Legally Self-Employed but De Facto Worker: Motor Couriers’ Working Conditions and Work-Life Balance in Zonguldak, Türkiye

Öz

This article investigates the working conditions and work-life balance of couriers in Zonguldak, Türkiye. The study aims to determine whether there is any differentiation in working conditions and work-life balance between self-employed platform couriers and employed platform or non-platform couriers. The “Survey on Socio-demographic Data and Opinions on the Working Conditions of Motor Couriers” which consists of close-ended questions prepared by researchers and the “Work-Life Balance Scale” developed by Fisher, Bulger, and Smith, was used as a data collection tool. The purposive sampling method was employed in the selection of a sampling group, and the snowball sampling method was used for data collection. In the field study, 195 couriers were surveyed out of a total of 250-275 couriers. According to the data, self-employed platform couriers work longer than salaried platform and non-platform couriers, and their work-life imbalance is higher than others. Although they make more money than all other couriers, their life satisfaction is not much higher than that of salaried and weekly-waged couriers. In the SPSS analysis, it was found that self-employed platform couriers are not in a more advantageous position than other fixed-wage employed couriers in terms of income, work hours, seniority, flexibility, and work-life balance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Food delivery workers
• couriers gig economy
• gig workers
• platform workers
• flexibility
• work-life balance

Kaynakça

1. Benito-Osorio, D., Muñoz-Aguado, L., & Villar, C. (2014). The impact of family and work-life balance policies on the performance of Spanish listed companies. Management (France), 17(4), 214–236. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.174.0214 google scholar
2. Bertolini, A., Graham, M., Parthasarathy, M.N., Srinivasan, J., Taduri, P., & Ustek-Spilda, F. (2023). Platformizing informality, one gig at a time. In A. Surie & U. Huws (Eds.), Platformization and informality pathways of change, alteration, and transformation (pp. 13-46). Palgrave Macmillan, UK. google scholar
3. Booth, A.L., & Frank, J. (2005). Gender and work-life flexibility in the labour market. In D.M. Houston (Ed.), Work–life balance in the 21st century (pp. 11-28). Palgrave Macmillan, UK. google scholar
4. Cefaliello, A., & Countouris, N. (2020). Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation. Social Europe. https://www.socialeurope.eu/gig-workers-rights-and-their-strategic-litigation google scholar
5. Ceylan, B. (2022). Labour process and work in platform capitalism: A study on motor couriers of digital platforms in İstanbul. Master’s thesis. Middle East Technical University. google scholar
6. Chung, H., & van der Lippe, T. (2020). Flexible working, work–life balance, and gender equality: Introduction. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2025-x google scholar
7. Cini, L. (2023). How algorithms are reshaping the exploitation of labour-power: insights into the process of labour invisibilization in the platform economy. Theory and Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-023-09520-9 google scholar
8. De Stefano, V., Durri, I., Stylogiannis, C., & Wouters, M. (2022). Introduction to a research agenda for the gig economy and society. In V. De Stefano, I. Durri, C. Stylogiannis & M. Wouters (Eds.), Introduction to a research agenda for the gig economy and society (pp. 13-32). Edward Elgar Publishing, UK. google scholar

9. Diken (2021). Nakliyat^İş: Yemeksepeti toplu iş sözleşmesi yetkisini engellemeye çalışıyor. https://motkurder.org.tr/gundem/helal-olsun/ google scholar
10. Diken (2022). ‘Esnaf^kurye’ modeli davalık oldu: ‘Bu bir dalgakıran’. https://www.diken.com.tr/esnaf-kurye-modeli-davalik-oldu-bu-bir-dalgakiran/ google scholar
11. Disk (2023). BİSAM eylül 2023 dönemi raporu: Açlık sınırı 12.612 TL, yoksulluk sınırı 43.623 TL. https://arastirma.disk.org.tr/?p=10467 google scholar
12. Drobnič, S. (2011). Introduction: Job quality and work- life balance. In S. Drobnič & A.M. Guillén (Eds), Work^life balance in Europe the role of job quality (pp. 1-16). Palgrave Macmillan, London. google scholar
13. Duggan, J., McDonnell, A., Sherman, U., & Carbery R. (2022). Work in the gig economy a research overview. Routledge, London and New York. google scholar
14. Fairwork (2023a). Beyond techno^solutionism: Gender and platform work. https://fair.work/en/fw/publications/gender-and-platform-work-beyond-techno-solutionism/ google scholar
15. Fairwork (2023b). Fairwork BiH Ratings 2023: Labour standards in the platform economy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003274278-5 google scholar
16. Fairwork (2023c). Fairwork Brazil ratings 2023: Still pursuing decent work in the platform economy. https://fair.work/wp-content/ uploads/sites/17/2023/08/Brazil-accessible-version-v6.pdf google scholar
17. Fairwork (2023d). Fairwork Nigeria ratings 2023: Advocating for increased safety and security in the platform economy. https://fair.work/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2023/08/Nigeria-accessible-version-v2.pdf google scholar
18. Fairwork (2023e). Fairwork United States ratings 2023: A crisis of safety and fair work in a racialised platform economy. https://fair.work/ wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2023/08/Fairwork-US-Ratings-2023.pdf google scholar
19. Fairwork (2023f). Location^based platform work principles. https://fair.work/en/fw/principles/fairwork-principles-location-based-work/ google scholar
20. Fairwork (2024). Fairwork annual report 2023: State of the global platform economy. https://fair.work/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/ 2024/02/Fairwork-Annual-Report-2023.pdf google scholar
21. Fisher, G.G., Bulger, C.A., & Smith, C.S. (2009). Beyond work and family: A measure of work/nonwork interference and enhancement. google scholar
22. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016737 google scholar
23. Fiyuu (2023). I want to be a courier. https://fiyuu.com.tr/ google scholar
24. GazeteDuvar (2023). ‘Eylem dalgası’ kapıda: Kurye kuryeyle, kurye zamanla, zaman azrail ile yarışıyor. https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/ eylem-dalgasi-kapida-kurye-kuryeyle-kurye-zamanla-zaman-azrail-ile-yarisiyor-haber-1599199 google scholar
25. Glavin, P., Schieman, S., & Bierman, A. (2024). From flexibility to unending availability: Platform workers’ experiences of work–family conflict. Journal of Marriage and Family, 86, 574-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12977 google scholar
26. Griesbach, K., Reich, A., Elliott-Negri, L., & Milkman, R. (2019). Algorithmic control in platform food delivery work. Socius, 5, 1-15. https:// doi.org/10.1177/2378023119870041 google scholar
27. Guest, D.E. (2002). Perspectives on the study of work-life balance. Social Science Information, 41(2), 255–279. https://doi:10.1177/0539018402041002005 google scholar
28. Hamsici, M. (2022). Kuryelerin eylemleri neden yurt geneline yayıldı? BBC News Türkçe. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-60235440 google scholar
29. Heiland, H. (2019). Plattformarbeit im fokus: ergebnisse einer explorativen online-umfrage. WSI Mitteilungen, 72(4), 298–304. https:// doi.org/10.5771/0342-300X-2019-4-298 google scholar
30. Heiland, H. (2022a). Black box power: Zones of uncertainty in algorithmic management. In E. Armano, M. Briziarelli & E. Risi (Eds.), Digital platforms and algorithmic subjectivities (pp. 75-86). University of Westminster Press, London. google scholar
31. Heiland, H. (2022b). Neither timeless, nor placeless: control of food delivery gig work via place-based working time regimes. Human Relations, 75(9), 1824–1848. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211025283 google scholar
32. Henly, J.R., Shaefer H.L., & Waxman R.E. (2006). Non-standard work schedules: Employer-and employee-driven flexibility in retail jobs, Social Service Review, 80(4), 609–634. google scholar
33. Hewson, C. (2008). Research design and tools for Internet research. In N. Fielding, R. Lee & G. Blank (Eds), The Handbook of online research methods (pp. 58-78). Sage, UK. google scholar
34. Houston, D.M. (2005). Work-life balance in the 21st century. In: D.M. Houston (Ed.), Work^life balance in the 21st century (pp. 1-10). Palgrave Macmillan, UK. google scholar
35. Huang, H. (2022). Riders on the storm: Amplified platform precarity and the impact of COVID-19 on online food-delivery drivers in China. google scholar
36. Journal of Contemporary China, 31(135), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2021.1966895 google scholar
37. Huang, H. (2023). The food delivered is more valuable than my life”: Understanding the platform precarity of online food-delivery work in China. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 53:5, 852-868. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2022.2155866 google scholar
38. ILO (2022). Motosikletli kuryeler odağında teslimat sektörü çalışanlarında psikososyal risk analizi “iki tekerlek bir kask.” www.ilo.org/ publns google scholar
39. Ivanova, M., Bronowicka, J., Kocher, E., & Degner, A. (2018). Foodora and Deliveroo: The app as a boss? Control and autonomy in app-based management: the case of food delivery riders. Forschungsförderung, 107. https://d-nb.info/1179200845/34 google scholar
40. İlyas, Ö. (2022). Freelance emek. İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul. google scholar
41. Jimenez, I.W., Cefaliello, A., & Costa, A.C.R. (2021). Building back better workplaces. Social Europe. https://www.socialeurope.eu/building-back-better-workplaces google scholar
42. Kanyılmaz Polat, E., & Cezer Aydın G. (2023). Working conditions of those who could not “stay home” during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative analysis on motorcycle couriers. Anadolu University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 24(2), 26-60. google scholar
43. Kassem, S. (2023). Work and alienation in the platform economy. Bristol University Press, UK. google scholar
44. Kavurmacı, A. (2023). Determination of factors to improve the working conditions of motorcycle couriers: A Qualitative Research. Journal of Social Security, 13(1), 33–54. google scholar
45. Kaya, G., Akgündüz, Y. and Ahi, B. (2022). Motorcycle couriers in franchise restaurants in İzmir: Labor relations, problems and expectations. International Journal of Human Studies, 5(10), 342-366. https://doi:10.32331/sgd.1318002 google scholar
46. Kelliher, C., Richardson, J., & Boiarintseva, G. (2019). All of work? All of life? Reconceptualising work-life balance for the 21st century. google scholar
47. Human Resource Management Journal, 29(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12215 google scholar
48. Kıdak E. (2023). ‘Platform despotizmi’ karşısında kurye eylemleri. BirGün. https://www.birgun.net/haber/platform-despotizmi-karsisinda-kurye-eylemleri-418098 google scholar
49. Kim, Y.G., Chung, Y.K., & Woo, E. (2023). Gig workers’ quality of life and psychological well-being in service delivery platform. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(11), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118679 google scholar KuryeHaber (2022). Yunanistan’da moto kuryeler grevde. https://kuryehaber.com/2022/06/yunanistanda-moto-kuryeler-grevde/ google scholar
50. KuryeHaber (2023). Ankara Fiyuu kuryeleri zam istiyor. https://kuryehaber.com/2023/01/ankara-fiyuu-kuryeleri-zam-istiyor/ google scholar
51. Lakshmi, R.S., & Arunachalam, T. (2022). A study on work-life balance of gig employees in Madurai city–with special reference to food deliverers. International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI), 11(6), 69-74. https://www.ijbmi.org/papers/Vol (11)6/Ser-2/F1106026974.pdf google scholar
52. Lazǎr, I., Osoian, C., & Raţiu, P. (2010) The role of work-life balance practices in order to improve organizational performance. European Research Studies Journal, 13(1), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/267 google scholar
53. Lehdonvirta, V. (2018). Flexibility in the gig economy: managing time on three online piecework platforms. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12102 google scholar Marx, K. (1990). Capital: A critique of political economy, vol. 1. Penguin Books, London. google scholar
54. Marx, K. (1993). Capital: A critique of political economy, vol. 3. Penguin Books, London. google scholar
55. Mbare, B. (2023). Psychosocial work environment and mental wellbeing of food delivery platform workers in Helsinki, Finland: A qualitative study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well^Being, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631. 2023.2173336 google scholar
56. Moore, P.V., Upchurch, M., & Whittaker, X. (2018). Humans and machines at work: monitoring, surveillance and automation in contemporary capitalism. In P.V. Moore, M. Upchurch & X. Whittaker (Eds.), Humans and machines at work monitoring, surveillance and automation in contemporary capitalism (pp. 1-16). Palgrave Macmillan, UK. google scholar
57. Motorcycle Couriers Association (2022). Helal olsun. https://motkurder.org.tr/gundem/helal-olsun/ google scholar
58. Neuman, W.L. (2006). Social research method, qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson, USA. google scholar
59. O’Neil, C. (2017). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Penguen Books, UK. google scholar
60. PaketTaxi (2023). Do you want to be a courier? https://www.pakettaxi.com/ google scholar
61. Piasna, A., & Drahokoupil, J. (2021). Flexibility unbound: Understanding the heterogeneity of preferences among food delivery platform workers. Socio^Economic Review, 19(4), 1397–1419. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab029 google scholar
62. Poutanen, S., Kovalainen, A., & Rouvinen, P. (2019). Digital work in the platform economy. In: S. Poutanen, A. Kovalainen and P. Rouvinen (Eds), Digital work and the platform economy: understanding tasks, skills and capabilities in the new era (pp. 3-9) Routledge, London and New York. google scholar
63. Rani, U., & Gobel, N. (2023). Job instability, precarity, informality, and inequality: Labour in the gig economy. In I. Ness (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the gig economy (pp. 15-32). Routledge, London and New York. google scholar
64. Rodgers, G. (1989). Precarious work in western Europe: The state of the debate. In G. Rodgers G & J. Rodgers (Eds.), Precarious jobs in labour market regulation: The growth of atypical employment in Western Europe (pp. 1-16), International Institute for Labour Studies. google scholar
65. Schor, J.B. (2020). After the gig how the sharing economy got hijacked and how to win it back. University Of California Press, USA. google scholar
66. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2003). Research methods for business: a skill^building approach. John Wiley & Sons, USA. google scholar
67. Sennett, R. (2003). Karakter aşınması: Yeni kapitalizmde işin kapitalizm işin kişilik üzerindeki etkileri. Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul. google scholar
68. Standing, G. (2014). Prekarya yeni tehlikeli sınıf. İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul. google scholar
69. Sturges, J., & Guest, D. (2004). Working to live or living to work? Work-life balance early in the career. Human Resource Management Journal, 14(4), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2004.tb00130.x google scholar
70. Sun, P., Chen, J.Y., & Rani, U. (2023). From flexible labour to ‘sticky labour’: A tracking study of workers in the food-delivery platform economy of China. Work, Employment and Society, 37(2), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211021570 google scholar
71. Taylor, M., Marsh, G., Nicol, D., & Broadbent, P. (2017). Good work: The Taylor review of modern working practices. Industrial Relations Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12239 google scholar
72. Türk-İş (2023). Türk^İş Ağustos 2023 açlık and yoksulluk sınırı. https://www.turkis.org.tr/turk-is-agustos-2023-aclik-ve-yoksulluk-siniri/ google scholar
73. Turkish Labour and Employment Agency (2021). Motorcycle courier. The dictionary of professions. https://esube.iskur.gov.tr/Meslek/Vi ewMeslekDetayPopUp.aspx?uiID=8321.02 google scholar
74. Turkstat (2023). Labour force statistics June 2023. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Isgucu-Istatistikleri-Temmuz-2023-49375 google scholar
75. Umer, H. (2021). Illusory freedom of physical platform workers: Insights from Uber Eats in Japan. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 32(3), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304621992466 google scholar
76. Urzì, Brancati M.C., Pesole, A., & Fernández-Macías, E. (2020). New evidence on platform workers in Europe. JRC Science For Policy Report (Issue April). https://doi.org/10.2760/459278 google scholar
77. Uysal, K. (2023). Digital labour platforms and neoliberal governmentality: the case of platform workers in Turkey. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 43(1/2), 142-155. google scholar
78. Warren, T. (2021). Work–life balance and gig work: ‘Where are we now’ and ‘where to next’ with the work–life balance agenda? Journal of Industrial Relations, 63(4), 522–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856211007161 google scholar
79. Wood, A.J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Networked but commodified: The (dis)embeddedness of digital labour in the gig economy. Sociology, 53(5), 931–950. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519828906 google scholar
80. Woodcock, J., & M. Graham (2020). The gig economy: a critical introduction. Polity Press, London. google scholar