Evaluation of Usefulness of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Education on Public Health Physicians

Abstract

Objective: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a life-saving process in which many disciplines are involved. In this study, our aim was to evaluate CPR knowledge of public health physicians and determine usefulness of education on this important topic.

Methods: A total of 337 public health physicians were involved in an educational course and asked to answer a questionnaire both before and after the course. The questionnaire involved 26 questions and participants’ personal identifiers were hidden. The results of two questionnaires were compared.

Results: We achieved improvement in knowledge of 315 participants. In majority of the participants, the number of the right answers increased up to 6 to 10 points. We also determined that those who attended to a similar educational course before were more successful than those who did not.

Conclusion: Education on CPR is essential for every discipline involved in medicine. Increasing the knowledge of physicians may decrease mortality and morbidity related to sudden cardiac arrest. Institutions must be encouraged for continuous educational organizations and participation of health care providers from different disciplines must be assured.

Keywords

• Cardiopulmonary resuscitation,education,public health physician

Kaynakça

1. 1. Ozkose Z. Erişkinler İçin Kardiyopulmoner Resüsitasyon: I- Temel Yaşam Desteği. Gazi Med J 2005; 16: 3-13.
2. 2. Jacobs I, Nadkarni V, Bahr J, Berg RA, et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update and simplification of the Utstein templates for resuscitation registries: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Circulation 2004;110: 3385-97.
3. 3. Zipes DP, Wellens HJ. Sudden Cardiac Death. Circulation 1998;98:2334- 51.
4. 4. Ece Y, Unluer EE, Erenler AK, Sener A. Evaluation of characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with cardiac arrest. Eurasian J Emerg Med 2017;16:79-82.
5. 5. Einav S, Wacht O, Kaufman N, Alkalay E. Cardiopulmonary arrest in primary care clinics: more holes than cheese: a survey of the knowledge and attitudes of primary care physicians regarding resuscitation. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017;6:22.
6. 6. Grantham Asm H, Christiansen R. Resuscitation update for general practitioners. Aust Fam Physician. 2016; 45:879-883.
7. 7. Sasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of survival from out-of hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3:63-81.
8. 8. McNally B, Robb R, Mehta M, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest surveillance — Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), United States, October 1, 2005– December 31. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011;60:1–19.

9. 9. Nishiyama C, Iwami T, Kawamura T, et al. Prodromal symptoms of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a report from a large-scale population-based cohort study. Resuscitation.2013;84:558–63.
10. 10. Brooks SC, Lam KK, Morrison LJ. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurring in Southern Ontario health care clinics: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator use. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56:e213–8.
11. 11. Karim HM, Yunus M, Bhattacharyya P, Ahmed G. Comparison of effectiveness of class lecture versus workshop-based teaching of basic life support on acquiring practice skills among the health care providers. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2016;6:61-4.
12. 12. Ong ME, Chan YH, Ang HY, Lim SH, Tan KL. Resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by Asian primary health-care physicians. Resuscitation.2005;65:191-195.
13. 13. Colquhoun M. Resuscitation by primary care doctors. Resuscitation. 2006;70:229–37.