Encounters with Death and Corpses in Disaster Times (The February 6 Earthquakes in Turkey)

Öz

This study explores how dead body management was organized after the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes on February 6, 2023, in Türkiye, Turkey, using Actor-Network Theory (ANT). The research employed a qualitative, multi-method approach, including document analysis, field observations, discourse analysis, and in-depth interviews. 18 interviews with personnel from the Presidency of Religious Affairs (PRA) mainly served as tools for network tracing to identify key actors, actants, and organizational mechanisms, rather than as sources of individual stories. The results show that the PRA became the essential point in organizing the deceased through translation processes, supported by delegated flexibility and religious legitimacy. Material constraints, such as the condition and number of bodies, time pressure, and infrastructural damage, significantly influenced decision-making. The study also finds that volunteerism is socially valued but insufficient for the professional and emotionally intense task of managing dead bodies. By mapping the networked relationships involved in post-disaster death practices, this study emphasizes the importance of established protocols, inter-institutional collaboration, ethical standards for suspending rituals, psychological support for staff, and clear data-sharing processes. It presents a new ANT-based view of disaster governance and enhances understanding of how dead bodies serve as key actors in crisis management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Earthquake
• The Organization of the Dead Body
• Actor-Network Theory
• Presidency of Religious Affairs
• Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. Alexander, D. E. (2006). Globalization of disaster: trends, problems and dilemmas. Journal of International Affairs, 59(2), 1–22. google scholar
2. Ali, H., Brown, N., Chiro, L., Dillinger, E., Droder, E., Hanby, J., Mittal, N., Nardi, G., Rakos, M., Relaford, B., Soderholm, M., Tharp, J., Yosafat, J., & London, A. J. (2011). Recovery and identification of the missing after disaster: Case studies, ethical guidelines, and policy recommendations. Carnegie Mellon University. https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/ehpp/documents/2011-Recovery-and- Identification-of-the-Missing-after-Disaster.pdf google scholar
3. Arık, I. A., Arık, F., Sağır, A., Taş, L., Çakır, M., & Açıkalın, M. (2026). Crisis, culture, and connection: developing a relational resilience model for earthquake-affected communities (the case of the 2023 earthquakes in Türkiye). Journal of Risk Research, 29(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2026.2627609 google scholar
4. Bachelard, G. (1987). The psychoanalysis of fire (Vol. 277). Beacon Press. google scholar
5. Bagherzadeh, N. (2014). Death in disaster: Actions and attitudes toward dead body management after disasters in Yogyakarta. IFHV Working Paper Series. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4150779 google scholar
6. Battin, M. P. (2005). Ending life: Ethics and the way we die. Oxford University Press. google scholar
7. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics. Edicoes Loyola. google scholar
8. Bennett, S. (2024). Foregrounding threats to disaster investigations with actor-network theory. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 81(5), 2284–2301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2024.2368444 google scholar

9. Blok, A., & Jensen, T. E. (2011). Bruno Latour: Hybrid thoughts in a hybrid world. Routledge. google scholar
10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa google scholar
11. Brewer, G., McVeigh, A., & von Meding, J. (2013). An evaluation of the usefulness of actor network theory in understanding the complexities of vulnerability and resilience in post-disaster reconstruction. ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 7(3), 80. google scholar
12. Bryant, C. D. (Ed.). (2003). Handbook of death and dying. Sage Publications. google scholar
13. Bussular, C. Z., Burtet, C. G., & Antonello, C. S. (2020). The actor-network theory as a method in the analysis of Samarco disaster in Brazil. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 15(2), 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM- 04-2017-1520 google scholar
14. Callahan, D. (2000). The troubled dream of life: In search of a peaceful death. Georgetown University Press. google scholar
15. Callon, M. (1986a). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–233). Routledge and Kegan Paul. google scholar
16. Callon, M. (1986b). The sociology of an actor network: The case of the electric vehicle. In M. Callon, J. Law, & A. Rip (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world (pp. 19–34). Macmillan. google scholar
17. Cassell, E. J. (1998). The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. Loss, Grief & Care, 8(1–2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1300/J132v08n01_18 google scholar
18. Cidell, J. (2012). Just passing through: The risky mobilities of hazardous materials transport. Social Geography, 7(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.5194/sg-7-13-2012 google scholar
19. Coyle, D., & Meier, P. (2009). New technologies in emergencies and conflicts: The role of information and social networks. United Nations Foundation & Vodafone Foundation. google scholar
20. de Goyet, C. D. V. (2004). Epidemics caused by dead bodies: a disaster myth that does not want to die. Pan American Journal of Public Health, 15(5), 297–299. google scholar
21. Dolwick, J. S. (2009). ‘The social’ and beyond: Introducing actor-network theory. Journal of Maritime Archaeology, 4, 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11457-009-9044-3 google scholar
22. Doughty, C. (2014). Smoke gets in your eyes: and other lessons from the crematory. WW Norton & Company. google scholar
23. Farrell, A. M. (2018). Managing the dead in disaster response: A matter for health security in the Asia-Pacific region? Australian Journal of International Affairs, 72(6), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2018.1534940 google scholar
24. Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2011). Considering materiality in educational policy: Messy objects and multiple reals. Educational Theory, 61(6), 709–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2011.00429.x google scholar
25. Frimpong, L. K., Okyere, S. A., Diko, S. K., Abunyewah, M., Erdiaw-Kwasie, M. O., Commodore, T. S., … & Kita, M. (2022). Actor-network analysis of community-based organizations in health pandemics: evidence from the COVID-19 response in Freetown, Sierra Leone. Disasters, 46(4), 903–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12508 google scholar
26. Ibrion, M. (2020). Iran: The impact of the beliefscape on the risk culture, resilience, and disaster risk governance. In R. C. Parra, S. C. Zapico, & D. H. Ubelaker (Eds.), Forensic science and humanitarian action: Interacting with the dead and the living (pp. 117–134). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119482062.ch8 google scholar
27. Işık, Z. (2025). Lacanian Transference in A Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled Hosseini and The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy. Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature, 7(1), 99–113. google scholar
28. Kasapoğlu, M. A. (2008). Madalyonun İki Yüzü: Hastalık ve Sağlık. Phoenix Yayınevi. google scholar
29. Kasapoğlu, M. A. (2022). A relational sociological appraisal of climate refugees. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2022.42.006734 google scholar
30. Kasapoglu, M. A. (2023). Regenaration of Sociology in the New World. Novel Research in Sciences, 14(55). https://doi.org/10.31031/NRS.2023.14.000847 google scholar
31. Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Harvard University Press. google scholar
32. Latour, B. (1996). Aramis or the love of technology. MIT Press. google scholar
33. Latour, B. (1997). On actor network theory: a few clarifications. http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-9801/msg00019.html google scholar
34. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press. google scholar
35. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press. google scholar
36. Latour, B., & Weibel, P. (2005). Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy. MIT Press. google scholar
37. Latour, B. (2021). Toplumsalı yeniden toplama: Aktör-ağ teorisine bir giriş (çev. N. Bingöl). Tellekt. google scholar
38. Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 5(4), 379–393. google scholar
39. Law, J., & Mol, A. (1995). Notes on materiality and sociality. Sociological Review, 43(2), 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1995.tb00604.x google scholar
40. Law, J., & Mol, A. M. (2008). The actor-enacted: Cumbrian sheep in 2001. In C. Knappett & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency: Toward a non-anthropocentric approach. Springer. google scholar
41. Loh, I. H., Chong, J. L., Bidin, A., & Harun, N. (2017). Malaysia disaster management of human corpse act: The fundamental role of soft law. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(7), 127–138. google scholar
42. McEntire, D., Sadiq, A. A., & Gupta, K. (2012). Unidentified bodies and mass-fatality management in Haiti: a case study of the January 2010 earthquake with a cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 30(3), 301–327. google scholar
43. Morgan, O., Tidball-Binz, M., & Van Alphen, D. (2006). Management of dead bodies after disasters: a field manual for first responders. Pan American Health Organization. google scholar
44. Neimeyer, R. A. (Ed.). (2001). Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10397-000 google scholar
45. Neisser, F. (2014). ‘Riskscapes’ and risk management – Review and synthesis of an actor-network theory approach. Risk Management, 16, 88–120. https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2014.5 google scholar
46. Papakonstantinou, D., Patapis, P., Machairas, N., & Misiakos, E. (2021). Basic management of dead disaster victims. In Emergency medicine, trauma and disaster management: From prehospital to hospital care and beyond (pp. 537–543). Springer International Publishing. google scholar
47. Patro, B. K., Behera, C., Millo, T., & Murty, O. P. (2007). Management of human remains following disaster – A public health approach. Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 24(2), 20–23. google scholar
48. Pauzai, N. A., Makhtar, M., Chong, J. L., & Loh, I. H. (2017). Disaster management of human corpse act: From the legal practitioner’s perspective. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(7), 117–125. google scholar
49. Pellegrino, E. D., & Thomasma, D. C. (1993). The virtues in medical practice. Oxford University Press. google scholar
50. Petrone, P., Joseph, D. A. K., Jacquez, R. A., Baltazar, G. A., & Brathwaite, C. E. (2021). Management of mass casualties due to COVID-19: Handling the dead. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 47(5), 1343–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021- 01717-w google scholar
51. Phillips, B., Neal, D., Wikle, T., Subanthore, A., & Hyrapiet, S. (2008). Mass fatality management after the Indian Ocean tsunami. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 681–697. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560810918685 google scholar
52. Quill, T. E., & Miller, F. G. (Eds.). (2014). Palliative care and ethics. Oxford University Press. google scholar
53. Rahmayanti, K. P., Azzahra, S., & Arnanda, N. A. (2021). Actor-network and non-government failure in Jakarta flood disaster in January 2020. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 716(1), Article 012053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/716/1/012053 google scholar
54. Sadiq, A. A., & McEntire, D. (2012). Challenges in mass fatality management: A case study of the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Journal of Emergency Management, 10(1), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2012.0123 google scholar
55. Sağır, A. (2017). Ölüm Sosyolojisi. Phoenix Publications. google scholar
56. Sağır, A. (2021). Pandem(ic) confinement in the context of the sociology of death: Love, sensation, and nothingness. Istanbul University Journal of Sociology, 41(2), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.26650/sj.2021.41.2.0031 google scholar
57. Sağır, A., & Memiş Sağır, P. (2021). Framing Camlica Mosque as an avant-garde shrine in the context of actor-network theory. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(44), 8333–8361. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.932364 google scholar
58. Sağır, A., & Aktaş, Z. (2022). Gassal. Phoenix Publications. google scholar
59. Sağır, A. (2025). Getting dirty with death loss: Enduring the “dirty emotions” during the earthquake in Turkey. Illness, Crisis & Loss. https://doi.org/10.1177/10541373251350198 google scholar
60. Scanlon, J. (1998). Dealing with mass death after a community catastrophe: handling bodies after the 1917 Halifax explosion. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 7(4), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653569810230139 google scholar
61. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 18 google scholar
62. Encounters with Death and Corpses in Disaster Times (The February 6 Earthquakes in Turkey) Sağır, 2026 google scholar
63. Shiga, J. (2007). Translations: Artifacts from an actor-network perspective. Artifact: Journal of Design Practice, 1(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460600658318 google scholar
64. Stanley, S. A. (2010). Building mass fatality management at the regional level for pandemic and catastrophic response. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1682 google scholar
65. Stonaker, M. E. (Ed.). (2008). Management of dead bodies in disaster situations. DIANE Publishing. google scholar
66. Suwalowska, H., Amara, F., Roberts, N., & Kingori, P. (2021). Ethical and sociocultural challenges in managing dead bodies during epidemics and natural disasters. BMJ Global Health, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006345 google scholar
67. Taylor, A. J. W., & Frazer, A. G. (1982). The stress of post-disaster body handling and victim identification work. Journal of Human Stress, 8(4), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0097840X.1982.9936113 google scholar
68. Teahen, P. R. (2011). Mass fatalities: Managing the community response. CRC Press. google scholar
69. Thapa, D., Budhathoki, N. R., & Munkvold, B. E. (2017). Analyzing crisis response through actor-network theory: The case of Kathmandu Living Labs. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 41, 414–428. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04119 google scholar
70. Tomasini, R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Fleet Forum: Rethinking humanitarian vehicle management. INSEAD. https://publishing.insead.edu/case/fleet-forum-rethinking-humanitarian-vehicle-management google scholar
71. Veatch, R. M. (2018). The definition of death: Problems for public policy. In Dying (pp. 405–432). Taylor & Francis. google scholar
72. Walter, T. (1996). Facing death without tradition. In G. Howarth & P. C. Jupp (Eds.), Contemporary issues in the sociology of death, dying and disposal. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24303-7_15 google scholar
73. Weber, C., Sailer, K., & Katzy, B. (2012). Disaster relief management – A dynamic network perspective. In International Technology Management Conference (pp. 167–176). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITMC.2012.6306403 google scholar
74. Weedn, V. W. (2022). Ethical and legal considerations. In J. A. Williams & V. W. Weedn (Eds.), Disaster victim identification in the 21st century: A US perspective (pp. 265–311). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119652823.ch10 google scholar
75. Woods, S. (2014). Death duty – caring for the dead in the context of disaster. New Genetics and Society, 33(3), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2014.944260 google scholar