Derleme

Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power

Sayı: 65 15 Haziran 2022
PDF İndir
EN

Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power

Öz

In this article, we aim to work toward a rich theoretical understanding of the relationship between social identity, professional identity, and school leadership in the context of recognitional power. We approach the relationship the study constructs by problematizing the traditional areas of leadership literature that is marked by veneration of leadership and its functional toolkit that includes traits, attitudes, behaviors, efficiency, productivity, mastery, etc. as antecedents to the leadership process. In addition, the article aims to capture the intersection of professional and social identity considering the relations of domination and everyday practices of recognition. These goals are reflected in two research questions: (1) How do we understand the relationship between school leadership, social identity and professional identity? (2) How do we approach social and professional identities in educational leadership studies in terms of recognitional power? We propound that leadership literature should include diverse epistemic approaches, problematize the structural inequalities and the institutionalized relations of recognition and recognitional power, and problematize the intersection of social identity, professional identity, and recognitional power.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Ashforth, B.E. & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
  2. Blackmore, J. (2006). Deconstructing diversity discourses in the field of educational management and leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143206062492
  3. Beatty, B.R. (2000). The emotions of educational leadership: breaking the silence. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3(4), 331-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/136031200750035969
  4. Beijaard, D., Maijer, P. J., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teacher and Teacher Education, 20, 107-128.
  5. Bolden, R., Petrov, G. & Gosling, J. (2008). Tensions in higher education leadership: Towards a multi-level model of leadership practice. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 358–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00398
  6. Brass, D.J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 518-539.
  7. Brewer, M.B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive- motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
  8. Brewer, M.B. (2010). Ethnocentrism. In J.M. Levine & M.A. Hogg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Group Processes and Intergroup Relations (pp.247-252). SAGE Publications.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sosyoloji

Bölüm

Derleme

Yayımlanma Tarihi

15 Haziran 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

19 Temmuz 2021

Kabul Tarihi

12 Mart 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Sayı: 65

Kaynak Göster

APA
Göktürk, D., & Çomak, Ö. (2022). Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 65, 415-428. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2022-972972
AMA
1.Göktürk D, Çomak Ö. Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2022;(65):415-428. doi:10.26650/JECS2022-972972
Chicago
Göktürk, Duygun, ve Özge Çomak. 2022. “Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, sy 65: 415-28. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2022-972972.
EndNote
Göktürk D, Çomak Ö (01 Haziran 2022) Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power. Journal of Economy Culture and Society 65 415–428.
IEEE
[1]D. Göktürk ve Ö. Çomak, “Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power”, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, sy 65, ss. 415–428, Haz. 2022, doi: 10.26650/JECS2022-972972.
ISNAD
Göktürk, Duygun - Çomak, Özge. “Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 65 (01 Haziran 2022): 415-428. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2022-972972.
JAMA
1.Göktürk D, Çomak Ö. Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 2022;:415–428.
MLA
Göktürk, Duygun, ve Özge Çomak. “Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, sy 65, Haziran 2022, ss. 415-28, doi:10.26650/JECS2022-972972.
Vancouver
1.Duygun Göktürk, Özge Çomak. Structural Inequalities in Educational Leadership: Addressing Social and Professional Identities and Recognitional Power. Journal of Economy Culture and Society. 01 Haziran 2022;(65):415-28. doi:10.26650/JECS2022-972972