Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Differentiation between neoplastic and nonneoplastic brain masses using intermediate echo time MR Spectroscopy

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 7 - 12, 31.03.2020
https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.607221

Öz

Abstract

Aim: The
aim of this study was to evaluate the role of intermediate echo time (TE) Proton
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (1 H-MRS)  in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic
and nonneoplastic cerebral mass lesions.

Materials and Methods: The
research was done at Cukurova University in a 1.5 Tesla whole-body MR system.
In point-resolved-single volume-spectroscopy (PRESS) localization method,
Probe-P pulse sequence was studied with intermediate TE (TE=144). Of 55 cases
whose diagnosis was confirmed with the histopathologically or clinical and
radiological follow-up,  MR Spectroscopy
findings were discussed.

Results: Twenty cases’ definite diagnosis
were neoplastic and thirty-five cases’ were nonneoplastic lesions. For tumor
detection in cerebral mass lesions, intermediate TE MRS  was determined 100% sensitive and 91.7%
specific.  The positive predictive value
was 86.4% and the negative one was 100%. In this study, in the neoplastic-nonneoplastic
lesion differential diagnosis, NAA/Cho, NAA/Cr, Cho/Cr, and Cho/NAA ratios were
evaluated and the most useful of them were found to be Cho/NAA ratio.







Conclusion: It is
concluded that intermediate TE MR Spectroscopy is a reliable imaging technique
for the neoplastic-nonneoplastic differential diagnosis of the cerebral mass
lesions.



           




Kaynakça

  • 1- Howe FA, Opstad KS. 1H MR spectroscopy of brain tumours and masses. NMR Biomed. 2003; 16:123-131.
  • 2- Sibtain NA, Howe FA, Saunders DE. The clinical value of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in adult brain tumours. Clin Radiol. 2007 Feb;62(2);109-19.
  • 3- Brandao LA, Castillo M. Adult Brain Tumors: Clinical Applications of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2016 Nov;24(4):781-809.
  • 4- Shih MT, Singh AK, Wang A, Patel S. Brain Lesions with Elevated Lactic Acid Peaks on Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2004; 33:85-95.
  • 5- Burtscher IM, Skagerberg G, Geijer B, Englund E, Stahlberg F, Holtas S (2000) Proton MR spectroscopy and preoperative diagnostic accuracy: an evaluation of intracranial mass lesions characterized by stereotactic biopsy findings. AJNR 21:84-93.
  • 6- Bertholdo D, Watcharakorn A, Castillo M. Brain Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: Introduction and Overview. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2013 Aug;23(3):359-80.
  • 7- Young RJ, Knopp EA. Brain MRI: tumor evaluation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Oct;24(4):709-24.
  • 8- Herminghaus S, Pilatus U, Möller-Hartmann W, Raab P, Lanfermann H, Schlote W, Zanella FE. Increased choline levels coincide with enhanced proliferative activity of human neuroepithelial brain tumors. NMR Biomed. 2002 Oct;15(6):385-92.
  • 9- Kim SH, Chang KH, Song IC, Han MH, Kim HC, Kang HS, Han MC. Brain abscess and brain tumor: discrimination with in vivo H-1 MR spectroscopy. Radiology 1997; 204:239-45.
  • 10- Poptani H, Gupta RK, Roy R, Pandey R, Jain VK, Chhabra DK. Characterization of intracranial mass lesions with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16:1593-1603.
  • 11- Magalhaes A, Godfrey W, Shen Y, Hu J, Smith W. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain tumors correlated with pathology. Acad Radiol 2005; 12(1):51-57.
  • 12- Dowling C, Bollen AW, Noworolski SM, Mc Dermott MW, Barbaro NM, Day MR, Henry RG, Chang SM, Dillon WP, Nelson SJ, Vigneron DB. Preoperative proton MR spectroscopic imaging of brain tumors: correlation with histopathologic analysis of resection specimens. AJNR 2001; 22: 604-612.
  • 13- McKnight TR, von dem Bussche MH, Vigneron DB, Lu Y, Berger MS, McDermott MW, Dillon WP, Graves EE, Pirzkall A, Nelson SJ. Histopathological validation of a three- dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopy index as a predictor of tumor presence. J Neurosurg 2002; 97(4):794-802.
  • 14- Brandao LA. MR Spectroscopy of the Brain. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003.
  • 15- Law M, Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, Arnett J, Litt AW. High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases: differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging. Radiology. 2002 Mar;222(3):715-21.
  • 16- Kim JH, Chang KH, Na DG, Song IC, Kwon BJ, Han MH, Kim K. 3T 1H-MR Spectroscopy in Grading of Cerebral Gliomas: Comparison of Short and Intermediate Echo Time Sequences Am. J. Neuroradiol., Aug 2006; 27: 1412 - 1418.
  • 17- Schlemmer HP, Bachert P, Herfarth KK, Zuna I, Debus J, van Kaick G. Proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy. Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22:1316-1324.

Serebral Kitlesel Lezyonların Ayırıcı Tanısında Manyetik Rezonans Spektroskopik İnceleme

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 7 - 12, 31.03.2020
https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.607221

Öz

            Amaç: Serebral kitlesel lezyonu olan hastaların optimum klinik yönetimi için doğru tanı esastır. Konvansiyonel MR morfolojiyi değerlendiren yüksek rezolüsyonlu bir tekniktir. Ancak kesin tanı vermede yetersiz kaldığı durumlarda doku biyokimyası hakkında bilgi veren MR spektroskopi gibi fonksiyonel tekniklere ihtiyaç ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı serebral lezyonların ayırıcı tanısında MR spektroskopinin rolünü ve neoplastik-nonneoplastik lezyon ayrımında sensitivite, spesifisite ve doğruluğunu değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: 1,5 Tesla cihazda PRESS lokalizasyon metodunda Probe-P puls sekansı ile orta TE (TE=144) ile çalışıldı. Tanısı patoloji veya klinik-radyolojik takip ile kesinleşmiş 55 olgudan 37’sinde tek ve 18’inde multivoksel inceleme yapıldı. 46 olguda lezyona ve 9 olguda lezyon periferine yönelik inceleme gerçekleştirildi.
Bulgular: Olguların 20’sinde kesin tanı tümöral ve 35’inde nontümöral patoloji idi. MRS serebral lezyonlarda tümörü saptamada % 100 sensitivite, % 91,7 spesifisiteye sahip bulundu. Pozitif prediktif değer % 86,4 ve negatif prediktif değer % 100 idi. Neoplastik-nonneoplastik lezyon ayrımında NAA/Cho, NAA/Cr, Cho/Cr ve Cho/NAA oranlarının değerlendirildiği bu çalışmada en kullanışlı olan Cho/NAA oranı olup Cho/Cr oranı da hassas bulundu.
Sonuç: MR Spektroskopinin serebral lezyonlarda neoplastik-nonneoplastik lezyon ayrımında güvenilir bir yöntem olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Elde edilen spektral verilerden tümörü seçmede en hassas olanı Cho/NAA oranı olup kolin artışı tümör lehine önemli bir bulgudur.

Kaynakça

  • 1- Howe FA, Opstad KS. 1H MR spectroscopy of brain tumours and masses. NMR Biomed. 2003; 16:123-131.
  • 2- Sibtain NA, Howe FA, Saunders DE. The clinical value of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in adult brain tumours. Clin Radiol. 2007 Feb;62(2);109-19.
  • 3- Brandao LA, Castillo M. Adult Brain Tumors: Clinical Applications of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2016 Nov;24(4):781-809.
  • 4- Shih MT, Singh AK, Wang A, Patel S. Brain Lesions with Elevated Lactic Acid Peaks on Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2004; 33:85-95.
  • 5- Burtscher IM, Skagerberg G, Geijer B, Englund E, Stahlberg F, Holtas S (2000) Proton MR spectroscopy and preoperative diagnostic accuracy: an evaluation of intracranial mass lesions characterized by stereotactic biopsy findings. AJNR 21:84-93.
  • 6- Bertholdo D, Watcharakorn A, Castillo M. Brain Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: Introduction and Overview. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2013 Aug;23(3):359-80.
  • 7- Young RJ, Knopp EA. Brain MRI: tumor evaluation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Oct;24(4):709-24.
  • 8- Herminghaus S, Pilatus U, Möller-Hartmann W, Raab P, Lanfermann H, Schlote W, Zanella FE. Increased choline levels coincide with enhanced proliferative activity of human neuroepithelial brain tumors. NMR Biomed. 2002 Oct;15(6):385-92.
  • 9- Kim SH, Chang KH, Song IC, Han MH, Kim HC, Kang HS, Han MC. Brain abscess and brain tumor: discrimination with in vivo H-1 MR spectroscopy. Radiology 1997; 204:239-45.
  • 10- Poptani H, Gupta RK, Roy R, Pandey R, Jain VK, Chhabra DK. Characterization of intracranial mass lesions with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16:1593-1603.
  • 11- Magalhaes A, Godfrey W, Shen Y, Hu J, Smith W. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of brain tumors correlated with pathology. Acad Radiol 2005; 12(1):51-57.
  • 12- Dowling C, Bollen AW, Noworolski SM, Mc Dermott MW, Barbaro NM, Day MR, Henry RG, Chang SM, Dillon WP, Nelson SJ, Vigneron DB. Preoperative proton MR spectroscopic imaging of brain tumors: correlation with histopathologic analysis of resection specimens. AJNR 2001; 22: 604-612.
  • 13- McKnight TR, von dem Bussche MH, Vigneron DB, Lu Y, Berger MS, McDermott MW, Dillon WP, Graves EE, Pirzkall A, Nelson SJ. Histopathological validation of a three- dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopy index as a predictor of tumor presence. J Neurosurg 2002; 97(4):794-802.
  • 14- Brandao LA. MR Spectroscopy of the Brain. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003.
  • 15- Law M, Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, Arnett J, Litt AW. High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases: differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging. Radiology. 2002 Mar;222(3):715-21.
  • 16- Kim JH, Chang KH, Na DG, Song IC, Kwon BJ, Han MH, Kim K. 3T 1H-MR Spectroscopy in Grading of Cerebral Gliomas: Comparison of Short and Intermediate Echo Time Sequences Am. J. Neuroradiol., Aug 2006; 27: 1412 - 1418.
  • 17- Schlemmer HP, Bachert P, Herfarth KK, Zuna I, Debus J, van Kaick G. Proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy. Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22:1316-1324.
Toplam 17 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Orjinal Araştırma
Yazarlar

Şerife Leblebisatan 0000-0003-3495-3785

Yunus Kenan Bıçakcı Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-2689-8598

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Mart 2020
Kabul Tarihi 30 Kasım 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

AMA Leblebisatan Ş, Bıçakcı YK. Differentiation between neoplastic and nonneoplastic brain masses using intermediate echo time MR Spectroscopy. J Contemp Med. Mart 2020;10(1):7-12. doi:10.16899/jcm.607221