EVALUATIONS OF HOME-EDUCATED STUDENTS AND THEIR FAMILIES ON THE EDUCATION PROCESS

Öz

Due to various health problems, the students who cannot attend schools are educated at home but there are not enough studies available on this subject. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate perceptions of the students who are ducated at hopme due to the their chronic sickness and their families about their home education processes. The qualitative research method was implemented as a case study including semi-structured interview technique. The research group of the study was home-educated students (n= 46) and their families (n = 46). After the data collection process was completed, the data were evaluated using descriptive analysis by stating as frequencies and percentages. 78,2% of the parents in the research group expressed that their children benefited from home education services, as they were located in a safe environment. All of the parents were found to be concerned that their social development was insufficient. 89,1% of them were generally satisfied with home education practices. 78,2% of the families stated that teachers should have been available from all subjects, 63% of them said that the educational materials were inadequate, and 60% of them pointed out that the course books used within education should have been more visual and enjoyable. 86.9% of these children stated that after the home education practice, there was a decrease in some their symptoms such as anger, depression, frustration and insomnia.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Home education,children with special needs,families with children with chronic sickness,education process

Kaynakça

1. Aymen Peker, E., Taş, E. (2017). Evde Eğitim Uygulaması Üzerine Bir Durum Çalışması: Evde Fen Eğitimi. KSBD, 9 (9): 2, 139-173.
2. Basham, P., Merrifield, J., Hepburn, C.R (2007). Homeschooling from the Extreme to the Mainstream. Canada: The Fraser Institute. source: on 03.04.2018 from http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/ twps0053.html
3. Bauman, K.J. (2001) Home Schooling in the United States: Trends and Characteristics. Population Division, Working Paper Series No. 53. From online source: http://www.census.gov/population/www/ documentation/twps0053.html#impact
4. Collom, E. (2005). The Ins and Outs of Homeschooling: The Determinants of Parental Motivations and Student Achievement.” Education and Urban Society, 37, 307-335.
5. Dursun, F. (2006). Öğretim Sürecinde Araç Kullanımı. İlköğretmen Dergisi. 1: 8-9.
6. Ensign, J. (2000). Defying the Stereotypes of Special Education: Home School Students. Peabody Journal of Education, 75 1 (2): 147-158.
7. Fidan, K. N. (2008). İlköğretimde Araç Gereç Kullanımına İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşleri. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 1 (1): 48-61.
8. Green, C.L., Hoover-Dempsey, K.V. (2007). Why Do Parents Homeschool? A Systematic Examination of Parental Involvement.” Education and Urban Society, 39, 264-285.

9. Hill, P.T. (2000). Home Schooling and the Future of Public Education. Peabody Journal of Education. 75 (1/2): 20-31.
10. Kırcali-Iftar, G. (1998). Özel Eğitim. Özel Gereksinimli Bireyler ve Özel Eğitim. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi, Açık Öğretim Yayınları.
11. Luffman, J. (1998). When parents replace teachers: the homeschooling option. Canadian Social Trends. Autumn: 8-10.
12. Mercan, H., Yildirim Sarı, H. (2018). Lise Öğrencilerinde Akran Zorbalığı ve Sosyodemografik Değişkenlerle İlişkisi. FNJN Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Dergisi; 26 (1): 21-29.
13. Ministry of National Education (2010). From online source http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/2629_0.html on 24.02.2018
14. Morton, R. (2010). Home education: Constructions of choice, International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education. 3(1): 45-56.
15. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3.rd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
16. Petrie, A.J. (1995). Home Educators and the Law within Europe. International Review of Education. 41 3 (4): 285-296.
17. Preiss, J. (1989). Homeschooling: What’s That? Paper presented at the Mid-South Educational Research Association meeting, LittleRock, AR (Nov. 8-10).
18. Pretti Frontczak, K., Bricker, D. (1998). An Activity-Based Approach to Early Intervention, London: ETS Publisher.
19. Roussinov, D., Zhao, J.L. (2003). Automatic discovery of similarity relationships through Web mining. Decision Support Syst., 35(1): 149–166.
20. Sad, N., Akdağ, M. (2010). Evde Eğitim. Millî Eğitim Dergisi. Sayı 188: 19-31.
21. Sahin, Y.G., Balta S, Ercan, T. (2010). The Use of ınternet resources by university students during their course projects elicitation: A Case Study. Turk. Online J. Edu. Technol., – TOJET, 9(2): 234-244.
22. Smith C. F., Williams E. M. (2009). Motivations, Sacrifices, and Challenges: Black Parents’ Decisions to Home School. Urban Rev, 41, 369–389.
23. Spiegler, T. (2009). Why state sanctions fail to deter home education? An analysis of home education in Germany and its implications for home education policies. Theory and Research in Education, 7(3), 297-309.
24. Taylor, J. C., Therrien, W. J., Kaldenberg, E., Watt, S., Chanlen, N., & Hand, B. (2011). Using an inquiry-based teaching approach to improve science outcomes for students with disabilities: Snapshot and longitudinal data. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 15 (1), 27-39.
25. Tasdan, M., Demir, Ö. (2010). Alternatif Bir Eğitim Modeli Olarak Ev Okulu. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama. 9 (18): 81-99.
26. Taylor, A. (2012). Self-concept in home schooling children. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
27. Vandenbroeck, M., Roets, G. & Roose, R. (2012). Why the evidence-based paradigm in early childhood education and care is anything but evident. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 20 (4), 537‐552
28. Wayman. K.I., & Lynch. E.W. (1991). Home-based early childhood services: Cultural sensitivity in a family systems approach. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. 10 (4). 56-70.
29. Winstanley, C. (2009). Too cool for school? Gifted children and homeschooling. Theory and Research in Education, 7(3), 347‐362.
30. Yildirim, N., Talas, S., Yazici, L., Nural, H., Celebi, I., Cetin, K., Acet, O., Pelitli, U., Caylak, M. (2015). Evde eğitim alan öğrencilerin eğitim süreçlerinin değerlendirilmesi (Tokat İli Örneği). Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulamaları Araştırmaları Dergisi-EKUAD, 1 (1): 33-52.