Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Beslenme ve Diyetetik Öğrencileri, Diyetisyenler ve Sağlık Profesyonellerinin Sürdürülebilir Beslenme Hakkındaki Görüşleri

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 6, 348 - 354, 30.11.2024
https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1533350

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, beslenme ve diyetetik alanında eğitim gören bireylerin, diyetisyenlerin ve sağlık profesyonellerinin sürdürülebilir beslenmeye ilişkin görüşleri değerlendirilmiştir. Materyal ve Metot: Tarama modelinde tasarlanan bu çalışma, Beslenme ve Diyetetik öğrencileri, diyetisyenler ve sağlık profesyonelleri olmak üzere 456 kişi üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Bireylerin sosyodemografik özellikleri, sürdürülebilir beslenme konusundaki bilgi ve yaklaşımları sorgulanmıştır. Bulgular: Katılımcıların %34.4'ü beslenme ve diyetetik öğrencisi, %13.1'i diyetisyen ve %52.5'i sağlık profesyoneliydi. Daha önce sürdürülebilir beslenme konusunda eğitim almış olan katılımcıların yüzdesi diyetisyenler, lisans öğrencileri ve sağlık çalışanları için sırasıyla %36.7, %26.1 ve %2.5'tir (p<0.05). Sürdürülebilir beslenme konusundaki bilgi düzeyleri değerlendirildiğinde, diyetisyenlerin %13.3'ü ve lisans öğrencilerinin %3.8'i mükemmel düzeyde bilgi sahibi olduğunu beyan ederken, sağlık profesyonellerinden hiç kimse mükemmel düzeyde bilgi sahibi olduğunu beyan etmemiştir (<0.05). Beslenme ve Diyetetik eğitimi alan bireylerin sürdürülebilir beslenme, çevre ve çevre sorunları, çeşitli gıdaların temini ve tüketimi, gıda alışverişi yaparken satın alınan ürünlerle ilgili doğru bilgilendirme konularında bilgi ve yaklaşımları sağlık çalışanlarına göre daha yüksek bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Sonuç: Bu çalışma, Beslenme ve Diyetetik eğitimi görenlerin sürdürülebilir beslenme konusunda sağlık profesyonellerine göre daha bilgili olduğunu, ancak bu bilgilerin yeterli seviyelerde olmadığı görülmektedir. Sürdürülebilir beslenme eğitiminin yaygınlaştırılmasının gerekliliği giderek daha fazla anlaşılmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Pieniak Z, Żakowska-Biemans S, Kostyra E, Raats M. Sustainable healthy eating behaviour of young adults: towards a novel methodological approach. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1-9.
  • 2. Hoek AC, Pearson D, James SW, Lawrence MA, Friel S. Shrinking the foodprint: A qualitative study into consumer perceptions, experiences and attitudes towards healthy and environmentally friendly food behaviours. Appetite. 2017;108;117-31.
  • 3. Alsaffar AA. Sustainable diets: The interaction between food industry, nutrition, health and the environment. Food Sci Technol Int. 2016;22(2):102-11.
  • 4. Fanzo J, Bellows AL, Spiker ML, Thorne-Lyman AL, Bloem MW. The importance of food systems and the environment for nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;113(1):7-16.
  • 5. Alder J, Barling D, Dugan P, Herren HR, Josupeit H, Lang T. Avoiding future famines: Strengthening the ecological foundation of food security through sustainable food systems. A UNEP synthesis report. 2012.
  • 6. Poli G, Charron M, Agostoni C, Saguy IS. Nurturing sustainable nutrition through innovations in food science and technology. Front Nutr. 2022;9:999055.
  • 7. Capozzi F. Food innovation in the frame of circular economy by designing ultra-processed foods optimized for sustainable nutrition. Front Nutr. 2022;9:886220.
  • 8. Guillaumie L, Boiral O, Baghdadli A, Mercille G. Integrating sustainable nutrition into health-related institutions:a systematic review of the literature. Can J Public Health. 2020;111(6):845-61.
  • 9. Carlsson L, Callaghan E, Morley A, Broman G. Food system sustainability across scales: a proposed local-to-global approach to community planning and assessment. Sustainability. 2017;9(6):1061.
  • 10.Özel M, Bogueva D, Marinova D, Tekiner IH. Climate change knowledge and awareness of nutrition professionals: a case study from Turkey. Sustainability. 2022;14(7):3774.
  • 11. Ünal Özen G. Assessing the knowledge and attitudes of dietitians and dietitian candidates with regards to sustainable diet. Hacettepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Master Thesis, Ankara, Türkiye. 2019.
  • 12. Akay G. Evaluation of the knowledge level of university students studying in the field of health about the relationship between sustainable nutrition and the environment. Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Master Thesis, Konya, Türkiye. 2020.
  • 13. Alberdi G, Begiristain-Zubillaga M. The promotion of sustainable diets in the healthcare system and ımplications for health professionals:a scoping review. Nutrients. 2021;13(3):747.
  • 14. Coveney J, Booth S, editors. Critical Dietetics and Critical Nutrition Studies. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland;2019.
  • 15.Hawkins IW, Balsam AL, Goldman RA. Survey of registered dietitians’ concern and actions regarding climate change in the United States. Front Nutr. 2015;2:21.
  • 16. Kang H. Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power Software. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 2021;18.
  • 17. World Health Organization [Internet]. A healthy lifestyle - WHO recommendations. [cited 2023 June 27]. Available from: https://www. who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/a-healthy-lifestyle---whorecommendations.
  • 18. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th ed. SAGE Publications. 2013.
  • 19. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Bioversity International; Burlingame B; Dernini, S. (eds.) (2012) Sustainable diets and biodiversity. 309 p.;ill. ISBN: 978-92-5-107288-2.
  • 20. Engin Ş, Sevim Y. Lisans öğrencilerinin sürdürülebilir beslenme hakkındaki davranışları ve bilgi düzeyleri ile besin tercihleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: tek merkezli çalışma. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Derg 2022;38:259-69.
  • 21. Lentz G, Connelly S, Mirosa M, Jowett T. Gauging attitudes and behaviours:Meat consumption and potential reduction. Appetite. 2018;127:230-41.
  • 22. Kadıoglu BU, Uncu F. Health Sciences Students’ Attitudes Towards Environmental Problems. J Curr Res Health Sector 2018;8 (2):285-96.
  • 23. Tokay A, Yılmaz C, Bölük S, Boyraz Ö, Bülbül N. Sürdürülebilir beslenme modellerinden akdeniz diyetinin sürdürülebilirlikteki yeri. TOGÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;2(2):187-201.
  • 24. Besler HT, Buyuktuncer Z, Uyar M. Consumer understanding and use of food and nutrition labeling in Turkey. J Nutr Educ Behav 2012;44(6):584- 91.
  • 25. Akdemir Tüfekçilerli MN. An evaluation of the status of the students’ usage of nutrition labels in a foundation university’s faculty of health science. Yeditepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Master Thesis, İstanbul, Türkiye. 2019.
  • 26. Ede J, Graine S, Rhodes C. Moving towards sustainable food consumption: identifying barriers to sustainable student diets. School of Engineering Blekinge Institute of Technology, Master Thesis, Karlskrona, Sweden 2011.
  • 27. Kayak S. Evaluation of family health center employees' knowledge, attitudes, behaviors and diet quality about sustainable nutrition:Kırklareli city center example. Trakya University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Master Thesis, Konya, Edirne, Türkiye. 2023.

Views on Sustainable Nutrition Among Nutrition and Dietetics Students, Dietitians, and Healthcare Professionals

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 6, 348 - 354, 30.11.2024
https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1533350

Öz

Objective: In this study, the views of individuals, dietitians and health professionals who are educated in the field of nutrition and dietetics on sustainable nutrition were evaluated. Material and Method: This study, which was designed in the survey model, was conducted on 456 individuals, including Nutrition and Dietetics students, dietitians and health professionals. Sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge and attitudes towards sustainable nutrition were questioned. Results: 34.4% of the participants were nutrition and dietetics students, 13.1% were dietitians and 52.5% were health professionals. The percentage of participants who had previously received education on sustainable nutrition was 36.7%, 26.1% and 2.5% for dietitians, undergraduate students and health professionals, respectively (p<0.05). When the level of knowledge about sustainable nutrition was evaluated, 13.3% of dietitians and 3.8% of undergraduate students declared that they had excellent knowledge, while no health professionals declared that they had excellent knowledge (<0.05). The knowledge and approaches of nutrition and dietetics educated individuals about sustainable nutrition, environment and environmental problems, supply and consumption of various foods, and correct information about the products purchased while shopping for food were found to be higher than health professionals (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study shows that students in Nutrition and Dietetics are more knowledgeable about sustainable nutrition compared to healthcare professionals; however, their knowledge is not at sufficient levels. The necessity of expanding education on sustainable nutrition is becoming increasingly apparent.

Etik Beyan

This study was approved by the Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Ethics Committee. After ethical approval was obtained, all participants were given the necessary explanations about the study through the information paragraph in the questionnaire before starting the study and the informed consent form was signed. This study was conducted by the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Teşekkür

We extend our gratitude to everyone who participated in and contributed to this study.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Pieniak Z, Żakowska-Biemans S, Kostyra E, Raats M. Sustainable healthy eating behaviour of young adults: towards a novel methodological approach. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1-9.
  • 2. Hoek AC, Pearson D, James SW, Lawrence MA, Friel S. Shrinking the foodprint: A qualitative study into consumer perceptions, experiences and attitudes towards healthy and environmentally friendly food behaviours. Appetite. 2017;108;117-31.
  • 3. Alsaffar AA. Sustainable diets: The interaction between food industry, nutrition, health and the environment. Food Sci Technol Int. 2016;22(2):102-11.
  • 4. Fanzo J, Bellows AL, Spiker ML, Thorne-Lyman AL, Bloem MW. The importance of food systems and the environment for nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;113(1):7-16.
  • 5. Alder J, Barling D, Dugan P, Herren HR, Josupeit H, Lang T. Avoiding future famines: Strengthening the ecological foundation of food security through sustainable food systems. A UNEP synthesis report. 2012.
  • 6. Poli G, Charron M, Agostoni C, Saguy IS. Nurturing sustainable nutrition through innovations in food science and technology. Front Nutr. 2022;9:999055.
  • 7. Capozzi F. Food innovation in the frame of circular economy by designing ultra-processed foods optimized for sustainable nutrition. Front Nutr. 2022;9:886220.
  • 8. Guillaumie L, Boiral O, Baghdadli A, Mercille G. Integrating sustainable nutrition into health-related institutions:a systematic review of the literature. Can J Public Health. 2020;111(6):845-61.
  • 9. Carlsson L, Callaghan E, Morley A, Broman G. Food system sustainability across scales: a proposed local-to-global approach to community planning and assessment. Sustainability. 2017;9(6):1061.
  • 10.Özel M, Bogueva D, Marinova D, Tekiner IH. Climate change knowledge and awareness of nutrition professionals: a case study from Turkey. Sustainability. 2022;14(7):3774.
  • 11. Ünal Özen G. Assessing the knowledge and attitudes of dietitians and dietitian candidates with regards to sustainable diet. Hacettepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Master Thesis, Ankara, Türkiye. 2019.
  • 12. Akay G. Evaluation of the knowledge level of university students studying in the field of health about the relationship between sustainable nutrition and the environment. Necmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Master Thesis, Konya, Türkiye. 2020.
  • 13. Alberdi G, Begiristain-Zubillaga M. The promotion of sustainable diets in the healthcare system and ımplications for health professionals:a scoping review. Nutrients. 2021;13(3):747.
  • 14. Coveney J, Booth S, editors. Critical Dietetics and Critical Nutrition Studies. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland;2019.
  • 15.Hawkins IW, Balsam AL, Goldman RA. Survey of registered dietitians’ concern and actions regarding climate change in the United States. Front Nutr. 2015;2:21.
  • 16. Kang H. Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power Software. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 2021;18.
  • 17. World Health Organization [Internet]. A healthy lifestyle - WHO recommendations. [cited 2023 June 27]. Available from: https://www. who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/a-healthy-lifestyle---whorecommendations.
  • 18. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th ed. SAGE Publications. 2013.
  • 19. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Bioversity International; Burlingame B; Dernini, S. (eds.) (2012) Sustainable diets and biodiversity. 309 p.;ill. ISBN: 978-92-5-107288-2.
  • 20. Engin Ş, Sevim Y. Lisans öğrencilerinin sürdürülebilir beslenme hakkındaki davranışları ve bilgi düzeyleri ile besin tercihleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi: tek merkezli çalışma. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Derg 2022;38:259-69.
  • 21. Lentz G, Connelly S, Mirosa M, Jowett T. Gauging attitudes and behaviours:Meat consumption and potential reduction. Appetite. 2018;127:230-41.
  • 22. Kadıoglu BU, Uncu F. Health Sciences Students’ Attitudes Towards Environmental Problems. J Curr Res Health Sector 2018;8 (2):285-96.
  • 23. Tokay A, Yılmaz C, Bölük S, Boyraz Ö, Bülbül N. Sürdürülebilir beslenme modellerinden akdeniz diyetinin sürdürülebilirlikteki yeri. TOGÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;2(2):187-201.
  • 24. Besler HT, Buyuktuncer Z, Uyar M. Consumer understanding and use of food and nutrition labeling in Turkey. J Nutr Educ Behav 2012;44(6):584- 91.
  • 25. Akdemir Tüfekçilerli MN. An evaluation of the status of the students’ usage of nutrition labels in a foundation university’s faculty of health science. Yeditepe University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Master Thesis, İstanbul, Türkiye. 2019.
  • 26. Ede J, Graine S, Rhodes C. Moving towards sustainable food consumption: identifying barriers to sustainable student diets. School of Engineering Blekinge Institute of Technology, Master Thesis, Karlskrona, Sweden 2011.
  • 27. Kayak S. Evaluation of family health center employees' knowledge, attitudes, behaviors and diet quality about sustainable nutrition:Kırklareli city center example. Trakya University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Master Thesis, Konya, Edirne, Türkiye. 2023.
Toplam 27 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Klinik Tıp Bilimleri (Diğer)
Bölüm Orjinal Araştırma
Yazarlar

Yahya Özdoğan 0000-0002-4697-8042

Zehra Nur Beşler 0000-0001-5289-696X

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 29 Kasım 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Kasım 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 15 Ağustos 2024
Kabul Tarihi 17 Eylül 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 6

Kaynak Göster

AMA Özdoğan Y, Beşler ZN. Views on Sustainable Nutrition Among Nutrition and Dietetics Students, Dietitians, and Healthcare Professionals. J Contemp Med. Kasım 2024;14(6):348-354. doi:10.16899/jcm.1533350