Investigating the Aviation English Needs of Ab-Initio Air Traffic Controllers

Öz

The aim of the study was to investigate the Aviation English needs of ab-initio air traffic controllers by applying a needs analysis model from the field of English for Specific Purposes, which emphasizes three key dimensions: lacks, wants, and necessities. The participant group comprised 86 ab-initio air traffic controllers who were enrolled in course-based and university-based undergraduate education programs in Türkiye. The data were collected using a structured questionnaire employing a 5-point Likert scale. The results revealed that the highest average score was in the want dimension (M= 3.9163), indicating a strong internal motivation to improve Aviation English skills. The necessity dimension followed (M= 3.6964), showing that participants recognized the importance of meeting professional language requirements. The lack dimension received the lowest score (M= 3.5388), suggesting a moderate level of perceived language deficiencies. These findings point to the need for training programs that balance personal motivation with regulatory and operational standards. A well-designed Aviation English program should integrate learners’ goals with the communication demands of the profession to enhance both language development and aviation safety.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Air Traffic Controller
• Aviation
• Aviation English
• Aviation English Training
• Needs Analysis

Öğrenci Hava Trafik Kontrolörlerinin Havacılık İngilizcesi İhtiyaçlarının İncelenmesi

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı özel amaçlı ingilizce alanında geliştirilen ve eksiklikler, istekler ile gereklilikler olmak üzere üç temel boyutu vurgulayan ihtiyaç analizi modeli aracılığıyla, öğrenci hava trafik kontrolörlerinin havacılık ingilizcesi ihtiyaçlarını incelemektir. Araştırmanın katılımcı grubu Türkiye’de kurs ve üniversitelerde lisans programlarına kayıtlı 86 öğrenci hava trafik kontrolöründen oluşmaktadır. Veriler 5 dereceli Likert ölçeği kullanan yapılandırılmış bir soru formu aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Bulgular en yüksek ortalama puanın istek boyutunda olduğunu göstermektedir (M= 3.9163). Bu durum havacılık ingilizcesi becerilerini geliştirmeye yönelik güçlü bir içsel motivasyonu işaret etmektedir. Bunu katılımcıların mesleki dil yeterliliklerini karşılama gerekliliğini fark ettiklerini ortaya koyan gereklilik boyutu izlemektedir (M= 3.6964). En düşük puanı alan eksiklik boyutu ise (M= 3.5388), algılanan dil yetersizliklerinin orta düzeyde olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu bulgular, kişisel motivasyon ile düzenleyici ve operasyonel standartlar arasında bir denge kuran eğitim programlarına duyulan ihtiyacı işaret etmektedir. Etkili bir havacılık ingilizcesi programı öğrenenlerin bireysel hedeflerini mesleğin iletişimsel gereklilikleriyle bütünleştirerek hem dil gelişimini hem de havacılık emniyetini artırmayı hedeflemelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hava Trafik Kontrolörleri
• Havacılık
• Havacılık İngilizcesi
• Havacılık İngilizcesi Eğitimi
• İhtiyaç Analizi

Kaynakça

1. Abeyratne, R. (2016). Regulation of Air Transport. Springer International Pu.
2. Aiguo, W. (2008). Reassessing the position of Aviation English: From a special language to English for Specific Purposes. Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para–Fines Específicos (AELFE), 15, 151-164.
3. Alderson, J. (2011). The Politics of Aviation English Testing. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8, 386 - 403.
4. Alderson, J. C. (2009). Air safety, language assessment policy, and policy implementation: The case of aviation English. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 168-187.
5. Ali, H. I., & Salih, A. (2013). Perceived views of language teachers on the use of needs analysis in ESP materials writing. English Language Teaching, 6(3), 11-19.
6. Alizadeh, M. (2016). The impact of motivation on English language learning. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1(1), 11–15.
7. Astika, G. (1999). The role of needs analysis in English for specific purposes. TEFLIN Journal, 10(1), 31-47. Barbieri, B. (2015). Aviation English: History And Pedagogy. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 2, 615-623.
8. Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various χ 2 approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 296-298.

9. Basturkmen, H. (2015). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Springer. Billings, C. E., & Cheaney, E. S. (1981). Information transfer problems in the aviation system (No. A-8567).
10. Brown, J. D. (2016). Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Routledge.
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2020). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı: İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni, SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum (27. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
12. Camelia, G., & Mihai, S. (2010). The economic and social benefits of air transport. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 10(1), 60-66.
13. Campbell-Laird, K. (2004). Aviation English: a review of the language of International Civil Aviation. International Professional Communication Conference, 2004. IPCC 2004. Proceedings., 253-261.
14. Cardosi, K. M. (1994). An analysis of tower (local) controller-pilot voice communications (No. DOT-VNTSC-FAA-94-11). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration.
15. Cardosi, K. M., Brett, B., & Han, S. (1996). An Analysis of TRACON (Terminal Radar Approach Control) Controller-Pilot Voice Communication (No. DOT-VNTSC-FAA-96-7). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration.
16. Cassidy, S. (2016). The academic resilience scale (ARS-30): A new multidimensional construct measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1787), 1-11.
17. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354.
18. Cutting, J. (2011). English for airport ground staff. English for Specific Purposes, 31(1), 3-13.
19. Demirdöken, G. (2019). Ready for Take-Off: An Aviation English Needs Analysis Study in Turkey (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Bahçeşehir University, Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Istanbul, Turkiye.
20. Drayton, J., & Coxhead, A. (2023). The development, evaluation and application of an aviation radiotelephony specialised technical vocabulary list. English for Specific Purposes, 69, 51-66.
21. Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge university press.
22. Estival, D., & Farris, C. (2016). Aviation English as a lingua franca. In S. T. Masi, F. G. Amprimo, G. Ferrairs, & J. E. Priano (Eds.), Aviation English: A Lingua Franca for Pilots and Air Traffic Controllers (pp. 1-21).
23. Feak, C. (2013). ESP and speaking. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 35–53). Wiley-Blackwell.
24. Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (Fourth Edition). London: Sage
25. Graddol, D. (2006). Why Global English may Mean the End of “English as a Foreign Language”. United Kingdom: British Council.
26. Hamzah, H. (2021). Clarity and pronunciation of ab-initio air traffic controller. Aviation, 25(4), 252-261.
27. Hamzah, H., & Fei, W. F. (2018). Miscommunication in Pilot-controller Interaction. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(4).
28. Helmreich, R. L. (1994). Anatomy of a system accident: The crash of Avianca Flight 052. The international journal of aviation psychology, 4(3), 265-284.
29. Hotak, S., Hekmat, A. M., Kamal, M. M., & Rogmal, S. (2024). Investigating English for Specific Purpose (ESP) learners’ perspectives towards factors causing demotivation in ESP classes. JETLEE: Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 4(1), 13–26.
30. Howard, J. W. (2008). “Tower, am I cleared to land?”: Problematic communication in aviation discourse. Human communication research, 34(3), 370-391.
31. Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning Centred Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2010). Doc 9835- AN/453- Manual on the Implementation of ICAO Language Proficiency Requirements, Second Edition.
33. Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford University Press
34. Johnson, E. J., Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (1993). Adapting to time constraints. In Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making (pp. 103-116). Boston, MA: Springer US.
35. Kabdrgalinova, S., Kenzhebekova, A., Mirzoyeva, L., Manapbayeva, Z., & Daineko, Y. A. (2023). Motivating students in learning English for specific purposes (ESP). In DTESI (workshops, short papers).
36. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An Index Of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
37. Karababa, Z. C., & Karagül, S. (2013). A needs analysis for learners of Turkish as a foreign language. Education and Science, 38(170), 361-371.
38. Kraśnicka, I. (2016). English with Flying Colors: The Aviation English and the International Civil Aviation Organization. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 45, 111 - 124.
39. Lambert, C. (2010). A task-based needs analysis: Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 99-112.
40. Lertchalermtipakoon, P., Wongsubun, U., & Kawinkoonlasate, P. (2021). Need analysis: English language use by students in the tourism and hospitality and industry. English Language Teaching, 14(3), 59-71.
41. Lohmann, G., & Pereira, B. A. (2020). Air transport innovations: A perspective article. Tourism Review, 75(1), 95-101.
42. Macalister, J. (2012). Narrative frames and needs analysis. System, 40, 120-128.
43. Mahmoud, S. S. (2014). A framework for investigating foundation year students’ needs in general English in KAU: Needs analysis extended to curriculum development. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 335-342.
44. Malicka, A., Gilabert Guerrero, R., & Norris, J. M. (2019). From needs analysis to task design: Insights from an English for specific purposes context. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 78-106.
45. Mathews, E., Carson, J., Brickhouse, A., & Valdes, E. (2023). Language as a Factor In Aviation Accidents and Serious Incidents: A Handbook for Accident Investigators ed. 3. https://commons.erau.edu/db-lhuft-book/3/ (Accessed on 19 Apr 2025).
46. Moder, C. L. (2013). Aviation English. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 227–242). Wiley Blackwell.
47. Molesworth, B. R., & Estival, D. (2015). Miscommunication in general aviation: The influence of external factors on communication errors. Safety science, 73, 73-79.
48. Morrow, D., Lee, A., & Rodvold, M. (1993). Analysis of problems in routine controller-pilot communication. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(4), 285-302.
49. Morrow, D., Rodvold, M., & Lee, A. (1994). Nonroutine transactions in controller‐pilot communication. Discourse processes, 17(2), 235-258.
50. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248–292.
51. Otilia, S. M., & Brancusi, C. (2015). Needs analysis in English for specific purposes. Annals of the Constantin Brâncuşi University of Târgu Jiu, Economy Series, 1(2), 54-55.
52. Paschke, M., & Lutter, C. (2018). Regulatory Framework of Global Aviation. Biokerosene: Status and Prospects, 59-92. Prinzo, O. V. (1996). An analysis of approach control/pilot voice communications (No. DOT/FAA/AM-96/26). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration.
53. Prinzo, O. V., & Britton, T. W. (1993). ATC/pilot voice communications: a survey of the literature. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/data_research/research/med_humanfacs/oamtechreports/AM93-20.pdf (Accessed on 19 Apr 2025).
54. Prinzo, O. V., Hendrix, A. M., & Hendrix, R. (2008). Pilot English language proficiency and the prevalence of communication problems at five US air route traffic control centers (No. DOT/FAA/AM-08/21). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute.
55. Rahman, M. (2015). English for Specific Purposes (ESP): A Holistic Review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 24-31.
56. Raju, D., Eleswarapu, L., Saiv, R., & Nath, V. (2019). Study and design of smart embedded system for aviation system: a review. Nanoelectronics, Circuits and Communication Systems: Proceeding of NCCS 2017, 573-590.
57. Rankov, D., Jovanović, T., & Kapor, N. (2024). The challenges of aviation communication: Aspects of using aviation English. Megatrend revija, 21(1), 201-216.
58. Rashid, Q. J., & Teslenko, N. (2020). Professionally oriented English teaching of future aviation industry professionals. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11B), 5768-5778.
59. Rawsthorne, L. J., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 326-344.
60. Rochmawati, L. (2017, August). Adapting ICAO Language Aspects into Learning Activities In Esp Course Construction for Air Traffic Controller. In International Conference on English Language Teaching (ICONELT 2017) (pp. 97-102). Atlantis Press.
61. Rodgers, M. (2017). Human factors impacts in air traffic management. Routledge.
62. Ross, S. (1998). Self-assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing, 15(1), 1–20.
63. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.
64. Sally, S., & Pradana, S. A. (2019). A need analysis English for business course. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 12(2), 139-146.
65. Sanne, J. (2001). Creating Safety in Air Traffic Control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 345.
66. Satvindar Singh, R. K., Cheong, C. Y. M., & Rahman, N. A. A. (2021). Spoken and Written Communication Needs of Aviation Management Trainees. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 3(3), 535-547.
67. Seiler, W. (2009). English as a lingua franca in aviation. English Today, 25, 43-48
68. Singh, S., Sharma, S. K., & Parti, R. (2024). Role of Aviation Infrastructure in Aviation Operation. In New Innovations in AI, Aviation, and Air Traffic Technology (pp. 212-245). IGI Global.
69. Sirin, P. & Inan, T.T. (2024). Safety in focus: Analyzing aviation English competency among ab-initio pilots. Collegiate Aviation Review International, 42(2), 41-62.
70. Streiner, D. L. (1994). Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39(3), 135-140.
71. Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
72. Tajima, A. (2004). Fatal miscommunication: English in aviation safety. World Englishes, 23(3), 451-470.
73. Tomak, T., & Pavelić, M. (2017). Motivation towards studying English for specific purposes among students of medical and healthcare studies. Jahr – European Journal of Bioethics, 8, 151–170.
74. Tosqui-Lucks, P., & de Carvalho, A. L. B. (2020). Aeronautical English: Investigating the nature of this specific language in search of new heights. The Especialist, 41(3).
75. Wu, Y. (2012). An empirical study on needs analysis of college business English course. International Education Studies, 5(2), 216-221.
76. Yan, R. (2013). Assessing the English language proficiency of international aviation staff. The Companion to Language Assessment, 1, 484-496.
77. Yang, H. H., Chang, Y. H., & Chou, Y. H. (2023). Subjective measures of communication errors between pilots and air traffic controllers. Journal of Air Transport Management, 112, 102461.