A Social Movement Influencing Political Discourse in Germany: PEGIDA

Öz

Building on Castells’ view that contemporary social movements are increasingly formed and spread through social media networks, this study examines PEGIDA as an empirical example of this process. Emerging from a Facebook group in Germany, PEGIDA rapidly expanded beyond national borders and, despite its dissolution after a decade, has come to symbolize right-wing populism in the German context. While the movement’s mobilizing capacity declined over time, its political and social repercussions remained significant. Rather than addressing PEGIDA solely as a social movement, this study focuses on its influence on political discourse in Germany, drawing on in-depth interviews conducted with nine German Turks. The findings indicate that levels of awareness about PEGIDA vary according to demographic factors such as age and occupation; however, irrespective of socioeconomic background, all participants demonstrate a basic familiarity with the movement and perceive PEGIDA as a symbolic representation of right-wing populist discourse in Europe. Accordingly, the findings indicate that German Turks perceive PEGIDA as being directly linked to racism and Islamophobia, while indirectly associating it with feelings of threat and fear.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Islamophobia
• PEGIDA
• German Turks
• Social movement
• Political discourse

Kaynakça

1. Almeida, P. (2023). Toplumsal Hareketler: Kolektif Seferberliğin Yapısı. Ebru Açık Turğuter & Abdulkadir Öncel (Trans.), Ankara: Fol Yayınları. google scholar
2. Antifa Recherche Team Dresden (2017). Pegida: Entwicklung einer rechten Bewegung. In Timo Heim (Eds.), PEGİDA als Spiegel und Projektionsfläche (pp.33-54). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. google scholar
3. Barın, H. (2014, December 25). “5 Soru: Alman Faşizmin Değişen Yüzü PEGİDA Hareketi” SETA. Retrieved from https://www.setav.org/5-soru-alman-fasizminin-degisen-yuzu-pegida-hareketi/ google scholar
4. Brühl, J. & Beitzer, H. (2015, January 5). PEGİDA floppt außerhalb Dresdens. Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved from https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/erfolg-deutschlandweiter-gegendemos-pegida-floppt-ausserhalb-dresdens-1.2291802 google scholar
5. Castells, M. (2013). İsyan ve Umut Ağları: İnternet Çağında Toplumsal Hareketler. İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
6. Hausler, A. (2016). “AfD und PEGİDA: Knotenpunkte für eine rechte Neuformierung im Kontext der Flüchtlingsdebatte”. DGB Bildungswerk. Retrieved from: https://www.vielfalt-mediathek.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/AfD_und_pegida_ohne_demokratie_leben.pdf. google scholar
7. Havertz, R. (2021). Radical right populism in Germany. New York: Routledge. google scholar
8. Hebel, C. (2015, April 14). Zu recht für die AfD – für PEGİDA gerade recht. Spiegel. Retrieved from: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/pegida-frau-tatjana-festerling-zu-rechts-fuer-die-afd-a-1028464.html google scholar

9. Kissler, A. (2024, March 19). “Wir müssen über den politischen İslam sprechen.” Neue Zürcher Zeitung. Retrieved from: https://www.nzz.ch/international/cdu-friedrich-merz-wirbt-fuer-eine-deutsche-leitkultur-und-mehr-patriotismus-ld.1822739 google scholar
10. Malzahn, C. C. (2015, January 1). Der İslam gehört nicht zu Sachsen. Die Welt. Retrieved from: https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article136740584/Tillich-CDU-Der-Islam-gehoert-nicht-zu-Sachsen.html google scholar
11. MDR Sachsen (2024, October 14). “PEGİDA-Mitbegründer Bachmann zieht Schlussstrich in Dresden.” MDR Sachsen. Retrieved from: https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/sachsen/dresden/dresden-radebeul/ende-pegida-proteste-lutz-bachmann-100.html. google scholar
12. MDR Sachsen (2024, October 21). “Polizei ermittelt nach letzter PEGİDA-Demo und Gegenprotesten in Dresden.” MDR Sachsen. Retrieved from: https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/sachsen/dresden/dresden-radebeul/pegida-letzte-demonstration-gegendemo-ermittlungen-100.html. google scholar
13. Meyer, D. S. (2023). Toplumsal Hareketler (Bazen) Nasıl Fark Yaratabilir?. Zeynep Demir (Trans.), İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları. google scholar
14. Neumann, W. L. (2017). Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri. Sedef Özge (Trans.). Ankara: Yayınodası. google scholar
15. Nimz, U. (2018, September 2). “Ziemlich rechte Freunde.” Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved from https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/AfD-politiker-und-pegida-ziemlich-rechte-freunde-1.4113699. google scholar
16. Perspektif (2020, February 18). “Almanya’da İslam Karşıtı PEGİDA, 200’üncü Eylemini Gerçekleştirdi.” Perspektif. Retrieved from https://perspektif.eu/2020/02/18/almanyada-islam-karsiti-pegida-200uncu-eylemini-gerceklestirdi/. google scholar
17. Perspektif (2019, March 4). “Hollanda’da İslam Karşıtı PEGİDA’dan Camiye Saldırı” Perspektif. Retrieved from https://perspektif.eu/2019/03/04/hollandada-islam-karsiti-pegidadan-camiye-saldiri/ google scholar
18. Perspektif (2022, April 3). “PEGİDA’nın Ramazan’da Planladığı Mangallı Eylemlerin İlki Yasaklandı”. Perspektif. Retrieved from https://perspektif.eu/2022/04/03/pegidanin-ramazanda-planladigi-mangalli-eylemlerin-ilki-yasaklandi/. google scholar
19. Reuband, K. (2016). Außenseiter oder Reprasentanten der Mehrheit? In Karl Rehberg & Franziska Kunz & Tino Schlinzing (Eds.), PEGİDA-Rechtspopulismus zwischen Fremdenangst und “Wende”-Enttauschung (pp.165-188). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. google scholar
20. Saraç oğ lu, Cansu. (2022). “2015 Sonrası Almanya’ya Suriyeli Gö ç ü nü n Siyasi Yansımaları: Pegida Hareketi ve AfD Partisi Ö rneğ i” Journal of International Relations and Political Science Studies, (4), 36-53. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2392094. google scholar
21. Scharf, S. & Pleul, C. (2016). Im Netz ist jeden Tag Montag. In Karl Rehberg & Franziska Kunz & Tino Schlinzing (Eds.), PEGİDA-Rechtspopulismus zwischen Fremdenangst und “Wende”-Enttauschung (pp.83-98). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. google scholar
22. Schwandt, T. A. & Gates, E. F. (2021). Durum Çalışması Yöntemi. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), SAGE Nitel Araştırmalar Kılavuz Kitabı (pp. 349-366). Gülay Ekici & Sabahattin Yeşilçınar (Trans.). Ankara: Vizetek. google scholar
23. Schulz, S. (2015, February 3). PEGİDA and the state of German democracy. E3G. Retrieved from https://www.e3g.org/publications/pegida-and-the-state-of-democracy-in-germany/ google scholar
24. SPİEGEL (2020, December 14). Lutz Bachmann erneut wegen Volksverhetzung verurteilt. Spiegel. Retrieved from https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/lutz-bachmann-pegida-chef-erneut-wegen-volksverhetzung-verurteilt-a-81016deb-347c-41d7-8f1e-de2065210eb7 google scholar
25. Spoon, J. & Klüver, H. (2019). Party convergence and vote switching: Explaining mainstream party decline across Europe. European Journal of Political Research 58: 1021–1042. google scholar
26. Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Express. google scholar
27. Vorländer H. & Herold M. & Schaller S. (2016). PEGİDA: Entwicklung, Zusammensetzung und Deutung einer Empörungsbewegung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. google scholar
28. Winter, S. (2024, October 19). Deutschland zehn Jahre nach PEGİDA: Es grummelte schon lange in der Bevölkerung. Spiegel. Retrieved from: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/pegida-proteste-enden-nach-zehn-jahren-wie-die-bewegung-die-rechte-radikalisierung-vorantrieb-a-d9d70118-5db0-4c1a-9034-d821680335f5 google scholar
29. Zeyrek, M. (2022, June 10). “Almanya’da 7,5 yılda 768 cami saldırısı gerçekleşti.” Anadolu Ajans. Retrieved from: https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/almanyada-7-5-yilda-768-cami-saldirisi-gerceklesti/2610868. google scholar