THE SPATIAL TRANSFORMATION OF GLOBAL SECURITY

Abstract

Under the conditions created by the globalization process, the concept of "space" has changed in terms of its political and social meanings. Therefore, security needs to be analyzed in a new sociological and spatial framework. In this study, firstly, the assumptions of "national / statist perspective" in traditional security studies will be explained. Secondly, the effects of the globalization process on issues such as identities, borders and state power will be discussed in the context of security. This kind of perspective offers a different vision from the state-centered security understanding. Thus, it will be possible to evaluate new non-national security areas such as "cities", cyber-fields and global policies. It is emphasized that these new areas should increasingly be taken into account in the security policies of states due to globalization and technological advances.

Keywords

• security
• cyber-space
• Global cities
• Violence
• Nation-State

KÜRESEL GÜVENLİĞİN MEKÂNSAL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ

Öz

Küreselleşme sürecinin yarattığı koşullar altında “mekân” kavramı, politik ve sosyal anlamları itibariyle değişmiştir. Bu durum güvenliğin (ya da şiddetin varlığı ve yönetiminin) sosyo-mekân çerçevesinde analiz edilmesini gerektirmektedir. Bu çalışmada, geleneksel güvenlik çalışmalarında “ulusal/devletçi perspektif”in barındırdığı ön kabuller üzerinde durulacaktır. İkinci olarak küreselleşme sürecinin kimlikler, hudutlar ve devlet gücü gibi hususlarda yarattığı etkiler güvenlik bağlamında ele alınacaktır. Böyle bir yaklaşımla, devlet merkezli güvenlik anlayışının dışında “kent”ler, siber-alanlar ve küresel politikalar gibi yeni ulusal olmayan güvenlik alanlarını değerlendirmek mümkün olabilecektir. Bu yeni alanların, küreselleşme ve teknolojik ilerlemeler nedeniyle devletlerin güvenlik politikalarında gittikçe daha fazla hesaba katılması gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Güvenlik
• Siber alan
• Küresel Kent
• Şİddet
• Ulus-Devlet

Kaynakça

1. Aydınlı, E., Kurubaş, E., Özdemir, H. (2017) Yöntem, Kuram, Komplo: Türk Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininde Vizyon Arayışları, 2. Baskı, Küre Yayınları, İstanbul.
2. Adamson, F. B., Koinova, M. (2013). The Global City as a Space for Transnational Identity Politics, SOAS Working Paper, London, England.
3. Adamson, F. B. (2005) “Globalization, Transnational Political Mobilization, and Networks of Violence.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 18(1), 31–49.
4. Alba, R. (2005) “Bright vs. Blurred Boundaries: Second Generation Assimilation and Exclusion in France, Germany and the United States.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 28(1), 20–49.
5. Griffin, A. (2015) “Charlie Hebdo: France Hit by 19,000 Cyberattacks Since Paris Shootings in Unprecedented Hacking Onslaught,” The Independent, January 15.
6. Arendt, H. (2017) Totalitarizmin Kaynakları 3: Totalitarizm, 2. Baskı, İletişim İstanbul.
7. Barkawi, T., Laffey., M (1999) “The Imperial Peace: Democracy, Force and Globalization.” European Journal of International Relations 5(4), 403–34.
8. Bayraklı E., Yalçın, H. B., Yeşiltaş M. (2019) Avrupa’da PKK Yapılanması, Seta, İstanbul.

9. Booth, K. (2008) Theory of World Security. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
10. Bull, H. (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York, Columbia University Press.
11. Burchill, S. vd. (2013) Uluslararası ilişkiler Teorileri, Küre Yay., İstanbul.
12. Choucri, N. (2014) Co-Evolution of Cyberspace and International Relations: New Challenges for the Social Sciences (October 13, 2014). MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2014-29.
13. Choucri, N. (2000) “Introduction: CyberPolitics in international relations” International Political Science Review, Vol 21, No. 3, 243–263
14. Clausewitz, C. (2015) Savaş Üzerine , Çeviren: Selma Koçak, Doruk Yay., İstanbul.
15. Curtis, S. (2011) “Global Cities and the Transformation of the International System.” Review of International Studies 37(4), 1923–1947.
16. David, S. R. (1991) “Explaining Third World Alignment.” World Politics 43(2), 233–256.
17. Deutsche Welle, turistleri hedef alan 10 terör saldırısı https://www.dw.com/tr/turistleri-hedef-alan-10-terör-saldırısı/a-18974695 (06.09.2019)
18. Donnelly, J. (2015) “The Discourse of Anarchy in IR.” International Theory 7(3), 393–425.
19. Doyle, M. (1986) “Liberalism and World Politics.” American Political Science Review 80(4), 1151–1169.
20. Doyle, M., Ikenberry J. (2015). Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorisinde Yeni Düşünce. Beta, İstanbul.
21. Friedman, T. (2012) Dünya Düzdür 21. Yüzyılın Kısa Tarihi, 7. Baskı Çev.: Levent Cinemre, Boyner yay.: İstanbul.
22. Friedmann, J. (1986) “The World City Hypothesis.” Development and Change 17(1), 69–83.
23. Galtung, J. (1971). “A Structural Theory of Imperialism”. Journal of Peace Research, 8(2), 81-117.
24. Guldi, J. The Spatial Turn in History, http://spatial.scholarslab.org/spatial-turn/the-spatial-turn-in-history/index.html#_ftn2 (07.08.2019)
25. Wright, G. (2005) “Cultural History: Europeans, Americans, and the Meanings of Space,” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 64, no. 4 (December), 436-440
26. Hassner, R. E. (2003) “‘To Halve and to Hold’: Conflicts over Sacred Space and the Problem of Indivisibility.” Security Studies 12(4), 1–33.
27. Hobsbawm, E. (2008) Küreselleşme Demokrasi ve Terörizm, Agora, İstanbul.
28. Kasgarian A. (2020b) “Report: Coerced Uighur Labor Could be China’s New Strategy”, https://www.voanews.com/extremism-watch/report-coerced-uighur-labor-could-be-chinas-new-strategy (05.08.2020)
29. Kashgarian A. (2020a) “Diaspora Uighurs Continue Online Activism Against Crackdown in Xinjiang”, https://www.voanews.com/extremism-watch/diaspora-uighurs-continue-online-activism-against-crackdown-xinjiang (05.08.2020)
30. Kello, L. (2013) “The Meaning of the Cyber Revolution: Perils to Theory and Statecraft.” International Security 38(2), 7– 40.
31. Koinova, M. (2013) “Four Types of Diaspora Mobilization: Albanian and Kosovo Independence in the US and UK.” Foreign Policy Analysis 9(4), 433–453.
32. Kumar, P. (2018) “Rerouting the Narrative: Mapping the Online Identity Politics of the Tamil and Palestinian Diaspora”, Social Media + Society January-March, 1–18.
33. Linklater, A. (2015) Siyasal Topluluğun Dönüşümü, Uluslararası İlişkiler Kütüphanesi, Ankara.
34. Lundby, S. (2015) “On the European System of Immigration Detention.” Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration 5(1), 7–15.
35. Martin, D., and Miller, B. (2003) “Space and Contentious Politics.”Mobilization: An International Journal 8(2), 143–156.
36. Meyer, J. et. all. (1997) “World Society and the Nation State.” American Journal of Sociology 103(1), 144–181.
37. Mitzen, J. (2006) “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma.” European Journal of International Relations 12(3), 341–370.
38. Neville B., Betz, D., Azari, J. (2008) Propaganda of the Deed 2008 Understanding the Phenomenon, The Royal United Services Institute Whitehall Report 3-08 https://rusi.org/sites/default/files/200809_whr_propaganda_of_the_deed_0.pdf (06.05.2019)
39. Ong, A. (2003) “Cyberpublics and Diaspora Politics among Transnational Chinese.” Interventions 5(1), 82–100.
40. Paker, E. B. (2012) Küresel Güvenlik Konsepti, İletişim, İstanbul.
41. Rosenberg, J. (2013) “The ‘Philosophical Premises’ of Uneven and Combined Development.” Review of International Studies 36(3), 569–597.
42. Ruggie, J. (1993) “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.” International Organization 47(1), 139–174.
43. Sassen, S. (2010b). “What Makes a Global City Global?” Foreign Policy, 182, 18.
44. Sassen, S. (2010a) “When the City Itself Becomes a Technology of War.” Theory, Culture and Society 27(6), 33–50.
45. Sassen, S. (2012) “Interactions of the Technical and the Social.” Information, Communication and Society 15(4), 455–478.
46. Savigear, P. (2015) "Avrupa Kökenli Siyaset Felsefesi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramı", Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Siyasi Düşünce, der.: Faruk Yalvaç, Uluslararası İlişkiler Kütüphanesi, İstanbul. 21-41.
47. Sjoberg, L. (2008) “Scaling IR Theory: Geography’s Contribution to Where IR Takes Place.” International Studies Review 10(3), 472–500.
48. Smirl, L. (2008) “Building the Other, Constructing Ourselves: Spatial Dimensions of International Humanitarian Response.” International Political Sociology 2(3), 236–253.
49. Smith, M. E. (2020) Uluslararası Güvenlik, Felix, Ankara.
50. Tsing, A. (2003). “Natural Resources and Capitalist Frontiers”. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(48), 5100-5106.
51. Vertovec, S. (2007). “Super-diversity and its Implications”. Ethnic and Racial Studies 20, 1024–1054.
52. Waltz, K. (2015) Uluslararası Politika Teorisi, Phoenix, Ankara.
53. Waltz, K. (2009) İnsan Devlet ve Savaş: Teorik Bir Analiz, Asil Yay., Ankara.
54. Watts, N. (2004) “Institutionalizing Virtual Kurdistan West: Transnational Networks and Ethnic Contention in International Affairs.” In Boundaries and Belonging: States and Societies in the Struggle to Shape Identities and Local Practice, ed. by Joel Migdal, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 121–147.
55. Wight, M. (2015) "Neden Bir Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramı Yoktur?" Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Siyasi Düşünce, der.: Faruk Yalvaç, Uluslararası İlişkiler Kütüphanesi, İstanbul, 5-20.
56. Wimmer, A., Schiller, N. G. (2003) “Methodological Nationalism, the Social Sciences, and the Study of Migration: An Essay in Historical Epistemology.” International Migration Review 37(3), 576–610.
57. Wimmer, A., Schiller. N. G. (2002) “Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation-State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences.” Global Networks 2(4), 301–334.
58. Wolfers, A. (1961) “The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations.” World Politics 14(1), 77–92.