The Millennial Generational Style: New Global Political and Economic Orientations

Öz

In this paper, using Mannheim, I identify Millennials (covering both Gen Y and Gen Z) as a global generation that has spawned a new generational style. I provide a brief overview of the historical conditions that have shaped Millennials’ life experiences. In a nutshell, Millennials have come of age in a new world marked by an ongoing shift in actorhood from macro structures to micro agents. I argue that this formative experience has impelled at least three meaningful norms that distinguish Millennials’ generational style: self-reliance, quotidianism and regeneration. I then trace manifestations of these norms in politics and the economy. I suggest that in politics, the push for self-reliance takes the form of a self-responsible citizen, quotidianism is manifested through a shift towards politics of the ordinary, and regeneration is embodied in Do-it-Yourself (DIY) politics. In economics , on the other hand, the self-reliant actorhood is reflected through the new occupational profile of the ‘maker’, quotidianism is expressed through non-traditional types of work monetizing individuality and personality, and finally regeneration takes the form of critical making. I conclude with implications for social theory on youth and change. The paper attempts to move beyond the dichotomous view of youth either as threats or as heroic figures and propose a broader conceptualization of young adult’s agency to capture how ordinary youth create new centers of configuration in society, from new citizenship norms to new market patterns.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Millennials
• passion economy
• Generation Z
• Mannheim
• Generational Style

Kaynakça

1. Aboim, S., & Vasconcelos, P. (2014). From political to social generations: A critical reappraisal of Mannheim’s classical approach. European Journal of Social Theory, 17(2), 165-183. google scholar
2. Andretta, M., & della Porta, D. (2020). When millennials protest. Italian Youth in international context: Belonging, constraints and opportunities. Routledge. google scholar
3. Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2004). A model of the entrepreneurial economy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education 2(2): 143—166. google scholar
4. Bang, H. P., & Eva, S. (1999). The everyday maker: A new challenge to democratic governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21(3), 325—341. google scholar
5. Bang, H. P., (2005) Everyday Makers and Expert Citizens: Active Participants in the Search for a New Governance, In J. Newman (Ed.), Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere (pp. 159—179). Policy Press. google scholar
6. Bauman, Z. (2001). Individually Together. In (Ed.) U. Beck, & E. Beck-Germshein, Individualization: institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. (pp xiv—xx). Sage. google scholar
7. Beck, U. (2008). Global generations in world risk society. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 203-216. google scholar
8. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2009). Global generations and the trap of methodological nationalism for a cosmopolitan turn in the sociology of youth and generation. European sociological review, 25(1), 25—36. google scholar

9. Bennett, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20—39. google scholar
10. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. google scholar
11. Bourdieu, P. 1993. “Youth’ Is Just a Word.” In P. Bourdieu (Ed.), Sociology in Question. (pp 94—102). London, UK: Sage. google scholar
12. Buckner, E., Beges, S., & Khatib, L. (2012). Social Entrepreneurship: Why is it important Post Arab Spring? Online Survey Report. Stan ford University. Retrieved from https://fsi-live.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/ White_Paper_Social_Entrepreneurship.pdf google scholar
13. Cavatorta, F. (2012). Arab Spring: the awakening of civil society: a general overview: 75-81. European Institute of the Mediterranean Yearbook (pp. 75—81). Barcelona, Spain: IEMed Press. google scholar
14. Cavatorta, F. (2012) ‘Arab Spring: The Awakening of Civil Society: A General Overview’, google scholar
15. Challand, B. (2011). The Counter-Power of Civil Society and the Emergence of a New Political Imaginary in the Arab World. Constellations, 18(3), 271—283. google scholar
16. Collin, P. (2015). Young citizens and political participation in a digital society: addressing the democratic disconnect. Springer. google scholar
17. Constine, J. (2020) SignalFire’s creator economy market map. [Blog post] Signal Fire. Retrieved from https://a16z.com/2019/10/08/passion-economy/ google scholar
18. Cain, L. D. (1964). Life Course and Social Structure In (Ed.) R. E. L. Faris, Handbook of Modern Sociology. (pp 272—309). Chicago: Rand McNally. google scholar
19. Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society, Volume I of The information age: economy, society and culture. Oxford: Blackwell google scholar
20. Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. (2006). Reflections on youth, from the past to the postcolony. In M.S. Fisher, G. google scholar
21. Downey (Eds.), Frontiers of capital: Ethnographic reflections on the new economy (pp. 267—81). Duke University Press google scholar
22. Cicchelli, V., & Octobre, S. (2018) Aesthetico-Cultural Cosmopolitanism and French Youth: The Taste of the World, London: Palgrave. google scholar
23. Davidson, A. (2020). The Passion Economy: The New Rules for Thriving in the Twenty-first Century. Vintage. google scholar
24. Davies, S. R. (2017). Hackerspaces: making the maker movement. John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
25. della Porta, D. (2019) “Deconstructing generations in movements: Introduction. American Behavioral Scientist. 63(10), 1407-1426. google scholar
26. De Stefano, V. (2015). The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowd work, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37 (3), 471-503. google scholar
27. Edmunds, J., & Turner, B. S. (2005). Global generations: social change in the twentieth century. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 559-577. google scholar
28. Elder, G. H. (1974). Children of the great depression. Routledge. google scholar
29. Eisenstadt, S.N. (1956) From generation to generation. New York: The Free Press. google scholar
30. Frank, D. J., & Meyer, J. W. (2002). The profusion of individual roles and identities in the postwar period. Sociological Theory, 20(1), 86-105. google scholar
31. Fatemi, F. (2021, January 20) The Rise of substack—And what’s behind It. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www. forbes.com/sites/falonfatemi/2021/01/20/the-rise-of-substack-and-whats-behind-it/?sh=36fff85e159f google scholar
32. Furlong, A., Cartmel, F., & Biggart, A. (2006). Choice biographies and transitional linearity: re-conceptualizing modern youth transitions. Papers: Revista de sociologia, 79, 225-239. google scholar
33. Gauntlett, D. (2013). Making is Connecting. John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
34. Gerhardt, M. (2020) Coronavirus quarantine? Gen X was made for this. Boomers and Gen Z, not so much. NBC news Retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/coronavirus-quarantine-gen-x-was-made-boomers-gen-z-not-ncna1168021 google scholar
35. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press. google scholar
36. Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2005). Contexts of ageing: Class, cohort and community. Polity. google scholar
37. Hanafi, S. (2012). The Arab revolutions; the emergence of a new political subjectivity. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 5(2), 198—213. google scholar
38. Harris, A., & Roose, J. (2014). DIY citizenship amongst young Muslims: Experiences of the ‘ordinary’. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(6), 794—813. google scholar
39. Jin, L. (2019, October 8). The Passion Economy and the Future of Work. [Blog post] Andreessen Horowitz. Retrieved from https://a16z.com/2019/10/08/passion-economy/ google scholar
40. Kalleberg, A. (2011). Good Jobs, Bad Jobs. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. google scholar
41. Lash, S (2001). Individualization in a Non-Linear Mode. In (Eds.) U. Beck, & E. Beck-Germshein, Individualization: institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. (pp. vii—xiv). Sage. google scholar
42. Mannheim, K (1952). “The Problem of Generations”. In P., Kecskemeti (Ed.). Essays on the sociology of knowledge: Collected works (Vol. 5). (pp. 276-322). New York: Routledge. google scholar
43. Masquelier, A., & Soares, B. F. (Eds.). (2016). Muslim youth and the 9/11 generation. University of New Mexico Press. google scholar
44. Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Robinson, K., Mischke, J., & Mahajan, D. (2016). Independent-Work-Choice-necessity-and-the-gig-economy. McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/ featured%20insights/employment%20and%20growth/independent%20work%20choice%20necessity%20and%20 the%20gig%20economy/independent-work-choice-necessity-and-the-gig-economy-executive-summary.pdf google scholar
45. Milkman, R. (2017). A new political generation: Millennials and the post-2008 wave of protest. American Sociological Review, 82(1), 1-31. google scholar
46. McKay, G. (Ed.). (1998). DIY culture: Party & protest in nineties Britain. Verso. google scholar
47. Momani, B. (2017). Entrepreneurship: An Engine for Job Creation and Inclusive Growth in the Arab World. google scholar
48. Brookings Doha Center. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/ entrepreneurship_in_the_arab_world.pdf google scholar
49. Morgan, G., & Nelligan, P. (2018). The creativity hoax: Precarious work in the gig economy. Anthem Press. google scholar
50. Musgrove, F. (1964) Youth and the social order, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. google scholar
51. Micheletti, M. (2002, August). Individualized collective action. Paper for the Nordic Political Science Association’s google scholar
52. Meeting, Aalborg, Denmark (pp. 14-17). Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.202.9849&rep=rep1&type=pdf google scholar
53. Parker, K., Graf, N., & Igielnik, R. (2019). Generation Z looks a lot like Millennials on key social and political issues. Pew Research Center, 17. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/01/17/ generation-z-looks-a-lot-like-millennials-on-key-social-and-political-issues/ google scholar
54. BNP Paribas (2015). 2016 Bnp PariBas global entrepreneur report: The emergence of the ‘Millennipreneur’. Retrieved from https://wealthmanagement.bnpparibas/content/dam/bnpparibas/pdfs/entrepreneur-report-2016/2016-BNP-Paribas-Global-Entrepreneur-Report.pdf google scholar
55. Parsons, T. (1942) ‘Age and sex in the context of the United States’, American SociologicalReview, 7: 604-16. google scholar
56. Pickard, S. (2019). Politics, Protest and Young People. Springer. google scholar
57. Pilcher, J. (1994). Mannheim’s sociology of generations: an undervalued legacy. British Journal of Sociology, 45 (3): 481—495. google scholar
58. Philipps, J. (2018). A global generation? Youth studies in a postcolonial world. Societies, 8(1), 14. google scholar
59. Ratto, M. (2011). Critical making: Conceptual and material studies in technology and social life. The information society. 27(4), 252—260. google scholar
60. Ratto, M., & Boler, M. (2014). Introduction. In M. Ratto & M. Boler (Eds.). DIY citizenship: Critical making and social media (pp. 1—22). MIT Press. google scholar
61. Rosenau, J. N. (2003). Distant proximities: Dynamics beyond globalization. Princeton University Press. google scholar
62. Rosenau, J. N. (2017). Globalization and governance: bleak prospects for sustainability. In Pfaller, A., & M. Lerch (Eds.). Challenges of globalization: New trends in international politics and society (pp. 201-216). Routledge. google scholar
63. Sander, T. H., & Putnam, R. D. (2010). Democracy’s past and future: still bowling alone? The Post-9/11 Split. Journal of Democracy, 21(1), 9—16. google scholar
64. Tiidenberg, K., & Allaste, A. A. (2016). Perceptions of participation and the share button. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 8(2), 52—63 google scholar
65. Thorpe, C., & Inglis, D. (2019). Do ‘global generations’ exist? : From Mannheim to Beck and beyond. Youth and Globalization, 1(1), 40—64. google scholar
66. Tomlinson, J. (2007). The culture of speed: The coming of immediacy. Sage. google scholar
67. Oettler, A., & Schwarz, C. (2017). Political temporalities of youth. Middle East - Topics & Arguments. 9. 5-14. google scholar
68. Wehr, K. (2013). DIY: The Search for Control and Self-reliance in the 21st Century. Routledge. google scholar
69. Woodman, D., & Wyn, J. (2015) Youth and generation: Rethinking continuity and change in the lives of young people, London: Sage. google scholar
70. Young, I. M. (1994) Gender as seriality: Thinking about women as a social collective, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 19: 713-38. google scholar
71. Zachara-Szymanska, M. (2021). A Postcapitalistic people? Examining the Millennial generation’s economic philosophies and practices. Sustainability, 13(7), 3784. google scholar
72. Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. google scholar