Intergenerational Differences in Communication Processes with the Homeland: Turkish Immigrants Living in Australia

Öz

The focus of this study is the first-generation Turkish immigrants who went to Australia to work after the bilateral agreement signed between Australia and Turkey in 1968 and their second and third generation relatives. The objective is to reveal the communication processes of different generations of Turkish immigrants living in Australia with Turkey in terms of transnationalism. The research was designed as a holistic single case study in accordance with the qualitative method. Accordingly, triangulation was ensured by using data collection tools such as online observation, semi-structured interviews and participant observation. The field research was carried out in Sydney, Australia between September 2018 and January 2019. During the research, semi-structured interviews were held with 30 participants who were reached by snowball sampling. Of the 30 participants, 14 are from the first generation, 13 are from the second generation and 3 are from the third generation. Findings show that the means of communication and engagement with their homeland, which have evolved significantly since the beginning of Turkish immigration to Australia, directly affected the migrants' lives. Additionally, it has been observed that transnational ties are strengthened by thechoice of communication tools that provide instant communication. It was also revealed that the developing technology and historical conditions had different effects on different generations of migrants.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Intercultural communication
• Migration
• Transnationalism
• Australia
• Multiculturalism

Kaynakça

1. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. (4th Ed.). New York, USA: Oxford University Press google scholar
2. Bochner, A.P., & Riggs, N.A. (2014). Practicing narrative inquiry. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 195-222. google scholar
3. Hopkins, L. (2000). Turkish transnational media in Melbourne. International journal on multicultural societies, 11(2), 230-247. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/shs/ijms/vol11/issue2/art7 google scholar
4. Inglis, C. (2011). Türkiye to Australia: Turkish settlement in Victoria. Melbourne, Australia: Moreland Turkish Association Pty. Ltd. google scholar
5. Inglis, C. (2015). Australia Turkey connections: Traders, foes and citizens. In M. S. Michael (Ed.), Reconciling cultural and political identities in a globalized world: Perspectives on Australia-Turkey relations. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan, 45-62. google scholar
6. Inglis, C., Akgönül, S., & De Tapia, S. (2009). Turks abroad: Settlers, citizens, transnationals-Introduction. International journal on multicultural societies, 11(2), 104-118. Retrieved from http://www. unesco.org/shs/ijms/vol11/issue2/intro google scholar
7. İçduygu, A. (1994). Facing changes and making choices: Unintended Turkish immigrant settlement in Australia. International migration, 32, 71-93. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111Zj.1468-2435.1994. tb00516.x google scholar
8. İçduygu, A., Erder S., & Gençkaya, Ö. F. (2014). Türkiye’nin uluslararası göç politikaları, 1923-2023. Ulus-devlet oluşumundan ulus-ötesi dönüşümlere. Istanbul, Turkey: Koç Üniversitesi Göç Araştırmaları Merkezi. google scholar

9. Jakubowicz, A. (2015). ‘In the beginning all is chaos . . .’: Roaming the dystopic realm in Australian multiculturalism. In: S. Castles, D. Özkul, & M. D. Cubas (Eds.), Social transformation and migration: National and local experiences in South Korea, Turkey, Mexico and Australia. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 221-236. google scholar
10. Karanfil, G. (2009). Pseudo-exiles and reluctant transnationals: Disrupted nostalgia on Turkish satellite broadcasts.Media, culture & society, 31(6), 887-899. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709343793 google scholar
11. Kaya, A. (2007). German-Turkish transnational space: A separate space of their own. German studies review, 30(3), 483-502. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27668369 google scholar
12. Kivisto, P., & Faist, T. (2009). Beyond a border: The causes and consequences of contemporary immigration. Thousand Oaks, USA: Pine Forge Press. google scholar
13. Koleth, E. (2015). Multiculturalism at the margins of global Sydney: Cacophonous diversity in Fairfield, Australia. In S. Castles, D. Özkul, & M. D. Cubas (Eds.), Social transformation and migration: National and local experiences in South Korea, Turkey, Mexico and Australia. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 237-254. google scholar
14. Markus, A. (2017). Australia’s immigrants: Identity and citizenship. In J. Mann (Ed.), Citizenship in transnational perspective: Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 225-244. google scholar
15. Modood, T. (2013). Multiculturalism: A civic idea. London, UK: Polity Press. google scholar
16. Mortan, K., & Sarfati, M. (2014). Vatan olan gurbet II Avustralya’ya işçi göçünün 45. yılı. İstanbul, Turkey: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları. google scholar
17. Mütercimler, E. (1998). Avustralya örneğinde Türk göçü ve sorunları. (Doctoral Dissertation). İstanbul University, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=biL2P3cCsPgUNjVdV2BsGA yYXpUMoFU6RxYXs6mjhsqKbGuJQk2FnGDD2-RE0mro google scholar
18. Özkul, D. (2016). Ulus-ötesi göç: Uluslararası göç yazınında yeni bir paradigma. In S. Ihlamur-Öner, & N. A. Öner (Eds.), Küreselleşme çağında göç: Kavramlar, tartışmalar. Istanbul, Turkey: İletişim Yayınları, 483-500. google scholar
19. Schwandt T. A., & Gates E. F. (2018). Case study methodology. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. London, UK: SAGE Publications. 600-630. google scholar
20. Şahin Kütük, B. (2017). Turkish migration to the Netherlands and transnational activities. Istanbul Journal of Sociological Studies, 55, 85-106. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iusoskon/issue/30651/328315 google scholar
21. Şanlıer Yüksel, Ö. İ. (2008). Türkiye’den Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’ne göç eden birinci kuşak göçmenlerin yararlandığı kitle iletişim ortamlarının ulusaşırı kimlik dönüşümüne etkileri. (Doctoral Dissertation). Anadolu University, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=-Z0vbSUgrhM9fXoGkRe6Q5j-79aKsAHTc_3pcX3cQ2GC9lrXb5dQFB7Q4GrhzaJT google scholar
22. Şenay, B. (2010). Ulusaşırı toplumsal alanlar, ulusaşırı kimlikler: Avustralyalı Türkler örneği. In R. Dönmez, P. Enneli, & N. Altuntaş (Eds.), Türkiye>de kesişen-çatışan dinsel ve etnik kimlikler. Istanbul, Turkey: Say Yayınları. 255-287. google scholar
23. Şenay, B. (2013). Beyond Turkey>s borders: Long-distance Kemalism, state politics and the Turkish diaspora.London, UK: I. B. Tauris & Co Ltd. google scholar
24. Türkoğlu, N. (2015). iletişim bilimlerinden kültürel çalışmalara toplumsal iletişim: Tanımlar, kavramlar, tartışmalar. Adana, Tukey: Karahan Kitabevi. google scholar
25. Vasta, E. (2015). Generations and change: Affinities old and new. In: S. Castles, D. Özkul, & M. D. Cubas (Eds.), Social transformation and migration: National and local experiences in South Korea, Turkey, Mexicoand Australia. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 283–298. google scholar