Clientelism in Public Employment in Turkey

Öz

This study aims to examine political clientelism, which can be defined as the distribution of public resources to the advocates through political powers, with its recent dimension in Turkey. In Turkey, a new dimension of clientelism has started to be mentioned with the conservative politics that has been effective especially as of the 2000s. This research focuses on the clientelistic relations experienced in recent appointments to positions such as district governors, judges, prosecutors, and auditors, which are also defined as the white collars of the public in Turkey. Research data were collected in 2019 with Ankara and Adiyaman face-to-face and telephone calls from various provinces of Turkey. Data were collected from 29 candidates (2 focus group interviews and 19 in-depth interviews) who were candidates for the aforementioned positions and were previously candidates. The research is based on the data obtained from the subjective experiences of the candidates who applied to the mentioned positions from various provinces of Turkey in 2019 and before. According to the findings, widespread relationships of clientelism have been identified in the appointment processes to the mentioned positions. Internal regulations of public institutions such as security investigation, interviews, and reference are used as effective tools in such relations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Public employment in Turkey
• clientelism
• favoritism
• merit
• trust

Kaynakça

1. Abdalla, H. F., Maghrabi, A. S. & Raggad, B. G. (1998). Assessing the perceptions of human resource managers toward nepotism: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Manpower, 19(8), 554-570. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729810242235 google scholar
2. Adaman, F., Çarkoğlu, A. & Şenatalar, B. (2005). Toplumun Kamu Yönetimine, Kamu Hizmetlerine ve Reforma Bakışı, [Society’s Perspective on Public Administration, Public Services and Reform]. TESEV Yayınları, https://www.tesev.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/rapor_ Toplumun_Kamu_Yonetimine_Kamu_Hizmetlerine_Ve_Reforma_Bakisi.pdf google scholar
3. Aksoy, V. (2016). Eğitim örgütlerinde meritokrasi ihlali sonucu oluşan yeni bir liderlik: Hafi liderlik. [A new leadership formed because of meritocracy violation in educational organizations: Light leadership]. Akademik Bakış Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 54, 204-215. google scholar
4. Aktan, C. C., & Acar, O. K. (2021). Önsöz [Preface]. (C.C. Aktan, and O.K. Acar, Eds.), Kamu Yönetiminde Kayırmacılık [Nepotism in Public Administration]. İzmir: SOBİAD Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları. google scholar Ayata, S. (1996). Patronage, party, and state: The politicization of Islam in Turkey. Middle East Journal, 50(1), 40-56. google scholar
5. Aydoğan, İ. (2009). Favoritism in the Turkish educational system: Nepotism, cronyism and patronage. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 4(1), 19-35. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/epasr/issue/17479/182978 google scholar
6. Bauman, Z. (2015). Sosyolojik Düşünmek [Thinking Sociologically]. (A. Yılmaz, Trans.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı. google scholar
7. Brinkerhoff, Derick. W. & Arthur A. Goldsmith (2002). Clientelism, Patrimonialism and Democratic governance: an overview and framework for assessment and programming. Maryland: U.S. Agency for International Development, Office of Democracy and Government. google scholar
8. Çarkoğlu, A. & Toprak, B. (2006). Değişen Türkiye’de Din, Toplum ve Siyaset [Religion, Society and Politics in a Changing Turkey]. İstanbul: TESEV. google scholar

9. Dépelteau, F. & Powell, C. (eds) (2013). Applying Relational Sociology: Relations, Networks, and Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
10. Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı (DİB) (nd). Nisâ Suresi 58. Ayet Tefsiri [Interpretation of the 58th Aya of Nisa Surah]. https://kuran.diyanet.gov. tr/tefsir/Nis%C3%A2-suresi/551/58-ayet-tefsiri google scholar
11. Durakoğlu, M. (2020). Çocuk Hâkimler Sorunu Yaşıyoruz [We Have a Problem with Juvenile Judges]. İstanbul Barosu Yayını, https://www. istanbulbarosu.org.tr/HaberDetay.aspx?ID=15367&Desc=%C3%87ocuk-H%C3%A2kimler-Sorunu-Ya%C5%9F%C4%B1yoruz google scholar
12. Eisenstadt, S. N. & Roniger, L. (1983). Patrons, Clients and Friends. Interpersonal Relations and the Structure of Trust in Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
13. Heper, M. & Keyman, F. (1998). Double-faced state: Political patronage and the consolidation of democracy in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies, 34(4), 259-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263209808701251 google scholar
14. Houcham, E. C.& Juan, J. L. (1998). Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins Press. google scholar
15. İnalcık, H. (1994). Sultanizm üzerine yorumlar: Max Weber’in Osmanlı Siyasi Sistemi Tiplemesi [Commentaries on sultanism: Max Weber’s typing of the Ottoman political system]. Dünü ve Bugünüyle Toplum ve Ekonomi, (7), 5-26. google scholar
16. Kalaycıoğlu, E. (1992). 1960 Sonrası Türk Siyasal Hayatına Bir Bakış: Demokrasi, Neo-patrimonyalizm ve İstikrar [A Look at Turkish Political Life After 1960: Democracy, Neo-patrimonialism and Stability]. (Üniversite Öğretim Üyeleri Derneği, Ed.), Tarih ve Demokrasi: Tarık Zafer Tunaya’ya Armağan [History and Democracy: Gift to Tarık Zafer Tunaya]. İstanbul: Cem Yayınevi, 87-126. google scholar
17. Karpat, K. (2006). Osmanlı’da Değişim, Modernleşme ve Uluslaşma [Change, Modernization and Nationalization in the Ottoman Empire]. (D. Özdemir, Trans.). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi. google scholar
18. Katz, E. & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (2005). Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. New York: Routledge. google scholar
19. Kaufman, Robert R. (1974). The Patron-Client Concept and Macro-Politics: Prospects and Problems. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(4), 284-308. google scholar
20. Kıray, M. (1995). Siyasi Himayecilikten Dinsel Grup Himayeciliğine [From Political Protection to Religious Group Protectionism] (A. Bayramoğlu, Ed.). Türkiye’de Toplumsal Değişim [Social Change in Turkey], İstanbul: Yeni Yüzyıl. google scholar
21. Kitschelt, H. (2000). Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. Comparative Political Studies, 33 (6–7), 845–879. doi: 10.1177/001041400003300607 google scholar
22. Köse, A. (2008). Küreselleşme çağında bir aidiyet zemini ve örgütlenme şekli olarak hemşehrilik [Citizenship as a ground of belonging and a form of organization in the age of globalization]. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 3(1), 221-232. google scholar
23. Lewis, B. (1993). Modern Türkiye’nin Doğuşu [The Emergence of Modern Turkey]. Kıratlı, M. (trans.). Ankara: TTK google scholar
24. Lin, N. (1999). Building a Network Theory of Social Capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51. google scholar
25. Loewe, M., Blume, J., Schönleber, V., Seibert, S., Speer, J. & Voss, C. (2007). The impact of favoritism on the business climate: A study on Wasta in Jordan. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2218821 google scholar
26. Memurlar. Net (2019). Makam Sahibi Olmak için ya İmamHatipli ya da Trabzonlu Olacaksın. Available at “https://www.memurlar.net/ haber/873915/makam-sahibi-olmak-icin-ya-imam-hatipli-ya-da-trabzonlu-olacaksin.html google scholar
27. Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel Araştırma, Desen ve Uygulama için bir Rehber [Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation]. (S. Turan, Trans.). Ankara: Nobel. google scholar
28. Mutlu, K. (2000). Problems of nepotism and favoritism in the police organization in Turkey. An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 23(3), 381-389. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510010343056 google scholar
29. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri, Nitel veNicel Yaklaşımlar [Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches]. (S. Özge, Trans.). 1. Cilt. Ankara: Yayınodası. google scholar
30. Roniger, L. (1983). Modern patron-client relations and historical clientelism. Some clues from ancient Republican Rome. European Journal of Sociology, 24, 63-95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600003969 google scholar
31. Sabahaddin, P. (2007). Gönüllü Sürgünden Zorunlu Sürgüne [From Voluntary Exile to Forced Exile]. İstanbul: YKY. google scholar
32. Sayari, S. (1977). Political Patronage in Turkey. (E. Gellner and J. Waterbury. Ed.). Patrons and Clients in Mediterranean Societies içinde (p. 103–113). London: Duckworth. google scholar
33. Sayarı, S. (2011). Clientelism and Patronage in Turkish Politics and Society. (B. Toprak and F. Birtek, Eds.), Essays in Honor of Şerif Mardin: The Post-Modern Abyss and the New Politics of Islam: Assabiyah Revisited içinde (p. 81-94). İstanbul: Bilgi University. google scholar
34. Scott, C. J. (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. The American Political Science Review, 66 (1), 91-113. doi:10.2307/1959280 google scholar
35. Sennett, R. (2014). Otorite [Authority], Durand K (trans.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı. google scholar
36. Søren, S. (2018). The Power of Sultanism. (R. Hinnebusch and O. Imady, Eds.), The Syrian Uprising: Domestic Origins and Early Trajectory, London, New York: Routledge. google scholar
37. Stokes, S.C. (2007). Political Clientelism. (C. Boix and S. C. Stokes, Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics içinde (s. 604-627). New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
38. Theobald, R. (1983). The Decline of Patron-Client Relations in Developed Societies. European Journal of Sociology, 24 (1), 136-147. google scholar
39. Türk Sanayicileri ve İş İnsanları Derneği (TUSIAD) (1983). Kamu Bürokrasisi [Public Bureaucracy]. October 1, 1983. https://tusiad.org/tr/ yayinlar/raporlar/item/9076-kamu-burokrasisi google scholar
40. Türk Sanayicileri ve İş İnsanları Derneği TUSIAD (1995). Optimal Devlet [Optimal State]. February 1995. https://tusiad.org/tr/yayinlar/ raporlar/item/1798-optimal-devlet google scholar
41. Weber, M. (1968). Bureaucracy. (G. Roth and C. Wittich, Eds.), Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Society. New York: Bedminster Press, 956-1005. google scholar