Skin prick test results in patients with chronic allergic rhinitis: Housewives are risky occupational group for the development of allergic rhinitis due to house dust mites
Öz
Background/Aims: Allergic Rhinitis (AR) is a common disorder that negatively effects the quality of life with symptoms due to the inflammation of nasal epithelium. Objective of this study is to determine the general demographical and clinical features of patients with AR, who had positive skin prick test (SPT) results.
Methods: Patients diagnosed as AR with positive SPT results were analyzed. The allergens tested were: grasses, cereals+grasses , trees 1 (early flowering), trees 2 (late flowering), house-dust mites ( Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP), Dermatophagoides farinae (DF), tyrophagus putrescentiae (TP), lepidoglyphus destructor (LD) and acarus siro (AS).
Results: Of the total 202 patients, 145 female (with a mean age of 32.42 ±12.81 years) and 57 male (with a mean age of 28.44 ± 11.5 years) were included in the study. The most common allergens determined were; DF, DP, cereals+grasses and grasses. Tyrophagus significantly was more common in females (p:0.04). Nasal discharge, dyspnea, itching and weakness-tiredness were reported to be more common in females compared with males. DF, DP, TP and LD were statistically significantly more common in housewives (p<0.05). Dyspnea, wheezing and itching were statistically significantly more common in housewives (p<0.05).
Conclusions: Housewives
are risky occupational group for the development of allergic rhinitis due to
house dust mites
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Linneberg A. The increase in allergy and extended challenges. Allergy. 2011; 66 (Suppl): 95. 1–3.
- 2. Prasad R, Verma SK, Dua R, Kant S, Kushwaha RA, Agarwal SP. A study of skin sensitivity to various allergens by skin prick test in patients of nasobronchial allergy. Lung India. 2009; 26: 70–73.
- 3. Khazaei HA, Moulaei NA, Tabatabaei SNA, Khazaei A, Khosravi A. The Effect of Smoke Cigarette on Immune Responses of AR Patients. Biosc Biotech Res Asia. 2014; 11(2): 925–30
- 4. Wheatley LM, Togias A. Clinical practice. Allergic rhinitis. N Engl J Med. 2015; 29; 372(5): 456-63.
- 5. Liu Y, Peng J, Zhou Y, Cui Y. Comparison of atopy patch testing to skin prick testing for diagnosing mite-induced atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transl Allergy. 2017 Nov 29; 7: 41.
- 6. Chiriac AM, Bousquet J, Demoly P. In vivo methods for the study and diagnosis of allergy. In: Adkinson NF Jr, Bochner BS, Burks AW, Busse WW, Holgate ST, Lemanske RF, O'Hehir RE Jr, editors. Middleton's allergy principles and practice. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2013. pp. 1119–1132.
- 7. Bousquet J, Heinzerling L, Bachert C, et all. Global Allergy and Asthma European Network; Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma. Practical guide to skin prick tests in allergy to aeroallergens. Allergy. 2012 Jan;67(1):18-24.
- 8. Nevis IF, Binkley K, Kabali C. Diagnostic accuracy of skin-prick testing for allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2016 Apr 27; 12:20.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Tarkan Ozdemir
*
0000-0002-9344-7586
Türkiye
Benan Kasapoglu
0000-0003-3858-0103
Türkiye
Mustafa Turkkani
Bu kişi benim
0000-0001-7662-7924
Türkiye
Cigdem Ozdilekcan
0000-0001-5335-0571
Türkiye
Fuat Erel
0000-0002-4788-8161
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Eylül 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi
14 Haziran 2019
Kabul Tarihi
2 Eylül 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2019 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3