NEGOTIATING WITH THE TALIBAN: HOW WILL IT AFFECT THE FUTURE OF AFGHANISTAN?

Yıl 2020, , 19 - 27, 18.05.2020

Qaisar Nasrat

https://doi.org/10.35344/japss.600987

Cited By: 1

Öz

In
response to the 9/11 terrorist attack in New York, US military launched an
operation on October 7, 2001. Despite the totally removal of the Taliban in
2001, now Afghanistan
is more insecure than ever. According to the Special Inspector General for
Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), Taliban controlling the 43 per cent of
Afghanistan’s districts and threaten 70% of Afghanistan. After President Donald
Trump's will to end the longest war in American history, special representative
Zalmay Khalilzad began to shuttle between the countries that might have an
impact on the Afghan issue. Since September 2018, Khalilzad has held five
rounds of talks with the Taliban.

The most important issues of these negotiations are: The
United States wants to ensure that Afghanistan will not be a shelter for terrorist
organizations, cutting off ties with organizations such as al-Qaeda, Taliban
talks with the Afghan government and a ceasefire. On the other side, the only
condition of the Taliban is that the
clear timetable of foreign forces complete
withdrawal from Afghanistan. Also, Afghan president Gani stressed that they
would void the outcome of the negotiations that excluded the elected
government. The American side gives the
message that the process continues with Gani's knowledge and support.

After U.S. withdraw, the predictions that the Taliban can
return to Kabul are pushing Washington to pursue peace talks and to accept the
Taliban as a political reality is the defeat in any case for the United States. On the other side, Afghans are
concerned that negotiation with the Taliban could destroy the 18-year gains in
democratic and human rights fields.

Within this pessimistic atmosphere, is it posible to negotiate with
fragmented, factionalised and undisciplined groups of Taliban to be
successful?, Is the US-Taliban agreement sufficient for peace?, how will it
affect the future of Afghanistan? and is it beginning of dark times for women
and minorities in the Afghanistan?. This article tries to answer the above
questions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Afghanistan, Afghan government, peace talks, Taliban, USA

Kaynakça

• Aktan, Sertaç, ABD ve Taliban arasındaki barış görüşmeleri 25 Şubat'ta devam edecek, 28.01.2019, https://tr.euronews.com/2019/01/28/abd-ve-taliban-arasindaki-baris-gorusmeleri-25-subat-ta-devam-edecek
• Anadolu Ajansı, ABD'nin Afganistan Özel Temsilcisi Halilzad: Taliban ile barış görüşmeleri için ilerleme sağlandı, 29.01.2019, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/abdnin-afganistan-ozel-temsilcisi-halilzad-taliban-ile-baris-gorusmeleri-icin-ilerleme-saglandi/1377586#
• Arjmand, Mohammad Jafar Javadi, Taliban Movement and Its Influence on Pakistan, Afghanistan, and the United States Relations, Central Eurasia Studies, International Center for Advanced Studies, Law School, Political Science, Second Year, No 3, Winter and Spring, 2009- 10, pp.44
• Azami, Dawood, Guerra de Afganistán: las concesiones que se tienen que hacer para alcanzar la paz con el Talibán (y los principales obstáculos), 15 July 2019,
• https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-48986359?ocid=socialflow_twitter
• ABD ile Taliban anlaştı: Afganistan'da ateşkes ilan edilecek, barış görüşmeleri yapılacak, 28 January 2019, https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-47034109
• Cameron, David, “A Role for Federalism in Afghanistan after the Taliban”, Federations, Special Issue on Afghanistan, 2001.
• Darby, J. and Ginty, Roger Mac (ed), ”Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Peace Processes and Post-war Reconstruction.” Palgrave Macmillan UK. 2008.
• Khalilzad: We reached a general agreement with the Taliban; Ghani demanded Taliban to begun serious talks, BBC Persian, January 28, 2019, http://www.bbc.com/persian/afghanistan-47028942
• Mashal, Mujib and Schmitt Eric. 2018. “White House Orders Direct Taliban Talks to Jump-Start Afghan Negotiation.” The New York Times, July 15. https://www.nytimes.com/2018 /07/15/world/asia/afghanistantaliban-directnegotiations. html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first column-region®ion=topnews&WT.nav=top-news
• Mir, Haroun, “The Dilemma of Representation in Afghan Peace Negotiation.” Atimes, August 6, 2018. http://www.atimes.com/thedilemma-of-representation-in-afghan-peace-negotiations/
• Open Society Foundations, A peace solution for Afghanistan, May 2016, http://www.epd-afg.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Policy-Brief-Dari.pdf
• Osman, Borhan, “The Murree Peace Talk: Divisive Peace Talk Further Complicated by Mullah Omar’s Death.” Afghanistan Analyst Network, August 5, 2015. https://www.afghanistananalysts.org/the-murree-process-divisive-peace-talks furthercomplicated-by-mullah-omars-death/
• Sadr, Omar, Peace Processes in Afghanistan, Afghan Institute for Strategic Studies, Kabul 2018, pp. 10-11.
• Safi, Khalilullah and Thomas Ruttig, “Understanding Hurdles to Afghan Peace Talks: Are the Taleban a Political Party?” Afghanistan Analyst Network, June 27, 2018. https://www.afghanistananalysts.org/understanding-hurdles-to-afghan-peace-talks-arethe-taleban-a-political-party/
• Shahrani, M. Nazif, ‘Not ‘Who?’ but ‘How?’: Governing Afghanistan after the Conflict.’ Federations, 2001, Special Issue on Afghanistan.
• Shahrani, M. Nazif, “The Challenge of Post-Taliban Governance.’ ISIM Newsletter, 2003, no. 12: 22–23.
• Wormer, Nils, “Exploratory Talks and Peace Initiative in Afghanistan: Actors, Demands and Germany’s Role as Mediator.” Germen Institute for International and Security Affairs, SWP, 2012, Comments 44.
• 8subh newspaper, year 5, no: 1249, 1 october 2011, kabul afghanistan, p. 2