Style Classifications in Biology Teaching: A Systematic Review of Literature

Yıl 2024, , 81 - 93, 29.07.2024

Eda Doğan , Cem Gerçek

https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.1385243

Öz

This study aims to analyse systematically the articles on teaching biology and concerning style classification which were published in international and national journals according to criteria set. For this purpose, articles of style classification which were conducted in the period between 1990 and 2022 and directed to teaching biology at pre-school, primary school, secondary school and higher education levels were reached. 48 articles published in international journals and 88 articles published in national journals were put to content analysis within the scope of the study. They were considered in terms of their theoretical framework, key words they had, methods they used, types of data sources used in their sample, the countries where they were conducted and the years when they were conducted and the conclusions they reached according to the criteria set in the sub-problems. It was found accordingly that mostly activity-based styles were examined, that “learning style(s)” were the most frequently used key words, that the research mostly used quantitative methods and that they were mostly conducted with the participation of teachers. It was also found that the articles published in international journals were mostly conducted in Turkey. The articles were observed to increase as of 2013. The results of journal articles research analysed in the final sub-problem were given in detail in four categories. This current study makes various recommendations for style classification studies concerning biology teaching.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Style classifications, biology teaching, reviews of the literature, systematic review, descriptive content analysis

Kaynakça

• Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Henry Holt and Company.
• Bahar, M. & Kiras, B. (2017). General analysis of articles and thesis on environmental education which were published in Turkey. Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 17(4), 1702-1720.
• Balaban Zor, M. & Güneş, M. H. (2023). Pre-service science teachers’ opinions about portfolio and learning style-based applications. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 13(2), 493-520.
• Baran, M. (2019). Identifying barriers when teaching science and mathematics in low economy regions: Swansea and Hakkari as case studies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(6), 848-865.
• Black, P. & Atkin, J. M. (1996). Changing the subject: Innovations in science, mathematics and technology education. Routledge.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (5th Ed.). Routledge.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education.
• Curry, L. (1983). An organization of learning style theory and constructs. American Educational Research Association. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED235185.pdf
• Cuthbert, P. F. (2005). The student learning process: Learning styles or learning approaches?. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(2), 235-249.
• Dağhan, G. & Akkoyunlu, B. (2015). General trends of the studies about the sustainability of the technology usage in education: A thematic content analysis study. Education and Science, 40(178), 225-253.
• Gnanadevan, R. & Balasundaram, K. (2020). Relationship between teaching style and intellectual style of teachers working in schools. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, 12(6), 1308-1312.
• Gough, D., Oliver, S. & Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. SAGE Publications.
• Grigorenko, E. L. & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Thinking styles. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Perspectives on individual differences. International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 205-229). Plenum Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/978-1-4757-5571-8_11
• Gül, Ş. & Sözbilir, M. (2015). Biology education research trends in Turkey: 1997-2012. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 93-109.
• Güneş, M. H. & Güneş, T. (2005). Difficulties and their reasons in learning biology concepts in primary school students. Ahi Evran University Journal Kırşehir Education Faculty (KEFAD), 6(2), 169-175.
• House, A. E., House, B. J. & Campbell, M. B. (1981). Measures of interobserver agreement: Calculation formulas and distribution effects. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 3(1), 37-57.
• Jung, C. G. (1923). Psychological types; or, The psychology of individuation (H.G. Baynes, Trans.). Harcourt, Brace & Co. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.b4377042&view=1up&seq=268
• Kalyon, D. S. (2020). Primary teachers' and students' images of teachers and learning environments. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(1), 155-167.
• Kauchak, D. & Eggen, P. (2005). Introduction to teaching: Becoming a professional (2nd Ed.). Merrill Prentice Hall.
• Köroğlu, M. & Sıvacı, S. Y. (2017). Analyzing the relationship between learning styles and specific field competencies of prospective teachers. Ahi Evran University Journal Kırşehir Education Faculty (KEFAD), 18(1), 471-483.
• Mayer, R. E. & Massa, L. J. (2003). Three facets of visual and verbal learners: Cognitive ability, cognitive styles, and learning preference. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 833-846.
• Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://vivauniversity.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/milesandhuberman1994.pdf
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guide book. SAGE Publications Inc. https://www.daneshnamehicsa.ir/userfiles/files/1/9-%20The%20Content%20Analysis%20Guidebook.pdf
• Novak, J. D. & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press.
• Rayner, S. V. & Riding, R. (1997). Towards a categorisation of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17(1), 5-27.
• Reed, S. K. (2004). Cognition: Theory and applications. Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
• Riding, R. & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3-4), 193–215.
• Robinson, S. (2009). Teaching style of teachers in the colleges of education. Journal on School Educational Technology, 5(2), 51-55.
• Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge University Press.
• Tsai, C. & Huang, C. M. (2002). Exploring students’ cognitive structures in learning science: A review of relevant methods. Journal of Biological Education, 36(4), 163-169.
• Varughese, V. K. & Fehring, H. (2009). Effects of students' approaches to learning on performance in two pedagogical environments. International Education Studies, 2(4), 10-14.
• Yu, T. M. & Zhu, C. (2011). Relationship between teachers’ preferred teacher-student interpersonal behaviour and intellectual styles. Educational Psychology, 31(3), 301-317.
• Zhang, L. F. (2000). Are thinking styles and personality types related?. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 271-284.
• Zhang, L. F. & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review, 17(1), 1-53.
• Zhang, L. F. & Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles. Springer Publishing Company.