The Transformation of Intimate Relationships Among University Youth: The Case of Sakarya University

Öz

This study aims to explore the dynamics of premarital intimate relationships among undergraduate students at Sakarya University, which represents a postmodern melting pot at the intersection of agricultural traditional and industrial modern societal characteristics. This positioning makes the university a microcosm of Turkish society, with its diverse student body offering an ideal sample to demonstrate secularizing trends and cultural aspects such as individualization, the culture industry, and extensive narcissism, all of which emerge under global influences. The survey was conducted with 740 participants using stratified random sampling under a quantitative research methodology, as this approach enhances representativeness and ensures more precise comparisons across subgroups, thereby improving the reliability and generalizability of the findings. Accordingly, a confidence interval of 90% and an error margin of 0.3 were ensured in the survey. The selected data include variables such as the students’ levels of religiosity, the types of education (faculties), ideological predispositions, urbanization, and the duration and frequency of their current relationships, as these factors are anticipated to best reflect secularization trends. Thus, several findings reveal some remarkable consequences. For instance, the lower the level of religiosity among young people, the more they tend to be flexible and relaxed in their premarital intimate approaches. Students brought up in urban cities have more intimate experiences in the premarital stage than their counterparts from rural areas. Those who give priority to material demands in terms of ideological predispositions are more prone to engage in premarital sexual activities than those who give preference to spiritual and moral requirements. As a result, this research can be considered a contribution to the debates on modernity in the Turkish context of intimate relationships and family studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Secularization
• Individualization
• Urbanization
• Intimacy
• University Students

Kaynakça

1. Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (2007). Dialectic of enlightenment. Stanford University Press. google scholar
2. Amman, M. T. (2010). Türkiye’de ailenin açık ve örtülü sekülerleşmesinin sosyolojik analizi. In M. F. Bayraktar (Ed.), Aile ve eğitim (pp. 41– 70). Ensar Neşriyat. google scholar
3. Armutçu, E. (2007). Türkiye cinselliğini konuşuyor. Doğan Kitap. google scholar
4. Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Polity Press. google scholar
5. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. SAGE Publications. google scholar
6. Berger, P. L. (1990). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Anchor Books. google scholar
7. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2015). Modernite, çoğulculuk ve anlam krizi (M. D. Dereli, Trans.). Heretik Yayıncılık. google scholar
8. Bourgois, P. (2003). In search of respect: Selling crack in El Barrio. Cambridge University Press. google scholar

9. Bruce, S. (2002). God is dead: Secularization in the West. Blackwell. google scholar
10. Castells, M. (1977). The urban question: A Marxist approach (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Edward Arnold. google scholar
11. Ceyhan, M. Ş. (2005). Üniversite gençliğinin cinselliğe bakış açısı [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ankara Üniversitesi. google scholar
12. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson. Çapçıoğlu, İ. (2018). Sekülerleşen toplumda bireyselleşen aile. Turkish Studies, 13(2), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.13343 Efe, E. (2013). Üniversite öğrencilerinin eş seçme eğilimleri [Unpublished master's thesis]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi. google scholar
13. Ertit, V. (2018). God is dying in Turkey as well: Application of secularization theory to a non-Christian society. Open Theology, 4, 192–211. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0014 google scholar
14. Ertit, V. (2019). Sekülerleşme teorisi. Liberte Yayınları. google scholar
15. Garnham, N. (2007). Culture industries. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 942–945). Blackwell Publishing. google scholar
16. Glaeser, E. L. (2011). Triumph of the city: How our best inventions make us smarter, stronger, healthier, and happier. Penguin Press. google scholar
17. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press. google scholar
18. Göle, N. (2019). Modern mahrem: Medeniyet ve örtünme. Metis Yayınları. google scholar
19. Gürbilek, N. (2001). Vitrinde yaşamak: 1980’lerin kültürel iklimi. Metis Yayınları. google scholar
20. Harvey, D. (2016). Kent deneyimi (E. Soğancılar, Trans.). Sel Yayıncılık. google scholar
21. Hillman, N. (2021). Sex and relationships among students: Summary report (HEPI Policy Note 30). Higher Education Policy Institute. google scholar
22. Illouz, E. (2012). Why love hurts: A sociological explanation. Polity Press. google scholar
23. Illouz, E. (2024). Romantik ütopyayı tüketmek: Aşk ve kapitalizmin kültürel çelişkileri (G. Boztepe, Trans.). Livera Yayınevi. google scholar
24. Kahraman, H. B. (2010). Cinsellik, görsellik, pornografi. Agora Kitaplığı. google scholar
25. Kaya, F., Serin, Ö., & Genç, A. (2007). Eğitim fakültesi birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin cinsel yaşamlarına ilişkin yaklaşımlarının belirlenmesi. TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, 6(6), 441–448. google scholar
26. Kaya, İ. (2006). Sosyal teori ve geç modernlikler: Türk deneyimi. İmge Kitabevi. google scholar
27. Kaya, Ö. (2024). Üniversite gençliğinde romantik ilişkilerin dönüşümü [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
28. Kaymakcan, R. (2021). Gençlerin dine bakışı ve okullarda din-değerler öğretimi. Dem Yayınları. google scholar
29. Kellner, D., & Best, S. (2011). Postmodern teori (M. Küçük, Trans.). Ayrıntı Yayınları. google scholar
30. Kelly, M. G. E. (2022). Normal now: Individualism as conformity. Polity Press. google scholar
31. Keyes, R. (2004). The post-truth era: Dishonesty and deception in contemporary life. St. Martin’s Griffin. google scholar
32. Klinenberg, E. (2013). Going solo: The extraordinary rise and surprising appeal of living alone. Penguin Books. google scholar
33. Kozanoğlu, C. (1999). Cilalı imaj devri: 1980’lerden 90’lara Türkiye ve starları. İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
34. Lasch, C. (1991). The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. W. W. Norton & Company. google scholar
35. Luckmann, T. (2023). The invisible religion: The problem of religion in modern society (T. Kaden & B. Schnettler, Eds.). Routledge. google scholar
36. Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Beacon Press. google scholar
37. Mardin, Ş. (2017). Türkiye’de toplum ve siyaset (M. Türköne & T. Önder, Eds.). İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
38. McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. MIT Press. google scholar
39. Niedzviecki, H. (2006). Hello, I'm special: How individuality became the new conformity. City Lights Publishers. google scholar
40. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
41. Pew Research Center. (2014). Global views on morality. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2014/04/15/global-morality/ google scholar
42. Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research. Jossey–Bass. google scholar
43. Roy, O. (2024). The crisis of culture: Identity politics and the empire of norms. Hurst Publishers. google scholar
44. Saraçoğlu, G. V., Erdem, İ., Doğan, S., & Tokuç, B. (2014). Youth sexual health: Sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behavior among students google scholar
45. at a university in Turkey. Noro Psikiyatri Arşivi, 51(3), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.4274/npa.y6768 google scholar
46. Schreck, C. J., & Hirschi, T. (2009). Social control theory. In 21st century criminology: A reference handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 305–311). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412971997.n35 google scholar
47. Sennett, R. (1977). The fall of public man. Penguin Books. google scholar
48. Simmel, G. (2015). Metropol ve zihinsel yaşam (S. Gürses, Trans.). In C. Harrison & P. Wood (Eds.), Sanat ve kuram: 1900–2000 değişen fikirler antolojisi (pp. 157–161). Küre Yayınları. google scholar
49. Sözcü. (2025, Şubat 14). 14 Şubat haritasında şaşırtan sonuç: Türkiye’de çok eşliliğe sıcak bakanların sayısı artıyor. https://www.sozcu. com.tr/14-subat-haritasinda-sasirtan-sonuc-turkiye-de-cok-eslilige-sicak-bakanlarin-sayisi-artiyor-p138597 google scholar
50. Taylor, C. (2003). The ethics of authenticity. Harvard University Press. google scholar
51. Taylor, C. (2019). Seküler çağ (D. Körpe, Trans.). Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları. google scholar
52. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2022). İstatistiklerle aile. https://data.tuik.gov.tr google scholar
53. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2013). The narcissism epidemic: Living in the age of entitlement. Atria Books. google scholar
54. Widmer, E. D., Treas, J., & Newcomb, R. (1998). Attitudes toward nonmarital sex in 24 countries. The Journal of Sex Research, 35(4), 349–358. google scholar
55. Wilson, B. R. (2016). Religion in secular society: Fifty years on (S. Bruce, Ed.). Oxford University Press. google scholar
56. Yıldız, R., & Yıldırım, E. (2023). Türkiye’de cinsiyet algısı araştırması. Nobel Yayınları. google scholar