Retraction: Importance of Dietary Fiber in Poultry Nutrition

Öz

The scientific term of fiber is comprised of very diverse group of polymers having various physicochemical properties. The dietary fiber can contribute remarkably to the nutritive value of poultry diets both directly, as energy source, and indirectly, through its effects on digestive and metabolic processes going on in the poultry bird. In order to more accurately predict the nutritive effect of fiber from raw materials, a better characterization of fiber fractions, their degradation in the chicken, and their physiological effects are required. Traditional analytical methods to analyze fiber, as crude fiber (CF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), recover only a changeable fraction of fiber and are hence unfit for evaluation fiber fractions in raw materials and poultry diets. In poultry feeding the fiber gives less amount of energy because of its limited role in digestion however its slight increased proportion (up to 50 g/kg) can be productive for GIT development, thereby improving the digestion of nutrient and also posing good impact on growth and performance. A better understanding on the relation between specific fiber fractions and factors as GIT development, digesta retention time, and microbial colonization will help to develop nutritional strategies using specific fiber fractions to steer GIT health and function to enhance performance, especially under suboptimal environmental conditions.

This article was retracted on June 10, 2021.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Crude fiber
• Neutral detergent fiber
• Poultry nutrition
• Performance

Geri çekildi: Importance of Dietary Fiber in Poultry Nutrition

Öz

The scientific term of fiber is comprised of very diverse group of polymers having various physicochemical properties. The dietary fiber can contribute remarkably to the nutritive value of poultry diets both directly, as energy source, and indirectly, through its effects on digestive and metabolic processes going on in the poultry bird. In order to more accurately predict the nutritive effect of fiber from raw materials, a better characterization of fiber fractions, their degradation in the chicken, and their physiological effects are required. Traditional analytical methods to analyze fiber, as crude fiber (CF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), recover only a changeable fraction of fiber and are hence unfit for evaluation fiber fractions in raw materials and poultry diets. In poultry feeding the fiber gives less amount of energy because of its limited role in digestion however its slight increased proportion (up to 50 g/kg) can be productive for GIT development, thereby improving the digestion of nutrient and also posing good impact on growth and performance. A better understanding on the relation between specific fiber fractions and factors as GIT development, digesta retention time, and microbial colonization will help to develop nutritional strategies using specific fiber fractions to steer GIT health and function to enhance performance, especially under suboptimal environmental conditions.

Bu makale 10-06-2021 tarihinde geri çekildi. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Crude fiber
• Neutral detergent fiber
• Poultry nutrition
• Performance

Kaynakça

1. Annison, G. 1992. Anti-nutritive effect of wheat pentosans in broiler chickens: roles of viscosity and gut microflora. British Poultry Science 33(4): 821–834.
2. Annison, G. 1993. The role of wheat non-starch polysaccharides in broiler nutrition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44(3):405 - 422.
3. Bach Knudsen, K. E. 2001. The nutritional significance of “dietary fibre” analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90 (1–2):3-20.
4. Banfield, M. J., Kwakkel, R. P., Forbes, J. M. 2002. Effects of wheat structure and viscosity on coccidiosis in broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 98:37- 48.
5. Batal, A. B., Parsons, C. M. 2002. Effects of age on nutrient digestibility in chicks fed different diets. Poultry Science 81(3):400-407.
6. Branton, S. L., Lott, B. D., Deaton, J. W., Maslin, W. R., Austin, F. W., Pote, L. M. 1997. The effect of added complex carbohydrates or added dietary fiber on necrotic enteritis lesions in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 76(1): 24–28.
7. Choct, M., Annison, G. 1992. The inhibition of nutrient digestion by wheat pentosans. British Journal of Nutrition. 67(1):123-132.
8. Choct, M., Hughes, R. J., Wang, J., Bedford, M. R., Morgan, A. J., Annison, G. 1996. Increased small intestinal fermentation is partly responsible for the anti-nutritive activity of non-starch polysaccharides in chickens. British Poultry Science 37(3): 609–621.

9. Dierick, N. A., Vervaeke, I. J., Demeyer, D. I., Decuypere, J. A. 1989. Approach to the energetic importance of fibre digestion in pigs. I. Importance of fermentation in the overall energy supply. Animal Feed Science and Technology 23 (1–3):141-167.
10. Forman, L. P., Schneeman, B. O. 2018. Effects of Dietary Pectin and Fat on the Small Intestinal Contents and Exocrine Pancreas of Rats. The Journal of Nutrition 110(10): 1992–1999. Freitas, E. R., Watanabe, P. H., Eduardo, C., Cruz, B., Bezerra, R. M. 2014. Fiber level for laying hens during the growing phase. Ciênc. Agrotec., Lavras 38(2):188-198.
11. González-Alvarado, J. M., Jiménez-Moreno, E., González-Sánchez, D., Lázaro, R., Mateos, G. G. 2010. Effect of inclusion of oat hulls and sugar beet pulp in the diet on productive performance and digestive traits of broilers from 1 to 42 days of age. Animal Feed Science and Technology 162 (1–2):37-46.
12. Henchion, M., McCarthy, M., Resconi, V. C., Troy, D. 2014. Meat consumption: Trends and quality matters. Meat Science 98(3):561-568.
13. Hetland, H., Choct, M., Svihus, B. 2004. Role of insoluble non-starch polysaccharides in poultry nutrition. World’s Poultry Science Journal 60(4):415–422.
14. Iji, P. A., Saki, A. A., Tivey, D. R. 2001. Intestinal structure and function of broiler chickens on diets supplemented with a mannan oligosaccharide. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 81(12):1186-1192.
15. Jha, R., Berrocoso, J. D. 2015. Review: Dietary fiber utilization and its effects on physiological functions awine. Animal 9(9):1441–1452.
16. Jha, R., Berrocoso, J. F. D. 2016. Dietary fiber and protein fermentation in the intestine of swine and their interactive effects on gut health and on the environment: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 212: 18–26.
17. Jha, R., Rossnagel, B., Pieper, R., Van Kessel, A., Leterme, P. 2010. Barley and oat cultivars with diverse carbohydrate composition alter ileal and total tract nutrient digestibility and fermentation metabolites in weaned piglets. Animal 4(5):724–731.
18. Jiménez-Moreno, E., González-Alvarado, J. M., de Coca-Sinova, A., Lázaro, R., Mateos, G. G. 2009a. Effects of source of fibre on the development and pH of the gastrointestinal tract of broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 154 (1–2): 93-101.
19. Jiménez-Moreno, E., Frikha, M., De Coca-Sinova, A., Lázaro, R. P., & Mateos, G. G. 2013. Oat hulls and sugar beet pulp in diets for broilers. 2. Effects on the development of the gastrointestinal tract and on the structure of the jejunal mucosa. Animal Feed Science and Technology 182(1–4): 44–52.
20. Jørgensen, H., Zhao, X. Q., Knudsen, K. E., Eggum, B. O. 1996. The influence of dietary fibre source and level on the development of the gastrointestinal tract, digestibility and energy metabolism in broiler chickens. The British Journal of Nutrition 75(3):379–395.
21. Jørgensen, H., Larsen, T., Zhao, X. Q., Eggum, B. O. 1997. The energy value of short-chain fatty acids infused into the caecum of pigs. The British Journal of Nutrition 77(5):745–756.
22. Just, A., Fernández, J., Jørgensen, H. 1983. The net energy value of diets for growth in pigs in relation to the fermentative processes in the digestive tract and the site of absorption of the nutrients. Livestock Production Science 10 (2):171-186.
23. Krás, R.V.,Kessler, A de M., Ribeiro, AML., Henn, J.D., Bockor, L., Sbrissia, A.F. 2013. Effect of dietary fiber, genetic strain and age on the digestive metabolism of broiler chickens. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 15(2):83-90.
24. Liévin-Le Moal, V., Servin, A.L.2006. The front line of enteric host defense against unwelcome intrusion of harmful microorganisms: mucins, antimicrobial peptides, and microbiota. Clin Microbiol Rev. 19(2):315-317.
25. McDonald, J. C., Whitesides, G. M. 2002. Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a material for fabricating microfluidic devices. Accounts of Chemical Research 35(7): 491-499. Montagne, L., Pluske, J. R., Hampson, D. J. 2003. A review of interactions between dietary fibre and the intestinal mucosa, and their consequences on digestive health in young non-ruminant animals. Animal Feed Science and Technology 108(1–4):95–117.
26. Owusu-Asiedu, A., Patience, J. F., Laarveld, B., Van Kessel, A. G., Simmins, P. H., Zijlstra, R. T. 2006. Effects of guar gum and cellulose on digesta passage rate, ileal microbial populations, energy and protein digestibility, and performance of grower pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84(4):843-52.
27. Pieper, R., Jha, R., Rossnagel, B., Van Kessel, A. G., Souffrant, W. B., Leterme, P. 2008. Effect of barley and oat cultivars with different carbohydrate compositions on the intestinal bacterial communities in weaned piglets. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 66(3):556-66.
28. Jha,R., Woyengo, T. A., Li, J., Bedford, M. R., Vasanthan, T., Zijlstra, R. T. 2015. Enzymes enhance degradation of the fiber–starch–protein matrix of distillers dried grains with solubles as revealed by a porcine in vitro fermentation model and microscopy. Journal of Animal Science 93(3):1039-1051.
29. Rochell, S.J. 2018. Formulation of broiler chicken feeds using distillers dried grains with solubles. Fermentation 4(3): 64.
30. Sadeghi, A., Toghyani, M., Gheisari, A. 2006. Effect of various fiber types and choice feeding of fiber on performance, gut development, humoral immunity, and fiber preference in broiler chicks. Poult Sci. 94(11):2734-2743.
31. Saki, A. A., Hemati Matin, H. R., Zamani, P., Mirzaaghatabar, F. 2011. Non starch polysaccharides and broiler responses. World Applied Sciences Journal 15 (2): 192-198.
32. Sell, J. L. 1996. Physiological limitations and potential for improvement in gastrointestinal tract function of poultry. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 5(1):96–101.
33. Shires, A., Thompson, J. R., Turner, B. V., Kennedy, P. M., Goh, Y. K. 1987. Rate of passage of corn-canola meal and corn-soybean meal diets through the gastrointestinal tract of broiler and White Leghorn chickens. Poultry Science 66(2):289-298.
34. Siregar, A. P., Farrell, D. J. 1980. A comparison of the energy and nitrogen metabolism of starved ducklings and chickens. British Poultry Science 21(3):203-211.
35. Sklan, D., Smirnov, A., Plavnik, I. 2003. The effect of dietary fibre on the small intestines and apparent digestion in the turkey. British Poultry Science 44(5):735-40.
36. Smits, C. H.M., Veldman, A., Verkade, H. J., Beynen, A. C. 1998. The inhibitory effect of carboxymethylcellulose with high viscosity on lipid absorption in broiler chickens coincides with reduced bile salt concentration and raised microbial numbers in the small intestine. Poultry Science 77(10):1534–1539.
37. Smits, C. H.M., Te Maarssen, C. A. A., Mouwen, J. M. V. M., Koninkx, J. F. J. G., Beynen, A. C. 2000. The antinutritive effect of a carboxymethylcellulose with high viscosity on lipid digestibility in broiler chickens is not associated with mucosal damage. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 83(4‐5):239-245.
38. Soest, P. J. Van, Wine, R. H. 1967. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. Journal of the A.O.A.C.
39. Tiwari, U. P., Jha, R. 2016. Nutrient profile and digestibility of tubers and agro-industrial coproducts determined using an in vitro model of swine. Animal Nutrition 2(4): 357–360.
40. Tiwari, U. P., Jha, R. 2017. Nutrients, amino acid, fatty acid and non-starch polysaccharide profile and in vitro digestibility of macadamia nut cake in swine. Animal Science Journal 88(8): 1093–1099.
41. Varel, V. H., Yen, J. T. 1997. Microbial perspective on fiber utilization by swine. Journal of Animal Science 75(10):2715–2722.
42. Zelenka, J. 1968. Influence of the age of chicken on the metabolisable energy values of poultry diets. British Poultry Science 9 (2):135-142.