İstanbul: Sanayisizleşmeyen Bir Küresel Kent

Öz

Küresel ekonominin ulus-devletlerin bölgesel sınırlarını aşarak derinleşmesi, küresel kentler olarak adlandırılan bazı büyük şehirlerin bu sistemin organizasyonunda önemli işlevler üstelenerek giderek daha fazla önem kazanmasına neden olmaktadır. Bu kentlerin küresel ve bölgesel işlevleri, ulus-ötesi bağlantıları ve geçirdikleri ekonomik, politik ve sosyal dönüşümler üzerine inşa edilmiş geniş bir literatür bulunmaktadır. Bu literatürdeki temel yaklaşımlardan bir tanesi küresel şehirlerin üretim yapılarının sanayiden ileri hizmetler sektörüne doğru keskin bir geçiş gösterdiğidir. Zaman içinde hem küresel kentler olarak tanımlanan şehirlerin sayısındaki artışa hem de sanayisizleşme çalışmalarında önemli gelişimler gerçekleşmiştir. Bu gelişmelere rağmen küresel kentlerin sanayisizleşmiş şehirler olduğu tezinin yeteri kadar ampirik sorgulamaya tabi tutulmadığı gözlemlenmektedir. Bu noktadan hareketle, bu çalışma küresel kentlerin aynı zamanda post-endüstriyel bir karakter taşıdığı tezini İstanbul örneği üzerinde sorgulamaktadır. Bu amaçla, makale İstanbul’un bir küresel kent olarak ortaya çıktığı 2000’li yıllardan itibaren şehrin ekonomik yapısındaki değişimleri ekonomik üretimin, istihdamın ve mekânsal göstergeler yoluyla inceleyerek şehirde bir sanayisizleşme sürecinin yaşanıp yaşanmadığını incelemektedir. Bulgular, literatürde varsayılanın aksine, şehirde bu tarz bir dönüşüm yaşanmadığını, ancak küreselleşmenin sanayi üretiminin niteliğinde ve kent içindeki yerleşiminde birtakım değişikliklere yol açtığını göstermektedir. Bulgular ayrıca sanayisizleşmenin temelde bir kısım yerel ve ulusal faktörlerden kaynaklandığını, küreselleşmenin de bu sanayinin kentte kalmasına katkı sağladığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Küreselleşme
• Küresel Kentler
• Sanayisizleşme
• Post-endüstriyel Şehir
• İstanbul

Istanbul: A Global, but Still Industrial, City

Öz

Global cities are typically perceived as the outcomes of a series of structural transformations experienced by the advanced capitalist countries in North America and Western Europe in the 1970s. A radical decrease in the share of industrial production vis-à-vis an increase in advanced producer services in the sectorial composition of global cities is one of the indicators of such restructuring. However, beyond the North Atlantic Axis—and especially with regard to new global cities—the validity of this assumption is questionable. Consequently, this paper involves a case study of Istanbul on the subject. This paper considers economic production and employment levels as well as spatial indicators to explore the changes in the sectorial dynamics of Istanbul's economy following the 2000s. Furthermore, it evaluates whether post-industrial transformation has taken place in the city. The first empirical section of the paper argues that such post-industrial transformation has not taken place in Istanbul; it posits that rather, globalization has spurred some changes in the manufacturing industry in terms of the scale of production and spatial distribution within the city. It further discusses the local and global dynamics contributing to the survival of industries in the city.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Globalization
• Global Cities
• De-industrialization
• Post-industrial City
• Istanbul

Kaynakça

1. Akcan, E. (2015). The” Occupy” turn in the global city paradigm: The architecture of AK Party’s Istanbul and the Gezi Movement. Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association, 2(2), 359-378. google scholar
2. Akçalı, E., & Korkut, U. (2015). Urban transformation in Istanbul and Budapest: Neoliberal governmentality in the EU’s semi-periphery and its limits. Political Geography, 46, 76-88. google scholar
3. Akgün, İ. & Akgün, A. A. (2017). İstanbul’da istihdam eğilimlerinin belirlenmesi. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Yayınevi. google scholar
4. Aksoy, A. (2012). Riding the storm:‘new Istanbul’. City, 16(1-2), 93-111. google scholar
5. A.T. Kearney (2017). Global cities: Leaders in a world of disruptive innovation, Chicago, IL: A.T. Kearney. google scholar
6. Ayık, U. & Avcı, S. (2018). İstanbul’da sanayisizleşme: Coğrafi bir bakış. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(65), 505-523. google scholar
7. Beaverstock, J. V. (2005). Transnational elites in the city: British highly-skilled inter-company transferees in New York City’s financial district. Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 31(2), 245-268. google scholar
8. Beaverstock, J. V. (2017). The spatial mobility of corporate knowledge: expatriation, global talent, and the world city. In H. Jöns, P. Meusburger, M. Heffernan (Ed.), Mobilities of knowledge (pp. 227-246). Cham, CH: Springer. google scholar

9. Beaverstock, J. V., & Hall, S. (2012). Competing for talent: global mobility, immigration and the City of London’s labour market. Cambridge Journal ofRegions, Economy and Society, 5(2), 271-288. google scholar
10. Beaverstock, J. V., Smith, R. G. and Taylor, P. J. (2000). World-City network: A new metageography?. Annals of the Association ofAmerican Geographers, 90(1), 123-134. google scholar
11. Bell, D. (1976). The coming of the post-industrial society. The Educational Forum, 40(4), 574-579. google scholar
12. Bezmez, D. (2008). The politics of urban waterfront regeneration: the case of Haliç (the Golden Horn), Istanbul. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 815-840. google scholar
13. Bhandari, A., & Verma, R. P. (2013). Strategic management: A conceptualframework. New Delhi, IN: McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. google scholar
14. Brenner, N. (2004) New State Spaces: Urban Governance and Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. google scholar
15. Brenner, N. (2018) New Urban Spaces: Urban Theory and the Scale Question. Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press. google scholar
16. Brenner, R. (2006). The economics ofglobal turbulence: the advanced capitalist economies from long boom to long downturn, 1945—2005. New York, NY: Verso. google scholar
17. Caro, L. P. (2020). Türk işgücü piyasasında Suriyeli mülteciler. İstanbul: ILO Türkiye Ofisi. google scholar
18. Csomos, G. (2017). Cities as command and control centres of the world economy: An empirical analysis, 2006-2015. Bulletin of Geography, 38(38), 7-26. google scholar
19. Daniels, P. (2013). Reconfiguring the global service economy? The case of the BRICs. In J. R. Cuadrado-Roura (Ed.), Service Industries and Regions (pp. 135-155). Berlin, DE: Springer. google scholar
20. Derudder, B., & Taylor, P. (2016). Change in the world city network, 2000-2012. The Professional Geographer, 68(4), 624-637. google scholar
21. Dökmeci, V., & Berköz, L. (1994). Transformation of Istanbul from a monocentric to a polycentric city. European Planning Studies, 2(2), 193-205. google scholar
22. Doğan, M. (2013). Geçmişten günümüze İstanbul’da sanayileşme süreci ve son 10 yıllık gelişimi. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 27, 511-550. google scholar
23. Enlil, Z. M. (2011). The neoliberal agenda and the changing urban form of Istanbul. International Planning Studies, 16(1), 5-25. google scholar
24. Fainstein, S. S. (2001). Inequality in global city-regions. DisP-The Planning Review, 37(144), 20-25. google scholar
25. Florida, R. L. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York, NY: Routledge. google scholar
26. Ferm, J., & Jones, E. (2016). Mixed-use ‘regeneration’of employment land in the post-industrial city: challenges and realities in London. European Planning Studies, 24(10), 1913-1936. google scholar
27. Ferm, J. (2016). Preventing the displacement of small businesses through commercial gentrification: are affordable workspace policies the solution?. Planning Practice & Research, 31(4), 402-419. google scholar
28. Friedmann, J. (1986). The world city hypothesis. Development and change, 17(1), 69-83. google scholar
29. Fujita, K. (2003). Neo-industrial Tokyo: Urban development and globalisation in Japan’s state-centred developmental capitalism. Urban Studies, 40(2), 249-281. google scholar
30. GaWC (2000). The world according to GaWC 2000. Globalization and World Cities Network. Retrieved from https://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/world2000.html google scholar
31. GaWC (2017). The world according to GaWC 2016. Globalization and World Cities Network. Retrieved from https://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/world2016.html google scholar
32. Hamnett, C. (2000). Gentrification, postindustrialism, and industrial and occupational restructuring in global cities. In G. Bridge& S. Watson (Eds.), A Companion to the (pp. 331-341), Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. google scholar
33. Hamnett, C. (2020). The changing social structure of global cities: Professionalisation, proletarianisation or polarisation. Urban Studies, DOI: 10.1177/0042098020940556 google scholar
34. Harris, A. (2012). The metonymic urbanism of twenty-first-century Mumbai. Urban Studies, 49(13), 2955-2973. google scholar
35. Hassink, R., Hu, X., Shin, D. H., Yamamura, S., & Gong, H. (2018). The restructuring of old industrial areas in East Asia. Area Development and Policy, 3(2), 185-202. google scholar
36. He, C., Zhu, S., & Yang, X. (2017). What matters for regional industrial dynamics in a transitional economy?. Area Development and Policy, 2(1), 71-90. google scholar
37. Heo, I. (2015). Neoliberal developmentalism in South Korea: Evidence from the green growth policymaking process. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 56(3), 351-364. google scholar
38. Hill, R. C. and Kim, J. W. (2000). Global cities and developmental states: New York, Tokyo and Seoul. Urban Studies, 37(12), 2167-2195. google scholar
39. Hoyler, M., & Harrison, J. (2017). Global cities research and urban theory making. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(12), 2853-2858. google scholar
40. Huynh, D. T. (2020). Seoul. In Hyunh D. T. (Ed.). Making megacities in Asia (pp. 13-31). Singapore, SG: Springer. google scholar
41. Indraprahasta, G. S., Derudder, B., & Koelemaij, J. (2018). Global-local dynamics in the transformation of the Jakarta metropolitan area into a global city-region. disP-The Planning Review, 54(3), 52-62. google scholar
42. İBB (2009). 1/100.000 ölçekli İstanbul çevre düzeni planı raporu. Istanbul: İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi İmar ve Şehircilik Daire Başkanlığı Şehir Planlama Müdürlüğü. google scholar
43. İBB (2020). İstanbul ekonomi bülteni: İsgücü piyasası, Aralık, 2020. İstanbul İstatistik Ofisi, 15 Ocak 2021 tarihinde https://istatistik.istanbul/bulten.html?id=86 adresinden erişildi. google scholar
44. İSO (2015). İstanbul sanayi odası strateji belgesi. İstanbul Sanayi Odası: İstanbul. google scholar
45. İSTKA (2012). İstanbul bölgesinde yatırım ve yatırımın önündeki engeller. İstanbul Kalkınma Ajansı: İstanbul. google scholar
46. İSTKA (2014). 2014—2023 İstanbul çevre planı. İstanbul: İstanbul Kalkınma Ajansı. google scholar
47. İŞKUR (2016). İstanbul piyasası araştırma raporu. İstanbul Çalışma ve İş Kurumu İl Müdürlüğü: İstanbul. google scholar
48. Kantor, P., Lefevre, C., Saito, A., Savitch, H. V., & Thornley, A. (2012). Struggling giants: City-Region governance in London, New York, Paris and Tokyo. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
49. Kasaba, R. (2008). The Cambridge history of Turkey Volume 4: Turkey in the modern world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
50. Keyder, Ç. (1999). The setting. In Ç. Keyder (Ed.), Istanbul between the global and the local (pp. 3-30), Oxford, UK: Rowman and Littlefield. google scholar
51. Keyder, Ç. (2005). Globalization and social exclusion in Istanbul. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(1), 124-134. google scholar
52. Keyder, Ç. (2008). A brief history of modern Istanbul. In R. Kasaba (Ed.), The Cambridge history of Turkey volume 4: Turkey in the modern world (pp. 504-523), Cambridge,UK : Cambridge University Press. google scholar
53. Keyder, Ç. (2010). Capital city resurgent: İstanbul since the 1980s. New Perspectives on Turkey, 43, 177-186. google scholar
54. Kızıldere, D., & Chiodelli, F. (2018) Discrete emergence of neoliberal policies on public space: an informal business improvement district in Istanbul, Turkey. Urban Geography. 39(5), 783-802. google scholar
55. Kleibert, J. (2017). On the global city map, but not in command? Probing Manila’s position in the world city network. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(12), 2897-2915. google scholar
56. Krijnen, M., Bassens, D., & Van Meeteren, M. (2017). Manning circuits of value: Lebanese professionals and expatriate world-city formation in Beirut. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(12), 28782896. google scholar
57. Logie, S. & Morvan, Y. (2014). İstanbul 2023. İstanbul: İletişim. google scholar
58. Ma, X., & Timberlake, M. (2013). ‘World city typologies and national city system deterritorialisation: USA, China and Japan’, Urban Studies, 50(2), 255-275. google scholar
59. May, J., Wills, J., Datta, K., Evans, Y., Herbert, J., & McIlwaine, C. (2007). Keeping London working: global cities, the British state and London’s new migrant division of labour. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(2), 151-167. google scholar
60. Neumann, T. (2016). Remaking the rust belt: The postindustrial transformation of North America. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. google scholar
61. Olds, K., & Yeung, H. (2004). Pathways to global city formation: a view from the developmental city-state of Singapore. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), 489-521. google scholar
62. Öktem, B. (2011). The role of global city discourses in the development and transformation of the Buyukdere-Maslak Axis into the international business district of Istanbul. International Planning Studies, 16(1), 27-42. google scholar
63. Özdemir, D. (2002). The developments in the central business district of Istanbul in the 1990s. Louvain-La-Neuve: European Regional Science Association (ERSA). Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/115818 google scholar
64. Parnell, S., & Robinson, J. (2012). (Re)theorizing cities from the Global South: Looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography, 33(4), 593-617. google scholar
65. Parnreiter, C. (2014). Network or hierarchical relations? A plea for redirecting attention to the control functions of global cities. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 105(4), 398-411. google scholar
66. Parnreiter, C. (2013). The global city tradition. In M. Acuto & W. Steele (Eds.), Global city challenges: Debating a concept, improving the practice (pp. 15-32). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. google scholar
67. Parnreiter, C., Haferburg, C., & OBenbrügge J. (2013). Shifting corporate geographies in global cities of the South: Mexico City and Johannesburg as case studies. Die Erde, 144(1), 1-16. google scholar
68. Pike, A. (2020). Coping with deindustrialization in the global North and South. International Journal of Urban Sciences, DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2020.1730225 google scholar
69. PricewaterhouseCoopers and Urban Land Institute (2019). Emerging Trends in Real Estate: Europe. İstanbul: Urban Land Institute. google scholar
70. Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21 (1), 1-33. google scholar
71. Roy, A. (2016). Who’s afraid of postcolonial theory?. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 200-209. google scholar
72. Sanderson, M. R., Derudder, B., Timberlake, M., & Witlox, F. (2015). Are world cities also world immigrant cities? An international, cross-city analysis of global centrality and immigration. International Journal ofComparative Sociology, 56(3-4), 173-197. google scholar
73. Sarkis, H. (2009). It’s Istanbul (Not Globalisation). In R. Burdett (Ed). Istanbul: City of ıntersections (pp. 14-15), London: London School of Economics and Political Science. google scholar
74. Sassen, S. (1991). The Global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. google scholar
75. Sassen, S. (2001). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. google scholar
76. Sassen, S. (2016). The global city: Enabling economic intermediation and bearing its costs. City & Community, 15(2), 97-108. google scholar
77. Sassen, S. (2019). Cities in a world economy. 5th edition. Thousand Oaks, UK: SAGE. google scholar
78. Saito, A. (2003). Global city formation in a capitalist developmental state: Tokyo and the waterfront sub-centre project. Urban Studies, 40(2), 283-308. google scholar
79. Savitch, H. V., Gross, J. S., & Ye, L. (2014). Do Chinese cities break the global mold?. Cities, 41, 155-161. google scholar
80. Sayın, Ö., Hoyler, M., & Harrison, J. (2020). Doing comparative urbanism differently: Conjunctural cities and the stress-testing of urban theory. Urban Studies, DOI: 10.1177/0042098020957499 google scholar
81. Sayın, Ö. (2020). Bir küresel kent olarak İstanbul’un küresel ekonomideki konumu ve işlevlerine dair kısa bir değerlendirme. Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları, 125(246), 109-128. google scholar
82. Schindler, S. (2017). Towards a paradigm of Southern urbanism. City, 21(1), 47-64. google scholar
83. Schindler, S., Gillespie, T., Banks, N., Bayırbağ, M. K., Burte, H., Kanai, J. M., & Sami, N. (2020). Deindustrialization in cities of the Global South. Area Development and Policy, 1-22, DOI: 10.1080/23792949.2020.1725393 google scholar
84. Scott, A. J., Agnew, J., Soja, E. W., & Storper, M. (2001). Global city-regions. In Scott, A. J. (Ed.), Global city-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy (pp. 11-32). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. google scholar
85. Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2015). The nature of cities: The scope and limits of urban theory. International journal of urban and regional research, 39(1), 1-15. google scholar
86. SGK (2020). Kayıtdışı İstihdam Oranı. Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu. 10 Şubat 2021 tarihinde http://www.sgk.gov.tr/ wps/portal/sgk/tr/calisan/kayitdisi_istihdam/kayitdisi_istihdam_oranlari adresinden erişildi. google scholar
87. Sheppard, E., Leitner, H., & Maringanti, A. (2013). Provincializing global urbanism: A manifesto. Urban Geography, 34(7), 893-900. google scholar
88. Sputnik (2019, 20 Aralık). Türkiye’de beyin göçü ilk kez lise seviyesine indi. Sputnik. 20 Ocak 2021 tarihinde https://tr.sputniknews.com/turkiye/201912201040880571-turkiyede-beyin-gocu-ilk-kez-lise-seviyesine-indi/ adresinden erişildi. google scholar
89. TCEB (2017). Uluslararası doğrudan yatırımlar 2016 yılı raporu, Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Ekonomi Bakanlığı. google scholar
90. TCKB (2015). Onuncu kalkınma planı 2014—2018. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Kalkınma Bakanlığı. google scholar
91. TCTB (2020). Yurtdışında yerleşik gerçek ve tüzel kişilerin türkiye’deki yatırımları. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Ticaret Bakanlığı. 15 Şubat 2021 tarihinde https://www.ticaret.gov.tr/hizmet-ticareti/yurtdisi-yatirimlar/uluslararasi-yatirim-istatistikleri/yurtdisinda-yerlesik-gercek-ve-tuzel-kisilerin-turkiyedeki-yatirimlari adresinden erişildi. google scholar
92. Tekeli, İ. (2010). The story of Istanbul’s modernisation’, Architectural Design, 80(1), 32-39. google scholar
93. Temurçin, K. & Aldırmaz, Y. (2017). İstanbul ilinde sanayi: Tarihsel gelişim, yapısal değişim, mekânsal dönüşüm. K. google scholar
94. Temurçin, & MA Dulupçu (Eds.), Türkiye’ de mekânsal ve bölgesel dönüşümler kitabı içinde (s. 1-14). Isparta: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi. google scholar
95. Timberlake, M., Sanderson, M. R., Ma, X., Derudder, B., Winitzky, J., & Witlox, F. (2012). Testing a global city hypothesis: An assessment of polarization across US cities. City & Community, 11(1), 74-93. google scholar
96. Timberlake, M., Wei, Y. D., Ma, X., & Hao, J. (2014). Global cities with Chinese characteristics. Cities, 41, 162-170. google scholar
97. TMMOB (2017). Oda raporu: Organize sanayi bölgeleri, küçük sanayi siteleri ve teknoparklar. İstanbul: TMMOB Makine Mühendisleri Odası Yayınları. google scholar
98. Toksöz, G., Erdoğdu, S. & Kaşka, S. (20212). Irregular labour migration n Turkey and situation of migrant workers in the labour market. Ankara: International organization for Migration (IOM). google scholar
99. TÜİK (2016). İl bazında gayrisafi yurtiçi hasıla, 2004-2014. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. 15 Ocak 2021 tarihinde https://tuikweb.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24920 adresinden erişildi. google scholar
100. TÜİK (2019). İl bazında gayrisafi yurtiçi hasıla, 2015-2017. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. 15 Ocak 2021 tarihinde https://tuikweb.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=30888 adresinden erişildi. google scholar
101. TÜİK (2019). İl bazında gayrisafi yurtiçi hasıla, 2018. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. 15 Ocak 2021 tarihinde https:// tuikweb.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=30889 adresinden erişildi google scholar
102. Tümertekin, E. (2010). İstanbul insan ve mekan. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları. google scholar
103. Türkün, A., Aslan, S. & Şen, B. (2014) 1923-1980 döneminde kentsel politikalar ve İstanbul’da konut alanlarının gelişimi: Mevzuat, aktörler ve hakim söylem. A. Türkün (Ed.). Mülk, mahal, insan: İstanbul’da kentsel dönüşüm kitabı içinde (s. 43-69). Istanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. google scholar
104. Üçoğlu, M. (2019). Massive housing and nature’s limits? The urban political ecology of Istanbul’s periphery. In K. M. Güney, R. Keil & M. Üçoğlu (Eds.). Massive suburbanization:(Re) building the global periphery (pp. 181200). Toronto, CA: University of Toronto Press. google scholar
105. Verginer, L., & Riccaboni, M. (2021). Talent goes to global cities: The world network of scientists’ mobility. Research Policy, 50(1), 104127. google scholar
106. Walker, D.R.F., & Taylor, P. J. (2000). Istanbul: Gateway between east and west under conditions of contemporary globalization?, Globalization and World Cities Network. Retrieved from http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/projects/ project9.html google scholar
107. Wei, Y. D., & Leung, C. K. (2005). Development zones, foreign investment, and global city formation in Shanghai. Growth and Change, 36(1), 16-40. google scholar
108. Wei, Y. D., & Yu, D. (2006). State policy and the globalization of Beijing: Emerging themes. Habitat International, 30(3), 377-395. google scholar
109. Wei, Y. D., Leung, C. K., & Luo, J. (2006). Globalizing Shanghai: Foreign investment and urban restructuring. Habitat International, 30(2), 231-244. google scholar
110. Yeandle, M., Wardle, M., & Mainelli, M. (2018). The global financial centres index 24. The Global Finance Centres Index (GFCI)-Long Finance. google scholar
111. Yetişkul, E., & Demirel, S. (2018) ‘Assembling gentrification in Istanbul: The Cihangir neighbourhood of Beyoğlu’, Urban Studies, DOI: 10.1177/0042098017746623 google scholar
112. Zhang, L. Y. (2014). Dynamics and constraints of state-led global city formation in emerging economies: The case of Shanghai. Urban Studies, 51(6), 1162-1178. google scholar