An Important Value of Turkey: Lavender (Lavandula stoaches L.) Honey

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 53 - 64, 30.06.2024

Aslı Özkök

https://doi.org/10.35206/jan.1469441

Öz

Lavandula stoechas L., belonging to the Lamiaceae family, is locally known as “karabaşotu, karan, gargan, keşişotu” and is used in central nervous system diseases (epilepsy and migraine), in the treatment of various wounds and in reducing blood sugar. It is also used as analgesic, antiseptic, sedative, expectorant, cardiotonic and to heal eczema. L. stoechas L. is also well known good nectar source for the honeybees. In this study, melissopalynological, total phenolic and chemical compound analysis of L. stoechas L. honey produced in Kemalpaşa-İzmir was examined. To our knowledge, this is the first study conducted on this subject in Turkey.
As a result of the study, 10 plant taxa were determined in the honey and L. stoechas L. pollen was found to be dominant with 41.37%. Sanguisorba spp., Cistaceae, Ericaceae, Rosaceae, Trifolium spp., Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Chenopodiaceae and Echium spp. plants, respectively, were detected in the honey in important minor and minor proportions.
In addition to melissopalynological analysis, total phenolic and chemical compounds analyses were performed. As a result of total phenolic analysis 385.7223±2.253298101 mgGAE/L was found as a total phenolic amount. On the other hand, acetic acids and esters (5.87%), aldehydes (3.05%), alcohols (1.59%), carboxylic acids and esters (18.10%), fatty acids and esters (27.22%), hydrocarbons (7.96%), ketones (14.98%), terpenes (2.56%) and other chemical compounds (6.63%) were determined by the GC-MS analysis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Honey, chemical compounds, Lavandula stoaches L., pollen analysis, Turkey

Etik Beyan

-

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

Teşekkür

I would like to thank Balyum Arı Ürünleri-Osman Yaşar for help us to obtain the honey samples for our study.

Kaynakça

• Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. (2016). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 181(1), 1-20.
• Anonymus. (2000). Retrieved November 20, 2023 frrom http://www.paldat.org/
• Anonymus. (2021). Retrieved March 25, 2024 from https://www.lafsozluk.com/2009/03/kemealpasa
• Anonymus. (2024). Retrieved March 27, 2024 from https://pollenatlas.net/lavandula-stoechas
• Can, Z., Yildiz, O., Sahin, H., Turumtay, E. A., Silici, S., & Kolayli, S. (2015). An investigation of Turkish honeys: Their physico-chemical properties, antioxidant capacities and phenolic profiles. Food chemistry, 180, 133-141.
• Castro-Vázquez, L., Leon-Ruiz, V., Alañon, M. E., Pérez-Coello, M. S., & González-Porto, A. V. (2014). Floral origin markers for authenticating Lavandin honey (Lavandula angustifolia x latifolia). Discrimination from Lavender honey (Lavandula latifolia). Food Control, 37, 362-370.
• Çelik, T., & Aslantürk, Ö. (2007). Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of Lavandula stoechas aqueous extracts. Biologia, 62(3), 292-296.
• Çinbilgel, İ., & Kurt, Y. (2019). A Research on Species Diversity and Ethno Botanical Utilization of Lamiaceae Family in Southern Turkey. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 23(1), 90-97.
• Ez zoubi, Y., Bousta, D., & Farah, A. (2020). A phytopharmacological review of a Mediterranean plant: Lavandula stoechas L., Clinical Phytoscience, 6, 1-9.
• Gedik, O., Kürşat, M., Kiran, Y., & Karataş, M. (2016). Türkiye ‘de Yayılış Gösteren Bazı Taksonların Karyolojik Yönden Araştırılması. KSÜ Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(4), 462-468.
• Guyot-Declerck, C., Renson, S., Bouseta, A., & Collin, S. (2002). Floral quality and discrimination of Lavandula stoechas, Lavandula angustifolia, and Lavandula angustifolia×latifolia honeys. Food Chemistry, 79(4), 453-459.
• Karabagias, I. K., Karabagias, V. K., & Riganakos, K. A. (2019). Physico-chemical parameters, phenolic profile, in vitro antioxidant activity and volatile compounds of ladastacho (Lavandula stoechas) from the region of Saidona. Antioxidants, 8(4), 80.
• Küçük, S., Altıntaş, A., Demirci, B., Koca, F., & Başer, K. H. C. (2019). Morphological, anatomical and phytochemical characterizations of Lavandula stoechas L. subsp. stoechas Growing in Turkey. Natural Volatiles and Essential Oils, 6(2), 9-19.
• Louveaux, J., Maurizio, A., & Vorwohl, G. (1978). International commission for bee botany of IUBS. Methods of melissopalynology. Bee Word, 59(4), 139-157.
• Özkök, A. D’Arcy, B., & Sorkun, K. (2010) Total Phenolic Acid and Total Flavonoid Content of Turkish Pine Honeydew Honey. Journal of ApiProduct and ApiMedical Science, 2(2), 65-71.
• Özkök, A. (2019). Determination of antioxidant capacities, chemical composition and melissopalynological characterization of Verbascum spp. and Euphorbia spp. honeys. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 28(4), 2644-2649.
• Sorkun, K. (2008). Türkiye’nin Nektarlı bitkileri, polenleri ve balları. Ankara, Türkiye.
• Terrab, A., González, A. G., Díez, M. J., & Heredia, F. J. (2003). Characterization of Moroccan unifloral honeys using multivariate analysis. European Food Research and Technology, 218(1), 88-95.
• Temiz A., Şener A., Tüylü Özkök, A., Sorkun K., & Salih B. (2011). Antibacterial activity of bee propolis samples from different geographical regions of Turkey against two foodborne pathogens, Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes. Turkish Journal of Biology, 35(4), 503–511.