Araştırma Makalesi

Teacher Roles in the Blended Classroom – Swedish Lower Secondary School Teachers’ Boundary Management between Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 12 3 Aralık 2018
Annaliina Gynne , Marcus Persson *
PDF İndir
TR EN

Teacher Roles in the Blended Classroom – Swedish Lower Secondary School Teachers’ Boundary Management between Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces

Öz

The purpose of the study is to explore how Swedish lower secondary school teachers manage blended learning environments, established through using a specific learning management system (LMS) application. In the study, four teachers were followed during a four-month (n)ethnographic fieldwork. Based on analyses of data from video-recordings and observations in physical and virtual classrooms, the study examines teachers’ practices of integrating and segmenting the two classroom domains. In order to unpack the realms of these practices, the study employs affordance and boundary theories. Through the analysis of participants’ boundary practices and their use of communicative affordances in and across space and time, four teacher roles, enacted and emerging through teaching practices, are presented. The paper concludes with a discussion of how participants’ engagement with virtual and physical learning environment compels teachers to reflect upon their preferred teacher role in the new multidimensional classrooms.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Blended Classroom,Affordances,Boundary work,Chaining,teacher role

Kaynakça

  1. ReferencesAkkerman, S. & Bakker, A. (2011). Learning at the boundary: An introduction. International Journal of Educational Research, 50 (1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.002
  2. Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E. & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a Day’s Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25 (3), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.2307/259305
  3. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2002). Explorations in bilingual instructional interaction: A sociocultural perspective on literacy. Journal of the European Association on Learning and Instruction, 5 (2), 557-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00032-9
  4. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2004). Visually oriented language use. Discursive and technological resources in Swedish Deaf pedagogical arenas. In M. V. Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), Sociolinguistics in European Deaf Communities. Vol 10. The Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities Series, (pp.171-207). Washington DC: Gallaudet University.
  5. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2014). Languaging: Ways-of-being-with-words across Disciplinary Boundaries and Empirical Sites. In Paulasto, H., Riionheimo, H., Meriläinen, L. & Kok, M. (Eds.), Language Contacts at the Crossroads of Disciplines. (pp.89-130). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  6. Barton, D. & Lee, C. (2013). Language online. Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. London: Routledge.
  7. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Engeness, I. & Edwards, A. (2017). The Complexity of Learning: Exploring the Interplay of Different Mediational Means in Group Learning with Digital Tools. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61 (6), 650-667. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1173093
  9. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5, 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(95)00021-6
  10. Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E, Vitak, J. & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180

Kaynak Göster

APA
Gynne, A., & Persson, M. (2018). Teacher Roles in the Blended Classroom – Swedish Lower Secondary School Teachers’ Boundary Management between Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 6(12), 222-246. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.442499
AMA
1.Gynne A, Persson M. Teacher Roles in the Blended Classroom – Swedish Lower Secondary School Teachers’ Boundary Management between Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces. JCER. 2018;6(12):222-246. doi:10.18009/jcer.442499
Chicago
Gynne, Annaliina, ve Marcus Persson. 2018. “Teacher Roles in the Blended Classroom – Swedish Lower Secondary School Teachers’ Boundary Management between Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces”. Journal of Computer and Education Research 6 (12): 222-46. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.442499.
EndNote
Gynne A, Persson M (01 Aralık 2018) Teacher Roles in the Blended Classroom – Swedish Lower Secondary School Teachers’ Boundary Management between Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces. Journal of Computer and Education Research 6 12 222–246.
IEEE
[1]A. Gynne ve M. Persson, “Teacher Roles in the Blended Classroom – Swedish Lower Secondary School Teachers’ Boundary Management between Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces”, JCER, c. 6, sy 12, ss. 222–246, Ara. 2018, doi: 10.18009/jcer.442499.
ISNAD
Gynne, Annaliina - Persson, Marcus. “Teacher Roles in the Blended Classroom – Swedish Lower Secondary School Teachers’ Boundary Management between Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces”. Journal of Computer and Education Research 6/12 (01 Aralık 2018): 222-246. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.442499.
JAMA
1.Gynne A, Persson M. Teacher Roles in the Blended Classroom – Swedish Lower Secondary School Teachers’ Boundary Management between Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces. JCER. 2018;6:222–246.
MLA
Gynne, Annaliina, ve Marcus Persson. “Teacher Roles in the Blended Classroom – Swedish Lower Secondary School Teachers’ Boundary Management between Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces”. Journal of Computer and Education Research, c. 6, sy 12, Aralık 2018, ss. 222-46, doi:10.18009/jcer.442499.
Vancouver
1.Annaliina Gynne, Marcus Persson. Teacher Roles in the Blended Classroom – Swedish Lower Secondary School Teachers’ Boundary Management between Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces. JCER. 01 Aralık 2018;6(12):222-46. doi:10.18009/jcer.442499