Araştırma Makalesi

Simone Weil'in İletişim Etiği

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 31 Mart 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

Simone Weil's Communication Ethics

Abstract

Simone Weil describes love as radical attention that suspends egoistic concerns to pursue solely the good of another. Although contemporary communication ethics emphasizes responsiveness and dialogue, it seldom addresses how individuals can entirely overcome self-interest to transparently recognize the other's need. This article proposes that Weil’s concepts (particularly attention, décréation, and metaxu) fill that theoretical gap. Grounding Weil’s ethics in Plato and mysticism, the discussion places her ideas in dialogue with current communication ethics, demonstrating their practical relevance. Weil’s notion of attention provides a profound reinterpretation of ethical listening as a form of selfless presence, while décréation offers a framework for decentering ego-driven speech. Further, metaxu clarifies the ethical role of communication mediators in facilitating genuine understanding rather than superficial engagement or division. Ultimately, Weil's ethics offers a normative criterion for ethical discourse: communication is morally good when it serves as a channel for the genuine well-being of the other.

Keywords

Simone Weil , communication ethics , attention , digital attention economy , decreation

Kaynakça

  1. Aeschylus, & Aeschylus. (2001). Aeschylus. 1: Suppliant maidens. Persians. Prometheus. Seven against Thebes. In The Loeb classical library: Vol. 145 (Repr). London: Heinemann.
  2. Arnett, R., Arneson, P., & Bell, L. (2006). Communication Ethics: The Dialogic Turn. The Review of Communication, 6, 62–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358590600763334
  3. Bianco, M., & Lykes, M. (2023). Towards an ethics of compassionate care in accompanying human suffering: Dialogic relationships and feminist activist scholarship with asylum-seeking mothers. Journal of Global Ethics, 19, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2023.2211080
  4. Buber, M. (2010). I and Thou (R. G. Smith, Trans.). Mansfield Centre, CT: Martino Publishing.
  5. Çöl, D. (2023). God as the Other Within: Simone Weil on God, the Self and Love (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Maltepe University.
  6. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development (pp. xxx, 184). Cambridge, MA, US: Harvard University Press.
  7. Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. MIT Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=fmYjgiUMy7EC
  8. Jensen, J. V. (1997). Ethical issues in the communication process. Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  9. Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. M. (2021). A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: Barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2
  10. Lévinas, E. (1969). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Duquesne University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=JNAJngEACAAJ Lewis, C. T., & Short, C. (1879). A Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Çöl, D. (2026). Simone Weil’s Communication Ethics. İletişim ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.59534/jcss.1756277