Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında Toplam Kalite Yönetimi Bileşenleri ile Çalışan Performansı Arasındaki İlişkiler

Öz

Yüksek öğretim kurumları, toplumun temelidir. Ayrıca, geçmişle gelecek arasında bağ kuran kusursuz bir kültüre doğru ilerlemesinin anahtarıdır. Kurumların sunacağı iyi bir hizmet, tüm yeteneklerin ve bireysel veya kolektif başarıların temel taşıdır. Bu nedenle, tüm kalite yönetim sistemlerini önceliklendirmek ve uygulamak, bir işletmeyi dünya çapında büyük organizasyonlar arasına yönlendirecektir. Örgütün başarısı ve uzun vadeli istikrarı için uluslararası kurumlardan yeni uygulamalar öğrenmek ve bu yeniliklere uyum sağlamak hayati önem taşımaktadır. Bu çalışma, kapsamlı kalite yönetimi kavramlarının üniversitedeki akademik ve idari personelin performansını artırmak için nasıl daha etkili bir şekilde kullanılabileceği konusunda bilgi yaymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu aşamada, araştırmanın amacı yükseköğretim kurumlarında toplam kalite yönetiminin çalışan performansı üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Bu amaçla, 400 Samarra Üniversitesi çalışanından çevrimiçi anket aracılığıyla veri toplanmıştır. Çalışmada bağımlı değişken çalışan performansı, bağımsız değişkenler ise toplam kalite yönetimi ve onun alt değişkenleri olan liderlik, sürekli iyileştirme ve çalışan katılımıdır. Çalışma, tanımlayıcı istatistik, güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik analizlerinin yanı sıra faktör analizi, korelasyon analizi ve regresyon analizini de içermektedir. Sonuçlar, liderlik, sürekli iyileştirme, çalışan katılımı ve çalışan performansı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir doğrudan ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Yükseköğretimde toplam kalite yönetimi, liderlik, sürekli iyileştirme ve çalışan katılımı alt boyutları da dahil olmak üzere, çalışan performansı üzerinde önemli ve olumlu bir etkiye sahiptir. Sonuç olarak, tüm hipotezler kabul edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Toplam Kalite Yönetimi
• Çalışan Performansı
• Yükseköğretim

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT COMPONENTS AND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Öz

Higher education institutions are the foundation of society. They are also the key to progressing toward a perfect culture that connects the past with the future. The provision of good service by institutions is the cornerstone of all talents and individual or collective achievements. Therefore, prioritizing and implementing all quality management systems are crucial for positioning a business among large organizations worldwide. Learning new practices from international institutions and adapting to these innovations is vital for the success and long-term stability of the organization. This study sought to promote knowledge about how comprehensive quality management concepts might be more effectively utilized to improve the performance of academic and administrative staff at universities. At this moment, the purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of overall quality management on employee performance in higher education institutions. For this objective, data were collected from 400 Samarra University employees using an online survey. The dependent variable in the study is employee performance, whereas the independent variables are TQM and its sub-variables, Leadership, Continuous Improvement, and Employee Involvement. The study included descriptive, reliability, and validity analyses, as well as factor analysis, correlation analysis, and regression analysis. The results show a statistically significant direct association between leadership, continuous improvement, employee engagement, and employee performance. Total quality management in higher education, including the sub-dimensions of leadership, continuous improvement, and employee involvement, has a significant and positive impact on employee performance. Consequently, all hypotheses were accepted.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Total Quality Management
• Employee Performance
• Higher Education

Kaynakça

1. Abbas, Q., & Yaqoob, S. (2009). Effect of leadership development on employee performance in Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 269-292.
2. Abukhader, K., & Onbaşıoğlu, D. (2021). The effects of total quality management practices on employee performance and the effect of training as a moderating variable. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(3), 521–528.
3. Ahmed, J. U. (2008). Quality and TQM at higher education institutions in the UK : lessons from the university of east London and the Aston University. Business and Economics, December, 1-32.
4. Ahmed, R., & Ali, S. I. (2012). Implementing TQM practices in Pakistani higher education institutions Rizwan Ahmed and Syed Iftikhar Ali Systems. Pakistan Journal of Engineering Technology Science, 2(1), 1-26.
5. Aldaweesh, M. (2018). The effective implementation of total quality management and transformational leadership in higher education improvement : a case of Saudi Universities. September. https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/17017.
6. Al-Ghanboosi, S. S. M. (2002). Enhancing higher education services in the Sultanate of Oman through implementing total quality management : sultan qaboos university as case study. September.
7. Ali, M., & Shastri, R. K. (2010). Implementation of total quality management in higher education. Asian Journal of Business Management, 2(1), 9–16.
8. Al-Najjar, S. M., & Jawad, M. K. (2019). Total quality management practices and impediments in the Arab countries with special reference to Iraq. Journal of Law and Society, 6(1), 86-96.

9. Al-omoush, M., Alrahahleh, A. & Alabaddi, A. (2015). Total quality management in higher education. Information and knowledge management, 12 (5), 49-59.
10. Al-Qayoudhi, S. A. S., Hussain, D. S. S., & Khan, D. M. F. R. (2017). Application of total quality management (TQM) in higher education institution (HEI) in Oman: Shinas college of technology- a case study. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 5(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2017.512.
11. AlTabbaa, O., & Ankrah, S. (2016). University of Huddersfield Repository. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 104, 1-15.
12. Aly, N., & Akpovi, J. (2001). Total quality management in California Public higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 9(3), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880110399077.
13. Apostolou, A. (2000). Employee involvement, Innoregio: dissemination of innovation and knowledge management technique, ,D. of Production Engineering & Management, Technical University of Crete,p. 1-25. https://www.scribd.com/document/39965640/Employee-Involvement.
14. Awotinde, O. J. (2021). Work stress and employee performance. May, 1-305.
15. Baig, S. A., Abrar, M., Ali, A., & Ahmad, M. (2015). Implementation of TQM on higher education in Pakistan (short communication). Quality and Quantity, 49(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9973-7.
16. Bayraktar, C. A., Araci, O., Karacay, G., & Calisir, F. (2017). The mediating effect of rewarding on the relationship between employee involvement and job satisfaction. Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing, 27(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20683.
17. Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E., & Zaim, S. (2008). An instrument for measuring the critical factors of TQM in Turkish higher education. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 19(6), 551–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360802023921.
18. Bernardin, H. J., & Russell, J. E. A. (2006). Human resource management. Tata McGraw-Hill New York.
19. Berrish, M. M. (2016). The integration between knowledge management and total quality management and its impact on educational performance. Ph.d thesis. School of the Built Environment, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
20. Berrish, M. M. (2016). The integration between knowledge management and total quality management and its impact on educational performance. University of Salford (United Kingdom).
21. Bessant, J. J., Caffyn, S., Gilbert, J., Harding, R., & Webb, S. (1994). Rediscovering continuous improvement. Technovation, 14(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(94)90067-1.
22. Bon, A. T., & Mustafa, E. M. A. (2013). Impact of total quality management on innovation in service organizations: Literature review and new conceptual framework. Procedia Engineering, 53, 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.067.
23. Cascio, W. F. (1991). Costing human resources: The financial impact of behavior in organizations. Thomson South-Western.
24. Dedy, A. N., Zakuan, N., Omain, S. Z., Rahim, K. A., Ariff, M. S. M., Sulaiman, Z., & Saman, M. Z. M. (2016). An analysis of the impact of total quality management on employee performance with mediating role of process innovation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 131(1), 12017.
25. Evans, J. R., & Lindsay, W. M. (2002). The management and control of quality (Vol. 5). South-western Cincinnati, OH.
26. Field, Andy (2000), Discovering Statistics Using SPSS For Windows, London: SAGE Publication. Flores-molina, J. C. (2011). A Total Quality Management Methodology for Universities. 311. https://doi.org/10.25148/etd.FI11050308.
27. Gözaçan Borahan, N., & Ziarati, R. (2002). Developing quality criteria for application in the higher education sector in Turkey. Total Quality Management, 13(7), 913–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412022000017021.
28. Güner, Ç. Ö. L. (2008). Algılanan güçlendirmenin işgören performansı üzerine etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1), 35-46.
29. Hameed, Abdul, A. W. (2011). Employee development and its affect on employee performance a conceptual framework. International Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(13), 224–229.
30. Hasham, E., & Hasham, E. S. (2018). Academic institutions are no different to any other: total quality management does enhance performance. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 7(4), 348–373. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2018.60340.
31. Hoyle, D. (2017). ISO 9000 Quality Systems Handbook: Updated for the ISO 9001-2018 Standard. Routledge.
32. Jones, M. L., Hobson, R. S., Plasschaert, A. J. M., Gundersen, S., Dummer, P., Roger-Leroi, V., Sidlauskas, A., & Hamlin, J. (2007). Quality assurance and benchmarking: An approach for European dental schools. European Journal of Dental Education, 11(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2007.00446.x.
33. Juran, J. M., Gryna, F. M., & Bingham, R. S. (1974). Quality control handbook (Vol. 3). McGraw-Hill New York.
34. Kanji, G. K. (2012). Measuring business excellence. Taylor & Francis.
35. Khoja, M. (2016). The Development of a Sustainable Quality Management Framework for Libyan Higher Education System. 351.
36. Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management journal, 42(1), 58-74.
37. Kruger, V. (2001). Perspectives Main schools of TQM : "the big five" Volker Kru. The TQM Magazine, 13(3), 146–155.
38. Kumar, P., Raju, N. V. S., & Kumar, M. V. (2016). Quality of quality definitions-an analysis. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology, 5(3), 142–148.
39. Mahmoud, R., & Aloqlah, A. (2021). Obstacles of TQM Implementation in Saudi Universities : An Empirical Study. 186–200.
40. Marewo, N. T., Mutongi, C., Nyoni, T., & Nyoni, S. P. (2020). The impact of employee motivation on employee performance. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 6(6), 1487–1502. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347510308.
41. Mulyani, S. R., Sari, V. N., & Sari, M. W. (2019). The model of employee motivation and cooperative employee performance. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.20.2.32.
42. Nadali Najafabadi, H., Sadeghi, S., & Habibzadeh, P. (2008). Total Quality Management in Higher Education Case Study: Quality in Practice at University College of Borås. University of Borås/School of Engineering.
43. Neirotti, P. (2020). Work intensification and employee involvement in lean production: new light on a classic dilemma. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(15), 1958–1983. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1424016.
44. Neyestani, B. (2018). Principles and contributions of total quality mangement (tqm) gurus on business quality improvement. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2950981.
45. Osseo-Asare, A. E., Longbottom, D., & Murphy, W. D. (2005). Leadership best practices for sustaining quality in UK higher education from the perspective of the EFQM excellence model. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(2), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880510594391.
46. Owlia, M. S., & Aspinwall, E. M. (1996). A framework for the dimensions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education.
47. Pradesh, A. (2017). An Inquiry into Impact of TQM Implementation on Customer Oriented Performance at Working Pig Iron Firms of Hyderabad-Karnataka Region. International Journal of Engineering and Manufacturing Science, 7(1), 43–56.
48. Pradhan, R. K., & Jena, L. K. (2017). Employee Performance at Workplace: Conceptual Model and Empirical Validation. Business Perspectives and Research, 5(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533716671630.
49. Pulakos, E. (2014). Performance management - shrm connect. Performance management a roadmap for developing, Implementing and Evaluating Performance Management Systems Elain, 2(8, Aug-2015), 1–56.
50. Ross, S. C. (2021). Organizational development and training. Organizational Behavior Today, January 2015, 211–233. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003142119-14.
51. Saffar, N., & Obeidat, A. (2020). The effect of total quality management practices on employee performance: The moderating role of knowledge sharing. Management Science Letters, 10(1), 77–90.
52. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2003). Research methods for business, a skill building approach, John Willey & Sons. Inc. New York.
53. Sharma, S., & Taneja, M. (2018). The effect of training on employee performance. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(4), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.36555/almana.v4i3.1477.
54. Sherr, L. A., & Gregory Lozier, G. (1991). Total quality management in higher education. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1991(71), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.37019917103.
55. Sigler, T. H., & Pearson, C. M. (2000). Creating an empowering culture: examining the relationship between organizational culture and perceptions of empowerment. Journal of quality management, 5(1), 27-52.
56. Tinofirei, C. (2011). The unique factors affecting employee performance in nonprofit organisations (Vol. 7). University of South Africa.
57. Tribus, M. (2010). Total Quality Management in education. In Developing quality systems in education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203423660_chapter_5.
58. Ullah, P. S. (2015). Informal relationships at workplace and employee performance : A study of employees private higher education sector Informal Relationships at Workplace and Employee Performance : A Study of Employees Private Higher.
59. Zairi, M. (1992). The art of benchmarking: using customer feedback to establish a performance gap. Total Quality Management, 3(2), 177–188.
60. Zairi, M., & Leonard, P. (1996). Practical benchmarking: the complete guide. In practical benchmarking: the complete guide. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1284-0.
61. Zwain, A. (2012). The impact of total quality management on knowledge management and organizational performance in higher education institutions in Iraq Doctor of Philosophy Universiti Utara Malaysia. Dissertation, August, 371.
62. Zwain, A., Lim, K., & Othman, S. (2014). TQM practices and organisational knowledge creation: An empirical study of Iraqi higher education institutions. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 7(1).