Investigation of the Awareness of Expectant Mothers about Responsive Care

Öz

Objective: This study was conducted to examine the awareness of expectant mothers in the last trimester of pregnancy about responsive care. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 16 expectant mothers who were referred to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of a private hospital for NST (Nonstress Test). The data were collected using a demographic information form and a semi-structured interview form. The data were analyzed using the content analysis method by creating categories and subcategories based on similarities. The research data were analyzed in three subcate gories: "questions about parental emotion state", "questions about daily life routines", "questions about parent-child relationship/interaction" and "questions about home environment". Results: Twelve of the expectant mothers stated that their emotional states during the day would directly affect the care they would give to their babies; 16 of them stated that their babies' reactions to the person with whom they perform daily life routines such as sleeping, feeding, changing diapers and playing would differ; 6 of them stated that their babies would express their needs with different crying sounds; 8 of them stated that they did not expect the communication signals for their babies' needs to differ; 15 of them expected their babies to interact during breastfeeding; 6 of them stated that there would be no change in their babies' communication and play in the first year. Expectant mothers stated that they would pay attention to the light, temperature, sound, and number of materials in the room where their babies would sleep and to cleanliness, sound, and crowding in the room where they would feed. While all the expectant mothers thought that the emotional environment in their homes would affect the healthy development of their babies, 7 of them thought that the physical conditions of their homes would not be effective. Conclusion: The result of the research reflects the expectations and thoughts of the expectant mothers in the study group about the situations that will affect the level of responsive care they will give after birth. It was observed that the knowledge of expectant mothers about responsive caregiving was generally superficial and that they could not answer or gave limited answers to questions that included more details such as causes and effects.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Expectant Mothers
• Babies
• Responsive Care

Kaynakça

1. Field T. The effects of mother’s physical and emotional unavailability on emotion regulation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 1994; 59(2-3): 208-227. google scholar
2. Hofer MA. Hidden regulators in attachment, separation, and loss. The development of emotion regulation:
3. Biological and behavioral considerations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 1994; 59(2-3): 192-207. google scholar
4. Shonkoff J, Phillips D, editors. From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development.
5. Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development, National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000. google scholar
6. Konner M. The evolution of childhood: Relationships, emotion, mind. Harvard University Press; 2011. google scholar
7. Newmark C. Charles Darwin: the expression of the emotions in man and animals. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2022. google scholar
8. Richards MPM, editor. The Integration of a Child into a Social World. London: Cambridge University Press;1974. google scholar

9. Bornstein MH, Hahn CS, Haynes OM. Maternal personality, parenting cognitions, and parenting practices. Developmental psychology. 2011; 47(3): 658. google scholar
10. Feldman R. The adaptive human parental brain: implications for children's social development. Trends in neurosciences. 2015; 38(6): 387-399. google scholar
11. Parsons CE, Young KS, Murray L, Stein A, Kringelbach ML. The functional neuroanatomy of the evolving parent–infant relationship. Progress in neurobiology. 2010; 91(3): 220-241. google scholar
12. Parsons CE, Stark EA, Young KS, Stein A, Kringelbach ML. Understanding the human parental brain: a critical role of the orbitofrontal cortex. Social Neuroscience. 2013; 8(6): 525-543. google scholar
13. Döblin S, Seefeld L, Weise V, Kopp M, Knappe S, Asselmann E, et al. The impact of mode of delivery on parent-infant-bonding and the mediating role of birth experience: a comparison of mothers and fathers within the longitudinal cohort study DREAM. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023; 23(1): 285. google scholar
14. Cai T, Sutter C, Donovan SM, Fiese BH. The Relationship Between Maternal and Infant Sleep Duration Across the First Two Years. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. 2023; 44(6): e421-e428. google scholar
15. Kulasinghe K, Whittingham K, Mitchell AE, Boyd RN. Psychological Interventions Targeting Mental Health and The Mother–child Relationship in Autism: Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis. Developmental Medicine & Amp; Child Neurology. 2022; 3(65): 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15432 google scholar
16. Bredekamp S. (2015). Erken Çocukluk Eğitiminde Etkili Uygulamalar. 2nd ed. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık; 2015. p.343-345. google scholar
17. UNICEF. The State of The World’s Children. 2023. https://www.unicef.org/sowc 03/contents/pdf/SOWC03-eng.pdf. google scholar
18. World Health Organization. Nurturing care for early childhood development: A framework for helping children survive and thrive to transform health and human potential. World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund, World Bank Group. Geneva. 2018. google scholar
19. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals Knowledge Platform. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations; 2015. google scholar
20. Lucas JE, Richter LM, Daelmans B. Care for Child Development: an intervention in support of responsive caregiving and early child development. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2018; 44: 41– 49. google scholar
21. Horwood C, Luthuli S, Chiliza J, Mapumulo S, Haskins L. It’s Not the Destination It’s The Journey: Lessons from A Longitudinal ‘Mixed’ Mixed-methods Study Among Female Informal Workers in South Africa. International
22. Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2022; (21). 160940692211237. https://doi.org/10. 1177/16094069221123718 google scholar
23. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. USA: Sage Publishing; 1994. google scholar
24. Lemus A, Vogel SC, Greaves A, Brito NH. Maternal anxiety symptoms associated with increased behavioral synchrony in the early postnatal period. Infancy. 2022; 27(4): 821-835. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12473 google scholar
25. Punamäki R, Isosävi S, Qouta S, Kuittinen S, Diab SY. War trauma and maternal–fetal attachment predicting maternal mental health, infant development, and dyadic interaction in Palestinian families. Attachment & Amp; Human Development. 2017; 19(5): 463-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14616734.2017.1330833 google scholar
26. Behrendt HF, Scharke W, Herpertz‐Dahlmann B, Konrad K, Firk, C. Like mother, like child? maternal determinants of children's early social‐emotional development. Infant Mental Health Journal. 2019; 40(2), 234-247. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/imhj.21765 google scholar
27. Walker AL, Peters PH, Rooij SRD, Henrichs J, Witteveen AB, Verhoeven C, et al. (2020). The long-term impact of maternal anxiety and depression postpartum and in early childhood on child and paternal mental health at 11–12 years follow-up. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2020; 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020. 562237 google scholar
28. Newland R, Crnic KA. Mother-child affect and emotion socialization processes across the late preschool period: predictions of emerging behavior problems. Infant and Child Development. 2011; 20(6): 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd. 729 google scholar
29. Lahti K, Vänskä M, Qouta S, Diab SY, Perko K, Punamäki R. Maternal experience of their infants’ crying in the context of war trauma: determinants and consequences. Infant Mental Health Journal. 2019; 40(2): 186-203. https://doi. org/10.1002/imhj.21768 google scholar
30. Newton K, Buck ET, Weich S, Uttley L. A review and analysis of the components of potentially effective perinatal mental health interventions for infant development and mother-infant relationship outcomes.
31. Development and Psychopathology. 2020; 34(1): 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579420001340 google scholar
32. Bordin IAS, Curto BM, Murray JA. Maternal recognition of child mental health problems in two brazilian cities. Revista Brasileira De Psiquiatria. 2017; 40(1), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2016-1957 google scholar
33. Ellis BJ, Figueredo AJ, Brumbach BH, Schlomer GL. Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk. Human Nature. 2009; 20(2): 204–268. google scholar
34. Glynn LM, Baram TZ. The influence of unpre- dictable, fragmented parental signals on the developing brain. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. 2019; 53, Article 100736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2019.01.002 google scholar
35. Callaghan BL, Tottenham N. The stress acceleration hypothesis: Effects of early-life adversity on emotion circuits and behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2016b; 7, 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .cobeha.2015.11.018 google scholar
36. Gee DG, Gabard-Durnam LJ, Flannery J, Goff B, Humphreys KL, Telzer EH, et al. Early developmental emergence of human amygdala-prefrontal connectivity after maternal deprivation. Proceedings of the
37. National Academy of Sciences. 2023;110(39), 15638–15643. https:// doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307893110 google scholar
38. Premachandran H, Zhao M, Arruda-Carvalho M. Sex differences in the development of the rodent corticolimbic system. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2020; 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.583477 google scholar
39. Gee DG, Cohodes EM. Influences of caregiving on development: a sensitive period for biological embedding of predictability and safety cues. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2021; 30(5): 376-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 09637214211015673 google scholar
40. Shloim N, Vereijken C, Blundell P, Hetherington MM. Looking for cues – infant communication of hunger and satiation during milk feeding. Appetite. 2017; 108: 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.020 google scholar
41. Hetherington MM. Understanding infant eating behaviour – lessons learned from observation. Physiol Behav. 2017; 176:117–124. google scholar
42. Hetherington MM, McNally J. Reading appetite cues in infancy: a role for nutrition education. Nestlé Nutrition Institute Workshop Series. 2019; 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499548 google scholar
43. Durak BŞ, Bayındır L. Classification of Infant Crying with Machine Learning Methods. European Journal of Science and Technology. 2021; (27), 784-791. google scholar
44. Prayag AS, Münch M, Aeschbach D, Chellappa SL, Gronfier C. Light modulation of human clocks, wake, and sleep. Clocks & Amp; Sleep. 2019; 1(1): 193-208. https:// doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep1010017 google scholar
45. Nguyen PH, DiGirolamo A, González-Casanova I, Young M, Kim NJ, Nguyen S, et al. Influences of early child nutritional status and home learning environment on child development in Vietnam. Maternal & Amp; Child Nutrition. 2017; 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12468 google scholar
46. Orri M, Côté SM. Tremblay RE, Doyle O. Impact of an early childhood intervention on the home environment, and subsequent effects on child cognitive and emotional development: a secondary analysis. Plos One. 2019; 14(7): e0219133. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219133 google scholar
47. Ranzato E, Tolmie A, Herwegen JV. The home learning environment of primary school children with down syndrome and those with Williams syndrome. Brain Sciences. 2021; 11(6): 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11060733 google scholar
48. Kuhn L, Liu C, Wang T, Luo R. Home environment and early development of rural children: evidence from guizhou province in china. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(11): 6121. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ijerph18116121 google scholar
49. Watamura SE, Phillips D, Morrissey, TW, McCartney K, Bub KL. Double jeopardy: poorer social‐emotional outcomes for children in the nichd seccyd experiencing home and child‐care environments that confer risk. Child Development. 2011; 82(1): 48-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01540.x Valadi S, Gabbard C,
50. Sadrolsadati SS, Elyasid M. Maternal emotional intelligence and the provision of child motor affordances. Children. 2022; 9(10): 1442. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9101442 google scholar
51. Yang Q, Yang J, Zheng L, Song W, Yi L. Impact of home parenting environment on cognitive and psychomotor development in children under 5 years old: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2011; 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped. 2021.658094 google scholar
52. Miller AL, Song JH, Sturza J, Lumeng JC, Rosenblum K, Kaciroti N, Vazquez DM. Child cortisol moderates the association between family routines and emotion regulation in low‐income children. Developmental Psychobiology. 2017; 59(1): 99-110. google scholar