Necessary Conditions for the Existence of Organizational Legitimacy

Öz

Organizational legitimacy is a crucial factor for ensuring survival, securing resources, facilitating growth, and stabilizing the work environment. To achieve this, an organization must determine whether it currently possesses legitimacy or needs to take steps to attain it. This requires the use of measurement tools that enable effective evaluation. When scholars assess organizational legitimacy, they typically base their evaluation on audience perceptions. However, we argue that an organization either possesses or lacks legitimacy as an objective fact, grounded in its inherent properties. In this study, we propose a legitimacy framework that aligns with what a legitimate organization should exhibit. We analyze the foundational premises of organizational legitimacy and provide a roadmap for achieving it. Our position is that perceptions or sentiments are not the most reliable means of assessing an organization’s legitimacy, as they are inherently subjective and shaped by multiple variables that are difficult to quantify. We emphasize the need for a strong connection between intrinsic legitimacy—defined by its properties—and perceived legitimacy. We argue that the former constitutes a necessary condition, while the latter serves as a sufficient condition to ensure the coherence of organizational legitimacy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Organizational legitimacy
• consistent legitimacy
• legitimacy as a property
• legitimacy as a perception
• congruence

Kaynakça

1. Aerts, W., & Cormier, D. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34 (1), 1-27. https://doi.Org/l0.1016/J.AOS.2008.02.005 google scholar
2. Aggerholm, H. K., & Thomsen, C. (2024). Strategic communication in contexts of high sustainability pressure: balancing purposefulness, transparency and participation in pursuit of organizational legitimacy. Journal of Communication Management. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/jcom-12-2022-0131 google scholar
3. Argenti, P. A. (2017). Strategic Communication in the C-Suite. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(2), 146-160. https:// doi.org/10.1177/2329488416687053 google scholar
4. Auld, G., & Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2010). Transparency in nonstate certification: consequences for accountability and legitimacy. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 97-119. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00016 google scholar
5. Beetham, D. (1991). Towards a Social-scientific Concept of Legitimacy. In: D. Beetham, The Legitimation of Power. Issues in Political Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21599-7_1 google scholar
6. Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a Theory of Social Judgments of Organizations: The Case of Legitimacy, Reputation, and Status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151-179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0382 google scholar
7. Blanco-Gonzâlez, A., Cachon-Rodrîguez, G., Prado-Român, C., & Hernândez-Perlines, F. (2023). Effects of social responsibility on legit-imacy and revisit intention: The moderating role of anxiety. Journal of Business Research, 157,113583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2022.113583 google scholar
8. Chan, C. M., & Makino, S. (2007). Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments: implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 621-638. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400283 google scholar

9. Christensen, L. T., & Langer, R. (2009). Public relations and the strategic use of transparencY: Consistency, hYpocrisY, and corporate change. In Heath, R.L., Toth, E.L., & WaYmer, D. (Eds.), Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations II, (pp. 141-165). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874929. google scholar
10. Chung, J. Y., Berger, B. K., & DeCoster, J. (2016). Developing Measurement Scales of Organizational and Issue Legitimacy: A Case of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising in the Pharmaceutical IndustrY. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(2), 405-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 10551-014-2498-8 google scholar
11. Cruz-Suârez, A. ., Marino, D. ., & Prado-Roman, C. (2020). Origin and evolution of the legitimacy management in higher education. Journal of Management and Business Education, 3(2), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2020.0007 google scholar
12. Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does Isomorphism Legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024-1039. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 256722 google scholar
13. Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. SuddabY, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 50-77). SAGE Publications. google scholar
14. Deephouse, D. L. and Haack, P. (2025). Legitimacy foundations. In A. ZavYalova & R. Younger (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organiza-tional Social Evaluations: Oxford UniversitY Press. google scholar
15. De Fine Licht, J., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P., & Gilljam, M. (2014). When does transparency generate legitimacY? Experimenting on a context-bound relationship. Governance, 27(1), 111-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12021 google scholar
16. Dîez-de-Castro, E., Peris-Ortiz, M., & Dîez-Martîn, F. (2018). Criteria for Evaluating the Organizational Legitimacy: A Typology for Legitimacy Jungle. In Organizational Legitimacy (pp. 1-21). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75990-6_1 google scholar
17. Dîez-Martîn, F., Blanco-Gonzâlez, A., Cachon-Rodrîguez, G., & Dîez-de-Castro, E. (2025). Does the sustainability of universities influence their organizational legitimacy? / âLa sostenibilidad de las universidades inflUye en su legitimidad organizativa? Culture and Education, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/11356405241309246 google scholar
18. Dîez-Martîn, F., Miotto, G., & Cachon-Rodrîguez, G. (2022). Organizational legitimacy perception: Gender and uncertainty as bias for evaluation criteria. Journal of Business Research, 139, 426-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.09.073 google scholar
19. Dîez-Martîn, F., Prado-Roman, C., & Blanco-Gonzâlez, A. (2021). Measuring a scientifically multifaceted concept. The jungle of organi-zational legitimacy. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(1), 100131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen. 2020.10.001 google scholar
20. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational LegitimacY: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136. https://doi.org/l0.2307/l388226 google scholar
21. Drew, C. H., & NYerges, T. L. (2004). TransparencY of environmental decision making: a case studY of soil cleanup inside the Hanford 100 area. Journal of Risk Research, 7(1), 33-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987042000151197 google scholar
22. Elsbach, K. D. (1994). Managing Organizational LegitimacY in the California Cattle IndustrY: The Construction and Effectiveness of Verbal Accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 57-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393494 google scholar
23. Escamilla-Solano, S., Fernândez-Portillo, A., de la Fuente Flores, J. (2023). Managing Transparency and LegitimacY in Startups. In: Sendra-Pons, P., Garzon, D., Revilla-Camacho, MÂ. (eds) New Frontiers in Entrepreneurial Fundraising. Contributions to Finance and Accounting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33994-3_9 google scholar
24. Fisher, G., Kotha, S., & Lahiri, A. (2017). Changing with the Times: An Integrated View of Identity, LegitimacY, and New Venture Life CYcles. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 383-409. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0496 google scholar
25. Foreman, P., & Whetten, D. A. (2002). Members’ identification with multiple-identitY organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 618-635. google scholar
26. Gordo-Molina, V., Diez-Martin, F., & Del-Castillo-Feito, C. (2022). Legitimacy in entrepreneurship. Intellectual structure and research trends. Cuadernos De Gestion, 22(l), 115-128. https://doi.org/l0.5295/cdg.211471vg google scholar
27. Haack, P., Pfarrer, M. D., & Scherer, A. G. (2014). Legitimacy-as-feeling: How affect leads to vertical legitimacY spillovers in transnational governance. Journal of Management studies, 51(4), 634-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12071 google scholar
28. Haack, P., Schilke, O., & Zucker, L. (2021). LegitimacY Revisited: Disentangling Propriety, Validity, and Consensus. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 749-781. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12615 google scholar
29. Haveman, H. A. (1993). Follow the Leader: Mimetic Isomorphism and EntrY Into New Markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 593-627. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393338 google scholar
30. Ivanova, O., & Castellano, S. (2011). The impact of globalization on legitimacy signals. Baltic Journal of Management, 6(1), 105-123. https:// doi.org/10.1108/17465261111100897 google scholar
31. Jeong, Y. C., & Kim, T. Y. (2019). Between LegitimacY and Efficiency: An Institutional TheorY of Corporate Giving. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1583-1608. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2016.0575 google scholar
32. Lee, M. T., & Raschke, R. L. (2023). Stakeholder legitimacY in firm greening and financial performance: What about greenwashing temptations?. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113393. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2022.113393 google scholar
33. Llorente, I., Odriozola, M. D., & Baraibar-Diez, E. (2023). Fostering communication skills in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Management and Business Education, 6(1), 58-77. https://doi.org/10.35564/jmbe.2023.0004 google scholar
34. Loos, C., & Spraul, K. (2024). The WhY, How, and When of CSR Managers’ Internal Legitimation Strategies. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOMS.13145 google scholar
35. Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic manage-ment Journal, 22(6-7), 545-564.https://doi.org/l0.1002/smj.188 google scholar
36. Mexhuani, B., & Mexhuani, F. (2023). Leadership styles and the legitimacy of Kosovo’s leaders. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2242611. DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2242611 google scholar
37. Peeters, C., Massini, S., & Lewin, A. Y. (2014). Sources of Variation in the Efficiency of Adopting Management Innovation: The Role of Absorptive CapacitY Routines, Managerial Attention and Organizational LegitimacY. Organization Studies, 35(9), 1343-1371. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0170840614539311 google scholar
38. Phillips, D., Edwards, B. D., & Rutherford, M. W. (2025). ConformitY or Differentiation: Optimal distinctiveness through mediating channels. Journal of Business Research, 189, 115154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2024.115154 google scholar
39. Pollock, T., & Rindova, V. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631-642. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/30040654 google scholar Powell, W. W., & Dimaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago UniversitY Press. google scholar
40. Randrianasolo, A. A., & Arnold, M. J. (2020). Consumer legitimacy: conceptualization and measurement scales. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(4), 385-397. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2019-3124 google scholar
41. Rawlins, B. (2008). Give the Emperor a Mirror: Toward Developing a Stakeholder Measurement of Organizational TransparencY. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 71-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260802153421 google scholar
42. Rivero-Gutierrez, L., Cabanelas, P., Diez-Martin, F. and Blanco-Gonzalez, A. (2024), How can companies boost legitimacy in international markets? A dYnamic marketing capabilities approach, International Marketing Review, 41(1), 273-301. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2022-0215 google scholar
43. Roper, J., & Schoenberger-Orgad, M. (2011). State-Owned Enterprises. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 693-709. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0893318911415598 google scholar
44. Ruef, M., & Scott, W. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environ-ments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877-904. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393619 google scholar
45. Schoon, E. W. (2022). Operationalizing Legitimacy. American Sociological Review, 87(3), 478-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 00031224221081379 google scholar
46. Schoon, E. W., Joosse, A. P., & Milward, H. B. (2020). Networks, Power, and the Effects of Legitimacy in Contentious Politics. Sociological Perspectives, 073112141989680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419896808 google scholar
47. Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism" old" and" new". Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 270-277. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10. 2307/2393719 google scholar
48. Siraz, S.; Claes, B.; De Castro, J.; Vaara, E. (2023) Theorizing the grey area between legitimacy and illegitimacy. Journal of Management Studies. 60 (4), 924-962. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12901 google scholar
49. SuddabY, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451-478. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals. 2015.0101 google scholar
50. Tornikoski, E. T., & Newbert, S. L. (2007). Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacY perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 311-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2005.12.003 google scholar
51. TYler, T. R. (1990). Justice, self-interest, and the legitimacy of legal and political authority. In J. J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 171-179). UniversitY of Chicago Press. google scholar
52. Van der Steen, M. P., Quinn, M., & Moreno, A. (2021). Discursive strategies for internal legitimacy: Narrating the alternative organizational form. Long Range Planning, 55(5), 102162. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LRP.2021.102162 google scholar
53. Yu, X., Tao, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, W., & Xu, P. (2019). Social networks and online store performance in emerging economies: the mediating effect of legitimacy. Electronic Markets, 29, 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00333-2 google scholar