitiveness of port cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 59, 120- 133. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.01.014.
Toplam 25 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Çevresel Değerlendirme ve İzleme
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

İshak Altınpınar 0000-0002-1769-3857

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 16 Mart 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi
Gönderilme Tarihi 19 Ocak 2025
Kabul Tarihi 12 Şubat 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Altınpınar, İ. (2025). Green Port and City Integration: Sustainable Approaches in Location Selection. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 10(2), 132-138. https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1622890


13221            13345           13349              13352              13353              13354          13355    13356   13358   13359   13361     13363   13364                crossref1.png            
         Paperity.org                                  13369                                         EBSCOHost                                                        Scilit                                                    CABI   
JAES/AAS-Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences/Anatolian Academic Sciences&Anadolu Çevre ve Hayvancılık Dergisi/Anadolu Akademik Bilimler-AÇEH/AAS