Evaluation of Reliability, Quality, Accuracy, and Content of YouTube Videos on Bruxism in Children- A Descriptive Study

Yıl 2023, , 69 - 79, 27.03.2023

Yeşim Ölçer Us , Mahmut Caner Us

https://doi.org/10.26650/jchild.2023.1238386

Öz

Objective: People frequently refer to the internet for information about their health problems. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability, quality, accuracy, and content of YouTube videos about bruxism in children. Material and Methods: YouTube was searched systematically using multiple and specific keywords for ‘Bruxism in Children’. The first 60 videos from each keyword search were analyzed. Descriptive data were recorded. Videos were categorized and scored according to publishers. Researchers evaluated the reliability of the videos by using the modified DISCERN, the quality of the videos by using the Global Quality Score (GQS), and accuracy of the videos by using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria and the contents of the videos. Results: A total of 80 videos meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The average values of JAMA, DISCERN, and GQS were 1.3/4.00, 2.4/5.00, and 2.8/5.00, respectively. The contents of 35 videos were non-comprehensive. According to the contents, the median values differed in the DISCERN and GQS (p<0.001), but not in JAMA (p=0.812). The median value of the DISCERN, GQS, and Content scores in comprehensive videos were all higher (p<0.001). According to individual users, the median DISCERN, GQS, and Content values were lower (p=0.006, p=0.004, p=0.015), and the median interaction index value was higher (p=0.010). Conclusion: YouTube may not be considered a completely reliable source of information on bruxism in children. Health professionals should be encouraged to create and publish more comprehensive, reliable, and accurate videos on bruxism in children.

Anahtar Kelimeler

YouTube, Internet, Bruxism, Teeth Grinding, Children

Çocuklarda Bruksizmle İlgili Youtube Videolarının Güvenilirliği, Kalitesi, Doğruluğu ve İçeriğinin Değerlendirilmesi- Tanımlayıcı Çalışma

Öz

Amaç: İnsanlar sağlık sorunları hakkında bilgi almak için sıklıkla internete başvururlar. Bu çalışmanın amacı, çocuklarda bruksizm ile ilgili YouTube videolarının güvenilirliği, kalitesi, doğruluğu ve içeriğini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: YouTube’taki videolar ‘Çocuklarda Bruksizm’ için birden fazla ve spesifik anahtar kelime kullanılarak sistematik olarak arandı. Her bir anahtar kelime aramasından ilk 60 video analiz edildi. Tanımlayıcı veriler kaydedildi. Videolar yayıncılara göre kategorilere ayrıldı ve puanlandırıldı. Videoların güvenilirliği modifiye DISCERN, kalitesi Global Quality Score (GQS), doğruluğu Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark kriterleri ve içerikleri belirlenen kriterler göre değerlendirdi. Bulgular: Dahil edilme kriterlerini karşılayan toplam 80 video çalışmaya dahil edildi. JAMA, DISCERN ve GQS’ in ortalama değerleri sırasıyla 1.3/4.00, 2.4/5.00 ve 2.8/5.00 idi. 35 videonun içeriği kapsamlı değildi. İçeriğe göre, medyan DISCERN ve GQS skorları farklılık gösterirken (p<0,001) JAMA’da farklılık görülmedi (p=0,812). Kapsamlı videolarda DISCERN, GQS ve Content puanlarının medyan değeri daha yüksekti (p<0,001). Bireysel kullanıcılara göre medyan DISCERN, GQS ve Content değerleri daha düşük (p=0,006, p=0,004, p=0.015) ve medyan etkileşim indeks değeri daha yüksekti (p=0,010). Sonuç: YouTube, çocuklarda bruksizm hakkında tamamen güvenilir bir bilgi kaynağı değildir. Sağlık profesyonelleri çocuklarda bruksizm hakkında daha kapsamlı, güvenilir ve doğru videolar oluşturmaya ve yayınlamaya teşvik edilmelidir

Anahtar Kelimeler

YouTube, İnternet, Bruksizm, Diş gıcırdatma, Çocuk

Kaynakça

• 1. Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Pleis J. Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res. Feb 20 2009;11(1):e4. doi:10.2196/jmir.1035 google scholar
• 2. LaValley SA, Kiviniemi MT, Gage-Bouchard EA. Where people look for online health information. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 2017;34(2):146-155. google scholar
• 3. Fox S. Online Health Search 2006. Pew Internet and American Life Project. October 29, 2006. http://www pewinternet org/pdfs/ PIP_Online_Health_2006 pdf. 2006. google scholar
• 4. Abukaraky A, Hamdan AA, Ameera MN, Nasief M, Hassona Y. Quality of YouTube TM videos on dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. Jul 1 2018;23(4):e463-e468. doi:10.4317/ medoral.22447 google scholar
• 5. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res. Jul-Sep 2003;5(3):e17. doi:10.2196/jmir.5.3.e17 google scholar
• 6. Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Raphael KG, et al. International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: Report of a work in progress. J Oral Rehabil. Nov 2018;45(11):837-844. doi:10.1111/joor.12663 google scholar
• 7. Us MC, Us YO. Evaluation of the relationship between sleep bruxism and sleeping habits in school-aged children. Cranio. Feb 21 2021:1-9. doi:10.1080/08869634.2021.1890454 google scholar
• 8. Pons-Fuster E, Ruiz Roca J, Tvarijonaviciute A, Löpez-Jornet P. YouTube information about diabetes and oral healthcare. Odontology. Jan 2020;108(1):84-90. doi:10.1007/s10266-019-00445-3 google scholar
• 9. Ranade AS, Belthur MV, Oka GA, Malone JD. YouTube as an information source for clubfoot: a quality analysis of video content. J Pediatr Orthop B. Jul 2020;29(4):375-378. doi:10.1097/ bpb.0000000000000694 google scholar
• 10. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82469. google scholar
• 11. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Nov 15 2018;43(22):E1334-E1339. doi:10.1097/ BRS.0000000000002691 google scholar
• 12. Şallı GA, Egil E. Are YouTube videos useful as a source of information for oral care of leukemia patients? Quintessence International. 2020;51(1) google scholar
• 13. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor - Let the reader and viewer beware (Reprinted from the Journal of the American Medical Association, vol 277, pg 1244-1245, 1997). Generations-Journal of the American Society on Aging. Fal 1997;21(3):53-55. google scholar
• 14. Radonjic A, Fat Hing NN, Harlock J, Naji F. YouTube as a source of patient information for abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. Feb 2020;71(2):637-644. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.230 google scholar
• 15. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. Feb 1999;53(2):105-11. doi:10.1136/jech.53.2.105 google scholar
• 16. Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van ZS. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. Sep 2007;102(9):2070-7. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x google scholar
• 17. Singh SK, Liu S, Capasso R, Kern RC, Gouveia CJ. YouTube as a source of information for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Otolaryngol. Jul -Aug 2018;39(4):378-382. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.03.024 google scholar
• 18. Gul M, Diri MA. YouTube as a Source of Information About Premature Ejaculation Treatment. J Sex Med. Nov 2019;16(11):1734-1740. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.008 google scholar
• 19. Fox S. The social life of health information, 2011. Pew Internet & American Life Project Washington, DC; 2011. google scholar
• 20. Wong K, Doong J, Trang T, Joo S, Chien AL. YouTube Videos on Botulinum Toxin A for Wrinkles: A Useful Resource for Patient Education. Dermatol Surg. Dec 2017;43(12):1466-1473. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001242 google scholar
• 21. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. Sep 2015;21(3):173-94. doi:10.1177/1460458213512220 google scholar
• 22. Kilinc DD, Sayar G. Assessment of Reliability of YouTube Videos on Orthodontics. Turk J Orthod. Sep 2019;32(3):145-150. doi:10.5152/ TurkJOrthod.2019.18064 google scholar
• 23. Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA. Dec 5 2007;298(21):2482-4. doi:10.1001/jama.298.21.2482 google scholar
• 24. Pandey A, Patni N, Singh M, Sood A, Singh G. YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic. American journal of preventive medicine. 2010;38(3):e1-e3. google scholar
• 25. Sood A, Sarangi S, Pandey A, Murugiah K. YouTube as a source of information on kidney stone disease. Urology. 2011;77(3):558-562. google scholar
• 26. Tartaglione JP, Rosenbaum AJ, Abousayed M, Hushmendy SF, DiPreta JA. Evaluating the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Resources Pertaining to Hallux Valgus. Foot Ankle Spec. Feb 2016;9(1):17-23. doi:10.1177/1938640015592840 google scholar
• 27. Gas S, Zincir OO, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube Videos Useful for Patients Interested in Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Sep 2019;77(9):1776-1783. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2019.04.004 google scholar
• 28. Fernandez-Llatas C, Traver V, Borras-Morell JE, Martinez-Millana A, Karlsen R. Are Health Videos from Hospitals, Health Organizations, and Active Users Available to Health Consumers? An Analysis of Diabetes Health Video Ranking in YouTube. Comput Math Methods Med. 2017;2017:8194940. doi:10.1155/2017/8194940 google scholar
• 29. Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, Spijkervet FK. Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren’s syndrome? Oral Diseases. 2016;22(3):196-201. google scholar
• 30. Leong AY, Sanghera R, Jhajj J, Desai N, Jammu BS, Makowsky MJ. Is YouTube useful as a source of health information for adults with type 2 diabetes? A South Asian perspective. Canadian journal of diabetes. 2018;42(4):395-403. e4 google scholar