Evaluation of YouTube videos as a patient education source for inguinal hernias

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 198 - 203, 22.03.2023

Bahadır Kartal , Mehmethan Cihan

https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1226018

Cited By: 1

Öz

Abstract
Introduction: Patients frequently use YouTube to obtain information about their conditions and possible treatment options. Inguinal hernia is one of the most common surgical diseases among the general population. This study aims to evaluate the quality of videos about groin hernia on Youtube.
Materials and Methods: The videos are sorted according to the number of views after searching for "groin hernia" on YouTube on 8.12.2021. The study was performed on the videos selected from the top 50 most-watched videos. Two independent reviewers reviewed all videos for relevance and content. In addition, the descriptive characteristics of each video (upload date, number of views, likes and dislikes, and comments below the video) were recorded in the dataset. DISCERN, GQS, and JAMA rating scales were used to evaluate the quality of the videos.
Results: A statistically significant difference was found in DISCERN scores in the videos uploaded by doctors and non-physicians (p<0.001). Similarly, when the two groups were compared, the videos uploaded by the doctors were statistically higher in quality in JAMA and GQS scores (p<0.001, p:039, respectively).
Conclusion: The quality of information about groin hernia on YouTube is variable. Helpful and misleading videos have no difference in terms of views and popularity. It is more appropriate for patients to prefer videos uploaded by physicians as a source of information. It is essential to pay attention to the person who uploads the content rather than the popularity, duration, or number of comments of a video.

Anahtar Kelimeler

youtube, video, inguinal hernia

Kasık fıtıkları için hasta eğitim kaynağı olarak YouTube videolarının değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Özet
Giriş: Hastalar, durumları ve olası tedavi seçenekleri hakkında bilgi almak için sıklıkla YouTube'u kullanır. Kasık fıtığı, genel popülasyonda en yaygın cerrahi hastalıklardan biridir. Bu çalışma Youtube'da kasık fıtığı ile ilgili videoların kalitesini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: 8.12.2021 tarihinde YouTube'da "kasık fıtığı" araması yapıldıktan sonra videolar izlenme sayısına göre sıralanmıştır. Çalışma en çok izlenen ilk 50 video arasından seçilen videolar üzerinden yapılmıştır. İki bağımsız yorumcu, alaka düzeyi ve içerik açısından tüm videoları inceledi. Ayrıca her bir videonun tanımlayıcı özellikleri (yükleme tarihi, izlenme sayısı, beğenilenler ve beğenilmeyenler, videonun altına yapılan yorumlar) veri setine kaydedilmiştir. Videoların kalitesini değerlendirmek için DISCERN, GQS ve JAMA derecelendirme ölçekleri kullanıldı.
Bulgular: Doktor ve hekim olmayan kişiler tarafından yüklenen videolarda DISCERN puanlarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulundu (p<0.001). Benzer şekilde iki grup karşılaştırıldığında, doktorların yüklediği videoların kalitesi JAMA ve GQS puanlarında istatistiksel olarak daha yüksekti (sırasıyla p<0.001, p:039).
Sonuç: YouTube'da kasık fıtığı ile ilgili bilgilerin kalitesi değişkendir. Yararlı ve yanıltıcı videoların izlenme ve popülerlik açısından hiçbir farkı yoktur. Hastaların bilgi kaynağı olarak hekimler tarafından yüklenen videoları tercih etmesi daha uygundur. Bir videonun popülaritesinden, süresinden veya yorum sayısından çok içeriği yükleyen kişiye dikkat etmek esastır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

youtube, video, inguinal herni

Kaynakça

• 1. Berners‐Lee T, Cailliau R, Groff JF, Pollermann B. World‐Wide Web: The information universe. Internet Research. 1992
• 2. Internet World Stats [Available from: www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
• 3. Nyhus LM, Klein MS, Rogers FB. Inguinal hernia. Curr Probl Surg. 1991 Jun;28(6):401-50
• 4. Farag M, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N. Use of YouTube as a Resource for Surgical Education-Clarity or Confusion. Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):445-449
• 5. Keskinkılıç Yağız B, Yalaza M, Sapmaz A. Is Youtube a potential training source for total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair? Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2014-2020
• 6. Kanlioz M, Ekici U. Reliability and Educational Features of YouTube Videos About Hernia Operations Performed Using Laparoscopic TEP Method. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Feb;30(1):74-78
• 7. Chae J. YouTube makeup tutorials reinforce postfeminist beliefs through social comparison. Med Psyc. 2021;24(2):167-89
• 8. Erdem H, Sisik A. The Reliability of Bariatric Surgery Videos in YouTube Platform. Obes Surg. 2018 Mar;28(3):712-716
• 9. Turhan VB, Ünsal A. Evaluation of the Quality of Videos on Hemorrhoidal Disease on YouTube™. Turk J Colorectal Dis. 2021;31:261-7
• 10. Cakmak G. Evaluation of Scientific Quality of YouTube Video Content Related to Umbilical Hernia. Cureus. 2021 Apr 25;13(4):e14675
• 11. Aydin MA, Akyol H. Quality of Information Available on YouTube Videos Pertaining to Thyroid Cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):599-605
• 12. Kaicker J, Borg Debono V, Dang W, Buckley N, Thabane L. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument. BMC Med. 2010 Oct 12;8:59
• 13. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Feb;53(2):105-11
• 14. Langille M, Bernard A, Rodgers C, Hughes S, Leddin D, van Zanten SV. Systematic review of the quality of patient information on the internet regarding inflammatory bowel disease treatments. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Apr;8(4):322-8
• 15. Batar N, Kermen S, Sevdin S, Yıldız N, Güçlü D. Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Information on Nutrition After Bariatric Surgery on YouTube. Obes Surg. 2020 Dec;30(12):4905-4910
• 16. Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Nov 15;43(22):E1334-E1339
• 17. Celik H, Polat O, Ozcan C, Camur S, Kilinc BE, Uzun M. Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):31-34
• 18. Fyfield M, Henderson M, Phillips M. Navigating four billion videos: teacher search strategies and the YouTube algorithm. Learn, Med and Techno. 2021;46(1):47-59.
• 19. Roshan A, Agarwal S, England RJ. Role of information available over the internet: what are the parents of children undergoing tonsillectomy likely to find? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Oct;90(7):601-5
• 20. Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA. 2007 Dec 5;298(21):2482-4
• 21. Kumar N, Pandey A, Venkatraman A, Garg N. Are video sharing web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014 Jul;8(7):481-90
• 22. Celentano V, Smart N, Cahill RA, McGrath JS, Gupta S, Griffith JP, Acheson AG, Cecil TD, Coleman MG. Use of laparoscopic videos amongst surgical trainees in the United Kingdom. Surgeon. 2019 Dec;17(6):334-339
• 23. Lobato R. The cultural logic of digital intermediaries: YouTube multichannel networks. Convergence. 2016;22(4):348-60
• 24. Yaradılmış YU, Evren AT, Okkaoğlu MC, Öztürk Ö, Haberal B, Özdemir M. Evaluation of quality and reliability of YouTube videos on spondylolisthesis. Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2020;22:100827
• 25. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 18;8(12):e82469
• 26. Tartaglione JP, Rosenbaum AJ, Abousayed M, Hushmendy SF, DiPreta JA. Evaluating the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Resources Pertaining to Hallux Valgus. Foot Ankle Spec. 2016 Feb;9(1):17-23
• 27. Azer SA. Are DISCERN and JAMA Suitable Instruments for Assessing YouTube Videos on Thyroid Cancer? Methodological Concerns. J Cancer Educ. 2020 Dec;35(6):1267-1277
• 28. Kuru T, Erken HY. Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Rotator Cuff Tears. Cureus. 2020 Feb 3;12(2):e6852
• 29. Ferhatoglu MF, Kartal A, Ekici U, Gurkan A. Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube. Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484