The Digital Habitus of Architecture: Praxis of Design-oriented Internet Usage

Yıl 2023, , 71 - 98, 31.03.2023

Hanife Sümeyye Taşdelen , Leman Figen Gül

https://doi.org/10.53710/jcode.1236623

Öz

This study examines the visual-search and information-gathering behavior of architects in the early architectural design phase in relation to varied media tools. The study proposes the idea that navigation skills in online media help designers discover more creative solution areas during their design process. In continuation of our research, conceptual conclusions are made based on the results obtained from the field study and the literature review. In this context, we discuss the concept constituting the habitus of digital architecture. We re-evaluated our conceptual proposal by applying design experiments to examine the phenomena contained in the habitus of design-oriented research. We have discussed the results from the experiments in this article in detail; focusing on whether correlation exists between the interviewees’ expressions and designers’ practices. We then adapted field theory, as elaborated by Pierre Bourdieu in 1984, to the digital habitus of architecture. Afterward, by taking the process of design-oriented knowledge production into account, we have identified two fields of design-oriented digital habitus: online and offline. The fields forming the habitus of digital architecture and the possible advantages that may occur based on these fields have been identified. Finally, the meaning of having digital privilege for architects has been evaluated in terms of the future of architecture.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital habitus, Digital privilege, Search behavior, Design tool practices, Design-oriented search

Mimarlığın Dijital Habitusu: Tasarım odaklı İnternet Kullanım Pratiği

Öz

Bu çalışma, değişen medyalara bağlı olarak erken mimari tasarım aşamasında mimarların görsel arama ve bilgi toplama davranışlarını incelemektedir. Çalışma, çevrimiçi ortamda gezinme becerilerinin, tasarımcıların tasarım sürecinde daha yaratıcı çözüm alanları keşfetmelerine yardımcı olduğu ve tasarımcıların son ürün temsillerine etki ettiği fikrini önermektedir. Araştırmanın devamında alan çalışması ve literatür taramasından elde edilen sonuçlara dayalı olarak kavramsal çıkarımlarda bulunulmaktadır. Bu bağlamda mimarlığın dijital habitusunu oluşturan kavramı tartışılmaktadır. Tasarım odaklı araştırma habitusunda yer alan olguları görmek için tasarım deneyleri uygulayarak kavramsal öneri yeniden değerlendirilmiştir. Bu makalede deneylerden elde edilen sonuçlar ayrıntılı olarak tartışılmış; görüşülen kişilerin ifadeleri ile tasarımcıların uygulamaları arasında korelasyon olup olmadığını araştırılmıştır. Daha sonra, Pierre Bourdieu tarafından 1984’te detaylandırıldığı şekliyle alan teorisi mimarinin dijital habitusuna uyarlanmıştır. Ardından, tasarım odaklı bilgi üretimi sürecini dikkate alarak, tasarım odaklı dijital habitusun iki alanı belirlenmiştir: çevrimiçi ve çevrimdışı alanlar (yazılım). Dijital mimarinin habitusunu oluşturan alanlar ve bu alanlara bağlı olarak ortaya çıkabilecek olası avantajlar belirlenmiştir. Son olarak mimarların dijital ayrıcalığa sahip olmasının anlamı, mimarlığın geleceği açısından değerlendirilmiştir.

Kaynakça

• Stevens, G. The favoured circle: The social foundations of architectural distinction. USA: MIT, 1998.
• Lupton, D. Digital Sociology. Abingdon: Routledge. 2014.
• Bourdieu, P. Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste, trans. R. Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1984.
• Çelik, H. & Ekşi, H. Nitel desenler: Gömülü teori. EDAM, 2015.
• Cross, N. Designerly ways of knowing. Springer, 2006, ISBN 978-1-84628-301- 7.
• Manovich. L. Software takes command. Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.
• Naulin & Jourdain. Pierre Bourdieu’nun Kuramı ve Sosyolojik Kullanımları. Ed. İletişim. 2016, p.100. 19. Ed.
• Webb, J., Schirato, T. & Danaher, G. Understanding Bourdieu. Allen & Unwin, Australia, 2002, p. 38.
• Romele, A. Digital Hermeneutics: Philosophical Investigations in New Media and Technologies. Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy. 2020, p.10-15.
• Sarfatti Larson, Magali. Practice and Education in 21`st. Century Architecture in Fernando Lara and Sonia Marques, eds. Quid Novi? Dilemas do ensino da arqutectura no seculo 21. Austin, TX, nhamerica Press, 2015.
• Papacharissi, Z. & Easton, E. In the habitus of the new structure, agency and the social media habitus. New media dynamics, Blackwell companion. 2013, pp.171–184.
• Çeğin G. & E. Göker. “Araştırmasından 50 yıl, Kitabından 35 yıl sonra Ayrım”, P. Bourdieu, Ayrım: Beğeni Yargısının Toplumsal Eleştirisi, Ankara: Heretik, 2015, pp. 9–21.
• Rowlands, J & Gale, T in press (publication date December 2016), 'Shaping and being shaped: extending the relationship between habitus and practice', in J Lynch, J Rowlands, T Gale & A Skourdoumbis (eds) 2017, Routledge, Oxford, pp. 91-107.
• Susen, S. Hermeneutic Bourdieu. Ed. Adkins, Brosnan& Threadgold, Bourdieusian Prospects. 2017, pp.132-150.
• Costa, C., Burke, C. & Murphy, M., (2018), Capturing Habitus: Theory, Method and Reflexivity. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2017.1420771
• Llach D. Software comes to matter: Toward a material history of computational design. Design Issues, 31(3), Summer 2015.
• Oxman, R. & Oxman, R. New Structuralism: Design, Engineering and Architectural Technologies. Architectural Design, 2010, 80, 14–23. 10.1002/ad.1101.
• Oxman, R. The role of the image in digital design processing the image versus imaging the process. 2016, 10.1007/978-3-319-56466-1_6.
• Oxman, R. The thinking eye: visual re-cognition in design emergence, Design Studies, Volume 23, Issue 2, 2002. Pages 135-164.
• Goldschmidt, G. & Smolkov, M. Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance, Design Studies, Volume 27, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 549-569.
• Gonçalves, M., Cardoso & Badke-Schaub. Inspiration choices that matter: the selection of external stimuli during ideation. Design Science, 2, E10. 2016, doi:10.1017/dsj.2016.10.
• Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, Petra Badke-Schaub. What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation, Design Studies, Volume 35, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 29-53.
• Gonçalves, Milene & Cardoso, Carlos & Badke-Schaub, Petra. What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation. Design Studies, 35, 2013.
• Carpo, M. Big data and the end of the history. International Journal for Digital Art History, 3, 2018.
• Bengtsson, S. Digital distinctions: mechanisms of difference in digital media use. Journal of Media and Communication Research. 2015.
• Troiani, I. An Architectural Genogram: Writing Architectural History Based on the Transfer of Social Capital, The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences. Volume 5, Number 7, 2010. http://www.SocialSciences-Journal.com, ISSN 1833-1882.
• Nasciment & Marteleto. Social field, domains of knowledge and informational practice, Journal of Documentation, 64(3), 2008, pp. 397–412.
• Burch, J. Architectural drawing: The culture of learning an unstable currency. Charrette, 1(1), 2014, pp. 20–35.
• Schumacher, P. Parametricism- A New Global Style for Architecture and Urban Design. AD Arhitectural Design-Digital Cities, Vol 79:4, 2009, http://www.patrikschumacher.com/Texts/Parametricism (accessed in 19 April 2018).
• Oxman, R., Theory and design in the first digital age. Design Studies, 27, 2006, 229–265.
• Öztürk, Ş., Pierre Bourdieu’s Theory of Social Action, HABITUS, Journal of Sociology, 2020, (1), 63 – 77.
• Carpo, M. Digital Darwinism: Mass Collaboration, Form-Finding, and The Dissolution of Authorship. Log, No. 26, (Fall 2012), pp. 97-105, from http://www.arch.mcgill.ca/prof/sijpkes/Philo2018/digital%20influe nce%20on%20design.pdf.
• Kellerman, A. İnternet as a Space, 2016, from https://www.springer.com/.../9783319338033-c2.pdf.
• Oxman, R. Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking, Design Studies, 52, 2017, 4–39.
• Özkar, M., Uncertainties of Reason: Pragmatist Plurality in Basic Design Education. PhD Thesis, MIT, 2004.
• Chand, A. Habitus, Tacit Knowledge and Design Practice: The context of the Illustrator as Designer, PhD Thesis, University of Newcastle, 2017.
• Şahin-Dikmen, M. A Bourdieusian lens on to professions: A case study of architecture. Phd Thesis, University of York, UK, 2013
• Topolnicka, A., Architect’s taste. Master Thesis, University of Delft, 2015.
• Carpo, M., A Second Digital Turn, A Review Architecture: Short Review, December 2018, http://www.reviewarchitecture.com/reviews/seconddigitalturn. (accessed in 16 January 2019).