Questioning the Dimensions of Digital Surveillance and Parental Supervision: YouTube Challenges and Video Recommendation System

Öz

The development of communication technologies and the active use of social media platforms have led to the fusion of the existing culture with the digital culture formed in this field. While digital culture enables individuals to transfer their norms and values to social media platforms, on the other hand, it has adapted its norms and values to daily culture. YouTube has become one of the main social media platforms on which this culture is especially based and where it is defined as participatory culture. It is thought that especially younger age groups are included in this culture and that provides an occasion for them to take part in surveillance practices by providing data to big data. In this study, to make sense of this situation, the theories of digital sociology and digital surveillance sociology were rethought and qualitative research was conducted to look at the ways in which children aged 9-13 are involved in big data. The study focuses on their YouTube practices, especially their experiences of the challenges connected with using YouTube and the video recommendation system, and suggests precautions where necessary. After conducting netnography on YouTube, the sample of the study was determined using purposeful sampling and snowball sampling techniques, and in-depth interviews were conducted with 23 children upon obtaining consent forms from their families. The findings of the research revealed that usage patterns of social media platforms and the resulting consequences can reach very dangerous levels and that the degree of parental supervision should be reconsidered.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital Surveillance
• Video Recommendation System
• Challenge
• Parental Supervision

Kaynakça

1. Alexandersson, A. (2020). Doing qualitative research in times of alternative facts. Ephemera, 20(4), 339-344. google scholar
2. Baştürk, E. (2012). Michel Foucault’da liberalizm eleştirisi: İktidar, yönetimsellik ve güvenlik (The criticism of liberalism in Foucaultian perspective: Power, governmentality, security). Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. (14), 65-78. google scholar
3. Braga, A. (2021). Nethnography: An ecological approach to digital interactions. New Explorations: Studies in Culture and Communication, 2(1), 1-17. google scholar
4. Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2009). YouTube: Digital media and society series. Cambridge: Polity. google scholar
5. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. google scholar
6. Eroğlu Özçağlar, H. (2016). Foucault’nun iktidarları [Foucault’s powers]. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 49(2), 39-54. google scholar
7. Foucault, M. (1997). Toplumu savunmak gerekir [Society must be defended]. (Ş. Aktaş, Trans.) İstanbul, Turkey: Yapı Kredi Yayınları. google scholar
8. Foucault, M. (2017). Cinselliğin tarihi 1 [History of sexuality I]. (H. U. Tanrıöver, Trans.) İstanbul, Turkey: Ayrıntı Yayınları. google scholar

9. Harvey, L. (2013). YouTuber Celebrities-Expertise, Discovery and LegitimateWork. Retrieved from http://www. celebyouth.org/youtuber-celebrities-expertise-discovery-and-legitimate-work/ google scholar
10. Holmbom, M. (2015). The YouTuber: A qualitative study of popular content creators (Thesis, Umea University, Sweden). Retrieved from http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:825044/FULLTEXT01.pdf google scholar
11. Jenkins, H. (2009). What happened before YouTube. In J. Burgess & J. Green (Eds.), YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture (pp.109-125). London, UK: Polity. google scholar
12. Keen, A. (2011). The cult of amateur: How blogs, MySpace, YouTube and the rest of today’s user generated media are killing our culture. England: Nicholas Brealey Publishing. google scholar
13. Lupton, D. (2013). Digital sociology. London: Routledge. google scholar
14. Lyon, D. (2006). Gözetlenen toplum [Surveillance society]. (G. Soykan, Trans.) İstanbul, Turkey: Kalkedon Yayınları. google scholar
15. Melossi, D. (1997). State and social control a la fin de siecle: From the new world to the constitution of the New Europe. In Sumner R. B. (Eds.), Social control and political order: European perpectives at the end of the century (pp. 52-74). London: Sage. google scholar
16. Metz, C. (2007). Viacom slaps YouTuber for behaving like Viacom. The Register. Retrieved from https://www. theregister.com/2007/08/30/viacom_slaps_pol/ google scholar
17. Mingione, D. (2014). Hello internet!: An analysis of YouTuber greetings. Explorations in Linguistics, 1(1), 19-35. google scholar
18. Mutlu, B., & Bazarcı, S. (2017). Marka işbirlikleri için yeni bir alan: YouTube içerik üreticileri ve kanal toplulukları üzerine netnografik bir araştırma [A new area for brands collaborations: A netnographic study on YouTube content creators and channel communities]. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, (27), 28-45. google scholar
19. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods. Essex: Pearson. google scholar
20. Özdemir, M. (2010). Nitel veri analizi: Sosyal bilimlerde yöntembilim sorunsalı üzerine bir çalışma [Qualitative data analysis: A study on methodology problem in social sciences]. Eskişehir Osmangazi üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi, 11(1), 323-343. google scholar
21. Özkazanç, A. (2007). Biyopolitik çağda suç ve cezalandırma: Denetim Toplumunda neo-liberal yönetimsellik araştırma. Toplum ve Bilim, (108), 15-52. google scholar
22. Öztürk, S. (2013). Filmlerle görünürlüğün dönüşümü: panoptikon, süperpanoptikon, sinoptikon [The transformation of visibility through movies: Panopticon, superpanopticon, synopticon]. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, (36), 132-151. google scholar
23. Özuz, E. (2018). Dijital Sosyoloji Perspektifinden Toplumsal Değerlerin Değişim Sürecinde YouTuberlar: İlköğretim Öğrencileri Örneği [Youtubers in the Process of Changing Social Values from the Perspective of Digital Sociology: The Sample of Primary Education Students] (Master’s thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara). Retrieved from http://openaccess.hacettepe.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11655/4980 google scholar
24. Riley, M. N. (2014). The YouTube celebrity: Common factors of successful YouTuber channels (Arizona State University The Honours College Thesis/Creative Project, Arizona). Retrieved from https://keep.lib.asu.edu/ items/137041 google scholar
25. Sustam, E. (2016). Foucault’da iktidarın jeneolojisi: Biyopolitiğin doğuşu ve yönetimsellik. Teorik Bakış, (03), 221234. google scholar
26. Thwaites Diken, E. (2017). Dijital gözetim ve yeni medya toplumsallığı, oyun (game), büyülenme (captivation) ve birey kaçlık (‘dividuality’). Sosyoloji Divanı, (9), 61-72. google scholar
27. Yaraş, N. (2017). Yeni medya trendleri: “YoTtube güzellik ve moda vloggerlığı örneği”. In G. Öztürk & İ. Eken (Eds.), 1st International Conference on New Trends in Communication (pp.54-63). İstanbul: İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
28. YouTube. (2016). Rakamlarla Youtube: YouTube kullanıcı profili araştırması 2016. Retrieved from http://messaj. mess.org.tr/wpcontent/uploads/2016/12/Rakamlarla_YouTube__YouTube_Kullanici_Profili_ Arastirmasi_2016.pdf google scholar