Adıyaman University Campus Plan: Design, Development and Snapshot after Earthquake

Öz

Universities have a significant role in higher education with their campuses, including educational, social, cultural, and sports facilities. The campus is a place of settlement and daily life in diverse activities for students, staff, and city residents. Adıyaman University campus is one of the campuses founded in the last twenty years with a great ratio of establishments. Besides, it has the size and other features of the suburban campuses by being integrated into the city. This research investigates Adıyaman University Campus from the design perspective, and a development track study is conducted. Satellite imagery is used to observe the development and be evaluated the original master plan in a time sequence. The consistency and integrity of the establishment of universities are important to define the actual situation for further development. Besides, a section is implemented into the research to record the situation after the big earthquakes on February 2023. This snapshot is an initial observation of Adıyaman Campus, one of the most affected cities by Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes. The design framework of the campus and conducted brief literature survey about university campuses present an explanatory environment of the case. The framework of tracking campus development by satellite images figures the construction processes over 17 years. With the snapshot after the earthquake, the presented case and the conducting evaluations and documents contribute to the area as a valuable example.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Campus planning
• Adıyaman University
• Development Track
• Satellite Imagery

Kaynakça

1. Bahari, N. B., & Said, I. Bin. (2011). Establishing a Greenway Network for University Campus.
2. Coulson, J., Roberts, P., & Taylor, I. (2015). The future of the campus: Architecture and master planning trends. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 19(4), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2015.1026421
3. Dober, R. (1992). Campus Design. Wiley&Sons.
4. Erçevik, B. (2008). Üniversitelerde Sosyal Mekan Kullanımlarının İncelenmesi: Kent Üniversitesi, Kent İçi Ve Kent Dışı Kampüsler. Yıldız Teknik University.
5. Erçevik, B., & Önal, F. (2011). Üniversite Kampüs Sistemlerinde Sosyal Mekan Kullanımları. Megaron Journal, 6(3), 151–161.
6. Erkman, U. (1990). Büyüme ve Gelişme Açısından Üniversite Kampüslerinde Planlama ve Tasarım Sorunları. İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi.
7. Güneş, Z., & Gökçe, D. (2022). Dağınık Planlı Kent Dışı Genç Üniversite Yerleşkelerinde Büyüme ve Gelişme: Düzce Üniversitesi Konuralp Yerleşkesi Örneği. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 10, 847–861. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.755187
8. Kahveci, H. (2021). Sustainability of University Campuses: Bilecik Seyh Edebali University Example, Bilecik/Turkey. European Journal of Science and Technology, 27, 810–817. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.983505

9. Kuyrukçu, Z., & Alkan, A. (2021). Üniversitelerin Şehir içi Yer Seçimine Yönelik Metodolojik Bir Yaklaşım. Yuksekogretim Dergisi, 11(3), 649–670. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.20.704647
10. Lidsky, A. J. (2002). A perspective on campus planning. In New Directions for Higher Education (Vol. 2002, Issue 119, pp. 69–76). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/HE.73
11. Merlin, P. (2006). The campus or back to the city? City-university spatial relationships. In Ciudad y universidad. Ciudades universitarias campus urbanos.
12. Mevzuat Bilgi Sistemi, T. C. (2023). Yükseköğreti̇m Kurumlari Teşki̇lati Kanunu.
13. Neuman, D. J. (2013). Building Type Basics for College and University Facilities (2nd ed.). Wiley.
14. Özdemir, N., & Sivri, G. H. (2019). Üniversite ile Kent Arasında Bir İletişim Aracı Olarak Üniversite Müzeleri. Mimarlık Dergisi, Temmuz-Ağu, 55–58.
15. Salihoğlu, T., Salihoğlu, G., Özyılmaz Küçükyağcı, P., & Yıldız, M. (2021). Kampüs Tasarımının Öğrencilerin Kampüs Yaşamının Kalitesine Etkisi: Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi Çayırova Kampüsü Master Planı Örneği. Kent Akademisi, 14(4), 975–994. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.909791
16. Sun, C. J., & Chiou, S. C. (2019). The comparison of campus planning development at the initial stage of school establishment: A study of the two newly instituted private universities of science and technology in Taiwan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061525
17. Terro, M. J., Soliman, A. M., & Angell, J. (2021). Taxonomy of tertiary education campus planning. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 45(1), 19–37.
18. Türeyen, M. N. (2002). Yükseköğretim Kurumları-Kampüsler. Tasarım Yayın Grubu.
19. Turner, P. V. (1984). Campus: An American planning tradition. Cambridge. MIT Press Series 7.
20. URL-1. YÖK. (2023). Yükseköğretim Kurulu. Retrieved March 6, 2023, from https://www.yok.gov.tr/universiteler/universitelerimiz
21. URL-2. AFAD. (2023). Retrieved August 6, 2023, from https://www.afad.gov.tr/
22. URL-3. T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı. (2023). Retrieved March 6, 2023, from, https://www.sbb.gov.tr/
23. URL-4. T.C. Adıyaman Valiliği. (2023). Retrieved August 6, 2023, from http://www.adiyaman.gov.tr/
24. URL-5. Adıyaman Üniversitesi. (2023). Retrieved August 6, 2023, from https://adiyaman.edu.tr/tr
25. URL-6. Google Earth. (2023). Retrieved August 6, 2023, from https://earth.google.com/web/search/adıyaman+üniversitesi/@37.74792471,38.22759184,681.1862758a,2591.70284338d,35y,359.99999999h,0t,0r/data=CigiJgokCeSEOLGE5kRAETevUFEg5ERAGaMNTTBlMTtAIaUnqW_ZIztA